Terebellides ectopium Zhang & Hutchings 2018, n. sp.

Terebellides ectopium n. sp. Figures 13–16 Material examined. MBM 286026 in IOCAS, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Baibu Gulf, north South China Sea, 20.4099° N 109.7840° E, 17.5 m, mud, May 2016. Paratype. MBM 286027 (1 specimen, on SEM stub) in IOCAS, collected from same site as holotype. (Catalog numbers i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang, Jinghuai, Hutchings, Pat
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5946084
https://zenodo.org/record/5946084
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5946084
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Annelida
Polychaeta
Terebellida
Trichobranchidae
Terebellides
Terebellides ectopium
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Annelida
Polychaeta
Terebellida
Trichobranchidae
Terebellides
Terebellides ectopium
Zhang, Jinghuai
Hutchings, Pat
Terebellides ectopium Zhang & Hutchings 2018, n. sp.
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Annelida
Polychaeta
Terebellida
Trichobranchidae
Terebellides
Terebellides ectopium
description Terebellides ectopium n. sp. Figures 13–16 Material examined. MBM 286026 in IOCAS, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Baibu Gulf, north South China Sea, 20.4099° N 109.7840° E, 17.5 m, mud, May 2016. Paratype. MBM 286027 (1 specimen, on SEM stub) in IOCAS, collected from same site as holotype. (Catalog numbers in IOCAS are tentative, which will be changed after the specimens are deposited in IOCAS before this manuscript is published in its final form.) Description (Based on both holotype and paratypes). Holotype complete, 22.4 mm in length and 0.3–2.2 mm in width (from posterior end to anterior chaetigers (excluding chaetae) respectively), with distinct demarcation between thorax and abdomen; with 27 abdominal segments; body tapering posteriorly with segments (Fig. 16A– B). Dorsum and ventrum smooth, colour pale to reddish in preserved specimens. Buccal tentacles of two types on dorsal margin of large tentacular membrane, uniformly tapered and with expanded tips (Figs 13A–B & 14B–D). Prostomium compact which is almost completely hidden by expanded tentacular membrane. Eyespots absent. Peristomium consisting of expanded lower lip which forms an elongate rectangular structure and upper lip often covered by lower lip and tentacular membrane (Figs 13A–B; 14C–D & 16A). Segments 1–2 with small lateral lappets and inconspicuous ventral collar; segments 2 with a dorsal lobe and pair of dorsal cirri at base of branchia (Figs 13A & 14B–D). Segments 3–7 with distinct lateral lappets, largest on segment four; forming thickened membranous ventral collars on anterior margins of segments 3–7, and lobes progressively shorter from segment 4 onwards; ventral collars of segment 3 with an inverted “n” shaped invagination in centre, other segments with smooth ventral collars (Figs 13A–B & 14C). Lateral lappets without conspicuous projection (Figs 13A & 14C–D). Ventral glandular bands and glandular areas around parapodia absent. Branchia as single elongate structure dorsally inserted on segments 2–4, consisting of two pairs of posterior lobes and pair of anterior lobes (Figs 13A; 14D–E & 16A). Anterior lobes (BL5–6) fused completely, and prolonged about 1/4 posterior lobes. Posterior lobes fused for about 2/3 their length. BL1–2 much longer and larger than BL3–4. BL1–2 and BL5–6 with large lamellae, without distal tip; lamella of BL1–2 and BL5–6 with longitudinal ridges, without a row of papilla; BL3–4 with small lamellae and short distal tip (Fig. 14D–F). Thorax with 20 segments without dorsal hump. Notopodia 18 pairs, present on segments 3–20 (thoracic chaetigers 1–18). First two pairs smaller and situated more dorsally than following ones; first one strongly reduced with shorter and finer chaetae, notochaetae almost appearing to arise from body wall (Figs 13A, H; 14B–D, G & 16A). Chaetae arranged in 2 tiers, lower tier with finely pointed chaetae and upper tier with narrowly–winged chaetae; chaetae of lower tier finer and about 2/3 length of those of upper tier (Fig. 15D–H). Neuropodia beginning from segment 7 (chaetiger 5), and present on all subsequent segments. Thoracic neuropodia sessile pinnules. Neuropodia of chaetigers 5–6 with geniculate hooks arranged in single row; geniculate hooks with sharply constricted mucronate tips; ventral geniculate hooks smaller than dorsal ones; neuropodia of chaetiger 5 situated more ventrally than subsequent ones, and with 5 weakly bent geniculate hooks; neuropodia of chaetiger 6 with 5 sharply bent geniculate hooks (Figs 13C–E; 14C; 15A–C & 16C). Neuropodia of thoracic chaetigers 7–13 with one row of 16–18 long-handled uncini per torus; following thoracic neuropodia with partial double rows of 16–19 longhandled uncini per torus; uncini with several rows of secondary teeth above main fang, and 5–7 major teeth of first row (Figs 13F & 15I –K). Abdomen with 27 segments with length gradually decreasing posteriorly. Abdominal neuropodia as foliaceous pinnules with about 26 avicular uncini; arranged in a single row (Fig. 15L). Abdominal uncini with strongly crested head, covered with numerous small and scale-like teeth (Figs 13G & 15M). Pygidium blunt without appendages (Fig. 16D). The methyl green staining similar to pattern 4 of Schüller & Hutchings (2010), compact green colour of the first ten segment, and gradually fading (Fig. 11A–B). Margin of lower lip without white stripe. Following segment 10, segments without green stripes. Posterior abdominal neuropodia weakly stained. Thoracic notopodia, branchial tips and lamellae without staining. Variability. Paratype complete, 19.2 mm in length, 0.3–1.99 mm in width and 25 abdominal segments. Neuropodia with 5 weakly bent geniculate hooks on segment 5; neuropodia with 4 sharply bent geniculate hooks on segment 6. Neuropodia of TC7–18 with one or partial double rows of 16–19 long-handled uncini per torus. As we only have two complete specimens of similar size, we cannot comment on variation of morphological characters. Remarks. Terebellides ectopium n. sp. is easily distinguished from other species by TC5–6 with geniculate hooks with conspicuously constricted mucronate tips; neuropodia of TC5 situated more ventrally than following ones; first two pairs of notopodia are strongly reduced, and have shorter and finer chaetae than subsequent ones; a single branchia with three pairs of branchial lobes, the two pairs of posterior lobes are partially fused along their length, and BL1–2 are much longer and larger than BL3–4, BL5–6 distinctly prolonged for about 1/2 posterior lobes. There are four other species of Terebellides having geniculate hooks in TC5–6, Terebellides akares Hutchings, Nogueira & Carrerette, 2015 (type locality Lizard Island, Australia), Terebellides biaciculata Hartmann-Schröder, 1992 (type locality French Polynesia), Terebellides bigeniculatus Parapar, Moreira & Helgason, 2011 (type locality Iceland) and Terebellides crux Schüller & Hutchings, 2013 (type locality Southern Ocean). Terebellides ectopium n. sp. clearly differs from these species by the geniculate acicular hooks with conspicuously constricted mucronate tips and neuropodia of TC5 situated more ventrally than following ones. The new species can also be distinguished from T. akares which has BL5–6 not prolonged evidently; from T. crux which has free posterior branchial lobes and equal length; from T. biaciculata which has lateral lappets until TC4 and anterior branchial lobes are distinctly larger than posterior lobes; from T . bigeniculatus of which the notopodia of TC1 is similarly developed to subsequent ones. Terebellides ectopium n. sp. is similar to a specimen of Terebellides from the coast of Myanmar in the North Andaman Sea, which Parapar et al. (2016) believe is a new species for the following reasons: BL5–6 is large and about half the length of posterior lobes; TC5 and TC6 are both provided with geniculate acicular chaetae, and neuropodia of chaetiger 5 situated more ventrally than following ones. These characters are the same as Terebellides ectopium n. sp. but as Parapar et al. (2016) only had a single specimen they did not formally describe their specimen. We suggest that this specimen may be synonymous with T. ectopium but until more material becomes available this cannot be confirmed. Distribution. Known only from Beibu Gulf (Fig. 1). Habitat. Found in muddy bottom in shallow water (17.5 m depth). Etymology. The specific name ectopium is derived from English word ectopia, which refers to the different position of geniculate hooks in thoracic chaetigers 5 and 6. : Published as part of Zhang, Jinghuai & Hutchings, Pat, 2018, Taxonomy and distribution of Terebellides (Polychaeta: Trichobranchidae) in the northern South China Sea, with description of three new species, pp. 387-411 in Zootaxa 4377 (3) on pages 402-408, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4377.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/1164508 : {"references": ["Schuller, M. & Hutchings, P. A. (2010) New insights in the taxonomy of Trichobranchidae (Polychaeta) with description of a new Terebellides species from Australia. Zootaxa, 2395, 1 - 16.", "Hutchings, P. A., Nogueira, J. M. M. & Carrerette, O. (2015) Telothelepodidae, Thelepodidae and Trichobranchidae (Annelida, Terebelliformia) from Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Zootaxa, 4019 (1), 240 - 274. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4019.1.12", "Hartmann-Schroder, G. (1992) Zur Polychaeten fauna der Polynesischen Inseln Huahine (Gesellschaftsinseln) und Rangiroa (Tuamotu-Inseln). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut, 89, 49 - 84.", "Parapar, J., Moreira, J. & Helgason, G. V. (2011) Taxonomy and distribution of Terebellides (Polychaeta, Trichobranchidae) in Icelandic waters, with the description of a new species. Zootaxa, 2983, 1 - 20.", "Schuller, M. & Hutchings, P. A. (2013) New species of Terebellides (Polychaeta: Trichobranchidae) from the deep Southern Ocean, with a key to all described species. Zootaxa, 3619 (1), 1 - 45. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3619.1.1", "Parapar, J., Moreira, J. & Martin, D. (2016) On the diversity of the SE Indo-Pacific species of Terebellides (Annelida; Trichobranchidae), with the description of a new species. PeerJ, 4, e 2313. https: // doi. org / 10.7717 / peerj. 2313"]}
format Text
author Zhang, Jinghuai
Hutchings, Pat
author_facet Zhang, Jinghuai
Hutchings, Pat
author_sort Zhang, Jinghuai
title Terebellides ectopium Zhang & Hutchings 2018, n. sp.
title_short Terebellides ectopium Zhang & Hutchings 2018, n. sp.
title_full Terebellides ectopium Zhang & Hutchings 2018, n. sp.
title_fullStr Terebellides ectopium Zhang & Hutchings 2018, n. sp.
title_full_unstemmed Terebellides ectopium Zhang & Hutchings 2018, n. sp.
title_sort terebellides ectopium zhang & hutchings 2018, n. sp.
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2018
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5946084
https://zenodo.org/record/5946084
long_lat ENVELOPE(-64.456,-64.456,-65.688,-65.688)
ENVELOPE(9.914,9.914,63.019,63.019)
ENVELOPE(167.217,167.217,-77.483,-77.483)
geographic Southern Ocean
Pacific
Lizard Island
Stripe
Fang
geographic_facet Southern Ocean
Pacific
Lizard Island
Stripe
Fang
genre Iceland
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Iceland
Southern Ocean
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/1164508
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFE5FFCE2764FF9F0A53DB12FFCAFFAC
http://zoobank.org/678DA12D-BBDD-491E-ABF2-6658BFE5BD20
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4377.3.4
http://zenodo.org/record/1164508
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFE5FFCE2764FF9F0A53DB12FFCAFFAC
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164534
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164536
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164538
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164540
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164530
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164510
http://zoobank.org/678DA12D-BBDD-491E-ABF2-6658BFE5BD20
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5946085
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5946084
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4377.3.4
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164534
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164536
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164538
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164540
https:
_version_ 1766044082890604544
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5946084 2023-05-15T16:53:31+02:00 Terebellides ectopium Zhang & Hutchings 2018, n. sp. Zhang, Jinghuai Hutchings, Pat 2018 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5946084 https://zenodo.org/record/5946084 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/1164508 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFE5FFCE2764FF9F0A53DB12FFCAFFAC http://zoobank.org/678DA12D-BBDD-491E-ABF2-6658BFE5BD20 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4377.3.4 http://zenodo.org/record/1164508 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFE5FFCE2764FF9F0A53DB12FFCAFFAC https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164534 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164536 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164538 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164540 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164530 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164510 http://zoobank.org/678DA12D-BBDD-491E-ABF2-6658BFE5BD20 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5946085 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Trichobranchidae Terebellides Terebellides ectopium article-journal ScholarlyArticle Text Taxonomic treatment 2018 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5946084 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4377.3.4 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164534 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164536 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164538 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164540 https: 