Supplementary material from "Common noctules exploit low levels of the aerosphere"

Aerial habitats present a challenge to find food across a large potential search volume, particularly for insectivorous bats that rely on echolocation calls with limited detection range and may forage at heights over 1000 m. To understand how bats use vertical space, we tracked one to five foraging...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Teague O'Mara, Wikelski, Martin, Kranstauber, Bart, Dechmann, Dina K. N.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Figshare 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4400708
https://rs.figshare.com/collections/Supplementary_material_from_Common_noctules_exploit_low_levels_of_the_aerosphere_/4400708
id ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4400708
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4400708 2023-05-15T17:48:37+02:00 Supplementary material from "Common noctules exploit low levels of the aerosphere" M. Teague O'Mara Wikelski, Martin Kranstauber, Bart Dechmann, Dina K. N. 2019 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4400708 https://rs.figshare.com/collections/Supplementary_material_from_Common_noctules_exploit_low_levels_of_the_aerosphere_/4400708 unknown Figshare https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181942 CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 CC-BY Ecology FOS Biological sciences 60801 Animal Behaviour Collection article 2019 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4400708 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181942 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Aerial habitats present a challenge to find food across a large potential search volume, particularly for insectivorous bats that rely on echolocation calls with limited detection range and may forage at heights over 1000 m. To understand how bats use vertical space, we tracked one to five foraging flights of eight common noctules ( Nyctalus noctula ). Bats were tracked for their full foraging session (87.27 ± 24 min) using high-resolution atmospheric pressure radio transmitters that allowed us to calculate height and wingbeat frequency. Bats used diverse flight strategies, but generally flew lower than 40 m, with scouting flights to 100 m and a maximum of 300 m. We found no influence of weather on height and high-altitude ascents were not preceded by an increase in foraging effort. Wingbeat frequency was independent from climbing or descending flight, and bats skipped wingbeats or glided in 10% of all observations. Wingbeat frequency was positively related to capture mass, and wingbeat frequency was positively related to time of night, indicating an effect of load increase over a foraging bout. Overall, individuals used a wide range of airspace including altitudes that put them at increased risk from human-made structures. Further work is needed to test the context of these flight decisions, particularly as individuals migrate throughout Europe. Article in Journal/Newspaper Nyctalus noctula DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
60801 Animal Behaviour
spellingShingle Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
60801 Animal Behaviour
M. Teague O'Mara
Wikelski, Martin
Kranstauber, Bart
Dechmann, Dina K. N.
Supplementary material from "Common noctules exploit low levels of the aerosphere"
topic_facet Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
60801 Animal Behaviour
description Aerial habitats present a challenge to find food across a large potential search volume, particularly for insectivorous bats that rely on echolocation calls with limited detection range and may forage at heights over 1000 m. To understand how bats use vertical space, we tracked one to five foraging flights of eight common noctules ( Nyctalus noctula ). Bats were tracked for their full foraging session (87.27 ± 24 min) using high-resolution atmospheric pressure radio transmitters that allowed us to calculate height and wingbeat frequency. Bats used diverse flight strategies, but generally flew lower than 40 m, with scouting flights to 100 m and a maximum of 300 m. We found no influence of weather on height and high-altitude ascents were not preceded by an increase in foraging effort. Wingbeat frequency was independent from climbing or descending flight, and bats skipped wingbeats or glided in 10% of all observations. Wingbeat frequency was positively related to capture mass, and wingbeat frequency was positively related to time of night, indicating an effect of load increase over a foraging bout. Overall, individuals used a wide range of airspace including altitudes that put them at increased risk from human-made structures. Further work is needed to test the context of these flight decisions, particularly as individuals migrate throughout Europe.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author M. Teague O'Mara
Wikelski, Martin
Kranstauber, Bart
Dechmann, Dina K. N.
author_facet M. Teague O'Mara
Wikelski, Martin
Kranstauber, Bart
Dechmann, Dina K. N.
author_sort M. Teague O'Mara
title Supplementary material from "Common noctules exploit low levels of the aerosphere"
title_short Supplementary material from "Common noctules exploit low levels of the aerosphere"
title_full Supplementary material from "Common noctules exploit low levels of the aerosphere"
title_fullStr Supplementary material from "Common noctules exploit low levels of the aerosphere"
title_full_unstemmed Supplementary material from "Common noctules exploit low levels of the aerosphere"
title_sort supplementary material from "common noctules exploit low levels of the aerosphere"
publisher Figshare
publishDate 2019
url https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4400708
https://rs.figshare.com/collections/Supplementary_material_from_Common_noctules_exploit_low_levels_of_the_aerosphere_/4400708
genre Nyctalus noctula
genre_facet Nyctalus noctula
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181942
op_rights CC BY 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4400708
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181942
_version_ 1766154755831234560