Tegeocranellus martinezi Ermilov & Anichkin, 2014, sp. nov.

Tegeocranellus martinezi sp. nov. (Figures 25–28) With characters of the genus Tegeocranellus Berlese, 1913 as summarized by Behan-Pelletier (1997). Diagnosis. Body size 298–332 × 199–249. Lamellar setae longer than rostral setae, all setiform, smooth. Interlamellar setae short, thickened, barbed. B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ermilov, Sergey G., Anichkin, Alexander E.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6129868
https://zenodo.org/record/6129868
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6129868
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Sarcoptiformes
Tegeocranellidae
Tegeocranellus
Tegeocranellus martinezi
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Sarcoptiformes
Tegeocranellidae
Tegeocranellus
Tegeocranellus martinezi
Ermilov, Sergey G.
Anichkin, Alexander E.
Tegeocranellus martinezi Ermilov & Anichkin, 2014, sp. nov.
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Sarcoptiformes
Tegeocranellidae
Tegeocranellus
Tegeocranellus martinezi
description Tegeocranellus martinezi sp. nov. (Figures 25–28) With characters of the genus Tegeocranellus Berlese, 1913 as summarized by Behan-Pelletier (1997). Diagnosis. Body size 298–332 × 199–249. Lamellar setae longer than rostral setae, all setiform, smooth. Interlamellar setae short, thickened, barbed. Bothridial setae setiform, thickened, ciliate unilaterally. Ten pairs of notogastral setae present (centrodorsal setae absent): c , h 1, p 1 – p 3 short, others of medium size (16–20); all barbed. Epimeral setae 1 c , 3 c and their alveoli absent; setae 1 a , 2 a represented by alveoli; other setae setiform, smooth. Genito-aggenital and ano-adanal setae simple, smooth. Description. Measurements . Body length 298 (holotype: female), 298–332 (seven paratypes: five females and two males); body width 199 (holotype), 199–249 (seven paratypes). Integument . Body color light brown. Body surface smooth. Dorso-lateral sides of notogaster with long striate longitudinal band. Prodorsum . Rostrum rounded. Lamellae well separated, protruding in medio-distal part. Translamella thin, distinct. Rostral (12–14) and lamellar (6–8) setae setiform, thin, smooth. Interlamellar setae (6–8) thickened, barbed. Bothridial setae (69–77) setiform, thickened, ciliate unilaterally; distal cilia form weakly visible head in some specimens. Exobothridial setae and their alveoli absent. Tutoria ( tu ) long, widely knife-like. Notogaster . Anterior notogastral margin well developed, convex medially. Lenticulus ( len ) large, inverse trapezoid, distinctly visible. Humeral regions with one small, weakly developed concavity. Ten pairs of notogastral setae present: c , h 1, p 1 – p 3 short (4–6), thickened, barbed; others of medium size (16–20), setiform, barbed. Gnathosoma . Subcapitulum longer than wide (77–82 × 61). Subcapitular setae setiform, smooth; a and m (both 12–16) longer than h (8–10). Two pairs of adoral setae (8–10) setiform, smooth. Palps (61) with setation 0–2 – 1–3 – 8 (+ω). Solenidion little longer than half of palptarsus length, straight, thickened, not attached to eupathidium, inserted in distal part of palptarsus. Chelicerae (77–82) with two barbed setae; cha (24–28) longer than chb (16–18). Trägårdh’s organ distinct. Epimeral and lateral podosomal regions . Apodemes (1, 2, sejugal, 3, 4) well visible. Epimeral setal formula: 2 – 1–2 – 3. Setae 1 c , 3 c and their alveoli absent; setae 1 a , 2 a represented by alveoli; other setae (20–24) setiform, thin, smooth. Setae 