Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies

We combine the publicly available GRACE monthly gravity field time series to produce gravity fields with reduced systematic errors. We first compare the monthly gravity fields in the spatial domain in terms of signal and noise. Then, we combine the individual gravity fields with comparable signal co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean, Yoomin, Meyer, Ulrich, Jäggi, Adrian
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Springer 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.7892/boris.113820
https://boris.unibe.ch/113820/
id ftdatacite:10.7892/boris.113820
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.7892/boris.113820 2023-05-15T13:34:39+02:00 Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies Jean, Yoomin Meyer, Ulrich Jäggi, Adrian 2018 application/pdf https://dx.doi.org/10.7892/boris.113820 https://boris.unibe.ch/113820/ en eng Springer info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess 520 Astronomy Text article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2018 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.113820 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z We combine the publicly available GRACE monthly gravity field time series to produce gravity fields with reduced systematic errors. We first compare the monthly gravity fields in the spatial domain in terms of signal and noise. Then, we combine the individual gravity fields with comparable signal content, but diverse noise characteristics. We test five different weighting schemes: equal weights, non-iterative coefficient-wise, order-wise, or field-wise weights, and iterative field-wise weights applying variance component estimation (VCE). The combined solutions are evaluated in terms of signal and noise in the spectral and spatial domains. Compared to the individual contributions, they in general show lower noise. In case the noise characteristics of the individual solutions differ significantly, the weighted means are less noisy, compared to the arithmetic mean: The non-seasonal variability over the oceans is reduced by up to 7.7% and the root mean square (RMS) of the residuals of mass change estimates within Antarctic drainage basins is reduced by 18.1% on average. The field-wise weighting schemes in general show better performance, compared to the order- or coefficient-wise weighting schemes. The combination of the full set of considered time series results in lower noise levels, compared to the combination of a subset consisting of the official GRACE Science Data System gravity fields only: The RMS of coefficient-wise anomalies is smaller by up to 22.4% and the non-seasonal variability over the oceans by 25.4%. This study was performed in the frame of the European Gravity Service for Improved Emergency Management (EGSIEM; http://www.egsiem.eu) project. The gravity fields provided by the EGSIEM scientific combination service (ftp://ftp.aiub.unibe.ch/EGSIEM/) are combined, based on the weights derived by VCE as described in this article. Text Antarc* Antarctic DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
topic 520 Astronomy
spellingShingle 520 Astronomy
Jean, Yoomin
Meyer, Ulrich
Jäggi, Adrian
Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies
topic_facet 520 Astronomy
description We combine the publicly available GRACE monthly gravity field time series to produce gravity fields with reduced systematic errors. We first compare the monthly gravity fields in the spatial domain in terms of signal and noise. Then, we combine the individual gravity fields with comparable signal content, but diverse noise characteristics. We test five different weighting schemes: equal weights, non-iterative coefficient-wise, order-wise, or field-wise weights, and iterative field-wise weights applying variance component estimation (VCE). The combined solutions are evaluated in terms of signal and noise in the spectral and spatial domains. Compared to the individual contributions, they in general show lower noise. In case the noise characteristics of the individual solutions differ significantly, the weighted means are less noisy, compared to the arithmetic mean: The non-seasonal variability over the oceans is reduced by up to 7.7% and the root mean square (RMS) of the residuals of mass change estimates within Antarctic drainage basins is reduced by 18.1% on average. The field-wise weighting schemes in general show better performance, compared to the order- or coefficient-wise weighting schemes. The combination of the full set of considered time series results in lower noise levels, compared to the combination of a subset consisting of the official GRACE Science Data System gravity fields only: The RMS of coefficient-wise anomalies is smaller by up to 22.4% and the non-seasonal variability over the oceans by 25.4%. This study was performed in the frame of the European Gravity Service for Improved Emergency Management (EGSIEM; http://www.egsiem.eu) project. The gravity fields provided by the EGSIEM scientific combination service (ftp://ftp.aiub.unibe.ch/EGSIEM/) are combined, based on the weights derived by VCE as described in this article.
format Text
author Jean, Yoomin
Meyer, Ulrich
Jäggi, Adrian
author_facet Jean, Yoomin
Meyer, Ulrich
Jäggi, Adrian
author_sort Jean, Yoomin
title Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies
title_short Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies
title_full Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies
title_fullStr Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies
title_full_unstemmed Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies
title_sort combination of grace monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies
publisher Springer
publishDate 2018
url https://dx.doi.org/10.7892/boris.113820
https://boris.unibe.ch/113820/
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.113820
_version_ 1766055075047800832