Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness

Expert collection of specimens in the field and further determination of species is the best method for determining species richness. However, the relative paucity of botanists working in Antarctica makes this approach impractical for broad-scale surveys of Antarctic floral biodiversity. Lichens are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Casanovas, Paula, Lynch, Heather J., Fagan, William F., Naveen, Ron
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Figshare 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168.v1
https://figshare.com/collections/Understanding_lichen_diversity_on_the_Antarctic_Peninsula_using_parataxonomic_units_as_a_surrogate_for_species_richness/3306168/1
id ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168.v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168.v1 2023-05-15T13:53:19+02:00 Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness Casanovas, Paula Lynch, Heather J. Fagan, William F. Naveen, Ron 2016 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168.v1 https://figshare.com/collections/Understanding_lichen_diversity_on_the_Antarctic_Peninsula_using_parataxonomic_units_as_a_surrogate_for_species_richness/3306168/1 unknown Figshare https://dx.doi.org/10.1890/13-0237.1 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168 CC-BY http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us CC-BY Environmental Science Ecology FOS Biological sciences Collection article 2016 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168.v1 https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0237.1 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Expert collection of specimens in the field and further determination of species is the best method for determining species richness. However, the relative paucity of botanists working in Antarctica makes this approach impractical for broad-scale surveys of Antarctic floral biodiversity. Lichens are the dominant macrophytes of terrestrial Antarctica and, as such, play a fundamental part of the ice-free terrestrial ecosystem. Many distinct ice-free terrestrial habitats in the Antarctic are not represented in the current network of Antarctic protected areas. However, it is difficult to identify appropriate areas for conservation because comprehensive data on distributional patterns of Antarctic flora are not available, and existing data for most Antarctic lichen species are not compiled. Consequently, cost-effective survey methods and surrogates for the prediction of species richness are needed to accelerate assessments of local biodiversity and help select areas for conservation. A combination of a photographic “citizen scientist” approach for the collection of data and the use of parataxonomic unit (PU) richness as a surrogate for species richness, might be a possible solution to effectively collect preliminary information and rapidly build databases on species diversity. We have developed a database and gathered photographic information on lichen occurrences for sites that are frequently visited by tourists. We tested the identification capabilities with a reference data set of Antarctic lichen images from the U.S. National Herbarium. We showed that all species used in this test can be detected and that, for 74% of the images, all classifiers were able to identify the genus of the specimen. Twenty-nine sites were photographically surveyed by researchers and tourists between 2009/2010 and 2011/2012 in the Antarctic Peninsula region. We estimated PU richness as a proxy for species richness for each of the 29 sites surveyed and provide two examples of potential applications. These surveys provide preliminary information for identifying areas for protection and priorities for future research. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Environmental Science
Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
spellingShingle Environmental Science
Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
Casanovas, Paula
Lynch, Heather J.
Fagan, William F.
Naveen, Ron
Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
topic_facet Environmental Science
Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
description Expert collection of specimens in the field and further determination of species is the best method for determining species richness. However, the relative paucity of botanists working in Antarctica makes this approach impractical for broad-scale surveys of Antarctic floral biodiversity. Lichens are the dominant macrophytes of terrestrial Antarctica and, as such, play a fundamental part of the ice-free terrestrial ecosystem. Many distinct ice-free terrestrial habitats in the Antarctic are not represented in the current network of Antarctic protected areas. However, it is difficult to identify appropriate areas for conservation because comprehensive data on distributional patterns of Antarctic flora are not available, and existing data for most Antarctic lichen species are not compiled. Consequently, cost-effective survey methods and surrogates for the prediction of species richness are needed to accelerate assessments of local biodiversity and help select areas for conservation. A combination of a photographic “citizen scientist” approach for the collection of data and the use of parataxonomic unit (PU) richness as a surrogate for species richness, might be a possible solution to effectively collect preliminary information and rapidly build databases on species diversity. We have developed a database and gathered photographic information on lichen occurrences for sites that are frequently visited by tourists. We tested the identification capabilities with a reference data set of Antarctic lichen images from the U.S. National Herbarium. We showed that all species used in this test can be detected and that, for 74% of the images, all classifiers were able to identify the genus of the specimen. Twenty-nine sites were photographically surveyed by researchers and tourists between 2009/2010 and 2011/2012 in the Antarctic Peninsula region. We estimated PU richness as a proxy for species richness for each of the 29 sites surveyed and provide two examples of potential applications. These surveys provide preliminary information for identifying areas for protection and priorities for future research.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Casanovas, Paula
Lynch, Heather J.
Fagan, William F.
Naveen, Ron
author_facet Casanovas, Paula
Lynch, Heather J.
Fagan, William F.
Naveen, Ron
author_sort Casanovas, Paula
title Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
title_short Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
title_full Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
title_fullStr Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
title_full_unstemmed Understanding lichen diversity on the Antarctic Peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
title_sort understanding lichen diversity on the antarctic peninsula using parataxonomic units as a surrogate for species richness
publisher Figshare
publishDate 2016
url https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168.v1
https://figshare.com/collections/Understanding_lichen_diversity_on_the_Antarctic_Peninsula_using_parataxonomic_units_as_a_surrogate_for_species_richness/3306168/1
geographic Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1890/13-0237.1
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168
op_rights CC-BY
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168.v1
https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0237.1
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306168
_version_ 1766258357699608576