Literary Didacticism and Collective Human Rights in US Borderlands: Ana Castillo's 'The Guardians' and Louise Erdrich's 'The Round House'
There is now a sizable body of scholarship on the relationship between human rights and literature. James Dawes suggests that the work of human rights is largely a matter of storytelling ("Human Rights in Literary Studies"). Joseph Slaughter contends, in turn, that "literary works and...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
eCommons
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ecommons.udayton.edu/eng_fac_pub/112 https://ecommons.udayton.edu/context/eng_fac_pub/article/1132/viewcontent/Literary_Didacticism_and_Collective_Human_Rights_in_U.S._Borderlands.pdf |
id |
ftdaytonuniv:oai:ecommons.udayton.edu:eng_fac_pub-1132 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdaytonuniv:oai:ecommons.udayton.edu:eng_fac_pub-1132 2023-06-11T04:03:48+02:00 Literary Didacticism and Collective Human Rights in US Borderlands: Ana Castillo's 'The Guardians' and Louise Erdrich's 'The Round House' Szeghi, Tereza M. 2018-01-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://ecommons.udayton.edu/eng_fac_pub/112 https://ecommons.udayton.edu/context/eng_fac_pub/article/1132/viewcontent/Literary_Didacticism_and_Collective_Human_Rights_in_U.S._Borderlands.pdf unknown eCommons https://ecommons.udayton.edu/eng_fac_pub/112 https://ecommons.udayton.edu/context/eng_fac_pub/article/1132/viewcontent/Literary_Didacticism_and_Collective_Human_Rights_in_U.S._Borderlands.pdf English Faculty Publications American Literature Arts and Humanities text 2018 ftdaytonuniv 2023-05-08T06:53:20Z There is now a sizable body of scholarship on the relationship between human rights and literature. James Dawes suggests that the work of human rights is largely a matter of storytelling ("Human Rights in Literary Studies"). Joseph Slaughter contends, in turn, that "literary works and literary modes of thinking have played important parts in the emergence of modern human rights ideals and sentiments, as well as in the elaboration of national and international human rights laws" ("Rights" xiii). More specifically, in her oft-cited Inventing Human Rights, Lynn Hunt argues that contemporary human rights thought derives from the rise of the epistolary novel, which enabled readers to empathize with people different from themselves by rendering their individual experiences in a compelling, broadly understandable fashion. Just as these epistolary novels focused on the individual, so too has the human rights tradition been derived from individualistic Western Enlightenment thought and foundational Western documents (from the Declaration of the Right of Man to the United States Declaration of Independence). Although much human rights fiction is non-Western, it tends to be read by Westerners through the dominant human rights frame—which emphasizes the struggles of individuals in relation to the societies in which they live. Too infrequently are such texts examined with an eye not just toward critiquing human rights thought or activism but also toward revising working conceptions of what human rights are and how literature can best be allied to the struggle for human rights. This article addresses how two recent novels, written by Indigenous US writers, offer precisely these types of critiques and revisions. Ana Castillo's The Guardians (2007) and Louise Erdrich's The Round House (2012) argue from Indigenous American perspectives (Chicana and Anishinaabe, respectively) for reforms to the individualistic nature of much human rights thought and, as a result, to the ways nation–states police and maintain their borders. ... Text anishina* University of Dayton: eCommons Slaughter ENVELOPE(-85.633,-85.633,-78.617,-78.617) The Guardians ENVELOPE(-65.247,-65.247,66.417,66.417) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Dayton: eCommons |
op_collection_id |
ftdaytonuniv |
language |
unknown |
topic |
American Literature Arts and Humanities |
spellingShingle |
American Literature Arts and Humanities Szeghi, Tereza M. Literary Didacticism and Collective Human Rights in US Borderlands: Ana Castillo's 'The Guardians' and Louise Erdrich's 'The Round House' |
topic_facet |
American Literature Arts and Humanities |
description |
There is now a sizable body of scholarship on the relationship between human rights and literature. James Dawes suggests that the work of human rights is largely a matter of storytelling ("Human Rights in Literary Studies"). Joseph Slaughter contends, in turn, that "literary works and literary modes of thinking have played important parts in the emergence of modern human rights ideals and sentiments, as well as in the elaboration of national and international human rights laws" ("Rights" xiii). More specifically, in her oft-cited Inventing Human Rights, Lynn Hunt argues that contemporary human rights thought derives from the rise of the epistolary novel, which enabled readers to empathize with people different from themselves by rendering their individual experiences in a compelling, broadly understandable fashion. Just as these epistolary novels focused on the individual, so too has the human rights tradition been derived from individualistic Western Enlightenment thought and foundational Western documents (from the Declaration of the Right of Man to the United States Declaration of Independence). Although much human rights fiction is non-Western, it tends to be read by Westerners through the dominant human rights frame—which emphasizes the struggles of individuals in relation to the societies in which they live. Too infrequently are such texts examined with an eye not just toward critiquing human rights thought or activism but also toward revising working conceptions of what human rights are and how literature can best be allied to the struggle for human rights. This article addresses how two recent novels, written by Indigenous US writers, offer precisely these types of critiques and revisions. Ana Castillo's The Guardians (2007) and Louise Erdrich's The Round House (2012) argue from Indigenous American perspectives (Chicana and Anishinaabe, respectively) for reforms to the individualistic nature of much human rights thought and, as a result, to the ways nation–states police and maintain their borders. ... |
format |
Text |
author |
Szeghi, Tereza M. |
author_facet |
Szeghi, Tereza M. |
author_sort |
Szeghi, Tereza M. |
title |
Literary Didacticism and Collective Human Rights in US Borderlands: Ana Castillo's 'The Guardians' and Louise Erdrich's 'The Round House' |
title_short |
Literary Didacticism and Collective Human Rights in US Borderlands: Ana Castillo's 'The Guardians' and Louise Erdrich's 'The Round House' |
title_full |
Literary Didacticism and Collective Human Rights in US Borderlands: Ana Castillo's 'The Guardians' and Louise Erdrich's 'The Round House' |
title_fullStr |
Literary Didacticism and Collective Human Rights in US Borderlands: Ana Castillo's 'The Guardians' and Louise Erdrich's 'The Round House' |
title_full_unstemmed |
Literary Didacticism and Collective Human Rights in US Borderlands: Ana Castillo's 'The Guardians' and Louise Erdrich's 'The Round House' |
title_sort |
literary didacticism and collective human rights in us borderlands: ana castillo's 'the guardians' and louise erdrich's 'the round house' |
publisher |
eCommons |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/eng_fac_pub/112 https://ecommons.udayton.edu/context/eng_fac_pub/article/1132/viewcontent/Literary_Didacticism_and_Collective_Human_Rights_in_U.S._Borderlands.pdf |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-85.633,-85.633,-78.617,-78.617) ENVELOPE(-65.247,-65.247,66.417,66.417) |
geographic |
Slaughter The Guardians |
geographic_facet |
Slaughter The Guardians |
genre |
anishina* |
genre_facet |
anishina* |
op_source |
English Faculty Publications |
op_relation |
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/eng_fac_pub/112 https://ecommons.udayton.edu/context/eng_fac_pub/article/1132/viewcontent/Literary_Didacticism_and_Collective_Human_Rights_in_U.S._Borderlands.pdf |
_version_ |
1768383617696792576 |