Pisione remota Southern 1914

• Main Authors: Martins, Roberto, Martín, Guillermo San, Rodrigues, Ana Maria, Quintino, Victor
• Format: Text
• Language: unknown
• Published: Zenodo 2012
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Taxonomy; Animalia; Annelida; Polychaeta; Phyllodocida; Sigalionidae; Pisione; Pisione remota; San Martín; Ramos; Aldan; Macpherson; Troncoso; North Atlantic
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6167407; https://zenodo.org/record/6167407

Pisione remota (Southern, 1914) Material examined. MB 29 -000245, 1 specimen, site R 70; MB 29 -000246, 1 specimen, site PC 91 (Table 1). Additional material: 2 specimens, site R 17; 14 specimens, site R 28; 2 specimens, site R 39; 13 specimens, site R 40; 1 specimen, site R 46; 4 specimens, site R 48; 25 specimens, R 51; 2 specimens, site R 52; 15 specimens, site R 59; 6 specimens, site R 68; 13 specimens, site R 70; 4 specimens, site PC 77; 55 specimens, site PC 85; 12 specimens, site PC 87; 7 specimens, site PC 90; 30 specimens, site PC 91; 21 specimens, site PC 92; 42 specimens, site PC 132; 7 specimens, site PC 133; 23 specimens, site PC 137; 5 specimens, site PC 138; 2 specimens, site PC 210; 2 specimens, site PC 222; 55 specimens, site G 21 (1); 2 specimens, site ALG 9; 1 specimen, site ALG 39; 1 specimen, site ALG 48; 1 specimen, site ALG 49; 1 specimen, site ALG 59; 1 specimen, site ALG 60; 3 specimens, site ALG 62; 1 specimen, site ALG 63; 4 specimens, site ALG 68 (Table 1). Brief description. Width of 10 th chaetiger ranged between 0.19 and 0.46 mm, total length up to 25.5 mm and maximum of 97 chaetigers. Buccal aciculae well developed and protruding, with slightly constricted distal ends subdistally and subrounded distal margin. Prechaetal lobe bilobed in anterior parapodia and entire in posterior ones. Dorsal cirri of chaetiger 2 similar to others in size and shape, bulbous with terminal papillae, ranging from 0.022 to 0.060 mm (cf. Table 2). Three types of chaetae: three short-bladed compound chaetae (longest blade up to 21 µm; cf. Table 2), one supra-acicular simple chaeta distally unidentate and one infra-acicular simple chaeta. One stout notoaciculum embedded in all parapodia. Male genitalia with 2 to 8 pairs of consecutive copulatory organs appear between chaetigers 29 and 32 (MB 29 -000246) or earlier in smaller specimens (16–17; cf. Table 2). Female genital chaetigers with a simple cirriform process developed ventrally at base of parapodium. Female gametes globular, with diameter ranging from 38 µm to 86 µm, 58 µm in average, located in chaetigers 29–74 (MB 29 - 000245), earlier in smaller specimens (16–36). Pygidium with two long anal cirri. Distribution and habitat. This species occurred mainly in coarse (42 %) and very coarse (36 %) sand and fine gravel (18 %), with low total organic matter content, usually below 1 % of total sediment dry weight and high biogenic content (6.6 % in average; cf. Table 3). The species was recorded between 3 and 80 m depth, along the western and southern Portuguese coast (Fig. 1). It is widely distributed along the North Atlantic, Mediterranean and Caribbean, at shelf depths (e.g. Dauvin et al. 2003; Lourido et al. 2010). A detailed revision of specimens from these other areas should be undertaken to confirm its cosmopolitan status (San Martín, 2004). Remarks. In males, the number of pairs of successive copulatory organs varied between 2 and 8 which differed from the literature (4–18; San Martín, 2004). The distribution of female gametes was clearly related to body size, in agreement with Alikunhi (1951). The classification and ordination analysis based on selected morphological descriptors of Pisione species showed a clear separation of the four species (Fig. 2). Axis 1 accounted for 46.6 % of the total variation. On the positive pole, this axis separated the species with a proportionally longer dorsal cirri of chaetiger 2 and bidentate supra-acicular chaetae. On the negative pole, axis 1 separated the species with single unidentate supra-acicular chaeta, dorsal cirri of proportional similar length and an infra-acicular simple chaeta. This axis separated P. guanche and P. parapari on the positive pole, from P. inkoi and especially P. re m o t a on the negative pole, this latter species being the single one with an infra-acicular simple chaeta. Axis 2 accounted for 31.5 % of the total variation and showed the separation of species with higher width of the 10 th chaetiger (W 10) and with the highest ratio of the protruding length of the notoacicula and W 10 on the positive pole ( P. in k oi ), from species with a lower W 10 and aciculae embedded throughout the body ( P. parapari and P. re m o ta ). The null hypothesis of no significant differences between the four species, on the basis of the selected morphological descriptors, was rejected with a very large value of the pseudo-F statistic (p <0.0001), shown in Table 4. Such strong rejection of the null hypothesis was due to a much larger sum of squares due to the species than the residual sum of squares, indicating that the intraspecific variability was much lower than the interspecific variability. A similar conclusion can be drawn from the inspection of the mean Euclidean distance within species and between species (cf. Table 4). The highest mean Euclidean distance within species was obtained with P. guanche due to the high variability of the W 10 values among the specimens of this species. Pisione parapari presented the lowest mean Euclidean distance within species denoting a reduced intra species variability regarding the analyzed morphological descriptors. All pairwise comparisons between individual species also rejected the null hypothesis at p <0.0001. Overall, the results showed that the interspecific variability was much higher than the intraspecific variability, supporting the validity of the four Iberian species of Pisione . The following key to the Pisione species of European waters is based on the understanding gained from the multivariate analysis: Total 74 370 : Published as part of Martins, Roberto, Martín, Guillermo San, Rodrigues, Ana Maria & Quintino, Victor, 2012, On the diversity of the genus Pisione (Polychaeta, Pisionidae) along the Portuguese continental shelf, with a key to European species, pp. 12-22 in Zootaxa 3450 on pages 17-19, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.208487 : {"references": ["Southern, R. (1914) Clare Island Survey. Archiannelida and Polychaeta. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 31 (47), 1 - 160.", "Dauvin, J. - C., Dewarumez, J. - M. & Gentil, F. (2003) Liste actualisee des especes d'Annelides Polychetes presentes en Manche [An up to date list of polychaetous annelids from the English Channel]. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 44 (1), 67 - 95.", "Lourido, A., Moreira, J. & Troncoso, J. (2010) Spatial distribution of benthic macrofauna in subtidal sediments of the Ria de Aldan (Galicia, northwest Spain). Scientia Marina, 74 (4), 705 - 715.", "San Martin, G. (2004) Familia Pisionidae Southern 1914. In Ramos, M. A., Alba-Tercedor, J., Belles, X., Gosalbez, J., Geurra, A., MacPherson, E., Serrano, J. & Templado, J. (Eds), Fauna Iberica. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, 25, pp. 446 - 456.", "Alikunhi, K. H. (1951) On the reproductive organs of Pisione remota (Southern), together with a review of the Family Pisionidae (Polychaeta). Proceedings: Plant Sciences, 33 (1), 14 - 31."]}