Cactophagus dragoni Anderson

Cactophagus dragoni Anderson (Figs. 7 ­10, 15­ 18) Identification.— Cactophagus dragoni appears to be closely related to C. ornatus and C . sinuatus based on similarities in the placement of the antennae on the rostrum far from the eye (Fig. 15), the bilamellate apical portion of the peduncle of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anderson, Robert S.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277907
https://zenodo.org/record/6277907
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6277907
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Dryophthoridae
Cactophagus
Cactophagus dragoni
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Dryophthoridae
Cactophagus
Cactophagus dragoni
Anderson, Robert S.
Cactophagus dragoni Anderson
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Dryophthoridae
Cactophagus
Cactophagus dragoni
description Cactophagus dragoni Anderson (Figs. 7 ­10, 15­ 18) Identification.— Cactophagus dragoni appears to be closely related to C. ornatus and C . sinuatus based on similarities in the placement of the antennae on the rostrum far from the eye (Fig. 15), the bilamellate apical portion of the peduncle of the postmentum which is somewhat projected anteriorly and ventrally, and the elytral maculations which (if present) distort the form of the elytal striae (Fig. 9). Most specimens of C. dragoni have elytra with orange humeri and a series of disjunct orange maculations extended in an oblique arc from the anterior one­third of the lateral elytal margin to the posterior one­third of the elytral length at interval 3 (Fig. 9). These maculations are tumescent and slightly distort the elytral striae. One immaculate conspecific specimen (near Boquete) is known (Figs. 7-8). Whereas similar, C. ornatus and C. sinuatus are not as markedly sculptured, have only a transverse subbasal pronotal impression, and the peduncle is not as sharply bilamellate as in C. dragoni . Description. Male, length, 13.8-15.3 mm; width, 5.8-6.5 mm. Female, length, 13.4- 14.4 mm; width, 6. 0-6.3 mm. Color black with elytral orange maculations at humeri, on Rostrum subequal to length pronotum; elongate, cylindrical, robust, evenly rather strongly curved, very coarsely, irregularly punctate basally, punctures somewhat finer, sparser apically; base of rostrum expanded slightly in dorsal view at point of antennal insertion only; in lateral view slightly wider at base but not obviously expanded, basal area long, about two­fifths total rostral length. Rostrum glabrous ventrally; peduncle markedly bilamellate apically, projected anteriorly and ventrally. Scrobe with posterior margin about 6 or 7 times width of base of scape from anterior margin of eyes. Antenna with scape more or less one­half length rostrum; club slightly laterally compressed, elongateoval; apical pilose part subequal to length basal glabrous part. Pronotum with lateral margins irregular, subparallel in basal one­half, convergent subapically, tubulate to apex; disc and flanks moderately deeply irregularly punctate throughout, some punctures coalescent forming irregular shallow rugae; surface irregular, with shallow impressions laterally at midlength and deep transverse impression subbasally at middle; anterolateral margin immediately behind eyes with surface somewhat crenulate. Pronotum slightly longer than wide. Elytra with length one and one­half times length pronotum; intervals finely punctate, irregularly creased; intervals 3­5 swollen and irregularly scupltured at base; striae with moderately deep, widely spaced, small punctures. Scutellum large, “V” shaped, length slightly longer than width at base, flat. Pygidium tumescent medially; shallowly regularly punctate throughout; apex broadly rounded, with transverse row of longer setae. Ventrally with front coxae very narrowly separated by no more than width of base of scape; prosternum markedly sloping between and anterior to front coxae, with low tubercle between coxae. Meso­, metasternum and ventrite 1 irregularly sparsely punctate; ventrites 2 to 5 sparsely, finely punctate; last ventrite flat, glabrous. Legs moderately long, moderately densely regularly punctate, especially on outer face of femora; front coxae of male with inwardly projected low rounded swelling, lacking in female; femora clavate, moderately long, hind femur reaching apex of pygidium; inner margins of middle and hind tibiae very slightly inwardly expanded subbasally; all tibiae with very fine, uniformly short, stout, peglike setae throughout length arranged in pectinate manner. Tarsi with article 1 of front leg pilose on both lobes; third article very widely dilated, pilose ventrally except for narrow median line in basal one­half; all tarsi with third articles symmetrical; apical margin of third articles very shallowly emarginate. Variation.—Some variation exists in the extent of the elytral orange maculations which are lacking on interval 4 and intervals 6 and 7 in some specimens, and one immaculate specimen (near Boquete) is known. Sexual dimorphism.—Sexes are difficult to separate in this species. Males have a slightly more concave metasternum and ventrite 1, and possess small tubercles on the front coxae. Material Examined.