The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT)

Figure 2. The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT). Each point represents the mean for each organic layer thickness bin, where each bin has at least three observations and includes all classes of slope and soil texture. For PF, a value of 0 indicates the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johnson, Kristofer D, Harden, Jennifer W, A David McGuire, Clark, Mark, Fengming Yuan, Finley, Andrew O
Format: Still Image
Language:unknown
Published: IOP Publishing 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789.v1
https://iop.figshare.com/articles/figure/_The_relationship_between_permafrost_probability_PF_and_organic_layer_thickness_OLT_/1011789/1
id ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789.v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789.v1 2023-05-15T17:55:32+02:00 The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT) Johnson, Kristofer D Harden, Jennifer W A David McGuire Clark, Mark Fengming Yuan Finley, Andrew O 2013 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789.v1 https://iop.figshare.com/articles/figure/_The_relationship_between_permafrost_probability_PF_and_organic_layer_thickness_OLT_/1011789/1 unknown IOP Publishing https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 CC-BY Environmental Science Image Figure graphic ImageObject 2013 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789.v1 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Figure 2. The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT). Each point represents the mean for each organic layer thickness bin, where each bin has at least three observations and includes all classes of slope and soil texture. For PF, a value of 0 indicates the absence of permafrost, whereas 1 indicates the presence of permafrost. Error bars were omitted for clarity. The vertical dotted line indicates the switch point, and 95% confidence interval in parenthesis, identified by the segmentation model. The horizontal dotted line indicates PF = 0.5, or where the probability of observing or not observing permafrost is equal. Abstract Permafrost is tightly coupled to the organic soil layer, an interaction that mediates permafrost degradation in response to regional warming. We analyzed changes in permafrost occurrence and organic layer thickness (OLT) using more than 3000 soil pedons across a mean annual temperature (MAT) gradient. Cause and effect relationships between permafrost probability (PF), OLT, and other topographic factors were investigated using structural equation modeling in a multi-group analysis. Groups were defined by slope, soil texture type, and shallow (<28 cm) versus deep organic (≥28 cm) layers. The probability of observing permafrost sharply increased by 0.32 for every 10-cm OLT increase in shallow OLT soils (OLTs) due to an insulation effect, but PF decreased in deep OLT soils (OLTd) by 0.06 for every 10-cm increase. Across the MAT gradient, PF in sandy soils varied little, but PF in loamy and silty soils decreased substantially from cooler to warmer temperatures. The change in OLT was more heterogeneous across soil texture types—in some there was no change while in others OLTs soils thinned and/or OLTd soils thickened at warmer locations. Furthermore, when soil organic carbon was estimated using a relationship with thickness, the average increase in carbon in OLTd soils was almost four times greater compared to the average decrease in carbon in OLTs soils across all soil types. If soils follow a trajectory of warming that mimics the spatial gradients found today, then heterogeneities of permafrost degradation and organic layer thinning and thickening should be considered in the regional carbon balance. Still Image permafrost DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Environmental Science
spellingShingle Environmental Science
Johnson, Kristofer D
Harden, Jennifer W
A David McGuire
Clark, Mark
Fengming Yuan
Finley, Andrew O
The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT)
topic_facet Environmental Science
description Figure 2. The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT). Each point represents the mean for each organic layer thickness bin, where each bin has at least three observations and includes all classes of slope and soil texture. For PF, a value of 0 indicates the absence of permafrost, whereas 1 indicates the presence of permafrost. Error bars were omitted for clarity. The vertical dotted line indicates the switch point, and 95% confidence interval in parenthesis, identified by the segmentation model. The horizontal dotted line indicates PF = 0.5, or where the probability of observing or not observing permafrost is equal. Abstract Permafrost is tightly coupled to the organic soil layer, an interaction that mediates permafrost degradation in response to regional warming. We analyzed changes in permafrost occurrence and organic layer thickness (OLT) using more than 3000 soil pedons across a mean annual temperature (MAT) gradient. Cause and effect relationships between permafrost probability (PF), OLT, and other topographic factors were investigated using structural equation modeling in a multi-group analysis. Groups were defined by slope, soil texture type, and shallow (<28 cm) versus deep organic (≥28 cm) layers. The probability of observing permafrost sharply increased by 0.32 for every 10-cm OLT increase in shallow OLT soils (OLTs) due to an insulation effect, but PF decreased in deep OLT soils (OLTd) by 0.06 for every 10-cm increase. Across the MAT gradient, PF in sandy soils varied little, but PF in loamy and silty soils decreased substantially from cooler to warmer temperatures. The change in OLT was more heterogeneous across soil texture types—in some there was no change while in others OLTs soils thinned and/or OLTd soils thickened at warmer locations. Furthermore, when soil organic carbon was estimated using a relationship with thickness, the average increase in carbon in OLTd soils was almost four times greater compared to the average decrease in carbon in OLTs soils across all soil types. If soils follow a trajectory of warming that mimics the spatial gradients found today, then heterogeneities of permafrost degradation and organic layer thinning and thickening should be considered in the regional carbon balance.
format Still Image
author Johnson, Kristofer D
Harden, Jennifer W
A David McGuire
Clark, Mark
Fengming Yuan
Finley, Andrew O
author_facet Johnson, Kristofer D
Harden, Jennifer W
A David McGuire
Clark, Mark
Fengming Yuan
Finley, Andrew O
author_sort Johnson, Kristofer D
title The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT)
title_short The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT)
title_full The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT)
title_fullStr The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT)
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between permafrost probability (PF) and organic layer thickness (OLT)
title_sort relationship between permafrost probability (pf) and organic layer thickness (olt)
publisher IOP Publishing
publishDate 2013
url https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789.v1
https://iop.figshare.com/articles/figure/_The_relationship_between_permafrost_probability_PF_and_organic_layer_thickness_OLT_/1011789/1
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789
op_rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789.v1
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1011789
_version_ 1766163476165689344