Preliminary Evaluation Of The Performance Of Edna For Marine Species Detection

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is the collective term for DNA molecules that are released from living or dead organisms in the form of blood, skin, mucous, gametes or faeces into the environment. Subsequently eDNA can be extracted from environmental samples such as water, air or. Techniques employing eDNA...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlson, Jens, Carlsson, Jeanette
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.571062
https://zenodo.org/record/571062
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.571062
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.571062 2023-05-15T17:08:49+02:00 Preliminary Evaluation Of The Performance Of Edna For Marine Species Detection Carlson, Jens Carlsson, Jeanette 2017 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.571062 https://zenodo.org/record/571062 unknown Zenodo Open Access Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY Text Presentation article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2017 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.571062 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Environmental DNA (eDNA) is the collective term for DNA molecules that are released from living or dead organisms in the form of blood, skin, mucous, gametes or faeces into the environment. Subsequently eDNA can be extracted from environmental samples such as water, air or. Techniques employing eDNA are non-invasive (i.e. do not require the direct observation or sampling of an organism), instead relying on DNA found in the environment as a source of information. As a result, eDNA is rapidly emerging as a valuable tool for assessing species presence and biodiversity monitoring. There are two methods for analysing eDNA – metabarcoding and quantitative (q)PCR. Both methods are usually targeting mitochondrial (mt)DNA due to the much higher copy number per cell than nuclear (n)DNA. While metabarcoding detects multiple species, qPCR is species (or taxanomical group specific). Specific probes and primers bind to target sequences (i.e. specific species) in the eDNA sample. An advantage of qPCR over metabarcoding is that only targets species specific DNA and not, as metabarcoding, multiple species making qPCR more sensitive and can detect lower concentrations of eDNA. In addition, it has been used to estimate the relative biomass of the target. However, qPCR cannot detect biodiversity as the method will only target what is being searched for while metabarcoding can target a wide range of taxa simultaneously. The purpose is to develop and validate species-specific qPCR assays for eDNA and deploy these approaches in ATLAS areas. The sampling will consists of water samples from different depths. Water samples will be filtered and filters preserved until analysed. These objectives are divided into tasks as follows: ( i ) cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa , ( ii ) vulnerable deep-sea seamount fish species Hoplostethus atlanticus or Beryx decadactylus , ( iii ) assess qPCR as a tool for estimating biomass of deep-sea fish species Helicolenus dactylopterus , ( iv ) qPCR analyses to help identifying seamount hotspots of pelagic biodiversity Thunnus obesus and Mobula tarapacana , and ( v ) identifying dispersal patterns of hydrothermal vent species Bathymodiolus azoricus , or Mirocaris fortunata or Segonzacia mesatlantic . Results from a recently accepted study (Gargan et al ., in press, Marine Biology ) on Mobula tarapacana eDNA from seamounts of the Azores will be presented. Conference Object Lophelia pertusa DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
description Environmental DNA (eDNA) is the collective term for DNA molecules that are released from living or dead organisms in the form of blood, skin, mucous, gametes or faeces into the environment. Subsequently eDNA can be extracted from environmental samples such as water, air or. Techniques employing eDNA are non-invasive (i.e. do not require the direct observation or sampling of an organism), instead relying on DNA found in the environment as a source of information. As a result, eDNA is rapidly emerging as a valuable tool for assessing species presence and biodiversity monitoring. There are two methods for analysing eDNA – metabarcoding and quantitative (q)PCR. Both methods are usually targeting mitochondrial (mt)DNA due to the much higher copy number per cell than nuclear (n)DNA. While metabarcoding detects multiple species, qPCR is species (or taxanomical group specific). Specific probes and primers bind to target sequences (i.e. specific species) in the eDNA sample. An advantage of qPCR over metabarcoding is that only targets species specific DNA and not, as metabarcoding, multiple species making qPCR more sensitive and can detect lower concentrations of eDNA. In addition, it has been used to estimate the relative biomass of the target. However, qPCR cannot detect biodiversity as the method will only target what is being searched for while metabarcoding can target a wide range of taxa simultaneously. The purpose is to develop and validate species-specific qPCR assays for eDNA and deploy these approaches in ATLAS areas. The sampling will consists of water samples from different depths. Water samples will be filtered and filters preserved until analysed. These objectives are divided into tasks as follows: ( i ) cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa , ( ii ) vulnerable deep-sea seamount fish species Hoplostethus atlanticus or Beryx decadactylus , ( iii ) assess qPCR as a tool for estimating biomass of deep-sea fish species Helicolenus dactylopterus , ( iv ) qPCR analyses to help identifying seamount hotspots of pelagic biodiversity Thunnus obesus and Mobula tarapacana , and ( v ) identifying dispersal patterns of hydrothermal vent species Bathymodiolus azoricus , or Mirocaris fortunata or Segonzacia mesatlantic . Results from a recently accepted study (Gargan et al ., in press, Marine Biology ) on Mobula tarapacana eDNA from seamounts of the Azores will be presented.
format Conference Object
author Carlson, Jens
Carlsson, Jeanette
spellingShingle Carlson, Jens
Carlsson, Jeanette
Preliminary Evaluation Of The Performance Of Edna For Marine Species Detection
author_facet Carlson, Jens
Carlsson, Jeanette
author_sort Carlson, Jens
title Preliminary Evaluation Of The Performance Of Edna For Marine Species Detection
title_short Preliminary Evaluation Of The Performance Of Edna For Marine Species Detection
title_full Preliminary Evaluation Of The Performance Of Edna For Marine Species Detection
title_fullStr Preliminary Evaluation Of The Performance Of Edna For Marine Species Detection
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary Evaluation Of The Performance Of Edna For Marine Species Detection
title_sort preliminary evaluation of the performance of edna for marine species detection
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2017
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.571062
https://zenodo.org/record/571062
genre Lophelia pertusa
genre_facet Lophelia pertusa
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.571062
_version_ 1766064690607161344