4 a , 4 b inserted antero-medially to triangular tubercle. Discidia triangular. Anogenital region . Six pairs of genital ( g 1 – g 4, 8–10; g 5, g 6, 6–8), one pair of aggenital (6–8), two pairs of anal (6–8) and three pairs of adanal (6–8) setae setiform, smooth. Lyrifissures iad long. Legs . Monodactylous; claws smooth. Formulae of leg setation and solenidia: I (1–5 – 2–4 – 18) [1–2 – 2], II (1–5 – 2–4 – 15) [1 – 1–2], III (2–3 – 1–3 – 15) [1 – 1 –0], IV (1–2 – 2–3 – 12) [0–1 –0]; homologies of setae and solenidia indicated in Table 8. See Table 2 for explanations. Type material. Collection data for holotype (female): locality 1 (litter); collection data for seven paratypes (five females and two males): locality 1 (litter). Type deposition. The holotype is deposited in the collection of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia; five paratypes are deposited in the collection of the Siberian Zoological Museum, Novosibirsk, Russia; two paratypes are deposited in the collection of the Tyumen State University Museum of Zoology, Tyumen, Russia. Etymology. The specific name is dedicated to our colleague, acarologist, Dr. Pablo Martinez (Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Argentina). Remarks. The genus Tegeocranellus comprises 17 species, having a cosmopolitan distribution except Antarctic region (data summarized by Subías 2004, updated 2014). In the absence of centrodorsal notogastral setae and the morphology of notogastral setae ( c , h 1, p 1 – p 3 short; others of medium size), Tegeocranellus martinezi sp. nov. is most similar to Tegeocranellus kethleyi Behan- Pelletier, 1997 from U.S.A. However, it clearly differs from the latter by the presence of notogastral striate bands (versus absent in T. kethleyi ), pedotecta I without teeth (versus with tooth or teeth in T. kethleyi ) and lamellar setae clearly shorter than rostral setae (versus similar in length in T. kethleyi ). : Published as part of Ermilov, Sergey G. & Anichkin, Alexander E., 2014, Taxonomic study of oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatida) of Bi Dup — Nui Ba National Park (southern Vietnam), pp. 1-86 in Zootaxa 3834 (1) on pages 40-45, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3834.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/286642 : {"references": ["Berlese, A. (1913) Acari nuovi. Manipulus 7 - 8. Redia, 9, 77 - 111.", "Behan-Pelletier, V. M. (1997) The semiaquatic genus Tegeocranellus (Acari: Oribatida: Ameronothroidea) of North and Central America. The Canadian Entomologist, 129, 537 - 577. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.4039 / ent 129537 - 3", "Subias, L. S. (2004) Listado sistematico, sinonimico y biogeografico de los acaros oribatidos (Acariformes: Oribatida) del mundo (excepto fosiles). Graellsia, 60 (numero extraordinario), 3 - 305. Online version accessed in February 2014, 577 pp. Available from: http: // www. ucm. es / info / zoo / Artropodos / Catalogo. pdf (Accessed 7 Jul. 2014)"]}
format Text
author Ermilov, Sergey G.
Anichkin, Alexander E.
author_facet Ermilov, Sergey G.
Anichkin, Alexander E.
author_sort Ermilov, Sergey G.
title Tegeocranellus martinezi Ermilov & Anichkin, 2014, sp. nov.
title_short Tegeocranellus martinezi Ermilov & Anichkin, 2014, sp. nov.
title_full Tegeocranellus martinezi Ermilov & Anichkin, 2014, sp. nov.
title_fullStr Tegeocranellus martinezi Ermilov & Anichkin, 2014, sp. nov.
title_full_unstemmed Tegeocranellus martinezi Ermilov & Anichkin, 2014, sp. nov.
title_sort tegeocranellus martinezi ermilov & anichkin, 2014, sp. nov.
