Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose
We present an analysis of nearly 4K examples of possessive constructions extracted from nearly 0.7M words of North Saami prose representing works of authors born in three time periods (1870-1927, 1947-1957, 1972-1983), plus a recent (1998) translation of the New Testament. The examples document an o...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Other/Unknown Material |
Language: | English Northern Sami Sami languages |
Published: |
DataverseNO
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS |
id |
ftdataverseno:doi:10.18710/SE00DS |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdataverseno:doi:10.18710/SE00DS 2023-10-29T02:39:48+01:00 Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose Antonsen, Lene Janda, Laura A. 2015 https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS English Northern Sami eng sme smi DataverseNO https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS Arts and Humanities possessive constructions possessive suffixes syntax North Saami language change corpus 2015 ftdataverseno https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS 2023-10-04T22:56:08Z We present an analysis of nearly 4K examples of possessive constructions extracted from nearly 0.7M words of North Saami prose representing works of authors born in three time periods (1870-1927, 1947-1957, 1972-1983), plus a recent (1998) translation of the New Testament. The examples document an ongoing language change in which the possessive suffix attached to a noun (“SOG”) is being replaced by the genitive reflexive pronoun preceding the noun (�ieža-”). All examples are hand tagged for the two constructions, SOG vs. ieža-, plus a host of variables including the case and semantic class of the possessum and possessor, the person and number of the possessor, the source of the example, and the generation and geographical location of the author. In addition to anaphoric, endophoric, and exophoric reference previously described, we discover a generic type of reference. We track the progress of the language change across generations and find Johan Turi exceptional because he used ieža- more than his contemporaries. We focus particularly on examples of double marking of possession, and on examples where the number of the possessive construction does not match the possessor, and on the case and semantic class of possessor and possessum. It appears that semantics play a greater role in the choice of possessive constructions for the middle and young er generations than for the older generation. We hypothesize that the greater morphological complexity of the SOG construction is a language-internal factor that has contributed to its decline. Other/Unknown Material saami DataverseNO |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
DataverseNO |
op_collection_id |
ftdataverseno |
language |
English Northern Sami Sami languages |
topic |
Arts and Humanities possessive constructions possessive suffixes syntax North Saami language change |
spellingShingle |
Arts and Humanities possessive constructions possessive suffixes syntax North Saami language change Antonsen, Lene Janda, Laura A. Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose |
topic_facet |
Arts and Humanities possessive constructions possessive suffixes syntax North Saami language change |
description |
We present an analysis of nearly 4K examples of possessive constructions extracted from nearly 0.7M words of North Saami prose representing works of authors born in three time periods (1870-1927, 1947-1957, 1972-1983), plus a recent (1998) translation of the New Testament. The examples document an ongoing language change in which the possessive suffix attached to a noun (“SOG”) is being replaced by the genitive reflexive pronoun preceding the noun (�ieža-”). All examples are hand tagged for the two constructions, SOG vs. ieža-, plus a host of variables including the case and semantic class of the possessum and possessor, the person and number of the possessor, the source of the example, and the generation and geographical location of the author. In addition to anaphoric, endophoric, and exophoric reference previously described, we discover a generic type of reference. We track the progress of the language change across generations and find Johan Turi exceptional because he used ieža- more than his contemporaries. We focus particularly on examples of double marking of possession, and on examples where the number of the possessive construction does not match the possessor, and on the case and semantic class of possessor and possessum. It appears that semantics play a greater role in the choice of possessive constructions for the middle and young er generations than for the older generation. We hypothesize that the greater morphological complexity of the SOG construction is a language-internal factor that has contributed to its decline. |
format |
Other/Unknown Material |
author |
Antonsen, Lene Janda, Laura A. |
author_facet |
Antonsen, Lene Janda, Laura A. |
author_sort |
Antonsen, Lene |
title |
Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose |
title_short |
Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose |
title_full |
Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose |
title_fullStr |
Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose |
title_full_unstemmed |
Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose |
title_sort |
replication data for: possessive constructions in north saami prose |
publisher |
DataverseNO |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS |
genre |
saami |
genre_facet |
saami |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS |
_version_ |
1781067193197264896 |