Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose

We present an analysis of nearly 4K examples of possessive constructions extracted from nearly 0.7M words of North Saami prose representing works of authors born in three time periods (1870-1927, 1947-1957, 1972-1983), plus a recent (1998) translation of the New Testament. The examples document an o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonsen, Lene, Janda, Laura A.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Northern Sami
Sami languages
Published: DataverseNO 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS
id ftdataverseno:doi:10.18710/SE00DS
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdataverseno:doi:10.18710/SE00DS 2023-10-29T02:39:48+01:00 Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose Antonsen, Lene Janda, Laura A. 2015 https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS English Northern Sami eng sme smi DataverseNO https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS Arts and Humanities possessive constructions possessive suffixes syntax North Saami language change corpus 2015 ftdataverseno https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS 2023-10-04T22:56:08Z We present an analysis of nearly 4K examples of possessive constructions extracted from nearly 0.7M words of North Saami prose representing works of authors born in three time periods (1870-1927, 1947-1957, 1972-1983), plus a recent (1998) translation of the New Testament. The examples document an ongoing language change in which the possessive suffix attached to a noun (“SOG”) is being replaced by the genitive reflexive pronoun preceding the noun (�ieža-”). All examples are hand tagged for the two constructions, SOG vs. ieža-, plus a host of variables including the case and semantic class of the possessum and possessor, the person and number of the possessor, the source of the example, and the generation and geographical location of the author. In addition to anaphoric, endophoric, and exophoric reference previously described, we discover a generic type of reference. We track the progress of the language change across generations and find Johan Turi exceptional because he used ieža- more than his contemporaries. We focus particularly on examples of double marking of possession, and on examples where the number of the possessive construction does not match the possessor, and on the case and semantic class of possessor and possessum. It appears that semantics play a greater role in the choice of possessive constructions for the middle and young er generations than for the older generation. We hypothesize that the greater morphological complexity of the SOG construction is a language-internal factor that has contributed to its decline. Other/Unknown Material saami DataverseNO
institution Open Polar
collection DataverseNO
op_collection_id ftdataverseno
language English
Northern Sami
Sami languages
topic Arts and Humanities
possessive constructions
possessive suffixes
syntax
North Saami
language change
spellingShingle Arts and Humanities
possessive constructions
possessive suffixes
syntax
North Saami
language change
Antonsen, Lene
Janda, Laura A.
Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose
topic_facet Arts and Humanities
possessive constructions
possessive suffixes
syntax
North Saami
language change
description We present an analysis of nearly 4K examples of possessive constructions extracted from nearly 0.7M words of North Saami prose representing works of authors born in three time periods (1870-1927, 1947-1957, 1972-1983), plus a recent (1998) translation of the New Testament. The examples document an ongoing language change in which the possessive suffix attached to a noun (“SOG”) is being replaced by the genitive reflexive pronoun preceding the noun (�ieža-”). All examples are hand tagged for the two constructions, SOG vs. ieža-, plus a host of variables including the case and semantic class of the possessum and possessor, the person and number of the possessor, the source of the example, and the generation and geographical location of the author. In addition to anaphoric, endophoric, and exophoric reference previously described, we discover a generic type of reference. We track the progress of the language change across generations and find Johan Turi exceptional because he used ieža- more than his contemporaries. We focus particularly on examples of double marking of possession, and on examples where the number of the possessive construction does not match the possessor, and on the case and semantic class of possessor and possessum. It appears that semantics play a greater role in the choice of possessive constructions for the middle and young er generations than for the older generation. We hypothesize that the greater morphological complexity of the SOG construction is a language-internal factor that has contributed to its decline.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Antonsen, Lene
Janda, Laura A.
author_facet Antonsen, Lene
Janda, Laura A.
author_sort Antonsen, Lene
title Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose
title_short Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose
title_full Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose
title_fullStr Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose
title_full_unstemmed Replication data for: Possessive constructions in North Saami prose
title_sort replication data for: possessive constructions in north saami prose
publisher DataverseNO
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS
genre saami
genre_facet saami
op_relation https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18710/SE00DS
_version_ 1781067193197264896