Supplementary material from "Harvest strategies for the elimination of low prevalence wildlife diseases"

• Main Authors: Mysterud, Atle, Viljugrein, Hildegunn, Rolandsen, Christer M., Belsare, Aniruddha V.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: The Royal Society 2021
• Subjects: Ecology; FOS Biological sciences; Nordfjella; Norway; Rangifer tarandus
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5328670.v1; https://rs.figshare.com/collections/Supplementary_material_from_Harvest_strategies_for_the_elimination_of_low_prevalence_wildlife_diseases_/5328670/1

The intensive harvesting of hosts is often the only practicable strategy for controlling emerging wildlife diseases. Several harvesting approaches have been explored theoretically with the objective of lowering transmission rates, decreasing the transmission period or specifically targeting spatial disease clusters or high-risk demographic groups. Here, we present a novel model-based approach to evaluate alternative harvest regimes, in terms of demographic composition and rates, intended to increase the probability to remove all infected individuals in the population during the early phase of an outbreak. We tested the utility of the method for the elimination of chronic wasting disease based on empirical data for reindeer ( Rangifer tarandus ) in Norway, in populations with (Nordfjella) and without (Hardangervidda) knowledge about exact disease prevalence and population abundance. Low and medium harvest intensities were unsuccessful in eliminating the disease, even at low prevalence. High-intensity harvesting had a high likelihood of eliminating the disease, but probability was strongly influenced by the disease prevalence. We suggest that the uncertainty about disease prevalence can be mitigated by using an adaptive management approach: forecast from models after each harvest season with updated data, derive prevalence estimates and forecast further harvesting. We identified the problems arising from disease surveillance with large fluctuations in harvesting pressure and hence sample sizes. The elimination method may be suitable for pathogens that cause long-lasting infections and with slow epidemic growth, but the method should only be attempted if there is a low risk of reinfection, either by a new disease introduction event (e.g. dispersing hosts) or due to environmental reservoirs. Our simulations highlighted the short time window when such a strategy is likely to be successful before approaching near complete eradication of the population.