Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes Ridley & Dendy 1886

Haliclona (Gellius) cf. flabelliformes (Ridley & Dendy, 1886) (Fig. 19, Tab. 15) Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes (Ridley & Dendy, 1886): following reassignment of Gellius Gray, 1867 as subgenus to Haliclona Grant, 1836 in de Weerdt 2000: 9. Synonymy: Gellius flabelliformis Ridley & De...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Göcke, Christian, Janussen, Dorte
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6145353
https://zenodo.org/record/6145353
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6145353
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Porifera
Demospongiae
Haplosclerida
Chalinidae
Haliclona
Haliclona flabelliformes
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Porifera
Demospongiae
Haplosclerida
Chalinidae
Haliclona
Haliclona flabelliformes
Göcke, Christian
Janussen, Dorte
Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes Ridley & Dendy 1886
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Porifera
Demospongiae
Haplosclerida
Chalinidae
Haliclona
Haliclona flabelliformes
description Haliclona (Gellius) cf. flabelliformes (Ridley & Dendy, 1886) (Fig. 19, Tab. 15) Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes (Ridley & Dendy, 1886): following reassignment of Gellius Gray, 1867 as subgenus to Haliclona Grant, 1836 in de Weerdt 2000: 9. Synonymy: Gellius flabelliformis Ridley & Dendy, 1886: 334, 1887: 45–46, pl. 26, figs. 5, 5a. Hentschel 1914: 131, pl. 8, fig. 12. Boury- Esnault & van Beveren 1982: 113–115, fig 34 f–h. Material. 1 specimen from station 048- 1 (SMF 11858), 602.1 m, 70 ° 23.94 ' S, 8 ° 19.14 ' W, 12.01. 2008. Material examined for comparison: BMNH 1887.5. 2.153, holotype, Challenger colln., stn. 320, wet specimen. Description. Specimen from stn. 048- 1 a fragment (Fig. 19 A), 40 x 30 x 10 mm in size. On one side, probably the upper side, two small specimens of T. leptoderma growing, 5 and 8 mm in diameter. Shape of living sponge unknown. Colour in ethanol greyish-beige. Skeleton: Skeleton (Fig. 19 B) of preserved specimen in poor state; a very poor organization visible with oxeas somewhat longitudinally arranged, partly forming weak tracts with single interconnecting spicules. Microscleres distributed throughout the tissue in a disorganised manner. Spiculation (Tab. 15): Main spicules very large almost straight oxeas with relatively blunt ends (Fig. 19 C), about 1097 x 25 µm. Most common microscleres toxas (Fig. 19 E–F), 135 x 4 µm. These very characteristic in shape, sharp, almost rectangularly bent in the middle, with short thin end pieces often slightly bent upwards. In center, sometimes small tyles present. Also present are small c-shaped sigmas (Fig. 19 D), about 24 µm in length and 14 µm in width. Remarks. An exact identification of the sponge is almost impossible, due to the bad state of preservation. The known species which bears the closest resemblance to our specimen is H. (G.) flabelliformes . The species was reported by Ridley and Dendy (1887) to show flabellate, thin, upright growth form, which is in contrast to our flat specimen. Ridley and Dendy (1887) also reported an irregular skeleton forming some sort of weak reticulation. This is well in accordance with the definition of the subgenus Haliclona (Gellius) as it is given in de Weerdt (2002). The spicule sizes reported by Ridley and Dendy (1887; compare Tab. 15) are quite similar to those obtained here. Still, differences are present especially in length of oxeas and sigmas. Oxeas are much larger in our SYSTCOsponge, while sigmas are considerably smaller. The characteristic toxas, which are only described, but not figured by Ridley and Dendy (1887), seem to be quite similar, although a bit smaller in our specimen. Those toxas are quite rare among Haliclona (Gellius) spp., especially in combination with such large oxeas. Therefore it seems not completely certain that our specimen really belongs to the species H. (G.) flabelliformes , but this is the species with the most shared similarities. The question of a more exact identification, or even a possible description as a new species, cannot be answered due to the bad state of preservation of the specimen. : Published as part of Göcke, Christian & Janussen, Dorte, 2013, Demospongiae of ANT XXIV / 2 (SYSTCO I) Expedition — Antarctic Eastern Weddell Sea, pp. 28-101 in Zootaxa 3692 (1) on page 81, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3692.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/249019
format Text
author Göcke, Christian
Janussen, Dorte
author_facet Göcke, Christian
Janussen, Dorte
author_sort Göcke, Christian
title Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes Ridley & Dendy 1886
title_short Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes Ridley & Dendy 1886
title_full Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes Ridley & Dendy 1886
title_fullStr Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes Ridley & Dendy 1886
title_full_unstemmed Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes Ridley & Dendy 1886
title_sort haliclona (gellius) flabelliformes ridley & dendy 1886
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2013
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6145353
https://zenodo.org/record/6145353
long_lat ENVELOPE(-58.017,-58.017,-61.850,-61.850)
geographic Antarctic
Weddell Sea
Weddell
Ridley
geographic_facet Antarctic
Weddell Sea
Weddell
Ridley
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Weddell Sea
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Weddell Sea
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/249019
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFD6FFA8CD3388028029FF93FFE4FFE9
