Cryptochironomus ramus Mason

Cryptochironomus ramus Mason (Fig. 4 A, 5) Cryptochironomus sp. n. B Chang et al. 1993. Cryptochironomus sp. n. A Chang et al. 1994. Material examined . CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg records: Victoria Beach, 53 males, 9. & 25.vii. 1969; Pine Dock, 38 males, 10.vii.– 2.ix. 1969; 0.5 km off Geor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saether, Ole A.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6220732
https://zenodo.org/record/6220732
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6220732
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Diptera
Chironomidae
Cryptochironomus
Cryptochironomus ramus
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Diptera
Chironomidae
Cryptochironomus
Cryptochironomus ramus
Saether, Ole A.
Cryptochironomus ramus Mason
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Diptera
Chironomidae
Cryptochironomus
Cryptochironomus ramus
description Cryptochironomus ramus Mason (Fig. 4 A, 5) Cryptochironomus sp. n. B Chang et al. 1993. Cryptochironomus sp. n. A Chang et al. 1994. Material examined . CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg records: Victoria Beach, 53 males, 9. & 25.vii. 1969; Pine Dock, 38 males, 10.vii.– 2.ix. 1969; 0.5 km off George Island, 3 males, 11.vii. 1969; 3 km off Grand Rapids, 1 male, 13.vii. 1969; 10 km off (Sturgeonskin) Long Point, 67 males, 14.vii. 1969; 3 km off McCreary Island, 462 males, 15.vii. 1969; Gull Harbour, 16 males, 16.vii. 1969; 3 km off George Island, 11 males, 27.vii. 1969; Grand Rapids Government Wharf, 34 males, 28.vii. 1969; 5 km of Selkirk (Horse) Island, 6 males, 29.vii. 1969; McBeth Harbour, 7 males, 7.ix. 1969; Beaver Point, 9 males, 30.vi.– 19.viii. 1971; 20 Mile Creek, 5 males, 22.vii.– 1.ix. 1971; Old Fishing Dock, 226 males, 29.vi.– 18.viii. 1971; Calder’s Dock, 33 males, 28.vii.– 31.viii. 1971; Hecla Island, 21 males, 27.vii.– 25.viii. 1971; Beaver Creek, 5 males, 1 pupal exuviae, 15.vi.– 29.vii 1971; 16 km east Long Point, 3 males, 10.vi. & 15.vii. 1969; South Basin, 43 larvae, 4.vi.– 31.x. 1969; Narrows, 36 larvae, 4. vi.– 31.x. 1969; North Basin, 152 larvae, 1 pupa, 4.vi.– 31.x. 1969. The male imagines of C. ramus from Lake Winnipeg are characterized by a wing length of 3.01–3.50 mm, an AR of 2.93–3.40, LR 1 of 1.40–1.55, absence of frontal tubercles, and hypopygium of C. fulvus type. The pupa has extremely long cephalic tubercles (about 1.37 mm) with a very long (about 0.97 mm) main branch, is about 7.0 mm long, and has about 65 filaments in fringe of anal lobe. The presumed fourth instar larvae have head capsule length of 0.52–0.72 mm, postmentum length of 220–248 µm, ventromental plates 2.96–3.24 times as long as wide, AR of 1.4–1.7, and apical tooth of mandible 0.21–0.26 times as long as mandible. Male imago (n = 9–11, except when otherwise stated) Total length 6.08–7.35, 6.80 mm. Wing length 3.01–3.50, 3.24 mm. Total length/wing length 1.96–2.19, 2.09. Wing length/length of profemur 2.52–2.64, 2.56. Head . AR 2.93–3.40, 3.20 (46). Temporals 28 –45, 35. Clypeus with 19 –29, 23 setae. Tentorium 183–233, 204 long. Stipes 183–230, 210 long. Frontal tubercles completely absent. Palp lengths (microns): 48 –67, 57; 72 –100, 88; 183–216, 198; 186–213, 192; 266–310, 282. Thorax . Antepronotum with 9 –15, 11 setae. Dorsocentrals 17 –27, 21; acrostichals 18 –25, 21; prealars 6 – 9, 7; parascutellar 1. Scutellum with 26 –53, 34 (57) setae. Wing . VR 1.07–1.11, 1.09. Brachiolum with 2 –5, 4 setae; R with 22 –31, 26; R 1 with 13 –21, 16; R 4 + 5 with 15 –34, 19 setae. Squama with 16 –30, 22 (48) setae. Legs . Sensilla chaeticae 1 –5, 3 (49) on mid leg; 0–5, 2 (48) on hind leg. Lengths and proportions of legs as in Table 1. TABLE 1. Lengths (in μm) and proportions of legs of Cryptochironomus ramus Mason, Male. fe ti ta 1 ta 2 p 1 1177 –1378, 1266 992 –1126, 1063 1471 –1698, 1598 672–756, 724 p 2 1143 –1311, 1252 1076 –1244, 1173 664–756, 716 313–384, 347 p 3 1126 –1462, 1354 1446 –1673, 1560 992 –1168, 1063 462–555, 507 ta 3 ta 4 ta 5 LR p 1 578–664, 622 435–510, 480 184–221, 202 1.40–1.55, 1.51 (49) p 2 238–292, 277 153–186, 173 113–150, 134 0.60–0.62, 0.62 p 3 381–469, 435 200–272, 240 130–63, 151 0.66–0.71, 0.68 BV SV BR p 1 1.88–1.98, 1.94 1.43 –1.51,1.46 2.88–4.93, 3.21 p 2 3.24–3.63, 3.36 3.28 –3.47,3.37 3.31 –5.00, 3.65 p 3 2.91–3.20, 2.99 2.51 –2.84,2.74 3.57–5.21, 4.25 Hypopygium (Fig. 4 A). T IX with 28 –41, 34 setae; laterosternites IX each with 4 –7, 5 setae. Phallapodeme 193–236, 208 µm long. Transverse sternapodeme 92–120, 110 µm long. Gonocoxite 223 –260, 24 µm; gonostylus 210–250, 233 µm. HR 0.96–1.11, 1.04; HV 2.75–3.08, 2.91. Pupa (n = 1) Total length 7.00 mm. Cephalothorax . Cephalic tubercles (Fig. 5 B) fused at base, 1368 µm long, 400 µm wide at base; main branch 969 µm long, 215 µm wide for the first 172 µm, 98 µm wide below first lateral branch, 20 µm wide below apical branch; lateral branch 150 µm long, 46 µm wide at base; apical branch 22 µm long, 14 µm wide; frontal seta 84 µm long. Abdomen (Fig. 5 A). Tergites and sternites not reticulated. Shagreen and chaetotaxy as illustrated. Caudal margin of T II with 44 hooklets to each side of 156 µm wide mesa] interruption. Pedes spurii A present on S IV–VII, longest spinules 22 µm on IV, 10–11 µm on V–VII. Caudal margins of T II–VIII respectively with the following numbers of spines (lengths in parentheses): indication (7 µm), 53 (12 µm), 54 (14 µm), 57 (14 µm), 42 (22 µm), 31 (24 µm), 24 (12 µm). Caudal margins of S II–VIII respectively with the following numbers of spines (lengths in parentheses): 22 (8 µm), 26 (8 µm), 23 (10 µm), 29 (14 µm), 27 (21 µm), 26 (30 µm), 33 (23 µm). Caudomedian projection of anal lobe 206 µm long, 130 µm wide, with 68 µm long, 14 µm wide branches. Genital sac of male with 20 µm long, 20 µm wide apical point. Fringe of anal lobe with 65 filaments. Fourth instar larva (n = 8–10, except when otherwise stated, tentatively associated) Total length 6.48–10.63, 8.39 mm. Head capsule length 0.52–0.66, 0.60 mm (217). Head . Antenna as in Fig. 5 C. Lengths of antennal segments (in µm): 78 –90, 82; 24 –28, 26; 20 –22, 21; 3 – 4, 4; 3 –4, 4. AR 1.42–1.67, 1.54. Basal antennal segment 31 –36, 33 µm wide; 3.00–3.52,3.25 times as long as second segment; ring organ 48 –64, 56 µm from base. Preapical blade of second segment 30 –37, 32 µm (5) long; apical style 10 –11, 11 µm (5) long. Labrum (Fig. 5 D) with 30 –38, 34 µm (7) long labral sensilla; SI 30 – 40, 34 µm (6); SII 50 –60, 56 µm (6) long. Premandible (Fig. 5 E) 136–146, 141 µm long. Mandible (Fig. 5 F) 180–218, 197 µm long; with 42 –52, 46 µm long apical tooth which is 0.21–0.26, 0.241, times as long as mandible. Basal segment of maxillary palp 60 –78, 70 µm long; 20 –27, 25 µm wide. Median tooth of mentum (Fig. 5 G), including darker lateral accessory teeth 58 –63, 61 µm wide. Ventromental plate 160 –194, 1$ 9 µm wide; 54 –64, 58 µm long; 2.96–3.24, 3.10 times as wide as long. Postmentum 220–248, 234 µm long. Gula and postoccipital margin pale. Abdomen . Procercus 36 –50, 42 µm high; 36 –60, 46 µm wide; with 564–785, 692 µm long anal setae. Supraanal seta 405–527, 446 µm (6); Supraanal seta/anal setae 0.52–0.72, 0.62 (6). Anal tubules triangular 130–180, 160 µm long; 68 –106, 79 µm wide at base. Posterior parapods 393–466, 424 µm long. Third instar larva Head capsule length 0.32–0.40, 0.36 mm (162) (See Fig. 9). Second instar larva Head capsule length 0.19–0.24 mm (3) (See Fig. 9). Remarks . The specimens from Lake Winnipeg are considerably smaller than those described by Mason (wing length 3.01–3.50 as opposed to 4.05–4.75 mm, pupa 7.0 mm as opposed to 8.0– 9.2 mm). The variety described below is even smaller. However, the very characteristic cephalic tubercles assure the conspecificity. Perhaps the difference is caused by more generations in Lake Winnipeg and just one in Lake Tobin. The antennal ratios also differ with AR 2.93–3.40 in Lake Winnipeg versus 2.64–2.91 in Lake Tobin. Another explanation is that the presence of several species of the genus Cryptochironomus with similar ecology cause the different larvae to segregate in size in order to share the resources. Thus the larval size of C. ramus is depressed by the larger C. stylifera (Fig. 00). A similar size segregation takes place also among the larvae of Procladius Skuse where seven species are found in Lake Winnipeg, five of them common. Distribution and ecology . Mason (1983: 412) collected larvae of C. ramus from pebble, sand and clay substrates in water 0.5 –2.0 m deep in Lake Tobin, Saskatchewan. : Published as part of Saether, Ole A., 2009, Cryptochironomus Kieffer from Lake Winnipeg, Canada, with a review of Nearctic species (Diptera: Chironomidae), pp. 1-24 in Zootaxa 2208 on pages 10-14, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.189776 : {"references": ["Chang, P. S. S., Cobb, D. G., Flannagan, J. F. & Saether, O. A. (1993) The aquatic insects from the 1969 Lake Winnipeg baseline survey. Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 897, 77 pp.", "Chang, P. S. S., Cobb, D. G., Flannagan, J. F. & Saether, O. A. (1994) Light trap collections of mayflies, caddis flies and chironomids from Lake Winnipeg during 1969 and 1971. Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2223, 27 pp."]}
format Text
author Saether, Ole A.
author_facet Saether, Ole A.
author_sort Saether, Ole A.
title Cryptochironomus ramus Mason
title_short Cryptochironomus ramus Mason
title_full Cryptochironomus ramus Mason
title_fullStr Cryptochironomus ramus Mason
title_full_unstemmed Cryptochironomus ramus Mason
title_sort cryptochironomus ramus mason
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2009
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6220732
https://zenodo.org/record/6220732
long_lat ENVELOPE(-55.331,-55.331,49.533,49.533)
ENVELOPE(9.895,9.895,63.645,63.645)
geographic Canada
Long Point
Seta
geographic_facet Canada
Long Point
Seta
genre Beaver Creek
genre_facet Beaver Creek
op_relation http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF93EC16FFF7E06D1347FF87FFA8FFC6
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189776
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF93EC16FFF7E06D1347FF87FFA8FFC6
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189780
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189781
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189785
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6220731
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6220732
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189776
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189780
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189781
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189785
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6220731
_version_ 1766374071639998464
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6220732 2023-05-15T15:41:11+02:00 Cryptochironomus ramus Mason Saether, Ole A. 2009 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6220732 https://zenodo.org/record/6220732 unknown Zenodo http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF93EC16FFF7E06D1347FF87FFA8FFC6 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189776 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF93EC16FFF7E06D1347FF87FFA8FFC6 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189780 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189781 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189785 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6220731 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Chironomidae Cryptochironomus Cryptochironomus ramus article-journal ScholarlyArticle Taxonomic treatment Text 2009 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6220732 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189776 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189780 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189781 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.189785 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6220731 2022-04-01T11:56:25Z Cryptochironomus ramus Mason (Fig. 4 A, 5) Cryptochironomus sp. n. B Chang et al. 1993. Cryptochironomus sp. n. A Chang et al. 1994. Material examined . CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg records: Victoria Beach, 53 males, 9. & 25.vii. 1969; Pine Dock, 38 males, 10.vii.– 2.ix. 1969; 0.5 km off George Island, 3 males, 11.vii. 1969; 3 km off Grand Rapids, 1 male, 13.vii. 1969; 10 km off (Sturgeonskin) Long Point, 67 males, 14.vii. 1969; 3 km off McCreary Island, 462 males, 15.vii. 1969; Gull Harbour, 16 males, 16.vii. 1969; 3 km off George Island, 11 males, 27.vii. 1969; Grand Rapids Government Wharf, 34 males, 28.vii. 1969; 5 km of Selkirk (Horse) Island, 6 males, 29.vii. 1969; McBeth Harbour, 7 males, 7.ix. 1969; Beaver Point, 9 males, 30.vi.– 19.viii. 1971; 20 Mile Creek, 5 males, 22.vii.– 1.ix. 1971; Old Fishing Dock, 226 males, 29.vi.– 18.viii. 1971; Calder’s Dock, 33 males, 28.vii.– 31.viii. 1971; Hecla Island, 21 males, 27.vii.– 25.viii. 1971; Beaver Creek, 5 males, 1 pupal exuviae, 15.vi.– 29.vii 1971; 16 km east Long Point, 3 males, 10.vi. & 15.vii. 1969; South Basin, 43 larvae, 4.vi.– 31.x. 1969; Narrows, 36 larvae, 4. vi.– 31.x. 1969; North Basin, 152 larvae, 1 pupa, 4.vi.– 31.x. 1969. The male imagines of C. ramus from Lake Winnipeg are characterized by a wing length of 3.01–3.50 mm, an AR of 2.93–3.40, LR 1 of 1.40–1.55, absence of frontal tubercles, and hypopygium of C. fulvus type. The pupa has extremely long cephalic tubercles (about 1.37 mm) with a very long (about 0.97 mm) main branch, is about 7.0 mm long, and has about 65 filaments in fringe of anal lobe. The presumed fourth instar larvae have head capsule length of 0.52–0.72 mm, postmentum length of 220–248 µm, ventromental plates 2.96–3.24 times as long as wide, AR of 1.4–1.7, and apical tooth of mandible 0.21–0.26 times as long as mandible. Male imago (n = 9–11, except when otherwise stated) Total length 6.08–7.35, 6.80 mm. Wing length 3.01–3.50, 3.24 mm. Total length/wing length 1.96–2.19, 2.09. Wing length/length of profemur 2.52–2.64, 2.56. Head . AR 2.93–3.40, 3.20 (46). Temporals 28 –45, 35. Clypeus with 19 –29, 23 setae. Tentorium 183–233, 204 long. Stipes 183–230, 210 long. Frontal tubercles completely absent. Palp lengths (microns): 48 –67, 57; 72 –100, 88; 183–216, 198; 186–213, 192; 266–310, 282. Thorax . Antepronotum with 9 –15, 11 setae. Dorsocentrals 17 –27, 21; acrostichals 18 –25, 21; prealars 6 – 9, 7; parascutellar 1. Scutellum with 26 –53, 34 (57) setae. Wing . VR 1.07–1.11, 1.09. Brachiolum with 2 –5, 4 setae; R with 22 –31, 26; R 1 with 13 –21, 16; R 4 + 5 with 15 –34, 19 setae. Squama with 16 –30, 22 (48) setae. Legs . Sensilla chaeticae 1 –5, 3 (49) on mid leg; 0–5, 2 (48) on hind leg. Lengths and proportions of legs as in Table 1. TABLE 1. Lengths (in μm) and proportions of legs of Cryptochironomus ramus Mason, Male. fe ti ta 1 ta 2 p 1 1177 –1378, 1266 992 –1126, 1063 1471 –1698, 1598 672–756, 724 p 2 1143 –1311, 1252 1076 –1244, 1173 664–756, 716 313–384, 347 p 3 1126 –1462, 1354 1446 –1673, 1560 992 –1168, 1063 462–555, 507 ta 3 ta 4 ta 5 LR p 1 578–664, 622 435–510, 480 184–221, 202 1.40–1.55, 1.51 (49) p 2 238–292, 277 153–186, 173 113–150, 134 0.60–0.62, 0.62 p 3 381–469, 435 200–272, 240 130–63, 151 0.66–0.71, 0.68 BV SV BR p 1 1.88–1.98, 1.94 1.43 –1.51,1.46 2.88–4.93, 3.21 p 2 3.24–3.63, 3.36 3.28 –3.47,3.37 3.31 –5.00, 3.65 p 3 2.91–3.20, 2.99 2.51 –2.84,2.74 3.57–5.21, 4.25 Hypopygium (Fig. 4 A). T IX with 28 –41, 34 setae; laterosternites IX each with 4 –7, 5 setae. Phallapodeme 193–236, 208 µm long. Transverse sternapodeme 92–120, 110 µm long. Gonocoxite 223 –260, 24 µm; gonostylus 210–250, 233 µm. HR 0.96–1.11, 1.04; HV 2.75–3.08, 2.91. Pupa (n = 1) Total length 7.00 mm. Cephalothorax . Cephalic tubercles (Fig. 5 B) fused at base, 1368 µm long, 400 µm wide at base; main branch 969 µm long, 215 µm wide for the first 172 µm, 98 µm wide below first lateral branch, 20 µm wide below apical branch; lateral branch 150 µm long, 46 µm wide at base; apical branch 22 µm long, 14 µm wide; frontal seta 84 µm long. Abdomen (Fig. 5 A). Tergites and sternites not reticulated. Shagreen and chaetotaxy as illustrated. Caudal margin of T II with 44 hooklets to each side of 156 µm wide mesa] interruption. Pedes spurii A present on S IV–VII, longest spinules 22 µm on IV, 10–11 µm on V–VII. Caudal margins of T II–VIII respectively with the following numbers of spines (lengths in parentheses): indication (7 µm), 53 (12 µm), 54 (14 µm), 57 (14 µm), 42 (22 µm), 31 (24 µm), 24 (12 µm). Caudal margins of S II–VIII respectively with the following numbers of spines (lengths in parentheses): 22 (8 µm), 26 (8 µm), 23 (10 µm), 29 (14 µm), 27 (21 µm), 26 (30 µm), 33 (23 µm). Caudomedian projection of anal