Stroke-Specific Quality of Life one-year post-stroke in two Scandinavian country-regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services: a prospective study

• Main Authors: Pedersen, Synne Garder, Friborg, Oddgeir, Heiberg, Guri Anita, Arntzen, Cathrine, Stabel, Henriette Holm, Thrane, Gyrd, Nielsen, Jørgen Feldbæk, Anke, Audny
• Format: Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: Taylor & Francis 2020
• Subjects: Medicine; Neuroscience; Biotechnology; Sociology; FOS Sociology; 69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified; FOS Biological sciences; 111714 Mental Health; FOS Health sciences; Norway; North Norway
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12229229; https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Stroke-Specific_Quality_of_Life_one-year_post-stroke_in_two_Scandinavian_country-regions_with_different_organisation_of_rehabilitation_services_a_prospective_study/12229229

To compare stroke-specific health related quality of life in two country-regions with organisational differences in subacute rehabilitation services, and to reveal whether organisational factors or individual factors impact outcome. A prospective multicentre study with one-year follow-up of 369 first-ever stroke survivors with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, recruited from stroke units in North Norway ( n = 208) and Central Denmark ( n = 161). The 12-domain Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale was the primary outcome-measure. The Norwegian participants were older than the Danish ( M age = 69.8 vs. 66.7 years, respectively), had higher initial stroke severity, and longer stroke unit stays. Both cohorts reported more problems with cognitive, social, and emotional functioning compared to physical functioning. Two scale components were revealed. Between-country differences in the cognitive-social-mental component showed slightly better function in the Norwegian participants. Depression, anxiety, pre-stroke dependency, initial stroke severity, and older age were substantially associated to scale scores. Successful improvements in one-year functioning in both country-regions may result from optimising long-term rehabilitation services to address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning. Stroke-Specific Quality of Life one-year post-stroke could be explained by individual factors, such as pre-stroke dependency and mental health, rather than differences in the organisation of subacute rehabilitation services.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe stroke-specific health related quality of life (SS-QOL) assessment tool captures multidimensional effects of a stroke from the perspective of the patient, which is clinically important information for the rehabilitation services.The cognitive-social-mental component and the physical health component, indicate specific functional problems which may vary across and within countries and regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services.For persons with mild to moderate stroke, longer-term functional improvements may be better optimised if the rehabilitation services particularly address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning. The stroke-specific health related quality of life (SS-QOL) assessment tool captures multidimensional effects of a stroke from the perspective of the patient, which is clinically important information for the rehabilitation services. The cognitive-social-mental component and the physical health component, indicate specific functional problems which may vary across and within countries and regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services. For persons with mild to moderate stroke, longer-term functional improvements may be better optimised if the rehabilitation services particularly address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning.