Bradophilidae Marchenkov 2002

Family Bradophilidae Marchenkov, 2002 Marchenkov (1999) suggested that the monotypic genus Bradophila belonged in a separate family and formally established it a few years later (Marchenkov 2002). The Bradophilidae is one of six families of mesoparasitic copepods which have adult females that are hi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Huys, Rony
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6071952
https://zenodo.org/record/6071952
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6071952
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Maxillopoda
Poecilostomatoida
Bradophilidae
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Maxillopoda
Poecilostomatoida
Bradophilidae
Huys, Rony
Bradophilidae Marchenkov 2002
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Maxillopoda
Poecilostomatoida
Bradophilidae
description Family Bradophilidae Marchenkov, 2002 Marchenkov (1999) suggested that the monotypic genus Bradophila belonged in a separate family and formally established it a few years later (Marchenkov 2002). The Bradophilidae is one of six families of mesoparasitic copepods which have adult females that are highly transformed and live partially embedded in their polychaete hosts, the other five being the Herpyllobiidae, Jasmineiricolidae, Phyllodicolidae, Saccopsidae and Xenocoelomatidae (Boxshall et al. 2015). Members of the latter family are radically different, mostly internal, parasites maintaining only a small aperture through the host’s body wall through which paired egg sacs are extruded. Adults of both sexes lack all trace of appendages and the three known species are cryptogonochoristic, with males reduced to a functional testis housed within a receptaculum masculinum inside the female body (Bresciani & Lützen 1974). In the Saccopsidae both the ovaries and digestive system are contained within the external sac-like body which connects via a short stalk with the internal holdfast or frontal bulla. The latter is a simple ring-shaped thickening of the cuticle surrounding the oral region and penetrates the blood vessels of the host’s gills (Bresciani & Lützen 1961) or opens into the connective tissues of the body wall (Bresciani & Lützen 1975). Adult females of the other four families share a bipartite body comprising an ectosoma lying external to the body wall of the host, and an endosoma which is embedded within the host. In the sole member of the Jasmineiricolidae the female reproductive organs are located in the endosoma (Boxshall et al. 2015) while in adult females of the Herpyllobiidae and Phyllodicolidae the ectosoma is essentially the reproductive tagma, containing the ovaries. The condition in the Bradophilidae remains equivocal (see below). Adult females in the family Phyllodicolidae have a unique type of endosoma, represented by a pair of elongate rootlets, and, rather than producing genuine egg sacs, attach their eggs separately to an axial filament originating at the genital aperture (Delamare-Deboutteville & Laubier 1960a; Laubier 1961). Members of the remaining two families, Herpyllobiidae and Bradophilidae, differ from each other primarily in the structure of the female endosoma and the gross morphology of the male ( e.g. Lützen 1966; Marchenkov 2002, López-González et al. 2006). Males of Bradophila have large prehensile antennae, robust subchelate maxillipeds and conspicuous caudal processes, all of which are used to attach to the ectosoma of the female (Marchenkov 2002; this study). The highly reduced males in the Herpyllobiidae all lack appendages (except for a pair of putative maxillipeds in Gottoniella López-González, Bresciani & Conradi, 2006). While herpyllobiids have dwarf males, typically being at least an order of magnitude smaller than the female, such extreme size sexual dimorphism is not encountered in the Bradophilidae. Unlike in Bradophila , male attachment in the Herpyllobiidae appears to be by means of a secretion in the vicinity of the genital apertures of the female. In addition to the type genus, the poorly known genera Trophoniphila and Flabellicola Gravier, 1918a are here also included in the family on the basis of the absence of cephalic appendages in the adult female, the shape and size of the egg sacs and their utilization of bristle-cage worms (Flabelligeridae) as hosts. Since both genera are only known from the less informative mesoparasitic female it is possible that they will be relegated to junior subjective synonyms of Bradophila when information about their respective males becomes available. Bradophilids are very rarely reported but it is known that other as yet undescribed species occur in European waters (Boxshall et al. 2015). : Published as part of Huys, Rony, 2016, Enigmas from the past: M'Intosh's (1885) annelidicolous copepods from the voyage of H. M. S. Challenger, pp. 355-385 in Zootaxa 4174 (1) on page 370, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4174.1.22, http://zenodo.org/record/262257 : {"references": ["Marchenkov, A. V. (2002) Bradophilidae fam. nov. - the new family of mesoparasitic copepod collected from the polychaete Brada villosa from the White Sea. Parazitologiya, 36, 514 - 516. [in Russian with English summary]", "Boxshall, G. A., O'Reilly, M., Sikorski, A. & Summerfield, R. (2015) A new genus and family of copepods (Crustacea: Copepoda) parasitic on polychaetes of the genus Jasmineira Langerhans, 1880 (family Sabellidae) in the northeastern Atlantic. Zootaxa, 4018 (3), 426 - 436. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4018.3.6", "Bresciani, J. & Lutzen, J. (1974) On the biology and development of Aphanodomus Wilson (Xenocoelomidae), a parasitic copepod of the polychaete Thelepus cincinnatus. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra dansk Naturhistorisk Forening i KjObenhavn, 137, 25 - 63.", "Bresciani, J. & Lutzen, J. (1961) The anatomy of a parasitic copepod, Saccopsis steenstrupi n. sp. Crustaceana, 3, 9 - 23. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854061 X 00491", "Bresciani, J. & Lutzen, J. (1975) Melinnacheres ergasiloides M. Sars, a parasitic copepod of the polychaete Melinna cristata, with notes on multiple infections caused by annelidicolous copepods. Ophelia, 13, 31 - 42. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1080 / 00785326.1974.10430590", "Delamare-Deboutteville, C. & Laubier, L. (1960 a) Les Phyllocolidae, une famille nouvelle de Copepodes parasites d'Annelides Polychetes. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, 251, 2083 - 2085.", "Laubier, L. (1961) Phyllodicola petiti (Delamare et Laubier, 1960) et la famille des Phyllodicolidae, Copepodes parasites d'Annelides Polychetes en Mediterranee occidentale. Crustaceana, 2, 228 - 242. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854061 X 00202", "Lopez-Gonzalez, P. J., Bresciani, J. & Conradi, M. (2006) New genus, three new species and new records of Herpyllobiidae Hansen, 1892 (Crustacea, Copepoda), parasites of polychaetes from Antarctica. Scientia marina, 70, 243 - 259.", "Gravier, C. J. (1918 a) Sur un nouveau Copepode (Flabellicola n. g. neapolitana n. sp.) parasite d'un Annelide polychete [Flabelligera diplochaitos (Otto)]. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, 166, 502 - 505. [published 25 March]"]}
format Text
author Huys, Rony
author_facet Huys, Rony
author_sort Huys, Rony
title Bradophilidae Marchenkov 2002
title_short Bradophilidae Marchenkov 2002
title_full Bradophilidae Marchenkov 2002
title_fullStr Bradophilidae Marchenkov 2002
title_full_unstemmed Bradophilidae Marchenkov 2002
title_sort bradophilidae marchenkov 2002
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2016
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6071952
https://zenodo.org/record/6071952
long_lat ENVELOPE(-58.250,-58.250,-63.917,-63.917)
ENVELOPE(-63.567,-63.567,-64.850,-64.850)
ENVELOPE(-67.350,-67.350,-67.217,-67.217)
ENVELOPE(-66.590,-66.590,-66.803,-66.803)
geographic White Sea
Gonzalez
Lopez
Gravier
Holdfast
geographic_facet White Sea
Gonzalez
Lopez
Gravier
Holdfast
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
White Sea
Copepods
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
White Sea
Copepods
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/262257
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF96C362FFA7FF980D18FFC4FFE6FF8C
http://zoobank.org/C7196500-B74B-423D-9FE1-3EB079B7F106
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4174.1.22
http://zenodo.org/record/262257
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF96C362FFA7FF980D18FFC4FFE6FF8C
http://zoobank.org/C7196500-B74B-423D-9FE1-3EB079B7F106
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6071953
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6071952
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4174.1.22
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6071953
_version_ 1766260821519761408
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.6071952 2023-05-15T13:54:44+02:00 Bradophilidae Marchenkov 2002 Huys, Rony 2016 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6071952 https://zenodo.org/record/6071952 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/262257 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF96C362FFA7FF980D18FFC4FFE6FF8C http://zoobank.org/C7196500-B74B-423D-9FE1-3EB079B7F106 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4174.1.22 http://zenodo.org/record/262257 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF96C362FFA7FF980D18FFC4FFE6FF8C http://zoobank.org/C7196500-B74B-423D-9FE1-3EB079B7F106 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6071953 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Maxillopoda Poecilostomatoida Bradophilidae article-journal ScholarlyArticle Taxonomic treatment Text 2016 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6071952 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4174.1.22 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6071953 2022-04-01T10:16:28Z Family Bradophilidae Marchenkov, 2002 Marchenkov (1999) suggested that the monotypic genus Bradophila belonged in a separate family and formally established it a few years later (Marchenkov 2002). The Bradophilidae is one of six families of mesoparasitic copepods which have adult females that are highly transformed and live partially embedded in their polychaete hosts, the other five being the Herpyllobiidae, Jasmineiricolidae, Phyllodicolidae, Saccopsidae and Xenocoelomatidae (Boxshall et al. 2015). Members of the latter family are radically different, mostly internal, parasites maintaining only a small aperture through the host’s body wall through which paired egg sacs are extruded. Adults of both sexes lack all trace of appendages and the three known species are cryptogonochoristic, with males reduced to a functional testis housed within a receptaculum masculinum inside the female body (Bresciani & Lützen 1974). In the Saccopsidae both the ovaries and digestive system are contained within the external sac-like body which connects via a short stalk with the internal holdfast or frontal bulla. The latter is a simple ring-shaped thickening of the cuticle surrounding the oral region and penetrates the blood vessels of the host’s gills (Bresciani & Lützen 1961) or opens into the connective tissues of the body wall (Bresciani & Lützen 1975). Adult females of the other four families share a bipartite body comprising an ectosoma lying external to the body wall of the host, and an endosoma which is embedded within the host. In the sole member of the Jasmineiricolidae the female reproductive organs are located in the endosoma (Boxshall et al. 2015) while in adult females of the Herpyllobiidae and Phyllodicolidae the ectosoma is essentially the reproductive tagma, containing the ovaries. The condition in the Bradophilidae remains equivocal (see below). Adult females in the family Phyllodicolidae have a unique type of endosoma, represented by a pair of elongate rootlets, and, rather than producing genuine egg sacs, attach their eggs separately to an axial filament originating at the genital aperture (Delamare-Deboutteville & Laubier 1960a; Laubier 1961). Members of the remaining two families, Herpyllobiidae and Bradophilidae, differ from each other primarily in the structure of the female endosoma and the gross morphology of the male ( e.g. Lützen 1966; Marchenkov 2002, López-González et al. 2006). Males of Bradophila have large prehensile antennae, robust subchelate maxillipeds and conspicuous caudal processes, all of which are used to attach to the ectosoma of the female (Marchenkov 2002; this study). The highly reduced males in the Herpyllobiidae all lack appendages (except for a pair of putative maxillipeds in Gottoniella López-González, Bresciani & Conradi, 2006). While herpyllobiids have dwarf males, typically being at least an order of magnitude smaller than the female, such extreme size sexual dimorphism is not encountered in the Bradophilidae. Unlike in Bradophila , male attachment in the Herpyllobiidae appears to be by means of a secretion in the vicinity of the genital apertures of the female. In addition to the type genus, the poorly known genera Trophoniphila and Flabellicola Gravier, 1918a are here also included in the family on the basis of the absence of cephalic appendages in the adult female, the shape and size of the egg sacs and their utilization of bristle-cage worms (Flabelligeridae) as hosts. Since both genera are only known from the less informative mesoparasitic female it is possible that they will be relegated to junior subjective synonyms of Bradophila when information about their respective males becomes available. Bradophilids are very rarely reported but it is known that other as yet undescribed species occur in European waters (Boxshall et al. 2015). : Published as part of Huys, Rony, 2016, Enigmas from the past: M'Intosh's (1885) annelidicolous copepods from the voyage of H. M. S. Challenger, pp. 355-385 in Zootaxa 4174 (1) on page 370, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4174.1.22, http://zenodo.org/record/262257 : {"references": ["Marchenkov, A. V. (2002) Bradophilidae fam. nov. - the new family of mesoparasitic copepod collected from the polychaete Brada villosa from the White Sea. Parazitologiya, 36, 514 - 516. [in Russian with English summary]", "Boxshall, G. A., O'Reilly, M., Sikorski, A. & Summerfield, R. (2015) A new genus and family of copepods (Crustacea: Copepoda) parasitic on polychaetes of the genus Jasmineira Langerhans, 1880 (family Sabellidae) in the northeastern Atlantic. Zootaxa, 4018 (3), 426 - 436. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4018.3.6", "Bresciani, J. & Lutzen, J. (1974) On the biology and development of Aphanodomus Wilson (Xenocoelomidae), a parasitic copepod of the polychaete Thelepus cincinnatus. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra dansk Naturhistorisk Forening i KjObenhavn, 137, 25 - 63.", "Bresciani, J. & Lutzen, J. (1961) The anatomy of a parasitic copepod, Saccopsis steenstrupi n. sp. Crustaceana, 3, 9 - 23. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854061 X 00491", "Bresciani, J. & Lutzen, J. (1975) Melinnacheres ergasiloides M. Sars, a parasitic copepod of the polychaete Melinna cristata, with notes on multiple infections caused by annelidicolous copepods. Ophelia, 13, 31 - 42. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1080 / 00785326.1974.10430590", "Delamare-Deboutteville, C. & Laubier, L. (1960 a) Les Phyllocolidae, une famille nouvelle de Copepodes parasites d'Annelides Polychetes. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, 251, 2083 - 2085.", "Laubier, L. (1961) Phyllodicola petiti (Delamare et Laubier, 1960) et la famille des Phyllodicolidae, Copepodes parasites d'Annelides Polychetes en Mediterranee occidentale. Crustaceana, 2, 228 - 242. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854061 X 00202", "Lopez-Gonzalez, P. J., Bresciani, J. & Conradi, M. (2006) New genus, three new species and new records of Herpyllobiidae Hansen, 1892 (Crustacea, Copepoda), parasites of polychaetes from Antarctica. Scientia marina, 70, 243 - 259.", "Gravier, C. J. (1918 a) Sur un nouveau Copepode (Flabellicola n. g. neapolitana n. sp.) parasite d'un Annelide polychete [Flabelligera diplochaitos (Otto)]. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, 166, 502 - 505. [published 25 March]"]} Text Antarc* Antarctica White Sea Copepods DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) White Sea Gonzalez ENVELOPE(-58.250,-58.250,-63.917,-63.917) Lopez ENVELOPE(-63.567,-63.567,-64.850,-64.850) Gravier ENVELOPE(-67.350,-67.350,-67.217,-67.217) Holdfast ENVELOPE(-66.590,-66.590,-66.803,-66.803)