Reviewing research on the synthesis of CALB-catalyzed sugar esters incorporating systematic mapping principles

Rigorous evidence reviews must follow specific guidelines designed to improve transparency, reproducibility, and to minimize biases to which traditional reviews are susceptible. While evidence synthesis methods, such as systematic reviews and maps, have been used in several research fields, the majo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonçalves, Maria Carolina Pereira, Romanelli, João Paulo, Guimarães, José Renato, Vieira, Ana Carolina, de Azevedo, Bruna Pereira, Tardioli, Paulo Waldir
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: Taylor & Francis 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205.v1
https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Reviewing_research_on_the_synthesis_of_CALB-catalyzed_sugar_esters_incorporating_systematic_mapping_principles/14134205/1
id ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205.v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205.v1 2023-05-15T13:37:10+02:00 Reviewing research on the synthesis of CALB-catalyzed sugar esters incorporating systematic mapping principles Gonçalves, Maria Carolina Pereira Romanelli, João Paulo Guimarães, José Renato Vieira, Ana Carolina de Azevedo, Bruna Pereira Tardioli, Paulo Waldir 2021 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205.v1 https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Reviewing_research_on_the_synthesis_of_CALB-catalyzed_sugar_esters_incorporating_systematic_mapping_principles/14134205/1 unknown Taylor & Francis https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1888071 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 CC-BY Biotechnology 39999 Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified FOS Chemical sciences Ecology FOS Biological sciences Science Policy dataset Dataset 2021 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205.v1 https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1888071 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Rigorous evidence reviews must follow specific guidelines designed to improve transparency, reproducibility, and to minimize biases to which traditional reviews are susceptible. While evidence synthesis methods, such as systematic reviews and maps, have been used in several research fields, the majority of reviews published in the realm of chemical engineering are nonsystematic. In this study, we incorporated principles of systematic mapping to conduct a literature review covering research on the synthesis of sugar fatty acid esters (SFAE) with Candida antarctica lipase B (CALB). Our results showed that the simple monosaccharides were the most cited sugars among studies we conducted. The direct use of renewable raw materials and frequently available resources to produce alternative sugar esters (SE) was scarcely reported in our data set. We found that free fatty acids (FFA) were the most commonly cited acyl donors amongst all publications, with lauric, oleic, and palmitic acids accounting for ∼43% of the occurrences. Tertiary alcohols (ter-butyl alcohol (T-but) and 2-methyl-2-butanol (2M2B)) and ionic liquids were the most used solvents to synthesize SE. The co-occurence analysis of keywords involving solvent terms showed that most of the papers evaluated different solvents as reaction media (mostly in the form of a bisolvent system), also investigating the impact of their choice on sugar ester productivities. Given the potential of reviews informing us of research decisions, this article reveals trends and spaces across CALB-catalyzed SE synthesis research, in addition to introducing a new methodological perspective for developing reviews in the field of chemical engineering. Dataset Antarc* Antarctica DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biotechnology
39999 Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
FOS Chemical sciences
Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
Science Policy
spellingShingle Biotechnology
39999 Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
FOS Chemical sciences
Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
Science Policy
Gonçalves, Maria Carolina Pereira
Romanelli, João Paulo
Guimarães, José Renato
Vieira, Ana Carolina
de Azevedo, Bruna Pereira
Tardioli, Paulo Waldir
Reviewing research on the synthesis of CALB-catalyzed sugar esters incorporating systematic mapping principles
topic_facet Biotechnology
39999 Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
FOS Chemical sciences
Ecology
FOS Biological sciences
Science Policy
description Rigorous evidence reviews must follow specific guidelines designed to improve transparency, reproducibility, and to minimize biases to which traditional reviews are susceptible. While evidence synthesis methods, such as systematic reviews and maps, have been used in several research fields, the majority of reviews published in the realm of chemical engineering are nonsystematic. In this study, we incorporated principles of systematic mapping to conduct a literature review covering research on the synthesis of sugar fatty acid esters (SFAE) with Candida antarctica lipase B (CALB). Our results showed that the simple monosaccharides were the most cited sugars among studies we conducted. The direct use of renewable raw materials and frequently available resources to produce alternative sugar esters (SE) was scarcely reported in our data set. We found that free fatty acids (FFA) were the most commonly cited acyl donors amongst all publications, with lauric, oleic, and palmitic acids accounting for ∼43% of the occurrences. Tertiary alcohols (ter-butyl alcohol (T-but) and 2-methyl-2-butanol (2M2B)) and ionic liquids were the most used solvents to synthesize SE. The co-occurence analysis of keywords involving solvent terms showed that most of the papers evaluated different solvents as reaction media (mostly in the form of a bisolvent system), also investigating the impact of their choice on sugar ester productivities. Given the potential of reviews informing us of research decisions, this article reveals trends and spaces across CALB-catalyzed SE synthesis research, in addition to introducing a new methodological perspective for developing reviews in the field of chemical engineering.
format Dataset
author Gonçalves, Maria Carolina Pereira
Romanelli, João Paulo
Guimarães, José Renato
Vieira, Ana Carolina
de Azevedo, Bruna Pereira
Tardioli, Paulo Waldir
author_facet Gonçalves, Maria Carolina Pereira
Romanelli, João Paulo
Guimarães, José Renato
Vieira, Ana Carolina
de Azevedo, Bruna Pereira
Tardioli, Paulo Waldir
author_sort Gonçalves, Maria Carolina Pereira
title Reviewing research on the synthesis of CALB-catalyzed sugar esters incorporating systematic mapping principles
title_short Reviewing research on the synthesis of CALB-catalyzed sugar esters incorporating systematic mapping principles
title_full Reviewing research on the synthesis of CALB-catalyzed sugar esters incorporating systematic mapping principles
title_fullStr Reviewing research on the synthesis of CALB-catalyzed sugar esters incorporating systematic mapping principles
title_full_unstemmed Reviewing research on the synthesis of CALB-catalyzed sugar esters incorporating systematic mapping principles
title_sort reviewing research on the synthesis of calb-catalyzed sugar esters incorporating systematic mapping principles
publisher Taylor & Francis
publishDate 2021
url https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205.v1
https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Reviewing_research_on_the_synthesis_of_CALB-catalyzed_sugar_esters_incorporating_systematic_mapping_principles/14134205/1
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1888071
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205
op_rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205.v1
https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1888071
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14134205
_version_ 1766088823341580288