Individual and Collective Self-Identification as Indigenous in the European Arctic: International Legal Perspectives
Who is indigenous is a question which is often difficult to answer from the perspective of non-indigenous law. Lovelace v. Canada is one of the key cases of indigenous rights law. It forms an important precedent but it does not establish an unlimited subjective right to be indigenous within the fram...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6997372 |
id |
ftdialnet:oai:dialnet.unirioja.es:ART0001331199 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdialnet:oai:dialnet.unirioja.es:ART0001331199 2023-05-15T15:13:51+02:00 Individual and Collective Self-Identification as Indigenous in the European Arctic: International Legal Perspectives Kirchner, Stefan 2018 application/pdf https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6997372 eng eng https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6997372 (Revista) ISSN 1794-600X LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI Misión Jurídica: Revista de derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1794-600X, Vol. 11, Nº. 15, 2018, pags. 27-42 text (article) 2018 ftdialnet 2019-08-29T12:33:29Z Who is indigenous is a question which is often difficult to answer from the perspective of non-indigenous law. Lovelace v. Canada is one of the key cases of indigenous rights law. It forms an important precedent but it does not establish an unlimited subjective right to be indigenous within the framework of the ICCPR. The decision in Lovelace v. Canada cannot be construed as requiring states which are parties to the ICCPR to allow anybody to claim indigenous identity without the consent of the indigenous people in question. ILO 169 strengthens the position of indigenous peoples in this regard. Self-identification has multiple dimensions: collective self-identification as indigenous, individual self-identification as indigenous and collective identification of the self through the identification of an individual as indigenous. Only indigenous peoples can decide who is a member. This decision is a sovereign right of the collective. Quién es indígena es una cuestión que a menudo es difícil de contestar desde la perspectiva del derecho no indígena. Lovelace c. Canadá es uno de los casos claves de derechos indígenas. Es un precedente importante, pero no establece un derecho subjetivo ilimitado de ser indígena en el marco del PIDCP. La decisión de Lovelace v. Canadá no puede interpretarse como un precedente para que los Estados partes del Pacto puedan permitir que alguien reclame la identidad indígena, sin el consentimiento del pueblo indígena en cuestión. El Convenio 169 de la OIT refuerza la posición de los pueblos indígenas en este sentido. La autoidentificación tiene múltiples dimensiones: la colectiva, la individualy lacolectiva del yo a través de la identificación de un individuo como indígena. Sólo los pueblos indígenas pueden decidir quién es uno de sus miembros. Esta decisión es un derecho soberano del colectivo. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Dialnet - Portada de revistas (Universidad de La Rioja) Arctic Canada Derecho ENVELOPE(-56.950,-56.950,-64.350,-64.350) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Dialnet - Portada de revistas (Universidad de La Rioja) |
op_collection_id |
ftdialnet |
language |
English |
description |
Who is indigenous is a question which is often difficult to answer from the perspective of non-indigenous law. Lovelace v. Canada is one of the key cases of indigenous rights law. It forms an important precedent but it does not establish an unlimited subjective right to be indigenous within the framework of the ICCPR. The decision in Lovelace v. Canada cannot be construed as requiring states which are parties to the ICCPR to allow anybody to claim indigenous identity without the consent of the indigenous people in question. ILO 169 strengthens the position of indigenous peoples in this regard. Self-identification has multiple dimensions: collective self-identification as indigenous, individual self-identification as indigenous and collective identification of the self through the identification of an individual as indigenous. Only indigenous peoples can decide who is a member. This decision is a sovereign right of the collective. Quién es indígena es una cuestión que a menudo es difícil de contestar desde la perspectiva del derecho no indígena. Lovelace c. Canadá es uno de los casos claves de derechos indígenas. Es un precedente importante, pero no establece un derecho subjetivo ilimitado de ser indígena en el marco del PIDCP. La decisión de Lovelace v. Canadá no puede interpretarse como un precedente para que los Estados partes del Pacto puedan permitir que alguien reclame la identidad indígena, sin el consentimiento del pueblo indígena en cuestión. El Convenio 169 de la OIT refuerza la posición de los pueblos indígenas en este sentido. La autoidentificación tiene múltiples dimensiones: la colectiva, la individualy lacolectiva del yo a través de la identificación de un individuo como indígena. Sólo los pueblos indígenas pueden decidir quién es uno de sus miembros. Esta decisión es un derecho soberano del colectivo. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Kirchner, Stefan |
spellingShingle |
Kirchner, Stefan Individual and Collective Self-Identification as Indigenous in the European Arctic: International Legal Perspectives |
author_facet |
Kirchner, Stefan |
author_sort |
Kirchner, Stefan |
title |
Individual and Collective Self-Identification as Indigenous in the European Arctic: International Legal Perspectives |
title_short |
Individual and Collective Self-Identification as Indigenous in the European Arctic: International Legal Perspectives |
title_full |
Individual and Collective Self-Identification as Indigenous in the European Arctic: International Legal Perspectives |
title_fullStr |
Individual and Collective Self-Identification as Indigenous in the European Arctic: International Legal Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Individual and Collective Self-Identification as Indigenous in the European Arctic: International Legal Perspectives |
title_sort |
individual and collective self-identification as indigenous in the european arctic: international legal perspectives |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6997372 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-56.950,-56.950,-64.350,-64.350) |
geographic |
Arctic Canada Derecho |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Canada Derecho |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
Misión Jurídica: Revista de derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1794-600X, Vol. 11, Nº. 15, 2018, pags. 27-42 |
op_relation |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6997372 (Revista) ISSN 1794-600X |
op_rights |
LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI |
_version_ |
1766344376320000000 |