What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review

Abstract Background Forest harvesting changes forest habitat and impacts forest dependent species. Uneven-aged management is often considered better for biodiversity than even-aged management, but there is an ongoing discourse over the benefits and disadvantages of different silvicultural systems. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Savilaakso, Sini, Johansson, Anna, Häkkilä, Matti, Uusitalo, Anne, Sandgren, Terhi, Mönkkönen, Mikko, Puttonen, Pasi
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: figshare 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5259187
https://springernature.figshare.com/collections/What_are_the_effects_of_even-aged_and_uneven-aged_forest_management_on_boreal_forest_biodiversity_in_Fennoscandia_and_European_Russia_A_systematic_review/5259187
id ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5259187
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
spellingShingle Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
Savilaakso, Sini
Johansson, Anna
Häkkilä, Matti
Uusitalo, Anne
Sandgren, Terhi
Mönkkönen, Mikko
Puttonen, Pasi
What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review
topic_facet Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
description Abstract Background Forest harvesting changes forest habitat and impacts forest dependent species. Uneven-aged management is often considered better for biodiversity than even-aged management, but there is an ongoing discourse over the benefits and disadvantages of different silvicultural systems. This systematic review contributes to the public discussion and provides evidence for policy making by synthesising current evidence on impacts of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on biodiversity in boreal forests of Fennoscandia and European Russia. In this review even-aged and uneven-aged forest management are compared directly to each other as well as to natural forest to provide a broad basis for public discussion. Methods Both peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched in bibliographical databases, organizational webpages and internet search engines in English, Finnish, Swedish and Russian. Articles were screened for relevance by their title/abstract and again by full text. The inclusion of studies was assessed against pre-defined criteria published in an a priori protocol. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted to describe the evidence base and to compare species richness and abundance between differently managed forests. The influence of habitat specialism, taxon, years since harvesting, deadwood availability and harvesting intensity on species richness and abundance were also tested. Review findings Searching identified 43,621 articles of which 137 articles with 854 studies had independent data and were included in the narrative synthesis. Of those, 547 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The most studied taxa were arthropods, vascular plants, bryophytes, fungi, and lichens. Results showed that forests with less disturbance (uneven-aged and mature even-aged) host more forest dependent species than young even-aged forests ( 80 years old). Uneven-aged forest had similar number of species and individuals than natural forest whereas even-aged forest had less species than natural forest. Open habitat species and their individuals were more numerous in young even-aged forests and forests undergone retention harvest. Effect sizes found were mostly large indicating strong and uniform impact of forest management based on species’ habitat preferences. In addition to habitat specialism, years since harvest explained some of the differences found in species richness and abundance due to increase of open habitat species in the early successional stages and forest dependent species in late successional stages. Taxon had limited explanatory power. Conclusions Habitat preferences determine species’ response to different harvesting methods and the magnitude of effect is large. Less disturbance from harvesting is better for forest dependent species whereas opposite is true for open habitat species. Uneven-aged and mature even-aged forests (> 80 years old) are important to maintain biodiversity in boreal forests. However, the results also highlight that natural forests are needed to ensure the future of forest dependent species in Fennoscandia and European Russia. Given that a broader set of biodiversity aspects are to be protected, best overall biodiversity impacts for a variety of species at landscape level can be achieved by ensuring that there is a mosaic of different forests within landscapes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Savilaakso, Sini
Johansson, Anna
Häkkilä, Matti
Uusitalo, Anne
Sandgren, Terhi
Mönkkönen, Mikko
Puttonen, Pasi
author_facet Savilaakso, Sini
Johansson, Anna
Häkkilä, Matti
Uusitalo, Anne
Sandgren, Terhi
Mönkkönen, Mikko
Puttonen, Pasi
author_sort Savilaakso, Sini
title What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review
title_short What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review
title_full What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review
title_fullStr What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review
title_sort what are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in fennoscandia and european russia? a systematic review
publisher figshare
publishDate 2021
url https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5259187
https://springernature.figshare.com/collections/What_are_the_effects_of_even-aged_and_uneven-aged_forest_management_on_boreal_forest_biodiversity_in_Fennoscandia_and_European_Russia_A_systematic_review/5259187
long_lat ENVELOPE(-117.453,-117.453,56.733,56.733)
geographic Deadwood
geographic_facet Deadwood
genre Fennoscandia
genre_facet Fennoscandia
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-00215-7
op_rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5259187
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-00215-7
_version_ 1765997045545435136
spelling ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5259187 2023-05-15T16:11:51+02:00 What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review Savilaakso, Sini Johansson, Anna Häkkilä, Matti Uusitalo, Anne Sandgren, Terhi Mönkkönen, Mikko Puttonen, Pasi 2021 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5259187 https://springernature.figshare.com/collections/What_are_the_effects_of_even-aged_and_uneven-aged_forest_management_on_boreal_forest_biodiversity_in_Fennoscandia_and_European_Russia_A_systematic_review/5259187 unknown figshare https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-00215-7 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 CC-BY Ecology FOS Biological sciences Collection article 2021 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5259187 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-00215-7 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Abstract Background Forest harvesting changes forest habitat and impacts forest dependent species. Uneven-aged management is often considered better for biodiversity than even-aged management, but there is an ongoing discourse over the benefits and disadvantages of different silvicultural systems. This systematic review contributes to the public discussion and provides evidence for policy making by synthesising current evidence on impacts of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on biodiversity in boreal forests of Fennoscandia and European Russia. In this review even-aged and uneven-aged forest management are compared directly to each other as well as to natural forest to provide a broad basis for public discussion. Methods Both peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched in bibliographical databases, organizational webpages and internet search engines in English, Finnish, Swedish and Russian. Articles were screened for relevance by their title/abstract and again by full text. The inclusion of studies was assessed against pre-defined criteria published in an a priori protocol. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted to describe the evidence base and to compare species richness and abundance between differently managed forests. The influence of habitat specialism, taxon, years since harvesting, deadwood availability and harvesting intensity on species richness and abundance were also tested. Review findings Searching identified 43,621 articles of which 137 articles with 854 studies had independent data and were included in the narrative synthesis. Of those, 547 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The most studied taxa were arthropods, vascular plants, bryophytes, fungi, and lichens. Results showed that forests with less disturbance (uneven-aged and mature even-aged) host more forest dependent species than young even-aged forests ( 80 years old). Uneven-aged forest had similar number of species and individuals than natural forest whereas even-aged forest had less species than natural forest. Open habitat species and their individuals were more numerous in young even-aged forests and forests undergone retention harvest. Effect sizes found were mostly large indicating strong and uniform impact of forest management based on species’ habitat preferences. In addition to habitat specialism, years since harvest explained some of the differences found in species richness and abundance due to increase of open habitat species in the early successional stages and forest dependent species in late successional stages. Taxon had limited explanatory power. Conclusions Habitat preferences determine species’ response to different harvesting methods and the magnitude of effect is large. Less disturbance from harvesting is better for forest dependent species whereas opposite is true for open habitat species. Uneven-aged and mature even-aged forests (> 80 years old) are important to maintain biodiversity in boreal forests. However, the results also highlight that natural forests are needed to ensure the future of forest dependent species in Fennoscandia and European Russia. Given that a broader set of biodiversity aspects are to be protected, best overall biodiversity impacts for a variety of species at landscape level can be achieved by ensuring that there is a mosaic of different forests within landscapes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Fennoscandia DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Deadwood ENVELOPE(-117.453,-117.453,56.733,56.733)