Polyeunoa McIntosh 1885

Polyeunoa McIntosh, 1885 Type species. Polyeunoa laevis McIntosh, 1885. Diagnosis. Body long, with about 70 segments or more. Elytra at least 15 pairs, on segments 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 26, 29, 32, with or without additional, sporadically and irregularly arranged pairs of elytra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barnich, Ruth, Gambi, Maria Cristina, Fiege, Dieter
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5680905
https://zenodo.org/record/5680905
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5680905
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Annelida
Polychaeta
Phyllodocida
Polynoidae
Polyeunoa
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Annelida
Polychaeta
Phyllodocida
Polynoidae
Polyeunoa
Barnich, Ruth
Gambi, Maria Cristina
Fiege, Dieter
Polyeunoa McIntosh 1885
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Annelida
Polychaeta
Phyllodocida
Polynoidae
Polyeunoa
description Polyeunoa McIntosh, 1885 Type species. Polyeunoa laevis McIntosh, 1885. Diagnosis. Body long, with about 70 segments or more. Elytra at least 15 pairs, on segments 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 26, 29, 32, with or without additional, sporadically and irregularly arranged pairs of elytra. Elytra nearly covering dorsum or leaving middorsum uncovered; most of posterior region of body uncovered. Prostomium bilobed with cephalic peaks poorly developed or absent; with three antennae; lateral antennae inserted ventrally to median antenna. Notopodia with prominent, digitiform acicular lobe; neuropodia with prominent, subtriangular acicular lobe, tip not extended to supra-acicular process; tips of noto- and neuroacicula penetrating epidermis. Notochaetae few, about as stout as neurochaetae, with blunt tip; neurochaetae numerous, with uni- or bidentate tip. Remarks. Pettibone (1969) discussed the differences of Polyeunoa McIntosh, 1885 and Hololepidella Willey, 1905 and other related genera in detail. Therefore, we will focus here on the distinction from other relevant genera in this context, i.e. Polynoe Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 (with regard to Polynoe thouarellicola Hartmann-Schröder, 1989, junior synonym of Polyeunoa laevis ), Enipo Malmgren, 1866 (with regard to Enipo rhombigera Ehlers, 1908, junior synonym of P. laevis ), Neopolynoe Loshamn, 1981 (genus attributed to Polynoe antarctica Kinberg, 1858 herein), and Parapolyeunoa n. gen. (new genus established herein for Hololepidella flynni Benham, 1921). The variability in the number of pairs of elytra (15 or more), as described for Polyeunoa laevis below, might be problematic when specimens of P. laevis show exactly 15 pairs, like in specimens originally described as Polynoe thouarellicola . But, due to its prominent notopodium, Polyeunoa is easily distinguished from Polynoe which has a rather short, conical notopodium. Differentiation of Polyeunoa and Enipo is also rather easy due to the absence of notochaetae tapering to a capillary tip in Polyeunoa , which is a typical character of Enipo . As in Polyeunoa, the notopodium of Neopolynoe , is prominent, but Neopolynoe never shows more than 15 pairs of elytra. Only in the case of P. laevis having exactly 15 pairs of elytra might its differentiation from Neopolynoe be problematic. But the fact that Neopolynoe always has distinct cephalic peaks and a thick, stout supra-acicular process at the tip of the neuropodial acicular lobe versus cephalic peaks poorly developed or absent and tip of acicular neuropodial lobe not extended to supra-acicular process as in Polyeunoa allows a clear identification. Parapolyeunoa n.gen., described below, is easily distinguished from Polyeunoa because of its obvious, distinct cephalic peaks and the presence of a supra-acicular process at the neuropodial tip. For further details on distinctive characters see Table 1 and remarks related to species descriptions below. The variability observed in some of the morphological characters of Polyeunoa, such as number of pairs of elytra or the presence/absence of dorsal tubercles (see description of P. la ev i s below) for example, suggests that the type species of the genus might represent a species complex. Currently the DNA-sequences of Polyeunoa and some other genera are analysed by two Italian colleagues, Stefano Schiaparelli and Maria Chiara Alvaro (University of Genova), but some more material has still to be checked before any definite conclusions can be drawn. : Published as part of Barnich, Ruth, Gambi, Maria Cristina & Fiege, Dieter, 2012, Revision of the genus Polyeunoa McIntosh, 1885 (Polychaeta, Polynoidae), pp. 25-38 in Zootaxa 3523 on pages 27-28, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214562 : {"references": ["McIntosh, W. C. (1885) Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 76. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. S. M. \" Challenger \", Zoology, 12, 1 - 554.", "Pettibone, M. H. (1969) The genera Polyeunoa McIntosh, Hololepidella Willey, and three new genera (Polychaeta, Polynoidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 82, 43 - 62.", "Willey, A. (1905) Report on the Polychaeta collected by Prof. Herdmann, at Ceylon, in 1902. Ceylon Pearl Oyster Fisheries, Supplementary Reports, 30, 243 - 324.", "Lamarck, J. B. P. A. d. (1818) Classe neuvieme. Les Annelides. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertebres, 5, 274 - 374.", "Hartmann-Schroder, G. (1989) Polynoe thouarellicola n. sp. aus der Antarktis, assoziiert mit Hornkorallen, und Wiederbeschreibung von Polynoe antarctica Kinberg, 1858 (Polychaeta, Polynoidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 222, 205 - 221.", "Malmgren, A. J. (1866) Nordiska Hafs-Annulata. Ofversigt af Konglia Vetenskaps-Akademiens Forhhandlingar Stockholm, 1, 51 - 110 (read 1865, printed 1866).", "Ehlers, E. (1908) Die bodensassigen Anneliden aus den Sammlungen der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer \" Valdivia \" 1898 - 1899, 16, 1 - 168.", "Loshamn, A. A. (1981) Description of five polynoid species (Polychaeta) from the coasts of Norway and Sweden, including three new species, one new genus and one new generic name. Zoologica Scripta, 10, 5 - 13.", "Kinberg, J. G. H. (1858) Annulater. Konglika svenska fregatten Eugenies resa omkring jorden under befal af C. A. Virgin aren 1851 - 1853. Ventenskapliga iakttagelser pa Konung Oscar den Forstes befallning utgifna af K. Svenska Vetenskaps- Akademien, Zoologi, 2, 9 - 32.", "Benham, W. B. (1921) Polychaeta. Australian Antarctic Expedition 1911 - 14. Scientific Reports, Series C, Zoology and Botany, 6, 1 - 128."]}
format Text
author Barnich, Ruth
Gambi, Maria Cristina
Fiege, Dieter
author_facet Barnich, Ruth
Gambi, Maria Cristina
Fiege, Dieter
author_sort Barnich, Ruth
title Polyeunoa McIntosh 1885
title_short Polyeunoa McIntosh 1885
title_full Polyeunoa McIntosh 1885
title_fullStr Polyeunoa McIntosh 1885
title_full_unstemmed Polyeunoa McIntosh 1885
title_sort polyeunoa mcintosh 1885
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2012
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5680905
https://zenodo.org/record/5680905
long_lat ENVELOPE(140.027,140.027,-66.666,-66.666)
ENVELOPE(-82.713,-82.713,-79.863,-79.863)
ENVELOPE(168.683,168.683,-77.517,-77.517)
ENVELOPE(-66.117,-66.117,-65.750,-65.750)
ENVELOPE(-60.811,-60.811,-62.471,-62.471)
ENVELOPE(-63.017,-63.017,-64.850,-64.850)
geographic Antarctic
Norway
Lamarck
Genova
McIntosh
Malmgren
Noto
Alvaro
geographic_facet Antarctic
Norway
Lamarck
Genova
McIntosh
Malmgren
Noto
Alvaro
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Antarktis*
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Antarktis*
op_relation http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF93FFA0761FFF866814FFF5926FFFEC
http://zoobank.org/158840BF-5C1F-4EBE-9BFE-E18968077548
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.214562
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF93FFA0761FFF866814FFF5926FFFEC
http://zoobank.org/158840BF-5C1F-4EBE-9BFE-E18968077548
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5680904
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5680905
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.214562
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5680904
_version_ 1766265257301377024
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5680905 2023-05-15T13:57:33+02:00 Polyeunoa McIntosh 1885 Barnich, Ruth Gambi, Maria Cristina Fiege, Dieter 2012 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5680905 https://zenodo.org/record/5680905 unknown Zenodo http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF93FFA0761FFF866814FFF5926FFFEC http://zoobank.org/158840BF-5C1F-4EBE-9BFE-E18968077548 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.214562 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF93FFA0761FFF866814FFF5926FFFEC http://zoobank.org/158840BF-5C1F-4EBE-9BFE-E18968077548 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5680904 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Annelida Polychaeta Phyllodocida Polynoidae Polyeunoa Taxonomic treatment article-journal Text ScholarlyArticle 2012 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5680905 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.214562 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5680904 2022-02-08T13:42:09Z Polyeunoa McIntosh, 1885 Type species. Polyeunoa laevis McIntosh, 1885. Diagnosis. Body long, with about 70 segments or more. Elytra at least 15 pairs, on segments 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 26, 29, 32, with or without additional, sporadically and irregularly arranged pairs of elytra. Elytra nearly covering dorsum or leaving middorsum uncovered; most of posterior region of body uncovered. Prostomium bilobed with cephalic peaks poorly developed or absent; with three antennae; lateral antennae inserted ventrally to median antenna. Notopodia with prominent, digitiform acicular lobe; neuropodia with prominent, subtriangular acicular lobe, tip not extended to supra-acicular process; tips of noto- and neuroacicula penetrating epidermis. Notochaetae few, about as stout as neurochaetae, with blunt tip; neurochaetae numerous, with uni- or bidentate tip. Remarks. Pettibone (1969) discussed the