Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent ...
The purpose of our study is to show how ecologists' interpretation of habitat selection by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) is altered by the scale of observation and also how management questions would be best addressed using predetermined scales of analysis. Using resource selection functions (RS...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Alberta Library
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.7939/r3br9z https://ualberta.scholaris.ca/handle/123456789/15859 |
_version_ | 1835021812608532480 |
---|---|
author | Ciarniello, L. M. Heard, D. C. Boyce, M. S. Seip, D. R. |
author_facet | Ciarniello, L. M. Heard, D. C. Boyce, M. S. Seip, D. R. |
author_sort | Ciarniello, L. M. |
collection | Unknown |
description | The purpose of our study is to show how ecologists' interpretation of habitat selection by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) is altered by the scale of observation and also how management questions would be best addressed using predetermined scales of analysis. Using resource selection functions (RSF) we examined how variation in the spatial extent of availability affected our interpretation of habitat selection by grizzly bears inhabiting mountain and plateau landscapes. We estimated separate models for females and males using three spatial extents: within the study area, within the home range, and within predetermined movement buffers. We employed two methods for evaluating the effects of scale on our RSF designs. First, we chose a priori six candidate models, estimated at each scale, and ranked them using Akaike Information Criteria. Using this method, results changed among scales for males but not for females. For female bears, models that included the full suite of covariates predicted habitat use best at ... |
format | Text |
genre | Ursus arctos |
genre_facet | Ursus arctos |
geographic | British Columbia Canada |
geographic_facet | British Columbia Canada |
id | ftdatacite:10.7939/r3br9z |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
long_lat | ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) |
op_collection_id | ftdatacite |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.7939/r3br9z |
op_rights | © 2007 Ecological Society of America. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited. |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | University of Alberta Library |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftdatacite:10.7939/r3br9z 2025-06-15T14:51:24+00:00 Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent ... Ciarniello, L. M. Heard, D. C. Boyce, M. S. Seip, D. R. 2007 https://dx.doi.org/10.7939/r3br9z https://ualberta.scholaris.ca/handle/123456789/15859 en eng University of Alberta Library © 2007 Ecological Society of America. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited. Ursus arctos Habitat selection Canada Grizzly bears Spatial extent Telemetry British Columbia Resource selection function Text Journal Article (Published) article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2007 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.7939/r3br9z 2025-06-02T13:01:46Z The purpose of our study is to show how ecologists' interpretation of habitat selection by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) is altered by the scale of observation and also how management questions would be best addressed using predetermined scales of analysis. Using resource selection functions (RSF) we examined how variation in the spatial extent of availability affected our interpretation of habitat selection by grizzly bears inhabiting mountain and plateau landscapes. We estimated separate models for females and males using three spatial extents: within the study area, within the home range, and within predetermined movement buffers. We employed two methods for evaluating the effects of scale on our RSF designs. First, we chose a priori six candidate models, estimated at each scale, and ranked them using Akaike Information Criteria. Using this method, results changed among scales for males but not for females. For female bears, models that included the full suite of covariates predicted habitat use best at ... Text Ursus arctos Unknown British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Canada |
spellingShingle | Ursus arctos Habitat selection Canada Grizzly bears Spatial extent Telemetry British Columbia Resource selection function Ciarniello, L. M. Heard, D. C. Boyce, M. S. Seip, D. R. Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent ... |
title | Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent ... |
title_full | Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent ... |
title_fullStr | Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent ... |
title_full_unstemmed | Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent ... |
title_short | Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent ... |
title_sort | grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent ... |
topic | Ursus arctos Habitat selection Canada Grizzly bears Spatial extent Telemetry British Columbia Resource selection function |
topic_facet | Ursus arctos Habitat selection Canada Grizzly bears Spatial extent Telemetry British Columbia Resource selection function |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.7939/r3br9z https://ualberta.scholaris.ca/handle/123456789/15859 |