AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.

Table S1. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay. The top 5 models are displayed, with the best model in boldface. Timing of arrival in James Bay is the response variable in all models. Departure refers to the last detection of an individual in Delaware Bay and tailwind re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duijns, Sjoerd, Niles, Lawrence J., Dey, Amanda, Aubry, Yves, Friis, Christian, Koch, Stephanie, Anderson, Alexandra M., Smith, Paul A.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: The Royal Society 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386
https://rs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386
id ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386 2023-05-15T14:29:33+02:00 AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant. Duijns, Sjoerd Niles, Lawrence J. Dey, Amanda Aubry, Yves Friis, Christian Koch, Stephanie Anderson, Alexandra M. Smith, Paul A. 2017 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386 https://rs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386 unknown The Royal Society https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1374 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 CC-BY Ecology FOS Biological sciences 60801 Animal Behaviour Text article-journal Journal contribution ScholarlyArticle 2017 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1374 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Table S1. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay. The top 5 models are displayed, with the best model in boldface. Timing of arrival in James Bay is the response variable in all models. Departure refers to the last detection of an individual in Delaware Bay and tailwind refers to the tailwind the first 3h of the trajectory.; Fig S1. Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America (see main text for details). The white dot indicates the capture site of Delaware Bay and the grey dot represents James Bay, located at the southern edge of the breeding grounds. The red dots indicate the fall detection sites of the Mingan Archipelago the Bay of Fundy. Maps created using R 3.3.3 using packages ggplot2, ggmap, raster and RgoogleMaps (image data providers: US Dept. of State Geographer © 2016); Fig S2. Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic. Birds in a higher condition at the stopover site arrive earlier at the breeding grounds. Data points are estimates of linear mixed models (see main text for details), and the gray area represents 95% confidence intervals. Text Arctic birds Arctic James Bay DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
60801 Animal Behaviour
spellingShingle Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
60801 Animal Behaviour
Duijns, Sjoerd
Niles, Lawrence J.
Dey, Amanda
Aubry, Yves
Friis, Christian
Koch, Stephanie
Anderson, Alexandra M.
Smith, Paul A.
AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
topic_facet Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
60801 Animal Behaviour
description Table S1. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay. The top 5 models are displayed, with the best model in boldface. Timing of arrival in James Bay is the response variable in all models. Departure refers to the last detection of an individual in Delaware Bay and tailwind refers to the tailwind the first 3h of the trajectory.; Fig S1. Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America (see main text for details). The white dot indicates the capture site of Delaware Bay and the grey dot represents James Bay, located at the southern edge of the breeding grounds. The red dots indicate the fall detection sites of the Mingan Archipelago the Bay of Fundy. Maps created using R 3.3.3 using packages ggplot2, ggmap, raster and RgoogleMaps (image data providers: US Dept. of State Geographer © 2016); Fig S2. Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic. Birds in a higher condition at the stopover site arrive earlier at the breeding grounds. Data points are estimates of linear mixed models (see main text for details), and the gray area represents 95% confidence intervals.
format Text
author Duijns, Sjoerd
Niles, Lawrence J.
Dey, Amanda
Aubry, Yves
Friis, Christian
Koch, Stephanie
Anderson, Alexandra M.
Smith, Paul A.
author_facet Duijns, Sjoerd
Niles, Lawrence J.
Dey, Amanda
Aubry, Yves
Friis, Christian
Koch, Stephanie
Anderson, Alexandra M.
Smith, Paul A.
author_sort Duijns, Sjoerd
title AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
title_short AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
title_full AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
title_fullStr AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
title_full_unstemmed AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
title_sort aicc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in james bay; locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in north america; estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-arctic from body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2017
url https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386
https://rs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic birds
Arctic
James Bay
genre_facet Arctic birds
Arctic
James Bay
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1374
op_rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1374
_version_ 1766303530331668480