http://table.plazi.org/id/DF39664ECD04883580BEFEB1FEAAFE90
http://zoobank.org/136660B8-7DCC-490E-AB79-46546CC18E40
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3692.1.5
http://zenodo.org/record/249019
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFD6FFA8CD3388028029FF93FFE4FFE9
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.249038
http://table.plazi.org/id/DF39664ECD04883580BEFEB1FEAAFE90
http://zoobank.org/136660B8-7DCC-490E-AB79-46546CC18E40
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6145352
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6145353
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3692.1.5
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.249038
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6145352
_version_ 1766099118839562240
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6145353 2023-05-15T13:37:53+02:00 Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes Ridley & Dendy 1886 Göcke, Christian Janussen, Dorte 2013 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6145353 https://zenodo.org/record/6145353 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/249019 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFD6FFA8CD3388028029FF93FFE4FFE9 http://table.plazi.org/id/DF39664ECD04883580BEFEB1FEAAFE90 http://zoobank.org/136660B8-7DCC-490E-AB79-46546CC18E40 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3692.1.5 http://zenodo.org/record/249019 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFD6FFA8CD3388028029FF93FFE4FFE9 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.249038 http://table.plazi.org/id/DF39664ECD04883580BEFEB1FEAAFE90 http://zoobank.org/136660B8-7DCC-490E-AB79-46546CC18E40 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6145352 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Porifera Demospongiae Haplosclerida Chalinidae Haliclona Haliclona flabelliformes article-journal ScholarlyArticle Taxonomic treatment Text 2013 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6145353 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3692.1.5 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.249038 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6145352 2022-04-01T11:00:22Z Haliclona (Gellius) cf. flabelliformes (Ridley & Dendy, 1886) (Fig. 19, Tab. 15) Haliclona (Gellius) flabelliformes (Ridley & Dendy, 1886): following reassignment of Gellius Gray, 1867 as subgenus to Haliclona Grant, 1836 in de Weerdt 2000: 9. Synonymy: Gellius flabelliformis Ridley & Dendy, 1886: 334, 1887: 45–46, pl. 26, figs. 5, 5a. Hentschel 1914: 131, pl. 8, fig. 12. Boury- Esnault & van Beveren 1982: 113–115, fig 34 f–h. Material. 1 specimen from station 048- 1 (SMF 11858), 602.1 m, 70 ° 23.94 ' S, 8 ° 19.14 ' W, 12.01. 2008. Material examined for comparison: BMNH 1887.5. 2.153, holotype, Challenger colln., stn. 320, wet specimen. Description. Specimen from stn. 048- 1 a fragment (Fig. 19 A), 40 x 30 x 10 mm in size. On one side, probably the upper side, two small specimens of T. leptoderma growing, 5 and 8 mm in diameter. Shape of living sponge unknown. Colour in ethanol greyish-beige. Skeleton: Skeleton (Fig. 19 B) of preserved specimen in poor state; a very poor organization visible with oxeas somewhat longitudinally arranged, partly forming weak tracts with single interconnecting spicules. Microscleres distributed throughout the tissue in a disorganised manner. Spiculation (Tab. 15): Main spicules very large almost straight oxeas with relatively blunt ends (Fig. 19 C), about 1097 x 25 µm. Most common microscleres toxas (Fig. 19 E–F), 135 x 4 µm. These very characteristic in shape, sharp, almost rectangularly bent in the middle, with short thin end pieces often slightly bent upwards. In center, sometimes small tyles present. Also present are small c-shaped sigmas (Fig. 19 D), about 24 µm in length and 14 µm in width. Remarks. An exact identification of the sponge is almost impossible, due to the bad state of preservation. The known species which bears the closest resemblance to our specimen is H. (G.) flabelliformes . The species was reported by Ridley and Dendy (1887) to show flabellate, thin, upright growth form, which is in contrast to our flat specimen. Ridley and Dendy (1887) also reported an irregular skeleton forming some sort of weak reticulation. This is well in accordance with the definition of the subgenus Haliclona (Gellius) as it is given in de Weerdt (2002). The spicule sizes reported by Ridley and Dendy (1887; compare Tab. 15) are quite similar to those obtained here. Still, differences are present especially in length of oxeas and sigmas. Oxeas are much larger in our SYSTCOsponge, while sigmas are considerably smaller. The characteristic toxas, which are only described, but not figured by Ridley and Dendy (1887), seem to be quite similar, although a bit smaller in our specimen. Those toxas are quite rare among Haliclona (Gellius) spp., especially in combination with such large oxeas. Therefore it seems not completely certain that our specimen really belongs to the species H. (G.) flabelliformes , but this is the species with the most shared similarities. The question of a more exact identification, or even a possible description as a new species, cannot be answered due to the bad state of preservation of the specimen. : Published as part of Göcke, Christian & Janussen, Dorte, 2013, Demospongiae of ANT XXIV / 2 (SYSTCO I) Expedition — Antarctic Eastern Weddell Sea, pp. 28-101 in Zootaxa 3692 (1) on page 81, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3692.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/249019 Text Antarc* Antarctic Weddell Sea DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Weddell Sea Weddell Ridley ENVELOPE(-58.017,-58.017,-61.850,-61.850)