2022-03-10T16:36:25Z Terebellides ectopium n. sp. Figures 13–16 Material examined. MBM 286026 in IOCAS, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Baibu Gulf, north South China Sea, 20.4099° N 109.7840° E, 17.5 m, mud, May 2016. Paratype. MBM 286027 (1 specimen, on SEM stub) in IOCAS, collected from same site as holotype. (Catalog numbers in IOCAS are tentative, which will be changed after the specimens are deposited in IOCAS before this manuscript is published in its final form.) Description (Based on both holotype and paratypes). Holotype complete, 22.4 mm in length and 0.3–2.2 mm in width (from posterior end to anterior chaetigers (excluding chaetae) respectively), with distinct demarcation between thorax and abdomen; with 27 abdominal segments; body tapering posteriorly with segments (Fig. 16A– B). Dorsum and ventrum smooth, colour pale to reddish in preserved specimens. Buccal tentacles of two types on dorsal margin of large tentacular membrane, uniformly tapered and with expanded tips (Figs 13A–B & 14B–D). Prostomium compact which is almost completely hidden by expanded tentacular membrane. Eyespots absent. Peristomium consisting of expanded lower lip which forms an elongate rectangular structure and upper lip often covered by lower lip and tentacular membrane (Figs 13A–B; 14C–D & 16A). Segments 1–2 with small lateral lappets and inconspicuous ventral collar; segments 2 with a dorsal lobe and pair of dorsal cirri at base of branchia (Figs 13A & 14B–D). Segments 3–7 with distinct lateral lappets, largest on segment four; forming thickened membranous ventral collars on anterior margins of segments 3–7, and lobes progressively shorter from segment 4 onwards; ventral collars of segment 3 with an inverted “n” shaped invagination in centre, other segments with smooth ventral collars (Figs 13A–B & 14C). Lateral lappets without conspicuous projection (Figs 13A & 14C–D). Ventral glandular bands and glandular areas around parapodia absent. Branchia as single elongate structure dorsally inserted on segments 2–4, consisting of two pairs of posterior lobes and pair of anterior lobes (Figs 13A; 14D–E & 16A). Anterior lobes (BL5–6) fused completely, and prolonged about 1/4 posterior lobes. Posterior lobes fused for about 2/3 their length. BL1–2 much longer and larger than BL3–4. BL1–2 and BL5–6 with large lamellae, without distal tip; lamella of BL1–2 and BL5–6 with longitudinal ridges, without a row of papilla; BL3–4 with small lamellae and short distal tip (Fig. 14D–F). Thorax with 20 segments without dorsal hump. Notopodia 18 pairs, present on segments 3–20 (thoracic chaetigers 1–18). First two pairs smaller and situated more dorsally than following ones; first one strongly reduced with shorter and finer chaetae, notochaetae almost appearing to arise from body wall (Figs 13A, H; 14B–D, G & 16A). Chaetae arranged in 2 tiers, lower tier with finely pointed chaetae and upper tier with narrowly–winged chaetae; chaetae of lower tier finer and about 2/3 length of those of upper tier (Fig. 15D–H). Neuropodia beginning from segment 7 (chaetiger 5), and present on all subsequent segments. Thoracic neuropodia sessile pinnules. Neuropodia of chaetigers 5–6 with geniculate hooks arranged in single row; geniculate hooks with sharply constricted mucronate tips; ventral geniculate hooks smaller than dorsal ones; neuropodia of chaetiger 5 situated more ventrally than subsequent ones, and with 5 weakly bent geniculate hooks; neuropodia of chaetiger 6 with 5 sharply bent geniculate hooks (Figs 13C–E; 14C; 15A–C & 16C). Neuropodia of thoracic chaetigers 7–13 with one row of 16–18 long-handled uncini per torus; following thoracic neuropodia with partial double rows of 16–19 longhandled uncini per torus; uncini with several rows of secondary teeth above main fang, and 5–7 major teeth of first row (Figs 13F & 15I –K). Abdomen with 27 segments with length gradually decreasing posteriorly. Abdominal neuropodia as foliaceous pinnules with about 26 avicular uncini; arranged in a single row (Fig. 15L). Abdominal uncini with strongly crested head, covered with numerous small and scale-like teeth (Figs 13G & 15M). Pygidium blunt without appendages (Fig. 16D). The methyl green staining similar to pattern 4 of Schüller & Hutchings (2010), compact green colour of the first ten segment, and gradually fading (Fig. 11A–B). Margin of lower lip without white stripe. Following segment 10, segments without green stripes. Posterior abdominal neuropodia weakly stained. Thoracic notopodia, branchial tips and lamellae without staining. Variability. Paratype complete, 19.2 mm in length, 0.3–1.99 mm in width and 25 abdominal segments. Neuropodia with 5 weakly bent geniculate hooks on segment 5; neuropodia with 4 sharply bent geniculate hooks on segment 6. Neuropodia of TC7–18 