Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective (D2.2)

In line with the vision of the SeeRRI project: establishing a foundation for building self-sustaining research and innovation ecosystems in Europe through Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), the present Deliverable 2.2 – Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparativ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neuländtner, Martina, Scherngell, Thomas, Schiebel, Edgar
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299078
https://zenodo.org/record/6299078
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6299078
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6299078 2023-05-15T17:24:39+02:00 Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective (D2.2) Neuländtner, Martina Scherngell, Thomas Schiebel, Edgar 2019 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299078 https://zenodo.org/record/6299078 en eng Zenodo https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299077 Open Access Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY article-journal ScholarlyArticle Project deliverable Text 2019 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299078 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299077 2022-03-10T16:06:18Z In line with the vision of the SeeRRI project: establishing a foundation for building self-sustaining research and innovation ecosystems in Europe through Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), the present Deliverable 2.2 – Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective constitutes an essential step in the establishment of a conceptual and theoretical foundation for self-sustaining R&I ecosystems. The results of the mapping will provide an important impetus for subsequent work packages, in particular, to the interactive stakeholder processes within and across the regions. The results are also intended to pave the way for the development of a generalized empirical framework that can be used to characterize territorial R&I ecosystems in the future. The empirical analysis has been accomplished following the guidelines to implement a comprehensive mapping of R&I ecosystems, as outlined in Deliverable 2.1 – Report on procedures and guidelines for active mapping. The aim of this report is to present the results of the systematic quantitative mapping of the three territorial R&I ecosystems selected as cases in SeeRRI – Nordland, Lower Austria, and B30 – in terms of (i) their R&I actors of different organizational types, (ii) being engaged in R&I activities of different forms, and (iii) the actors’ R&D collaborations and their engagement in regional, national and international networks. Text Nordland Nordland Nordland DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language English
description In line with the vision of the SeeRRI project: establishing a foundation for building self-sustaining research and innovation ecosystems in Europe through Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), the present Deliverable 2.2 – Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective constitutes an essential step in the establishment of a conceptual and theoretical foundation for self-sustaining R&I ecosystems. The results of the mapping will provide an important impetus for subsequent work packages, in particular, to the interactive stakeholder processes within and across the regions. The results are also intended to pave the way for the development of a generalized empirical framework that can be used to characterize territorial R&I ecosystems in the future. The empirical analysis has been accomplished following the guidelines to implement a comprehensive mapping of R&I ecosystems, as outlined in Deliverable 2.1 – Report on procedures and guidelines for active mapping. The aim of this report is to present the results of the systematic quantitative mapping of the three territorial R&I ecosystems selected as cases in SeeRRI – Nordland, Lower Austria, and B30 – in terms of (i) their R&I actors of different organizational types, (ii) being engaged in R&I activities of different forms, and (iii) the actors’ R&D collaborations and their engagement in regional, national and international networks.
format Text
author Neuländtner, Martina
Scherngell, Thomas
Schiebel, Edgar
spellingShingle Neuländtner, Martina
Scherngell, Thomas
Schiebel, Edgar
Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective (D2.2)
author_facet Neuländtner, Martina
Scherngell, Thomas
Schiebel, Edgar
author_sort Neuländtner, Martina
title Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective (D2.2)
title_short Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective (D2.2)
title_full Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective (D2.2)
title_fullStr Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective (D2.2)
title_full_unstemmed Report on R&I ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective (D2.2)
title_sort report on r&i ecosystem mapping of the territories from a comparative perspective (d2.2)
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2019
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299078
https://zenodo.org/record/6299078
genre Nordland
Nordland
Nordland
genre_facet Nordland
Nordland
Nordland
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299077
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299078
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299077
_version_ 1766115773234806784