Elliprhagio Han & Cai & Ren & Wang 2019, gen. nov.

Genus Elliprhagio gen. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 18DC6062-EF6F-40E8-901B-733F227C0CEE Type species. Elliprhagio macrosiphonius sp. nov. Diagnosis. Flagellum with 10 flagellemeres; proboscis long, labium fleshy, labella small. Wings elliptic and wide; R 2+3 sinuate at the middle, and sharply up-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Han, Ye, Cai, Yajing, Ren, Dong, Wang, Yongjie
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2019
Subjects:
ren
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943735
https://zenodo.org/record/5943735
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5943735
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Diptera
Rhagionidae
Elliprhagio
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Diptera
Rhagionidae
Elliprhagio
Han, Ye
Cai, Yajing
Ren, Dong
Wang, Yongjie
Elliprhagio Han & Cai & Ren & Wang 2019, gen. nov.
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Diptera
Rhagionidae
Elliprhagio
description Genus Elliprhagio gen. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 18DC6062-EF6F-40E8-901B-733F227C0CEE Type species. Elliprhagio macrosiphonius sp. nov. Diagnosis. Flagellum with 10 flagellemeres; proboscis long, labium fleshy, labella small. Wings elliptic and wide; R 2+3 sinuate at the middle, and sharply up-curved distally; crossvein r-m intersecting the upper margin of d cell at basal one third (1/3); four medial veins present, bM 3 and dM 3 straight; anal cell closed before wing margin. Midtibiae with 1 spur. Etymology. From “ ellip- ”, which means elliptic and genus Ragio , referring to the elliptic wings. Gender: masculine. Remarks. Among the snipe flies from the Daohugou locality, the new genus is most similar to Trichorhagio Zhang, 2013 in appearance, especially in venation and body configuration. But they can be distinguished by elliptic wing (vs. triangular wing in Trichorhagio ), and the equal length of bM 3 and dM 3 (vs. the bM 3 longer than dM 3). The similar long mouthparts and elliptic wing also present in two other genera Protorhagio Rohdendorf, 1938 and Palaeoarthroteles Kovalev & Mostovski, 1997, which have also been found from the Daohugou. In Protorhagio , costal section between Sc-R 1 is obviously longer than that between R 1 -R 2+3, while not distinct in Elliprhagio . Elliprhagio is distinguished from Palaeoarthroteles (Kovalev & Mostovski 1997; Zhang J. 2011) by the configuration of anal cell being closed (vs. open in Palaeoarthroteles ); up-curved R 2+3 at the middle (vs. almost straight R 2+3); straight bM 3 and dM 3 (vs. curved bM 3 and S-shaped dM 3 in Palaeoarthroteles ); costal section of R 1 -R 2+3 slightly shorter than Sc-R 1 (vs. costal section of R 1 -R 2+3 no shorter than Sc-R 1 in Palaeoarthroteles ) and mesotibiae with 1 apical spur (vs. 2 spurs in Palaeoarthroteles ). Moreover, the genus Sinorhagio Zhang, Yang & Ren, 2006, and some species of Palaeobolbomyia (Kovalev 1982; Zhang 2010) in the same locality also possess elliptical wings resembling Elliprhagio . But Sinorhagio can be separated by their straight R 2+3, long R 4 and R 5 branches, and long and narrow d cell. Although Palaeobolbomyia resembles the new genus with similar R 2+3, they can be separated by the absence of M 3 in the former. Comparing with genera from other localities, the genus Orsobrachyceron Ren, 1998 from Liaoning (China) also has similar long proboscis and venation as those of the Elliprhagio gen. nov. , but differs from Elliprhagio in the M 3 and M 4 strongly converged to a point at the margin of wing and cell cu closed without a short petiole apically. The other two genera Palaeobrachyceron Kovalev, 1981 and Jurabrachyceron Kovalev, 1981 from the Transbaikalia (Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous) show some similarities in the elliptic wings and configurations of venation with Elliprhagio . However, they can be separated by their configuration of M 3 and M 4: bM 3 much shorter than dM 3, and M 3 parallel to M 4. In addition, Palaeobrachyceron has an extremely long and straight R 5 that is distinctly different from the new genus. : Published as part of Han, Ye, Cai, Yajing, Ren, Dong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019, A new fossil snipe fly with long proboscis from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China (Diptera: Rhagionidae), pp. 153-160 in Zootaxa 4691 (2) on pages 154-155, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4691.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/3527151 : {"references": ["Zhang, J. F. (2013) Snipe flies (Diptera: Rhagionidae) from the Daohugou Formation (Jurassic), Inner Mongolia, and the systematic position of related records in China. Palaeontology, 56, 217 - 228. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1475 - 4983.2012.01192. x", "Rohdendorf, B. B. (1938) Dipterous insects of the Mesozoic of Karatau. I. Brachycera and part of the Nematocera. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii nauk SSSR, 7 (3), 29 - 67.", "Kovalev, V. G. & Mostovski, M. B. (1997) A new genus of snipe flies (Diptera, Rhagionidae) from the Mesozoic of eastern Transbaikalia. Paleontological Journal, 31 (5), 523 - 527.", "Zhang, K. Y., Yang, D. & Ren, D. (2006) The first snipe fly (Diptera: Rhagionidae) from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China. Zootaxa, 1134 (1), 51 - 57. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 1134.1.3", "Kovalev, V. G. (1982) Some Jurassic Diptera rhagionids (Muscida, Rhagionidae). Paleontological Journal, 16 (3), 87 - 99.", "Zhang, J. F. (2010) New species of Palaeobolbomyia Kovalev and Ussatchovia Kovalev (Diptera, Brachycera, Rhagionidae) from the Callovian-Oxfordian (Jurassic) Daohugou biota of China: Biostratigraphic and paleoecologic implications. Geobios, 43, 663 - 669. https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. geobios. 2010.06.004", "Ren, D. (1998) Late Jurassic Brachycera from Northeastern China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 23, 65 - 83.", "Kovalev, V. G. (1981) The oldest representatives of the Diptera with short antennae from the Jurassic in Siberia. Paleontological Journal, 15 (3), 84 - 100."]}
format Text
author Han, Ye
Cai, Yajing
Ren, Dong
Wang, Yongjie
author_facet Han, Ye
Cai, Yajing
Ren, Dong
Wang, Yongjie
author_sort Han, Ye
title Elliprhagio Han & Cai & Ren & Wang 2019, gen. nov.
title_short Elliprhagio Han & Cai & Ren & Wang 2019, gen. nov.
title_full Elliprhagio Han & Cai & Ren & Wang 2019, gen. nov.
title_fullStr Elliprhagio Han & Cai & Ren & Wang 2019, gen. nov.
title_full_unstemmed Elliprhagio Han & Cai & Ren & Wang 2019, gen. nov.
title_sort elliprhagio han & cai & ren & wang 2019, gen. nov.
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2019
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943735
https://zenodo.org/record/5943735
genre ren
Siberia
genre_facet ren
Siberia
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/3527151
http://publication.plazi.org/id/F102D20ECA23FF8FB72B2031FFDACD40
http://zoobank.org/84158919-975D-4118-B0FD-45449337902F
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4691.2.4
http://zenodo.org/record/3527151
http://publication.plazi.org/id/F102D20ECA23FF8FB72B2031FFDACD40
http://zoobank.org/84158919-975D-4118-B0FD-45449337902F
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943736
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943735
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4691.2.4
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943736
_version_ 1766244740096851968
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5943735 2023-05-15T18:50:58+02:00 Elliprhagio Han & Cai & Ren & Wang 2019, gen. nov. Han, Ye Cai, Yajing Ren, Dong Wang, Yongjie 2019 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943735 https://zenodo.org/record/5943735 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/3527151 http://publication.plazi.org/id/F102D20ECA23FF8FB72B2031FFDACD40 http://zoobank.org/84158919-975D-4118-B0FD-45449337902F https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4691.2.4 http://zenodo.org/record/3527151 http://publication.plazi.org/id/F102D20ECA23FF8FB72B2031FFDACD40 http://zoobank.org/84158919-975D-4118-B0FD-45449337902F https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943736 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Rhagionidae Elliprhagio article-journal ScholarlyArticle Text Taxonomic treatment 2019 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943735 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4691.2.4 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943736 2022-03-10T16:37:03Z Genus Elliprhagio gen. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 18DC6062-EF6F-40E8-901B-733F227C0CEE Type species. Elliprhagio macrosiphonius sp. nov. Diagnosis. Flagellum with 10 flagellemeres; proboscis long, labium fleshy, labella small. Wings elliptic and wide; R 2+3 sinuate at the middle, and sharply up-curved distally; crossvein r-m intersecting the upper margin of d cell at basal one third (1/3); four medial veins present, bM 3 and dM 3 straight; anal cell closed before wing margin. Midtibiae with 1 spur. Etymology. From “ ellip- ”, which means elliptic and genus Ragio , referring to the elliptic wings. Gender: masculine. Remarks. Among the snipe flies from the Daohugou locality, the new genus is most similar to Trichorhagio Zhang, 2013 in appearance, especially in venation and body configuration. But they can be distinguished by elliptic wing (vs. triangular wing in Trichorhagio ), and the equal length of bM 3 and dM 3 (vs. the bM 3 longer than dM 3). The similar long mouthparts and elliptic wing also present in two other genera Protorhagio Rohdendorf, 1938 and Palaeoarthroteles Kovalev & Mostovski, 1997, which have also been found from the Daohugou. In Protorhagio , costal section between Sc-R 1 is obviously longer than that between R 1 -R 2+3, while not distinct in Elliprhagio . Elliprhagio is distinguished from Palaeoarthroteles (Kovalev & Mostovski 1997; Zhang J. 2011) by the configuration of anal cell being closed (vs. open in Palaeoarthroteles ); up-curved R 2+3 at the middle (vs. almost straight R 2+3); straight bM 3 and dM 3 (vs. curved bM 3 and S-shaped dM 3 in Palaeoarthroteles ); costal section of R 1 -R 2+3 slightly shorter than Sc-R 1 (vs. costal section of R 1 -R 2+3 no shorter than Sc-R 1 in Palaeoarthroteles ) and mesotibiae with 1 apical spur (vs. 2 spurs in Palaeoarthroteles ). Moreover, the genus Sinorhagio Zhang, Yang & Ren, 2006, and some species of Palaeobolbomyia (Kovalev 1982; Zhang 2010) in the same locality also possess elliptical wings resembling Elliprhagio . But Sinorhagio can be separated by their straight R 2+3, long R 4 and R 5 branches, and long and narrow d cell. Although Palaeobolbomyia resembles the new genus with similar R 2+3, they can be separated by the absence of M 3 in the former. Comparing with genera from other localities, the genus Orsobrachyceron Ren, 1998 from Liaoning (China) also has similar long proboscis and venation as those of the Elliprhagio gen. nov. , but differs from Elliprhagio in the M 3 and M 4 strongly converged to a point at the margin of wing and cell cu closed without a short petiole apically. The other two genera Palaeobrachyceron Kovalev, 1981 and Jurabrachyceron Kovalev, 1981 from the Transbaikalia (Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous) show some similarities in the elliptic wings and configurations of venation with Elliprhagio . However, they can be separated by their configuration of M 3 and M 4: bM 3 much shorter than dM 3, and M 3 parallel to M 4. In addition, Palaeobrachyceron has an extremely long and straight R 5 that is distinctly different from the new genus. : Published as part of Han, Ye, Cai, Yajing, Ren, Dong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019, A new fossil snipe fly with long proboscis from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China (Diptera: Rhagionidae), pp. 153-160 in Zootaxa 4691 (2) on pages 154-155, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4691.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/3527151 : {"references": ["Zhang, J. F. (2013) Snipe flies (Diptera: Rhagionidae) from the Daohugou Formation (Jurassic), Inner Mongolia, and the systematic position of related records in China. Palaeontology, 56, 217 - 228. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1475 - 4983.2012.01192. x", "Rohdendorf, B. B. (1938) Dipterous insects of the Mesozoic of Karatau. I. Brachycera and part of the Nematocera. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii nauk SSSR, 7 (3), 29 - 67.", "Kovalev, V. G. & Mostovski, M. B. (1997) A new genus of snipe flies (Diptera, Rhagionidae) from the Mesozoic of eastern Transbaikalia. Paleontological Journal, 31 (5), 523 - 527.", "Zhang, K. Y., Yang, D. & Ren, D. (2006) The first snipe fly (Diptera: Rhagionidae) from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China. Zootaxa, 1134 (1), 51 - 57. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 1134.1.3", "Kovalev, V. G. (1982) Some Jurassic Diptera rhagionids (Muscida, Rhagionidae). Paleontological Journal, 16 (3), 87 - 99.", "Zhang, J. F. (2010) New species of Palaeobolbomyia Kovalev and Ussatchovia Kovalev (Diptera, Brachycera, Rhagionidae) from the Callovian-Oxfordian (Jurassic) Daohugou biota of China: Biostratigraphic and paleoecologic implications. Geobios, 43, 663 - 669. https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. geobios. 2010.06.004", "Ren, D. (1998) Late Jurassic Brachycera from Northeastern China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 23, 65 - 83.", "Kovalev, V. G. (1981) The oldest representatives of the Diptera with short antennae from the Jurassic in Siberia. Paleontological Journal, 15 (3), 84 - 100."]} Text ren Siberia DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)