AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant.
Table S1. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay. The top 5 models are displayed, with the best model in boldface. Timing of arrival in James Bay is the response variable in all models. Departure refers to the last detection of an individual in Delaware Bay and tailwind re...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2 https://rs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386/2 |
id |
ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2 2023-05-15T14:29:33+02:00 AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant. Duijns, Sjoerd Niles, Lawrence J. Dey, Amanda Aubry, Yves Friis, Christian Koch, Stephanie Anderson, Alexandra M. Smith, Paul A. 2017 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2 https://rs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386/2 unknown The Royal Society https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1374 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 CC-BY Ecology FOS Biological sciences 60801 Animal Behaviour Text article-journal Journal contribution ScholarlyArticle 2017 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1374 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Table S1. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay. The top 5 models are displayed, with the best model in boldface. Timing of arrival in James Bay is the response variable in all models. Departure refers to the last detection of an individual in Delaware Bay and tailwind refers to the tailwind the first 3h of the trajectory.; Fig S1. Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America (see main text for details). The white dot indicates the capture site of Delaware Bay and the grey dot represents James Bay, located at the southern edge of the breeding grounds. The red dots indicate the fall detection sites of the Mingan Archipelago the Bay of Fundy. Maps created using R 3.3.3 using packages ggplot2, ggmap, raster and RgoogleMaps (image data providers: US Dept. of State Geographer © 2016); Fig S2. Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic. Birds in a higher condition at the stopover site arrive earlier at the breeding grounds. Data points are estimates of linear mixed models (see main text for details), and the gray area represents 95% confidence intervals. Text Arctic birds Arctic James Bay DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftdatacite |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Ecology FOS Biological sciences 60801 Animal Behaviour |
spellingShingle |
Ecology FOS Biological sciences 60801 Animal Behaviour Duijns, Sjoerd Niles, Lawrence J. Dey, Amanda Aubry, Yves Friis, Christian Koch, Stephanie Anderson, Alexandra M. Smith, Paul A. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant. |
topic_facet |
Ecology FOS Biological sciences 60801 Animal Behaviour |
description |
Table S1. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay. The top 5 models are displayed, with the best model in boldface. Timing of arrival in James Bay is the response variable in all models. Departure refers to the last detection of an individual in Delaware Bay and tailwind refers to the tailwind the first 3h of the trajectory.; Fig S1. Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America (see main text for details). The white dot indicates the capture site of Delaware Bay and the grey dot represents James Bay, located at the southern edge of the breeding grounds. The red dots indicate the fall detection sites of the Mingan Archipelago the Bay of Fundy. Maps created using R 3.3.3 using packages ggplot2, ggmap, raster and RgoogleMaps (image data providers: US Dept. of State Geographer © 2016); Fig S2. Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic. Birds in a higher condition at the stopover site arrive earlier at the breeding grounds. Data points are estimates of linear mixed models (see main text for details), and the gray area represents 95% confidence intervals. |
format |
Text |
author |
Duijns, Sjoerd Niles, Lawrence J. Dey, Amanda Aubry, Yves Friis, Christian Koch, Stephanie Anderson, Alexandra M. Smith, Paul A. |
author_facet |
Duijns, Sjoerd Niles, Lawrence J. Dey, Amanda Aubry, Yves Friis, Christian Koch, Stephanie Anderson, Alexandra M. Smith, Paul A. |
author_sort |
Duijns, Sjoerd |
title |
AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant. |
title_short |
AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant. |
title_full |
AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant. |
title_fullStr |
AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant. |
title_full_unstemmed |
AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant. |
title_sort |
aicc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in james bay; locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in north america; estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-arctic from body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant. |
publisher |
The Royal Society |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2 https://rs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AICc_comparison_of_the_statistical_model_for_arrival_in_James_Bay_Locations_of_groupings_of_automated_telemetry_receivers_in_North_America_Estimates_of_the_relationship_between_residual_mass_relative_body_condition_and_arrival_dates_to_the_sub-Arctic_from/5501386/2 |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic birds Arctic James Bay |
genre_facet |
Arctic birds Arctic James Bay |
op_relation |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1374 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386 |
op_rights |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 |
op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386.v2 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1374 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5501386 |
_version_ |
1766303530677698560 |