Hyperoche picta Bovallius 1889
Hyperoche picta Bovallius, 1889 (Figs. 6–7) Hyperoche picta Bovallius, 1889: 111 –115, pl. 7, figs. 32–35.— Senna 1908: 168 –173, text figs. 11–20. Stephensen 1924: 79 –80. Stephensen 1925: 229 (table). Pirlot 1929: 118. Barnard 1930: 415 (key). Thurston 1976: 386 & 387 (table), 415. Harbison et...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6114490 https://zenodo.org/record/6114490 |
| Summary: | Hyperoche picta Bovallius, 1889 (Figs. 6–7) Hyperoche picta Bovallius, 1889: 111 –115, pl. 7, figs. 32–35.— Senna 1908: 168 –173, text figs. 11–20. Stephensen 1924: 79 –80. Stephensen 1925: 229 (table). Pirlot 1929: 118. Barnard 1930: 415 (key). Thurston 1976: 386 & 387 (table), 415. Harbison et al. 1978: 251 (table). Laval 1980: 18 (table). Brusca 1981: 10 (list), 41, fig. 7 e. Vinogradov et al. 1982: 282 (key), 287–288, fig. 146. Lin et al. 1995: 122 (table). Lin et al. 1996: 229 (table). Vinogradov & Semenova 1996: 618. Barkhatov et al. 1999: 808 (table). Zelickman 2005: xvi (list). Gasca & Franco-Gordo 2008: 569 (table), 571. Gasca 2009 a: 88 (table). Lavaniegos & Hereu 2009: 151 (appendix). Valencia et al . 2013: 51 (table). Type material. Type material of Hyperoche picta could not be found in the NRS or ZMUC and is considered lost. The type locality is the tropical Atlantic [20 °N 39 °W], Balder Expedition, 1881. Diagnosis. Females: Sexually mature at about 3.5 –4.0 mm. Antennae 1 shorter than head, about 1.7 x A 2. Head length equal to first two pereonites combined. Pereon globular, length about 1.5 x pleon. Gnathopod 1; basis relatively slender, slightly shorter than remaining articles combined; merus without characteristic spoon-shaped projection under carpus; carpal process relatively short, reaching base of dactylus, anterior margin denticulate; posterior and distal margin of propodus also denticulate, forming hood over dactylus medially; dactylus slightly curved, inserted sub-terminally on medial face of propodus in small pocket, length almost 0.4 x propodus. Gnathopod 2 slightly longer and more slender than G 1 but similar in structure. Pereopods 3 & 4 similar in length, marginally longer than P 5. Pereopod 3; basis length 3.2 x merus; carpus with postero-distal corner produced in slight tooth with denticulate margins, length 1.7 x merus and slightly shorter than propodus; dactylus length almost 0.3 x propodus. Pereopod 4 similar in structure to P 3 except the carpus and propodus are slightly more slender. Pereopod 5 is slightly longer than P 6; basis length twice merus; carpus length about 1.3 x merus, slightly shorter than propodus; dactylus length almost 0.4 x propodus. Pereopod 6 similar to P 5 except for relatively shorter merus; basis length almost 3 x merus. Pereopod 7; coxa fused with pereonite; similar in structure to P 6 but slightly shorter. Epimeral plates with postero-distal corner rounded. Uropod 1; peduncle not reaching to limit of peduncle of U 2 and to less than half of peduncle of U 3; rami of similar length, slightly longer than 0.7 x peduncle. Uropod 2; inner ramus slightly longer than outer, slightly longer than 0.7 x peduncle. Uropod 3; outer ramus similar in width but marginally longer than inner, slightly more than 0.6 x peduncle. Telson triangular, slightly longer than wide, slightly longer than half of peduncle of U 3. Males : Sexually mature at about 4–5 mm. Antennae slightly longer than entire animal. Pereon slender, slightly shorter than pleon. Appendages marginally more slender than in females, otherwise very similar in structure and relative lengths of articles, except for the following minor variations. Gnathopoda