Spatio-temporal variability of small-scale leads based on helicopter maps of winter sea ice surface temperatures

• Published in: Elem Sci Anth
• Main Authors: Thielke, Linda, Spreen, Gunnar, Huntemann, Marcus, Murashkin, Dmitrii
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: BioOne 2024
• Subjects: SAR-Signalverarbeitung; Arctic; Sea ice
• Online Access: https://elib.dlr.de/203987/; https://elib.dlr.de/203987/1/elementa.2023.00023_Murashkin.pdf; https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00023

Observations of sea ice surface temperature provide crucial information for studying Arctic climate, particularly during winter. We examined 1 m resolution surface temperature maps from 35 helicopter flights between October 2, 2019, and April 23, 2020, recorded during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC). The seasonal cycle of the average surface temperature spanned from 265.6 K on October 2, 2019, to 231.8 K on January 28, 2020. The surface temperature was affected by atmospheric changes and varied across scales. Leads in sea ice (cracks of open water) were of particular interest because they allow greater heat exchange between ocean and atmosphere than thick, snow-covered ice. Leads were classified by a temperature threshold. The lead area fraction varied between 0% and 4% with higher variability on the local (5–10 km) than regional scale (20–40 km). On the regional scale, it remained stable at 0–1% until mid-January, increasing afterward to 4%. Variability in the lead area is caused by sea ice dynamics (opening and closing of leads), as well as thermodynamics with ice growth (lead closing). We identified lead orientation distributions, which varied between different flights but mostly showed one prominent orientation peak. The lead width distribution followed a power law with a negative exponent of 2.63, which is in the range of exponents identified in other studies, demonstrating the comparability to other data sets and extending the existing power law relationship to smaller scales down to 3 m. The appearance of many more narrow leads than wide leads is important, as narrow leads are not resolved by current thermal infrared satellite observations. Such smallscale lead statistics are essential for Arctic climate investigations because the ocean–atmosphere heat exchange does not scale linearly with lead width and is larger for narrower leads.