Late Paleocene event chronology: unconformities, not diachrony

The chronology of the events associated with the late Paleocene thermal maximum (LPTM, Chron C24r) has been established through the construction of a composite reference section that involved chemomagnetobiostratigraphic correlations and assumed minimum diachrony of biostratigraphic events. On this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aubry, Marie-Pierre, Cramer, Benjamin S., Miller, Kenneth G., Wright, James D., Kent, Dennis V., Olsson, Richard K.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Columbia University 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.7916/d8445x32
https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8445X32
id ftdatacite:10.7916/d8445x32
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.7916/d8445x32 2023-05-15T18:00:56+02:00 Late Paleocene event chronology: unconformities, not diachrony Aubry, Marie-Pierre Cramer, Benjamin S. Miller, Kenneth G. Wright, James D. Kent, Dennis V. Olsson, Richard K. 2000 https://dx.doi.org/10.7916/d8445x32 https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8445X32 unknown Columbia University Geology Text Articles article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2000 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.7916/d8445x32 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z The chronology of the events associated with the late Paleocene thermal maximum (LPTM, Chron C24r) has been established through the construction of a composite reference section that involved chemomagnetobiostratigraphic correlations and assumed minimum diachrony of biostratigraphic events. On this basis, discrepancies between correlations in different sections were explained by inferred unconformities. However, diachrony between distant sections cannot be ruled out. We report here on two geographically close sections drilled onshore New Jersey that yield different records of chemomagnetobiostratigraphic correlations in the interval representing Chron C24r. Because of their proximity (approximately 40 km apart), diachrony of biostratigraphic events between the two sections can be ruled out. In contrast, the marked lithologic disconformities in the sections explain well the different records of events. We thus conclude that the current relative chronology for Chron C24r is firmly based and that the upper Paleocene-lower Eocene stratigraphic record yields multiple unconformities, with Subzone NP9b rarely sampled. We examine the implications that undeciphered unconformities may have on the identification of proxies for paleoceanographic reconstruction, in particular with regard to the identification of the carbon isotope excursion (CIE) that reflects a dramatic latest Paleocene disturbance of the carbon cycle. We propose biostratigraphic means (short-lived calcareous nannoplankton and planktonic foraminifera taxa) that permit the unequivocal identification of the CIE not only in the oceanic realm but also in neritic settings. Text Planktonic foraminifera DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Geology
spellingShingle Geology
Aubry, Marie-Pierre
Cramer, Benjamin S.
Miller, Kenneth G.
Wright, James D.
Kent, Dennis V.
Olsson, Richard K.
Late Paleocene event chronology: unconformities, not diachrony
topic_facet Geology
description The chronology of the events associated with the late Paleocene thermal maximum (LPTM, Chron C24r) has been established through the construction of a composite reference section that involved chemomagnetobiostratigraphic correlations and assumed minimum diachrony of biostratigraphic events. On this basis, discrepancies between correlations in different sections were explained by inferred unconformities. However, diachrony between distant sections cannot be ruled out. We report here on two geographically close sections drilled onshore New Jersey that yield different records of chemomagnetobiostratigraphic correlations in the interval representing Chron C24r. Because of their proximity (approximately 40 km apart), diachrony of biostratigraphic events between the two sections can be ruled out. In contrast, the marked lithologic disconformities in the sections explain well the different records of events. We thus conclude that the current relative chronology for Chron C24r is firmly based and that the upper Paleocene-lower Eocene stratigraphic record yields multiple unconformities, with Subzone NP9b rarely sampled. We examine the implications that undeciphered unconformities may have on the identification of proxies for paleoceanographic reconstruction, in particular with regard to the identification of the carbon isotope excursion (CIE) that reflects a dramatic latest Paleocene disturbance of the carbon cycle. We propose biostratigraphic means (short-lived calcareous nannoplankton and planktonic foraminifera taxa) that permit the unequivocal identification of the CIE not only in the oceanic realm but also in neritic settings.
format Text
author Aubry, Marie-Pierre
Cramer, Benjamin S.
Miller, Kenneth G.
Wright, James D.
Kent, Dennis V.
Olsson, Richard K.
author_facet Aubry, Marie-Pierre
Cramer, Benjamin S.
Miller, Kenneth G.
Wright, James D.
Kent, Dennis V.
Olsson, Richard K.
author_sort Aubry, Marie-Pierre
title Late Paleocene event chronology: unconformities, not diachrony
title_short Late Paleocene event chronology: unconformities, not diachrony
title_full Late Paleocene event chronology: unconformities, not diachrony
title_fullStr Late Paleocene event chronology: unconformities, not diachrony
title_full_unstemmed Late Paleocene event chronology: unconformities, not diachrony
title_sort late paleocene event chronology: unconformities, not diachrony
publisher Columbia University
publishDate 2000
url https://dx.doi.org/10.7916/d8445x32
https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8445X32
genre Planktonic foraminifera
genre_facet Planktonic foraminifera
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7916/d8445x32
_version_ 1766170215043825664