with relatively shorter basis and marginally shorter carpal process. Pereopods 6 & 7 with relatively longer merus, similar to P 5. Epimeral plates relatively much longer and deeper. Uropod 1 with inner margins of both rami with characteristic proximal excavation. Uropod 3 rami length about 0.7 x peduncle. Telson marginally wider than long, length slightly less than half of peduncle of U 3. Material examined. Three females (ZMUC), eastern Pacific, west of Galapagos Islands [00° 18 ’S 99 °07’W], Dana stns. 3558 III, VIII & IX; 2000, 100 & 50 mw respectively, 18 September 1928. One male (ZMUC CRU- 20291), Mediterranean Sea, off Sicily [38 ° 26 ’N 13 ° 37 ’E], Thor stn. 730 ( Nordboln II), 16 April 1913, (recorded by Stephensen (1924)). Juvenile female (SAMA C 7934), off south-eastern Tasmania [44 ° 12.05 ’S 147 ° 24.43 ’E], M. Lewis (CSIRO), FRV Southern Surveyor Cruise 492, stn. 81, 15 November 1992. Remarks. This is one of the smallest but most distinctive species of Hyperoche , reaching sexual maturity at about 3.5–5 mm. It is readily distinguished from all its congeners by the slightly hooded dactyls of the gnathopoda. It is most similar to H. martinezii in the habitus and relative lengths of the antennae of females, and in the relative lengths of the peduncles of the first two uropoda. The only record of association with gelatinous plankton is with the ctenophore Cestum veneris (Harbison et al . 1978). Distribution. A relatively rare species tending to inhabit tropical waters. Recorded from the Mediterranean Sea, off Messina and Sicily; the northern Atlantic (20–35 °N), and the North Pacific Ocean, in the east from central California to the equator, and in the west from the China Sea region. There is also one record from the central southern Indian Ocean (41 °S 58 °E; Vinogradov & Semenova 1996). The above record from the Tasman Sea is the first for this region. : Published as part of Zeidler, Wolfgang, 2015, A review of the hyperiidean amphipod genus Hyperoche Bovallius, 1887 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Hyperiidea: Hyperiidae), with the description of a new genus to accommodate H. shihi Gasca, 2005, pp. 151-192 in Zootaxa 3905 (2) on pages 165-168, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3905.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/233364 : {"references": ["Bovallius, C. (1889) Contributions to a monograph of the Amphipoda Hyperiidea; Part 1: 2. The families Cyllopodidae, Paraphronimidae, Thaumatopsidae, Mimonectidae, Hyperiidae, Phronimidae and Anchylomeridae. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 22 (7), 1 - 434, plates 1 - 18.", "Senna, A. (1908) Su alcuni Anfipodi Iperini del Plancton di Messina. Bulletino della Societa Entomologica Italiana, 38, 153 - 175, plate 1. [Firenze]", "Stephensen, K. (1924) Hyperiidea-Amphipoda (Part 2: Paraphronimidae, Hyperiidae, Dairellidae, Phronimidae, Anchylomeridae). Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions 1908 - 10 to the Mediterranean and Adjacent Seas, 2 (Biology-D 4), 71 - 149.", "Stephensen, K. (1925) Hyperiidea-Amphipoda (Part 3: Lycaeopsidae, Pronoidae, Lycaeidae, Brachyscelidae, Oxycephalidae, Parascelidae, Platyscelidae). Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions 1908 - 10 to the Mediterranean and Adjacent Seas, 2 (Biology - D 5), 151 - 252.", "Pirlot, J. M. (1929) Resultats zoologiques de la croisiere atlantique de'l'Armauer Hansen' (Mai-Juin 1922). 