—Male HOLOTYPE labelled “Pan. Chiriqui Prov. / Cont'l Divide Trl. / 11­15.V. 1995 / Morris & Wappes" (CMNC). Female ALLOTYPE labelled " Panama. Chiriqui / Fortuna, 82 ° 15 'W / 8 ° 44 'N, May 20, 1978 / O'Briens & Marshall " (CWOB). PARATYPES (5, 3). PANAMA. CHIRIQUI PROVINCE. Boquete (5.6 km. W.), La Culebra Trail, 1450m, 19.vi. 1996, J.Ashe & R. Brooks, Arum leaf axils, # 178 (1). Continental Divide Trail, 11­15.V. 1995, Morris and Wappes (1). Fortuna, 82 ° 15 'W 8 ° 44 'N, May 20, 1978, O'Briens & Marshall (1). May 16, 1978 (2; 1). Reserva Forestal La Fortuna, Quebrada Aleman, 21.VII. 1995, C.W. and L.B. O'Brien (1). Cuenca Fortuna, Aoki Camp, 23.V. 1985, R. Flowers (1). Paratypes in CMNC, CWOB. Distribution.— Panama (Chiriqui). Natural history.—Adults have been collected in montane cloud forest in the La Fortuna area of Chiriqui province, Panama. The specimen from 5.6 km. W. Boquete was collected in the axil of a large arum plant (Araceae). Derivation of specific name.— Through support for the Nature Discovery Fund at the Canadian Museum of Nature, this species is named after Jane Dragon of Fort Smith, Northwest Territories, Canada. Comments.—This species approaches species previously placed in Cactophagoides in the extent of pronotal and elytral sculpture. Such intermediate forms have led to the consideration of Cactophagoides as a junior synonym of Cactophagus . : Published as part of Anderson, Robert S., 2002, The Dryophthoridae of Costa Rica and Panama: Checklist with keys, new synonymy and descriptions of new species of Cactophagus, Mesocordylus, Metamasius and Rhodobaenus (Coleoptera; Curculionoidea), pp. 1-94 in Zootaxa 80 on pages 27-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.156033
format Text
author Anderson, Robert S.
author_facet Anderson, Robert S.
author_sort Anderson, Robert S.
title Cactophagus dragoni Anderson
title_short Cactophagus dragoni Anderson
title_full Cactophagus dragoni Anderson
title_fullStr Cactophagus dragoni Anderson
title_full_unstemmed Cactophagus dragoni Anderson
title_sort cactophagus dragoni anderson
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2002
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277907
https://zenodo.org/record/6277907
long_lat ENVELOPE(-111.889,-111.889,60.004,60.004)
ENVELOPE(-58.467,-58.467,-62.150,-62.150)
geographic Northwest Territories
Canada
Fort Smith
Fortuna
geographic_facet Northwest Territories
Canada
Fort Smith
Fortuna
genre Fort Smith
Northwest Territories
genre_facet Fort Smith
Northwest Territories
op_relation http://publication.plazi.org/id/FD0F425B147D5B5FFFC4FF8FFFB8E869
http://zoobank.org/6D9F45FE-587D-4161-A54E-DB83C10A112F
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.156033
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FD0F425B147D5B5FFFC4FF8FFFB8E869
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.168661
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.156037
http://zoobank.org/6D9F45FE-587D-4161-A54E-DB83C10A112F
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277908
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277907
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.156033
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.168661
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.156037
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277908
_version_ 1766003958767157248
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6277907 2023-05-15T16:17:56+02:00 Cactophagus dragoni Anderson Anderson, Robert S. 2002 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277907 https://zenodo.org/record/6277907 unknown Zenodo http://publication.plazi.org/id/FD0F425B147D5B5FFFC4FF8FFFB8E869 http://zoobank.org/6D9F45FE-587D-4161-A54E-DB83C10A112F https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.156033 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FD0F425B147D5B5FFFC4FF8FFFB8E869 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.168661 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.156037 http://zoobank.org/6D9F45FE-587D-4161-A54E-DB83C10A112F https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277908 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Dryophthoridae Cactophagus Cactophagus dragoni article-journal ScholarlyArticle Taxonomic treatment Text 2002 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277907 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.156033 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.168661 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.156037 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277908 2022-04-01T12:38:08Z Cactophagus dragoni Anderson (Figs. 7 ­10, 15­ 18) Identification.— Cactophagus dragoni appears to be closely related to C. ornatus and C . sinuatus based on similarities in the placement of the antennae on the rostrum far from the eye (Fig. 15), the bilamellate apical portion of the peduncle of the postmentum which is somewhat projected anteriorly and ventrally, and the elytral maculations which (if present) distort the form of the elytal striae (Fig. 9). Most specimens of C. dragoni have elytra with orange humeri and a series of disjunct orange maculations extended in an oblique arc from the anterior one­third of the lateral elytal margin to the posterior one­third of the elytral length at interval 3 (Fig. 9). These maculations are tumescent and slightly distort the elytral striae. One immaculate conspecific specimen (near Boquete) is known (Figs. 7-8). Whereas similar, C. ornatus and C. sinuatus are not as markedly sculptured, have only a transverse subbasal pronotal impression, and the peduncle is not as sharply bilamellate as in C. dragoni . Description. Male, length, 13.8-15.3 mm; width, 5.8-6.5 mm. Female, length, 13.4- 14.4 mm; width, 6. 