Paradigms (Optimal and Otherwise): A case for scepticism

This paper aims to contribute to the debate on the status of inflectional paradigms in grammatical theory, with special reference to the theory of Optimal Paradigms (OP, McCarthy 2005), a particular version of Paradigm Uniformity. OP proposes that certain systematic phonological differences between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bobaljik, Johnathan David
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Oxford University Press 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.7282/t34q7rzw
https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/41438/
id ftdatacite:10.7282/t34q7rzw
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.7282/t34q7rzw 2023-05-15T16:56:48+02:00 Paradigms (Optimal and Otherwise): A case for scepticism Bobaljik, Johnathan David 2006 https://dx.doi.org/10.7282/t34q7rzw https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/41438/ unknown Oxford University Press Text article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2006 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.7282/t34q7rzw 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z This paper aims to contribute to the debate on the status of inflectional paradigms in grammatical theory, with special reference to the theory of Optimal Paradigms (OP, McCarthy 2005), a particular version of Paradigm Uniformity. OP proposes that certain systematic phonological differences between nouns and verbs should be analyzed as arising from contingent facts about the individual affixes making up the nominal and verbal inflectional paradigms. I argue here that the Arabic data presented in OP does not support the OP model (as against, for example, cyclic alternatives) and that consideration of similar phenomena in Itelmen, a language with richer inflectional paradigms, suggests that it is morpho-syntactic category and not paradigm properties, that determine phonological behaviour. Text Itelmen DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) McCarthy ENVELOPE(66.543,66.543,-70.404,-70.404)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
description This paper aims to contribute to the debate on the status of inflectional paradigms in grammatical theory, with special reference to the theory of Optimal Paradigms (OP, McCarthy 2005), a particular version of Paradigm Uniformity. OP proposes that certain systematic phonological differences between nouns and verbs should be analyzed as arising from contingent facts about the individual affixes making up the nominal and verbal inflectional paradigms. I argue here that the Arabic data presented in OP does not support the OP model (as against, for example, cyclic alternatives) and that consideration of similar phenomena in Itelmen, a language with richer inflectional paradigms, suggests that it is morpho-syntactic category and not paradigm properties, that determine phonological behaviour.
format Text
author Bobaljik, Johnathan David
spellingShingle Bobaljik, Johnathan David
Paradigms (Optimal and Otherwise): A case for scepticism
author_facet Bobaljik, Johnathan David
author_sort Bobaljik, Johnathan David
title Paradigms (Optimal and Otherwise): A case for scepticism
title_short Paradigms (Optimal and Otherwise): A case for scepticism
title_full Paradigms (Optimal and Otherwise): A case for scepticism
title_fullStr Paradigms (Optimal and Otherwise): A case for scepticism
title_full_unstemmed Paradigms (Optimal and Otherwise): A case for scepticism
title_sort paradigms (optimal and otherwise): a case for scepticism
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2006
url https://dx.doi.org/10.7282/t34q7rzw
https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/41438/
long_lat ENVELOPE(66.543,66.543,-70.404,-70.404)
geographic McCarthy
geographic_facet McCarthy
genre Itelmen
genre_facet Itelmen
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7282/t34q7rzw
_version_ 1766047979169382400