Biomass, production and N content of remaining plants by growth form (mosses, lichens, forbs, evergreen shrubs, deciduous shrubs and graminoids) in 2003, after 6 years of experimental removal and fertilization

• Main Authors: M Syndonia Bret-Harte, Mack, Michelle C, Goldsmith, Gregory R, Sloan, Daniel B, DeMarco, Jennie, Gaius R Shaver, Ray, Peter M, Zy Biesinger, F Stuart Chapin
• Format: Still Image
• Language: unknown
• Published: figshare 2011
• Subjects: Uncategorized; Tundra
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.84051; https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Biomass,_production_and_N_content_of_remaining_plants_by_growth_form_(mosses,_lichens,_forbs,_evergreen_shrubs,_deciduous_shrubs_and_graminoids)_in_2003,_after_6_years_of_experimental_removal_and_fertilization/84051

(a) Biomass excluding roots, (b) above-ground net primary production of vascular plants, (c) mass of N in living biomass, (d) mass of N in above-ground net primary production of vascular plants. Treatment abbreviations: C = control (no removal, unfertilized), F = fertilized control (no removal), other abbreviations as in legend to . An F following a removal treatment abbreviation indicates that the treatment was fertilized. Error bars indicate 1 SE for the total community biomass, vascular plant production and N mass in production and biomass (all growth forms combined) among blocks ( = 6). Copyright information: Taken from "Plant functional types do not predict biomass responses to removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra"The Journal of Ecology 2008;96(4):713-726.Published online Jan 2008PMCID:PMC2438444.© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society