differences of Polyeunoa McIntosh, 1885 and Hololepidella Willey, 1905 and other related genera in detail. Therefore, we will focus here on the distinction from other relevant genera in this context, i.e. Polynoe Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 (with regard to Polynoe thouarellicola Hartmann-Schröder, 1989, junior synonym of Polyeunoa laevis ), Enipo Malmgren, 1866 (with regard to Enipo rhombigera Ehlers, 1908, junior synonym of P. laevis ), Neopolynoe Loshamn, 1981 (genus attributed to Polynoe antarctica Kinberg, 1858 herein), and Parapolyeunoa n. gen. (new genus established herein for Hololepidella flynni Benham, 1921). The variability in the number of pairs of elytra (15 or more), as described for Polyeunoa laevis below, might be problematic when specimens of P. laevis show exactly 15 pairs, like in specimens originally described as Polynoe thouarellicola . But, due to its prominent notopodium, Polyeunoa is easily distinguished from Polynoe which has a rather short, conical notopodium. Differentiation of Polyeunoa and Enipo is also rather easy due to the absence of notochaetae tapering to a capillary tip in Polyeunoa , which is a typical character of Enipo . As in Polyeunoa, the notopodium of Neopolynoe , is prominent, but Neopolynoe never shows more than 15 pairs of elytra. Only in the case of P. laevis having exactly 15 pairs of elytra might its differentiation from Neopolynoe be problematic. But the fact that Neopolynoe always has distinct cephalic peaks and a thick, stout supra-acicular process at the tip of the neuropodial acicular lobe versus cephalic peaks poorly developed or absent and tip of acicular neuropodial lobe not extended to supra-acicular process as in Polyeunoa allows a clear identification. Parapolyeunoa n.gen., described below, is easily distinguished from Polyeunoa because of its obvious, distinct cephalic peaks and the presence of a supra-acicular process at the neuropodial tip. For further details on distinctive characters see Table 1 and remarks related to species descriptions below. The variability observed in some of the morphological characters of Polyeunoa, such as number of pairs of elytra or the presence/absence of dorsal tubercles (see description of P. la ev i s below) for example, suggests that the type species of the genus might represent a species complex. Currently the DNA-sequences of Polyeunoa and some other genera are analysed by two Italian colleagues, Stefano Schiaparelli and Maria Chiara Alvaro (University of Genova), but some more material has still to be checked before any definite conclusions can be drawn. : Published as part of Barnich, Ruth, Gambi, Maria Cristina & Fiege, Dieter, 2012, Revision of the genus Polyeunoa McIntosh, 1885 (Polychaeta, Polynoidae), pp. 25-38 in Zootaxa 3523 on pages 27-28, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214562 : {"references": ["McIntosh, W. C. (1885) Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 76. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. S. M. \" Challenger \", Zoology, 12, 1 - 554.", "Pettibone, M. H. (1969) The genera Polyeunoa McIntosh, Hololepidella Willey, and three new genera (Polychaeta, Polynoidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 82, 43 - 62.", "Willey, A. (1905) Report on the Polychaeta collected by Prof. Herdmann, at Ceylon, in 1902. Ceylon Pearl Oyster Fisheries, Supplementary Reports, 30, 243 - 324.", "Lamarck, J. B. P. A. d. (1818) Classe neuvieme. Les Annelides. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertebres, 5, 274 - 374.", "Hartmann-Schroder, G. (1989) Polynoe thouarellicola n. sp. aus der Antarktis, assoziiert mit Hornkorallen, und Wiederbeschreibung von Polynoe antarctica Kinberg, 1858 (Polychaeta, Polynoidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 222, 205 - 221.", "Malmgren, A. J. (1866) Nordiska Hafs-Annulata. Ofversigt af Konglia Vetenskaps-Akademiens Forhhandlingar Stockholm, 1, 51 - 110 (read 1865, printed 1866).", "Ehlers, E. (1908) Die bodensassigen Anneliden aus den Sammlungen der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer \" Valdivia \" 1898 - 1899, 16, 1 - 168.", "Loshamn, A. A. (1981) Description of five polynoid species (Polychaeta) from the coasts of Norway and Sweden, including three new species, one new genus and one new generic name. Zoologica Scripta, 10, 5 - 13.", "Kinberg, J. G. H. (1858) Annulater. Konglika svenska fregatten Eugenies resa omkring jorden under befal af C. A. Virgin aren 1851 - 1853. Ventenskapliga iakttagelser pa Konung Oscar den Forstes befallning utgifna af K. Svenska Vetenskaps- Akademien, Zoologi, 2, 9 - 32.", "Benham, W. B. (1921) Polychaeta. Australian Antarctic Expedition 1911 - 14. Scientific Reports, Series C, Zoology and Botany, 6, 1 - 128."]} Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antarktis* DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Norway Lamarck ENVELOPE(140.027,140.027,-66.666,-66.666) Genova ENVELOPE(-82.713,-82.713,-79.863,-79.863) McIntosh ENVELOPE(168.683,168.683,-77.517,-77.517) Malmgren ENVELOPE(-66.117,-66.117,-65.750,-65.750) Noto ENVELOPE(-60.811,-60.811,-62.471,-62.471) Alvaro ENVELOPE(-63.017,-63.017,-64.850,-64.850)