1. Les Amphipodes Hyperides. Memoires de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, Serie 3, 15 (2), 1 - 196.", "Barnard, K. H. (1930) Crustacea. Part X 1: Amphipoda. British Antarctic (Terra Nova) Expedition 1910, Zoology, 8 (4), 307 - 454.", "Thurston, M. H. (1976) The vertical distribution and diurnal migration of the Crustacea Amphipoda collected during the SOND Cruise, 1965. II. The Hyperiidea and general discussion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 383 - 470. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0025315400018981", "Harbison, G. R., Madin, L. P. & Swanberg, N. R. (1978) On the natural history and distribution of oceanic ctenophores. Deep-Sea Research, 25, 233 - 256. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / 0146 - 6291 (78) 90590 - 8", "Laval, P. (1980) Hyperiid amphipods as crustacean parasitoids associated with gelatinous plankton. Oceanography and Marine Biology, Annual Review, 18, 11 - 56.", "Brusca, G. J. (1981) Annotated keys to the Hyperiidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) of North American coastal waters. Technical Reports of the Allan Hancock Foundation, 5, 1 - 76.", "Vinogradov, M. E., Volkov, A. F. & Semenova, T. N. (1982) Amfipody-Giperiidy (Amphipoda: Hyperiidea) Mirovogo Okeanea. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Opredeliteli po Faune SSSR No. 132. Leningrad, 492 pp. [in Russian, English translation, 1996, Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Washington D. C., D. Siegel-Causey, Scientific Editor]", "Lin, J., Chen, M. & Chen, R. (1995) The distribution pattern of planktonic Amphipoda in the southern Yellow Sea and East China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 17 (5), 117 - 123. [in Chinese]", "Lin, J., Chen, M. & Chen, R. (1996) The species diversity of planktonic Amphipoda in China Seas. Chinese Biodiversity, 4 (4), 228 - 234. [in Chinese]", "Vinogradov, M. E. & Semenova, T. N. (1996) Supplement. In: Vinogradov, M. E., Volkov, A. F. & Semenova, T. N. (Eds.), Hyperiid amphipods (Amphipoda, Hyperiidea) of the world oceans. Smithsonian Institution Libraries, D. Siegel-Causey, Scientific Editor, Washington D. C., pp. 609 - 621. [English translation from Russian]", "Barkhatov, V. A., Vinogradov, M. E. & Vinogradov, G. M. (1999) Boundaries of the areals of hyperiid amphipods in the epipelagic part of the Southern Subtropical Frontal Zone of the Pacific Ocean. Oceanology, 39 (6), 806 - 812. [translated from the Russian, Okeanologiya, 39 (6), 1999, pp. 887 - 894]", "Zelickman, E. A. (2005) Amphipoda: Hyperiidea of Israel. A morphological atlas. Fauna Palaestina. Crustacea 1. The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem, 2005, 440 pp.", "Gasca, R. & Franco-Gordo, C. (2008) Hyperiid amphipods (Peracarida) from Banderas Bay, Mexican tropical Pacific. Crustaceana, 81 (5), 563 - 575. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854008784092256", "Gasca, R. (2009 a) Hyperiid amphipods (Crustacea: Peracarida) in Mexican waters of the Pacific Ocean. Pacific Science, 63 (1), 83 - 95. [2009] http: // dx. doi. org / 10.2984 / 1534 - 6188 (2009) 63 [83: HACPIM] 2.0. CO; 2", "Lavaniegos, B. E. & Hereu, C. M. (2009) Seasonal variation in hyperiid amphipod abundance and diversity and influence of mesoscale structures off Baja California. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 394, 137 - 152. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3354 / meps 08285", "Valencia, B., Lavaniegos, B., Giraldo, A. & Rodriguez-Rubio, E. (2013) Temporal and spatial variation of hyperiid amphipod assemblages in response to hydrographic processes in the Panama Bight, eastern tropical Pacific. Deep-Sea Research I, 73, 46 - 61. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / j. dsr. 2012.11.009"]} |
|---|