with one or partial double rows of 16–19 long-handled uncini per torus. As we only have two complete specimens of similar size, we cannot comment on variation of morphological characters. Remarks. Terebellides ectopium n. sp. is easily distinguished from other species by TC5–6 with geniculate hooks with conspicuously constricted mucronate tips; neuropodia of TC5 situated more ventrally than following ones; first two pairs of notopodia are strongly reduced, and have shorter and finer chaetae than subsequent ones; a single branchia with three pairs of branchial lobes, the two pairs of posterior lobes are partially fused along their length, and BL1–2 are much longer and larger than BL3–4, BL5–6 distinctly prolonged for about 1/2 posterior lobes. There are four other species of Terebellides having geniculate hooks in TC5–6, Terebellides akares Hutchings, Nogueira & Carrerette, 2015 (type locality Lizard Island, Australia), Terebellides biaciculata Hartmann-Schröder, 1992 (type locality French Polynesia), Terebellides bigeniculatus Parapar, Moreira & Helgason, 2011 (type locality Iceland) and Terebellides crux Schüller & Hutchings, 2013 (type locality Southern Ocean). Terebellides ectopium n. sp. clearly differs from these species by the geniculate acicular hooks with conspicuously constricted mucronate tips and neuropodia of TC5 situated more ventrally than following ones. The new species can also be distinguished from T. akares which has BL5–6 not prolonged evidently; from T. crux which has free posterior branchial lobes and equal length; from T. biaciculata which has lateral lappets until TC4 and anterior branchial lobes are distinctly larger than posterior lobes; from T . bigeniculatus of which the notopodia of TC1 is similarly developed to subsequent ones. Terebellides ectopium n. sp. is similar to a specimen of Terebellides from the coast of Myanmar in the North Andaman Sea, which Parapar et al. (2016) believe is a new species for the following reasons: BL5–6 is large and about half the length of posterior lobes; TC5 and TC6 are both provided with geniculate acicular chaetae, and neuropodia of chaetiger 5 situated more ventrally than following ones. These characters are the same as Terebellides ectopium n. sp. but as Parapar et al. (2016) only had a single specimen they did not formally describe their specimen. We suggest that this specimen may be synonymous with T. ectopium but until more material becomes available this cannot be confirmed. Distribution. Known only from Beibu Gulf (Fig. 1). Habitat. Found in muddy bottom in shallow water (17.5 m depth). Etymology. The specific name ectopium is derived from English word ectopia, which refers to the different position of geniculate hooks in thoracic chaetigers 5 and 6. : Published as part of Zhang, Jinghuai & Hutchings, Pat, 2018, Taxonomy and distribution of Terebellides (Polychaeta: Trichobranchidae) in the northern South China Sea, with description of three new species, pp. 387-411 in Zootaxa 4377 (3) on pages 402-408, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4377.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/1164508 : {"references": ["Schuller, M. & Hutchings, P. A. (2010) New insights in the taxonomy of Trichobranchidae (Polychaeta) with description of a new Terebellides species from Australia. Zootaxa, 2395, 1 - 16.", "Hutchings, P. A., Nogueira, J. M. M. & Carrerette, O. (2015) Telothelepodidae, Thelepodidae and Trichobranchidae (Annelida, Terebelliformia) from Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Zootaxa, 4019 (1), 240 - 274. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4019.1.12", "Hartmann-Schroder, G. (1992) Zur Polychaeten fauna der Polynesischen Inseln Huahine (Gesellschaftsinseln) und Rangiroa (Tuamotu-Inseln). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut, 89, 49 - 84.", "Parapar, J., Moreira, J. & Helgason, G. V. (2011) Taxonomy and distribution of Terebellides (Polychaeta, Trichobranchidae) in Icelandic waters, with the description of a new species. Zootaxa, 2983, 1 - 20.", "Schuller, M. & Hutchings, P. A. (2013) New species of Terebellides (Polychaeta: Trichobranchidae) from the deep Southern Ocean, with a key to all described species. Zootaxa, 3619 (1), 1 - 45. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3619.1.1", "Parapar, J., Moreira, J. & Martin, D. (2016) On the diversity of the SE Indo-Pacific species of Terebellides (Annelida; Trichobranchidae), with the description of a new species. PeerJ, 4, e 2313. https: // doi. org / 10.7717 / peerj. 2313"]} Text Iceland Southern Ocean DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Southern Ocean Pacific Lizard Island ENVELOPE(-64.456,-64.456,-65.688,-65.688) Stripe ENVELOPE(9.914,9.914,63.019,63.019) Fang ENVELOPE(167.217,167.217,-77.483,-77.483)