0-6.3 mm. Color black with elytral orange maculations at humeri, on Rostrum subequal to length pronotum; elongate, cylindrical, robust, evenly rather strongly curved, very coarsely, irregularly punctate basally, punctures somewhat finer, sparser apically; base of rostrum expanded slightly in dorsal view at point of antennal insertion only; in lateral view slightly wider at base but not obviously expanded, basal area long, about two­fifths total rostral length. Rostrum glabrous ventrally; peduncle markedly bilamellate apically, projected anteriorly and ventrally. Scrobe with posterior margin about 6 or 7 times width of base of scape from anterior margin of eyes. Antenna with scape more or less one­half length rostrum; club slightly laterally compressed, elongateoval; apical pilose part subequal to length basal glabrous part. Pronotum with lateral margins irregular, subparallel in basal one­half, convergent subapically, tubulate to apex; disc and flanks moderately deeply irregularly punctate throughout, some punctures coalescent forming irregular shallow rugae; surface irregular, with shallow impressions laterally at midlength and deep transverse impression subbasally at middle; anterolateral margin immediately behind eyes with surface somewhat crenulate. Pronotum slightly longer than wide. Elytra with length one and one­half times length pronotum; intervals finely punctate, irregularly creased; intervals 3­5 swollen and irregularly scupltured at base; striae with moderately deep, widely spaced, small punctures. Scutellum large, “V” shaped, length slightly longer than width at base, flat. Pygidium tumescent medially; shallowly regularly punctate throughout; apex broadly rounded, with transverse row of longer setae. Ventrally with front coxae very narrowly separated by no more than width of base of scape; prosternum markedly sloping between and anterior to front coxae, with low tubercle between coxae. Meso­, metasternum and ventrite 1 irregularly sparsely punctate; ventrites 2 to 5 sparsely, finely punctate; last ventrite flat, glabrous. Legs moderately long, moderately densely regularly punctate, especially on outer face of femora; front coxae of male with inwardly projected low rounded swelling, lacking in female; femora clavate, moderately long, hind femur reaching apex of pygidium; inner margins of middle and hind tibiae very slightly inwardly expanded subbasally; all tibiae with very fine, uniformly short, stout, peglike setae throughout length arranged in pectinate manner. Tarsi with article 1 of front leg pilose on both lobes; third article very widely dilated, pilose ventrally except for narrow median line in basal one­half; all tarsi with third articles symmetrical; apical margin of third articles very shallowly emarginate. Variation.—Some variation exists in the extent of the elytral orange maculations which are lacking on interval 4 and intervals 6 and 7 in some specimens, and one immaculate specimen (near Boquete) is known. Sexual dimorphism.—Sexes are difficult to separate in this species. Males have a slightly more concave metasternum and ventrite 1, and possess small tubercles on the front coxae. Material Examined.—Male HOLOTYPE labelled “Pan. Chiriqui Prov. / Cont'l Divide Trl. / 11­15.V. 1995 / Morris & Wappes" (CMNC). Female ALLOTYPE labelled " Panama. Chiriqui / Fortuna, 82 ° 15 'W / 8 ° 44 'N, May 20, 1978 / O'Briens & Marshall " (CWOB). PARATYPES (5, 3). PANAMA. CHIRIQUI PROVINCE. Boquete (5.6 km. W.), La Culebra Trail, 1450m, 19.vi. 1996, J.Ashe & R. Brooks, Arum leaf axils, # 178 (1). Continental Divide Trail, 11­15.V. 1995, Morris and Wappes (1). Fortuna, 82 ° 15 'W 8 ° 44 'N, May 20, 1978, O'Briens & Marshall (1). May 16, 1978 (2; 1). Reserva Forestal La Fortuna, Quebrada Aleman, 21.VII. 1995, C.W. and L.B. O'Brien (1). Cuenca Fortuna, Aoki Camp, 23.V. 1985, R. Flowers (1). Paratypes in CMNC, CWOB. Distribution.— Panama (Chiriqui). Natural history.—Adults have been collected in montane cloud forest in the La Fortuna area of Chiriqui province, Panama. The specimen from 5.6 km. W. Boquete was collected in the axil of a large arum plant (Araceae). Derivation of specific name.— Through support for the Nature Discovery Fund at the Canadian Museum of Nature, this species is named after Jane Dragon of Fort Smith, Northwest Territories, Canada. Comments.—This species approaches species previously placed in Cactophagoides in the extent of pronotal and elytral sculpture. Such intermediate forms have led to the consideration of Cactophagoides as a junior synonym of Cactophagus . : Published as part of Anderson, Robert S., 2002, The Dryophthoridae of Costa Rica and Panama: Checklist with keys, new synonymy and descriptions of new species of Cactophagus, Mesocordylus, Metamasius and Rhodobaenus (Coleoptera; Curculionoidea), pp. 1-94 in Zootaxa 80 on pages 27-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.156033 Text Fort Smith Northwest Territories DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Northwest Territories Canada Fort Smith ENVELOPE(-111.889,-111.889,60.004,60.004) Fortuna ENVELOPE(-58.467,-58.467,-62.150,-62.150)