A biologist's guide to assessing ocean currents : a review

We review how ocean currents are measured (in both Eulerian and Lagrangian frameworks), how they are inferred from satellite observations, and how they are simulated in ocean general circulation models (OGCMs). We then consider the value of these ‘direct’ (in situ) and ‘indirect’ (inferred, simulate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S Fossette, N Putman, K Lohmann, R Marsh, Graeme Hays
Format: Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30058348
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/A_biologist_s_guide_to_assessing_ocean_currents_a_review/20953657
id ftdeakinunifig:oai:figshare.com:article/20953657
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdeakinunifig:oai:figshare.com:article/20953657 2023-05-15T16:05:21+02:00 A biologist's guide to assessing ocean currents : a review S Fossette N Putman K Lohmann R Marsh Graeme Hays 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30058348 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/A_biologist_s_guide_to_assessing_ocean_currents_a_review/20953657 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30058348 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/A_biologist_s_guide_to_assessing_ocean_currents_a_review/20953657 All Rights Reserved Oceanography Ecology Zoology geostrophic Ekman drift dispersal orientation turtle marine mammal plankton argos satellite-tracking Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Physical Sciences Marine & Freshwater Biology Environmental Sciences & Ecology LOGGERHEAD SEA-TURTLES POPULATION GENETIC-STRUCTURE PARTICLE TRACKING MODEL LONG-DISTANCE MOVEMENT SOUTHERN ELEPHANT SEAL CENTRAL NORTH PACIFIC CARETTA-CARETTA SURFACE CURRENTS GREEN TURTLES SATELLITE TELEMETRY Text Journal contribution 2012 ftdeakinunifig 2022-11-17T21:48:07Z We review how ocean currents are measured (in both Eulerian and Lagrangian frameworks), how they are inferred from satellite observations, and how they are simulated in ocean general circulation models (OGCMs). We then consider the value of these ‘direct’ (in situ) and ‘indirect’ (inferred, simulated) approaches to biologists investigating current-induced drift of strong-swimming vertebrates as well as dispersion of small organisms in the open ocean. We subsequently describe 2 case studies. In the first, OGCM-simulated currents were compared with satellite-derived currents; analyses suggest that the 2 methods yield similar results, but that each has its own limitations and associated uncertainty. In the second analysis, numerical methods were tested using Lagrangian drifter buoys. Results indicated that currents simulated in OGCMs do not capture all details of buoy trajectories, but do successfully resolve most general aspects of current flows. We thus recommend that the errors and uncertainties in ocean current measurements, as well as limitations in spatial and temporal resolution of the surface current data, need to be considered in tracking studies that incorporate oceanographic data. Whenever possible, cross-validation of the different methods (e.g. indirect estimates versus buoy trajectories) should be undertaken before a decision is reached about which technique is best for a specific application. Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper Elephant Seal Southern Elephant Seal DRO - Deakin Research Online Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection DRO - Deakin Research Online
op_collection_id ftdeakinunifig
language unknown
topic Oceanography
Ecology
Zoology
geostrophic
Ekman drift
dispersal
orientation
turtle
marine mammal
plankton
argos
satellite-tracking
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Physical Sciences
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
LOGGERHEAD SEA-TURTLES
POPULATION GENETIC-STRUCTURE
PARTICLE TRACKING MODEL
LONG-DISTANCE MOVEMENT
SOUTHERN ELEPHANT SEAL
CENTRAL NORTH PACIFIC
CARETTA-CARETTA
SURFACE CURRENTS
GREEN TURTLES
SATELLITE TELEMETRY
spellingShingle Oceanography
Ecology
Zoology
geostrophic
Ekman drift
dispersal
orientation
turtle
marine mammal
plankton
argos
satellite-tracking
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Physical Sciences
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
LOGGERHEAD SEA-TURTLES
POPULATION GENETIC-STRUCTURE
PARTICLE TRACKING MODEL
LONG-DISTANCE MOVEMENT
SOUTHERN ELEPHANT SEAL
CENTRAL NORTH PACIFIC
CARETTA-CARETTA
SURFACE CURRENTS
GREEN TURTLES
SATELLITE TELEMETRY
S Fossette
N Putman
K Lohmann
R Marsh
Graeme Hays
A biologist's guide to assessing ocean currents : a review
topic_facet Oceanography
Ecology
Zoology
geostrophic
Ekman drift
dispersal
orientation
turtle
marine mammal
plankton
argos
satellite-tracking
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Physical Sciences
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
LOGGERHEAD SEA-TURTLES
POPULATION GENETIC-STRUCTURE
PARTICLE TRACKING MODEL
LONG-DISTANCE MOVEMENT
SOUTHERN ELEPHANT SEAL
CENTRAL NORTH PACIFIC
CARETTA-CARETTA
SURFACE CURRENTS
GREEN TURTLES
SATELLITE TELEMETRY
description We review how ocean currents are measured (in both Eulerian and Lagrangian frameworks), how they are inferred from satellite observations, and how they are simulated in ocean general circulation models (OGCMs). We then consider the value of these ‘direct’ (in situ) and ‘indirect’ (inferred, simulated) approaches to biologists investigating current-induced drift of strong-swimming vertebrates as well as dispersion of small organisms in the open ocean. We subsequently describe 2 case studies. In the first, OGCM-simulated currents were compared with satellite-derived currents; analyses suggest that the 2 methods yield similar results, but that each has its own limitations and associated uncertainty. In the second analysis, numerical methods were tested using Lagrangian drifter buoys. Results indicated that currents simulated in OGCMs do not capture all details of buoy trajectories, but do successfully resolve most general aspects of current flows. We thus recommend that the errors and uncertainties in ocean current measurements, as well as limitations in spatial and temporal resolution of the surface current data, need to be considered in tracking studies that incorporate oceanographic data. Whenever possible, cross-validation of the different methods (e.g. indirect estimates versus buoy trajectories) should be undertaken before a decision is reached about which technique is best for a specific application.
format Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
author S Fossette
N Putman
K Lohmann
R Marsh
Graeme Hays
author_facet S Fossette
N Putman
K Lohmann
R Marsh
Graeme Hays
author_sort S Fossette
title A biologist's guide to assessing ocean currents : a review
title_short A biologist's guide to assessing ocean currents : a review
title_full A biologist's guide to assessing ocean currents : a review
title_fullStr A biologist's guide to assessing ocean currents : a review
title_full_unstemmed A biologist's guide to assessing ocean currents : a review
title_sort biologist's guide to assessing ocean currents : a review
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30058348
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/A_biologist_s_guide_to_assessing_ocean_currents_a_review/20953657
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre Elephant Seal
Southern Elephant Seal
genre_facet Elephant Seal
Southern Elephant Seal
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30058348
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/A_biologist_s_guide_to_assessing_ocean_currents_a_review/20953657
op_rights All Rights Reserved
_version_ 1766401252524032000