Self-similarity of active fault systems and distribution of earthquake epicenters ...

<!--!introduction!--> We analyse the fractal dimension of active fault systems versus the fractal dimension of earthquake epicentres in the Greater Caucasus, Altai-Sayan, Baikal, and Kamchatka Regions. In particular, for each of the four regional systems of active faults the box counting and c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nekrasova, Anastasia, Tsvetkov, Ivan, Kossobokov, Vladimir
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.57757/iugg23-0383
https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5016092
Description
Summary:<!--!introduction!--> We analyse the fractal dimension of active fault systems versus the fractal dimension of earthquake epicentres in the Greater Caucasus, Altai-Sayan, Baikal, and Kamchatka Regions. In particular, for each of the four regional systems of active faults the box counting and correlation dimensions, D 0 and D 2 , were computed based on the Active Faults of Eurasia Database (Bachmanov et al., 2017). The data permit distinguishing fractal dimensionality of the vertical, lateral and extensional displacement faults. The obtained regional values of D 0 and D 2 are compared to the regional distributions of the C-coefficient of the Unified Scaling Law for Earthquakes (USLE) that compliments to the a- and b-values of the classical Gutenberg-Richter relationship with C, an estimate of fractal dimension of earthquake epicentres at a given site. We used maps of the USLE coefficients in the selected four regions from (Kossobokov&Nekrasova 2018a, 2018b; Nekrasova&Kossobokov 2020, 2022). The ... : The 28th IUGG General Assembly (IUGG2023) (Berlin 2023) ...