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2014
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6129868
https://zenodo.org/record/6129868
long_lat ENVELOPE(-63.717,-63.717,-64.283,-64.283)
geographic Antarctic
Argentina
Pablo
geographic_facet Antarctic
Argentina
Pablo
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/286642
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF81540BFFBD012D3215FFFDFF9BF234
http://table.plazi.org/id/DF6ECDEDFF9A010A3282FA9AFC2FF74A
http://table.plazi.org/id/DF6ECDEDFFB301233282FED9FBFEF30F
http://zoobank.org/82E287A1-C51B-4196-8C53-FB3BA2CE6899
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3834.1.1
http://zenodo.org/record/286642
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF81540BFFBD012D3215FFFDFF9BF234
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286667
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286668
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286669
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286670
http://table.plazi.org/id/DF6ECDEDFF9A010A3282FA9AFC2FF74A
http://table.plazi.org/id/DF6ECDEDFFB301233282FED9FBFEF30F
http://zoobank.org/82E287A1-C51B-4196-8C53-FB3BA2CE6899
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6129869
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6129868
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3834.1.1
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286667
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286668
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286669
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286670
https://do
_version_ 1766246219989909504
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6129868 2023-05-15T13:47:01+02:00 Tegeocranellus martinezi Ermilov & Anichkin, 2014, sp. nov. Ermilov, Sergey G. Anichkin, Alexander E. 2014 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6129868 https://zenodo.org/record/6129868 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/286642 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF81540BFFBD012D3215FFFDFF9BF234 http://table.plazi.org/id/DF6ECDEDFF9A010A3282FA9AFC2FF74A http://table.plazi.org/id/DF6ECDEDFFB301233282FED9FBFEF30F http://zoobank.org/82E287A1-C51B-4196-8C53-FB3BA2CE6899 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3834.1.1 http://zenodo.org/record/286642 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF81540BFFBD012D3215FFFDFF9BF234 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286667 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286668 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286669 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286670 http://table.plazi.org/id/DF6ECDEDFF9A010A3282FA9AFC2FF74A http://table.plazi.org/id/DF6ECDEDFFB301233282FED9FBFEF30F http://zoobank.org/82E287A1-C51B-4196-8C53-FB3BA2CE6899 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6129869 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Sarcoptiformes Tegeocranellidae Tegeocranellus Tegeocranellus martinezi article-journal ScholarlyArticle Taxonomic treatment Text 2014 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6129868 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3834.1.1 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286667 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286668 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286669 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.286670 https://do 2022-04-01T10:55:21Z Tegeocranellus martinezi sp. nov. (Figures 25–28) With characters of the genus Tegeocranellus Berlese, 1913 as summarized by Behan-Pelletier (1997). Diagnosis. Body size 298–332 × 199–249. Lamellar setae longer than rostral setae, all setiform, smooth. Interlamellar setae short, thickened, barbed. Bothridial setae setiform, thickened, ciliate unilaterally. Ten pairs of notogastral setae present (centrodorsal setae absent): c , h 1, p 1 – p 3 short, others of medium size (16–20); all barbed. Epimeral setae 1 c , 3 c and their alveoli absent; setae 1 a , 2 a represented by alveoli; other setae setiform, smooth. Genito-aggenital and ano-adanal setae simple, smooth. Description. Measurements . Body length 298 (holotype: female), 298–332 (seven paratypes: five females and two males); body width 199 (holotype), 199–249 (seven paratypes). Integument . Body color light brown. Body surface smooth. Dorso-lateral sides of notogaster with long striate longitudinal band. Prodorsum . Rostrum rounded. Lamellae well separated, protruding in medio-distal