lobe 206 µm long, 130 µm wide, with 68 µm long, 14 µm wide branches. Genital sac of male with 20 µm long, 20 µm wide apical point. Fringe of anal lobe with 65 filaments. Fourth instar larva (n = 8–10, except when otherwise stated, tentatively associated) Total length 6.48–10.63, 8.39 mm. Head capsule length 0.52–0.66, 0.60 mm (217). Head . Antenna as in Fig. 5 C. Lengths of antennal segments (in µm): 78 –90, 82; 24 –28, 26; 20 –22, 21; 3 – 4, 4; 3 –4, 4. AR 1.42–1.67, 1.54. Basal antennal segment 31 –36, 33 µm wide; 3.00–3.52,3.25 times as long as second segment; ring organ 48 –64, 56 µm from base. Preapical blade of second segment 30 –37, 32 µm (5) long; apical style 10 –11, 11 µm (5) long. Labrum (Fig. 5 D) with 30 –38, 34 µm (7) long labral sensilla; SI 30 – 40, 34 µm (6); SII 50 –60, 56 µm (6) long. Premandible (Fig. 5 E) 136–146, 141 µm long. Mandible (Fig. 5 F) 180–218, 197 µm long; with 42 –52, 46 µm long apical tooth which is 0.21–0.26, 0.241, times as long as mandible. Basal segment of maxillary palp 60 –78, 70 µm long; 20 –27, 25 µm wide. Median tooth of mentum (Fig. 5 G), including darker lateral accessory teeth 58 –63, 61 µm wide. Ventromental plate 160 –194, 1$ 9 µm wide; 54 –64, 58 µm long; 2.96–3.24, 3.10 times as wide as long. Postmentum 220–248, 234 µm long. Gula and postoccipital margin pale. Abdomen . Procercus 36 –50, 42 µm high; 36 –60, 46 µm wide; with 564–785, 692 µm long anal setae. Supraanal seta 405–527, 446 µm (6); Supraanal seta/anal setae 0.52–0.72, 0.62 (6). Anal tubules triangular 130–180, 160 µm long; 68 –106, 79 µm wide at base. Posterior parapods 393–466, 424 µm long. Third instar larva Head capsule length 0.32–0.40, 0.36 mm (162) (See Fig. 9). Second instar larva Head capsule length 0.19–0.24 mm (3) (See Fig. 9). Remarks . The specimens from Lake Winnipeg are considerably smaller than those described by Mason (wing length 3.01–3.50 as opposed to 4.05–4.75 mm, pupa 7.0 mm as opposed to 8.0– 9.2 mm). The variety described below is even smaller. However, the very characteristic cephalic tubercles assure the conspecificity. Perhaps the difference is caused by more generations in Lake Winnipeg and just one in Lake Tobin. The antennal ratios also differ with AR 2.93–3.40 in Lake Winnipeg versus 2.64–2.91 in Lake Tobin. Another explanation is that the presence of several species of the genus Cryptochironomus with similar ecology cause the different larvae to segregate in size in order to share the resources. Thus the larval size of C. ramus is depressed by the larger C. stylifera (Fig. 00). A similar size segregation takes place also among the larvae of Procladius Skuse where seven species are found in Lake Winnipeg, five of them common. Distribution and ecology . Mason (1983: 412) collected larvae of C. ramus from pebble, sand and clay substrates in water 0.5 –2.0 m deep in Lake Tobin, Saskatchewan. : Published as part of Saether, Ole A., 2009, Cryptochironomus Kieffer from Lake Winnipeg, Canada, with a review of Nearctic species (Diptera: Chironomidae), pp. 1-24 in Zootaxa 2208 on pages 10-14, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.189776 : {"references": ["Chang, P. S. S., Cobb, D. G., Flannagan, J. F. & Saether, O. A. (1993) The aquatic insects from the 1969 Lake Winnipeg baseline survey. Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 897, 77 pp.", "Chang, P. S. S., Cobb, D. G., Flannagan, J. F. & Saether, O. A. (1994) Light trap collections of mayflies, caddis flies and chironomids from Lake Winnipeg during 1969 and 1971. Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2223, 27 pp."]} Text Beaver Creek DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Canada Long Point ENVELOPE(-55.331,-55.331,49.533,49.533) Seta ENVELOPE(9.895,9.895,63.645,63.645)