Variability in instructions for performance of nasopharyngeal swabs across Canada in the era of COVID-19 – what type of swab is actually being performed?

Abstract Background The primary method of surveillance for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 is with nasopharyngeal swabs. Given the significant demand for nasopharyngeal swabs, a large number of previously untrained and unfamiliar staff are now performing this test. It was noted that there was significant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nole M. Hiebert, Chen, Breanna Ashley, Sowerby, Leigh J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: figshare 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5285718
https://springernature.figshare.com/collections/Variability_in_instructions_for_performance_of_nasopharyngeal_swabs_across_Canada_in_the_era_of_COVID-19_what_type_of_swab_is_actually_being_performed_/5285718
id ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5285718
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5285718 2023-05-15T17:23:03+02:00 Variability in instructions for performance of nasopharyngeal swabs across Canada in the era of COVID-19 – what type of swab is actually being performed? Nole M. Hiebert Chen, Breanna Ashley Sowerby, Leigh J. 2021 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5285718 https://springernature.figshare.com/collections/Variability_in_instructions_for_performance_of_nasopharyngeal_swabs_across_Canada_in_the_era_of_COVID-19_what_type_of_swab_is_actually_being_performed_/5285718 unknown figshare https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-020-00490-x Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 CC-BY Biotechnology Ecology FOS Biological sciences 111714 Mental Health FOS Health sciences 110309 Infectious Diseases 60506 Virology Collection article 2021 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5285718 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-020-00490-x 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Abstract Background The primary method of surveillance for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 is with nasopharyngeal swabs. Given the significant demand for nasopharyngeal swabs, a large number of previously untrained and unfamiliar staff are now performing this test. It was noted that there was significant heterogeneity in instructions for performing nasopharyngeal swabs in Canada, in contrast to the guidance provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). The objective of this study was to review the instructions provided across Canada and contrast them to those of the CDC and PAHO. Methods A standard series of steps for nasopharyngeal swab performance was outlined based on the CDC, PAHO, and New England Journal of Medicine instructions. A comprehensive search was performed in August 2020 to identify nasopharyngeal swab guidelines provided by public health in the provinces and territories of Canada. Regional health authority guidance was also collected. Instructions provided were contrasted against the standardized steps. Results Instructions were identified for all provinces and territories, and for 81 regional health authorities. From the provincial and territorial guidelines, 10/13 (77%) cleared the nasal passages before swab insertion, 11/13 (85%) tilted the patient’s head back slightly, 12/13 (92%) inserted the swab parallel to the palate, but only 3/13 (23%) inserted the swab to at least a depth of two-thirds the distance between the patient’s nose and ear. A clear majority (81%) of regional health authority guidelines followed their respective provincial guidelines. For depth of insertion, Quebec provided a pictogram but no distance or technique for estimation. Six provinces and territories - Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Ontario, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island and Alberta - recommended 4 cm or one-half the distance from nostrils to ear. British Columbia and Manitoba recommended a 7 cm depth of insertion. Nova Scotia recommended one-half to two-thirds the distance from nose to ear. Lastly, Newfoundland, New Brunswick and the Yukon recommended an insertion from nose to the external ear canal. Conclusion There is significant heterogeneity in guidance for nasopharyngeal swab performance across Canada. The instructions provided by the majority of provinces and territories in Canada would not be effective in reaching the nasopharynx. Graphical abstract Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland Northwest Territories Nunavut Prince Edward Island Yukon DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Nunavut Yukon Northwest Territories Canada British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biotechnology
Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
111714 Mental Health
FOS Health sciences
110309 Infectious Diseases
60506 Virology
spellingShingle Biotechnology
Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
111714 Mental Health
FOS Health sciences
110309 Infectious Diseases
60506 Virology
Nole M. Hiebert
Chen, Breanna Ashley
Sowerby, Leigh J.
Variability in instructions for performance of nasopharyngeal swabs across Canada in the era of COVID-19 – what type of swab is actually being performed?
topic_facet Biotechnology
Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
111714 Mental Health
FOS Health sciences
110309 Infectious Diseases
60506 Virology
description Abstract Background The primary method of surveillance for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 is with nasopharyngeal swabs. Given the significant demand for nasopharyngeal swabs, a large number of previously untrained and unfamiliar staff are now performing this test. It was noted that there was significant heterogeneity in instructions for performing nasopharyngeal swabs in Canada, in contrast to the guidance provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). The objective of this study was to review the instructions provided across Canada and contrast them to those of the CDC and PAHO. Methods A standard series of steps for nasopharyngeal swab performance was outlined based on the CDC, PAHO, and New England Journal of Medicine instructions. A comprehensive search was performed in August 2020 to identify nasopharyngeal swab guidelines provided by public health in the provinces and territories of Canada. Regional health authority guidance was also collected. Instructions provided were contrasted against the standardized steps. Results Instructions were identified for all provinces and territories, and for 81 regional health authorities. From the provincial and territorial guidelines, 10/13 (77%) cleared the nasal passages before swab insertion, 11/13 (85%) tilted the patient’s head back slightly, 12/13 (92%) inserted the swab parallel to the palate, but only 3/13 (23%) inserted the swab to at least a depth of two-thirds the distance between the patient’s nose and ear. A clear majority (81%) of regional health authority guidelines followed their respective provincial guidelines. For depth of insertion, Quebec provided a pictogram but no distance or technique for estimation. Six provinces and territories - Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Ontario, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island and Alberta - recommended 4 cm or one-half the distance from nostrils to ear. British Columbia and Manitoba recommended a 7 cm depth of insertion. Nova Scotia recommended one-half to two-thirds the distance from nose to ear. Lastly, Newfoundland, New Brunswick and the Yukon recommended an insertion from nose to the external ear canal. Conclusion There is significant heterogeneity in guidance for nasopharyngeal swab performance across Canada. The instructions provided by the majority of provinces and territories in Canada would not be effective in reaching the nasopharynx. Graphical abstract
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nole M. Hiebert
Chen, Breanna Ashley
Sowerby, Leigh J.
author_facet Nole M. Hiebert
Chen, Breanna Ashley
Sowerby, Leigh J.
author_sort Nole M. Hiebert
title Variability in instructions for performance of nasopharyngeal swabs across Canada in the era of COVID-19 – what type of swab is actually being performed?
title_short Variability in instructions for performance of nasopharyngeal swabs across Canada in the era of COVID-19 – what type of swab is actually being performed?
title_full Variability in instructions for performance of nasopharyngeal swabs across Canada in the era of COVID-19 – what type of swab is actually being performed?
title_fullStr Variability in instructions for performance of nasopharyngeal swabs across Canada in the era of COVID-19 – what type of swab is actually being performed?
title_full_unstemmed Variability in instructions for performance of nasopharyngeal swabs across Canada in the era of COVID-19 – what type of swab is actually being performed?
title_sort variability in instructions for performance of nasopharyngeal swabs across canada in the era of covid-19 – what type of swab is actually being performed?
publisher figshare
publishDate 2021
url https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5285718
https://springernature.figshare.com/collections/Variability_in_instructions_for_performance_of_nasopharyngeal_swabs_across_Canada_in_the_era_of_COVID-19_what_type_of_swab_is_actually_being_performed_/5285718
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic Nunavut
Yukon
Northwest Territories
Canada
British Columbia
geographic_facet Nunavut
Yukon
Northwest Territories
Canada
British Columbia
genre Newfoundland
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
Prince Edward Island
Yukon
genre_facet Newfoundland
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
Prince Edward Island
Yukon
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-020-00490-x
op_rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5285718
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-020-00490-x
_version_ 1766110070847832064