part. Translamella thin, distinct. Rostral (12–14) and lamellar (6–8) setae setiform, thin, smooth. Interlamellar setae (6–8) thickened, barbed. Bothridial setae (69–77) setiform, thickened, ciliate unilaterally; distal cilia form weakly visible head in some specimens. Exobothridial setae and their alveoli absent. Tutoria ( tu ) long, widely knife-like. Notogaster . Anterior notogastral margin well developed, convex medially. Lenticulus ( len ) large, inverse trapezoid, distinctly visible. Humeral regions with one small, weakly developed concavity. Ten pairs of notogastral setae present: c , h 1, p 1 – p 3 short (4–6), thickened, barbed; others of medium size (16–20), setiform, barbed. Gnathosoma . Subcapitulum longer than wide (77–82 × 61). Subcapitular setae setiform, smooth; a and m (both 12–16) longer than h (8–10). Two pairs of adoral setae (8–10) setiform, smooth. Palps (61) with setation 0–2 – 1–3 – 8 (+ω). Solenidion little longer than half of palptarsus length, straight, thickened, not attached to eupathidium, inserted in distal part of palptarsus. Chelicerae (77–82) with two barbed setae; cha (24–28) longer than chb (16–18). Trägårdh’s organ distinct. Epimeral and lateral podosomal regions . Apodemes (1, 2, sejugal, 3, 4) well visible. Epimeral setal formula: 2 – 1–2 – 3. Setae 1 c , 3 c and their alveoli absent; setae 1 a , 2 a represented by alveoli; other setae (20–24) setiform, thin, smooth. Setae 4 a , 4 b inserted antero-medially to triangular tubercle. Discidia triangular. Anogenital region . Six pairs of genital ( g 1 – g 4, 8–10; g 5, g 6, 6–8), one pair of aggenital (6–8), two pairs of anal (6–8) and three pairs of adanal (6–8) setae setiform, smooth. Lyrifissures iad long. Legs . Monodactylous; claws smooth. Formulae of leg setation and solenidia: I (1–5 – 2–4 – 18) [1–2 – 2], II (1–5 – 2–4 – 15) [1 – 1–2], III (2–3 – 1–3 – 15) [1 – 1 –0], IV (1–2 – 2–3 – 12) [0–1 –0]; homologies of setae and solenidia indicated in Table 8. See Table 2 for explanations. Type material. Collection data for holotype (female): locality 1 (litter); collection data for seven paratypes (five females and two males): locality 1 (litter). Type deposition. The holotype is deposited in the collection of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia; five paratypes are deposited in the collection of the Siberian Zoological Museum, Novosibirsk, Russia; two paratypes are deposited in the collection of the Tyumen State University Museum of Zoology, Tyumen, Russia. Etymology. The specific name is dedicated to our colleague, acarologist, Dr. Pablo Martinez (Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Argentina). Remarks. The genus Tegeocranellus comprises 17 species, having a cosmopolitan distribution except Antarctic region (data summarized by Subías 2004, updated 2014). In the absence of centrodorsal notogastral setae and the morphology of notogastral setae ( c , h 1, p 1 – p 3 short; others of medium size), Tegeocranellus martinezi sp. nov. is most similar to Tegeocranellus kethleyi Behan- Pelletier, 1997 from U.S.A. However, it clearly differs from the latter by the presence of notogastral striate bands (versus absent in T. kethleyi ), pedotecta I without teeth (versus with tooth or teeth in T. kethleyi ) and lamellar setae clearly shorter than rostral setae (versus similar in length in T. kethleyi ). : Published as part of Ermilov, Sergey G. & Anichkin, Alexander E., 2014, Taxonomic study of oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatida) of Bi Dup — Nui Ba National Park (southern Vietnam), pp. 1-86 in Zootaxa 3834 (1) on pages 40-45, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3834.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/286642 : {"references": ["Berlese, A. (1913) Acari nuovi. Manipulus 7 - 8. Redia, 9, 77 - 111.", "Behan-Pelletier, V. M. (1997) The semiaquatic genus Tegeocranellus (Acari: Oribatida: Ameronothroidea) of North and Central America. The Canadian Entomologist, 129, 537 - 577. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.4039 / ent 129537 - 3", "Subias, L. S. (2004) Listado sistematico, sinonimico y biogeografico de los acaros oribatidos (Acariformes: Oribatida) del mundo (excepto fosiles). Graellsia, 60 (numero extraordinario), 3 - 305. Online version accessed in February 2014, 577 pp. Available from: http: // www. ucm. es / info / zoo / Artropodos / Catalogo. pdf (Accessed 7 Jul. 2014)"]} Text Antarc* Antarctic DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Argentina Pablo ENVELOPE(-63.717,-63.717,-64.283,-64.283)