Using unmanned aerial vehicles for the study of eelgrass habitat

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), also referred to as “drones,” are cheap, powerful platforms that are capable of capturing high-quality imagery rapidly and with little operator training. In this report, we describe our use of drones to measure the size of eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds in the nearsh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Favaro, Brett, Zargarpour, Nicola
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: figshare 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/Using_unmanned_aerial_vehicles_for_the_study_of_eelgrass_habitat/6210608/1
id ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608.v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608.v1 2023-05-15T17:23:01+02:00 Using unmanned aerial vehicles for the study of eelgrass habitat Favaro, Brett Zargarpour, Nicola 2018 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/Using_unmanned_aerial_vehicles_for_the_study_of_eelgrass_habitat/6210608/1 unknown figshare https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 CC-BY 60299 Ecology not elsewhere classified FOS Biological sciences 60205 Marine and Estuarine Ecology incl. Marine Ichthyology Text article-journal Journal contribution ScholarlyArticle 2018 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608.v1 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), also referred to as “drones,” are cheap, powerful platforms that are capable of capturing high-quality imagery rapidly and with little operator training. In this report, we describe our use of drones to measure the size of eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds in the nearshore waters of Newfoundland. Our primary research questions were: 1) Is it possible to detect eelgrass beds using drones? 2) To what extent are measurements of drone bed size reproducible with drones (i.e. how much measurement uncertainty do drones introduce?) 3) How does the ability of drones to detect eelgrass change with the altitude of drone flight, and what is the trade-off between resolution (increased by flying at low altitude) and possible area assessed given a unit of sampling time (increased by flying at high altitude)? In addition, we qualitatively assessed how wind, waves, and turbidity affected the clarity of our imagery. We found that eelgrass beds were indeed detectable with drones, and that image clarity was very good. Qualitatively speaking, the best imagery was collected when there was no fog, when the water was still (any choppiness at all made measurement of bed size much more difficult), and when the eelgrass beds were shallow. Wind speed was less detrimental than expected because drones were capable of compensating effectively. In addition to this primary research question, we conducted removals of invasive green crab using Fukui traps. Our reasons for doing so were twofold: First, to reduce their population density and thereby protect eelgrass beds in invaded areas. Second, to determine a relative density, so that if the eelgrass beds do decline over time, we can test to what extent the density of green crabs in a given area is correlated with decline rate. We also conducted an opportunistic study to determine whether a modified Fukui trap could increase catch per unit effort (CPUE) of green crabs relative to regular traps. We found that the modified traps were indeed more effective, confirming other work we have done on this topic. This paper represents a project report that we have not submitted for peer-review. While future studies will likely derive from this, we present this guide as-is for any researcher interested in using drones to study eelgrass or other sub-tidal habitat. Text Newfoundland DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic 60299 Ecology not elsewhere classified
FOS Biological sciences
60205 Marine and Estuarine Ecology incl. Marine Ichthyology
spellingShingle 60299 Ecology not elsewhere classified
FOS Biological sciences
60205 Marine and Estuarine Ecology incl. Marine Ichthyology
Favaro, Brett
Zargarpour, Nicola
Using unmanned aerial vehicles for the study of eelgrass habitat
topic_facet 60299 Ecology not elsewhere classified
FOS Biological sciences
60205 Marine and Estuarine Ecology incl. Marine Ichthyology
description Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), also referred to as “drones,” are cheap, powerful platforms that are capable of capturing high-quality imagery rapidly and with little operator training. In this report, we describe our use of drones to measure the size of eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds in the nearshore waters of Newfoundland. Our primary research questions were: 1) Is it possible to detect eelgrass beds using drones? 2) To what extent are measurements of drone bed size reproducible with drones (i.e. how much measurement uncertainty do drones introduce?) 3) How does the ability of drones to detect eelgrass change with the altitude of drone flight, and what is the trade-off between resolution (increased by flying at low altitude) and possible area assessed given a unit of sampling time (increased by flying at high altitude)? In addition, we qualitatively assessed how wind, waves, and turbidity affected the clarity of our imagery. We found that eelgrass beds were indeed detectable with drones, and that image clarity was very good. Qualitatively speaking, the best imagery was collected when there was no fog, when the water was still (any choppiness at all made measurement of bed size much more difficult), and when the eelgrass beds were shallow. Wind speed was less detrimental than expected because drones were capable of compensating effectively. In addition to this primary research question, we conducted removals of invasive green crab using Fukui traps. Our reasons for doing so were twofold: First, to reduce their population density and thereby protect eelgrass beds in invaded areas. Second, to determine a relative density, so that if the eelgrass beds do decline over time, we can test to what extent the density of green crabs in a given area is correlated with decline rate. We also conducted an opportunistic study to determine whether a modified Fukui trap could increase catch per unit effort (CPUE) of green crabs relative to regular traps. We found that the modified traps were indeed more effective, confirming other work we have done on this topic. This paper represents a project report that we have not submitted for peer-review. While future studies will likely derive from this, we present this guide as-is for any researcher interested in using drones to study eelgrass or other sub-tidal habitat.
format Text
author Favaro, Brett
Zargarpour, Nicola
author_facet Favaro, Brett
Zargarpour, Nicola
author_sort Favaro, Brett
title Using unmanned aerial vehicles for the study of eelgrass habitat
title_short Using unmanned aerial vehicles for the study of eelgrass habitat
title_full Using unmanned aerial vehicles for the study of eelgrass habitat
title_fullStr Using unmanned aerial vehicles for the study of eelgrass habitat
title_full_unstemmed Using unmanned aerial vehicles for the study of eelgrass habitat
title_sort using unmanned aerial vehicles for the study of eelgrass habitat
publisher figshare
publishDate 2018
url https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/Using_unmanned_aerial_vehicles_for_the_study_of_eelgrass_habitat/6210608/1
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608
op_rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608.v1
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6210608
_version_ 1766109997849116672