Cryptodius Moore 1992
Genus Cryptodius Moore, 1992 (Moore 1992: 913) Cryptodius Moore, 1992 (Moore 1992: 913 — Berge et al. 1998: 244.— Kim & Hong 2014: 137. Odius Liljeborg, 1865: Gurjanova 1951: 496 (part).— Barnard & Karaman 1991: 397 (part). Type species. Cryptodius kelleri (Brüggen, 1907): 478. Species . Inc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Zenodo
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5657712 https://zenodo.org/record/5657712 |
Summary: | Genus Cryptodius Moore, 1992 (Moore 1992: 913) Cryptodius Moore, 1992 (Moore 1992: 913 — Berge et al. 1998: 244.— Kim & Hong 2014: 137. Odius Liljeborg, 1865: Gurjanova 1951: 496 (part).— Barnard & Karaman 1991: 397 (part). Type species. Cryptodius kelleri (Brüggen, 1907): 478. Species . Including the new species described here, Cryptodius contains 3 species (Ariyama 2011, Brüggen 1907, Gurjanova 1938, Gurjanova 1951, Kim & Hong 2014, Moore 1992, new data): C. kelleri (Brüggen, 1907), C. sakhalinensis sp. nov. and C. unguidactylus Moore, 1992. Diagnosis (from Moore 1992, with additions). Body smooth. Pereon lacking a conspicuous narrow, mid-dorsal keel or carinated middorsally on pereon. Head telescoped into a pereon segment 1. Rostrum overriching antenna 1 peduncle segment 1. Eyes large, reniform. Antennae short. Antenna 1, peduncle segment 1 subequal to 2 an 3 together. Antenna 2, peduncle segment 4 and 5 subequal. Upper lip asymmetrically incised. Mandible elongate, spine row strong, molar below of level with palp origin, well developed, palp segment 1 small, segments 2 and 3 elongate, subequal. Maxilla 1, inner plate reduced, with 2–3 setae apically; outer plate conical, medial margin with curved dentate stout setae distally; palp 1-segmented, with 1–2 setae apically. Maxilliped, palp segment 2 produced medially, distally concave or not, segment 4 not reduced. Coxae 1–4 not shortened; coxa 1 triandular or concave anteriorly; coxae 2 and 3 distally truncate; coxa 4 with posterodistal lobe truncated obliquely to produce an acute posterior tooth. Pereopods dactylus with unguis. gnathopod 1 flagellar. Pereopod 1 (gnathopod 1) propodochelate, carpus and propodus elongate, subequal in length; dactylus bearing several long plumose setae. Pereopod 2 (gnathopod 2) broader than 1, merus with triangular lobe, propodus triangular, with long palm. Bases of pereopods 5–7 not bearing teeth or cusps. Uropod 1, rami subequal. Uropod 2 reaching or exceecling uropod 3, inner ramus longer than outer. Uropod 3, inner ramus longer than outer and subequal to peduncle. Telson ventrally boat-keeled, apex acutely rounded, entire or slightly incised. Distribution. Marine waters of arctic and boreal part of Northern hemisphere (Berge et al 1998, Gurjanova 1938, 1951, Kim & Hong 2014, Moore 1992). Remarks. Moore (1992) allocated Odius kelleri Brüggen, 1907 as the type species of Cryptodius Moore, 1992, that is a derivative of Odius Liljeborg, 1865, alluding to this genus hitherto hidden identity. The main features of the genus after Moore (1992): pereon lacking a conspiciuous narrow, mid-dorsal keel; head telescoped into a peraeon segment 1; eyes large; antennae short; antenna 1, peduncle segment 1 subequal to 2 an 3 together; antenna 2, peduncle segment 4 and 5 subequal; epistome raised in a median keel; upper lip elongate, asymmetrically incised; mandible elongate, spine row strong, molar on level with palp origin, well developed, palp segment 1 small, segments 2 and 3 elongate, subequal; maxilla 1, inner plate reduced, few setose; outer plate conical, medial margin with curved dentate spines distally, setose proximally; palp 1-segmented; maxilla 2, inner plate with medial margin setulose, outer plate with lateral margin setulose; maxilliped, palp segment 2 produced medially, segment 4 not reduced, inner plate subequal to or longer than outer plate; coxae 1–4 not shortened; coxa 1 triangular; coxae 2 and 3 distally truncate; coxa 4 with posterodistal lobe truncated obliquely to produce an acute posterior tooth; gnathopods and pereopods 3–7 dactylus with unguis; gnathopod 1 flagellar, propodochelate, carpus and propodus elongate, subequal; dactylus bearing several long plumose setae and 2 unguinal spines distally; gnathopod 2 broader than 1, propodus triangular, with long palm, dactylus with accessory tooth on posterior margin; bases of pereopods 5–7 not bearing teeth or cusps; epimeral plates 2 and 3 posterodistal angles acute; uropod 1, rami subequal; uropod 2, inner ramus longer than outer; uropod 3, inner ramus longer than outer and subequal to peduncle; telson ventrally boatkeeled, apex acutely rounded, entire. Berge et al. (1998: appendices 1 and 2) changed the diagnosis of the genus Cryptodius . It was added new main features—the structure of mandible, maxilliped, pereopods 1 and 2, uropod 2: “Attachment of mandible palp in relation to molar: … below”; “Mandible projection of the hingeline: … absent”; “Maxilliped palp article 2 distally: … concave”; “Pereopod 1 propodus: … at least as long as carpus”; “Uropod 2: … reaching or exceecling uropod 3”. Features of the dorsal armament, maxilliped and telson of Cryptodius sakhalinensis sp. nov. indicate that this features is unstable and can not be used as a generic characteristic. With the addition of new species described here, the only stable features of the genus Cryptodius are signs of structure of pereopod 6 and pereopod 7 (basis smooth posteriorly), uropod 2 (reaching or exceecling uropod 3); telson (entire or slightly incised). : Published as part of Labay, Vjacheslav S., 2019, Review of amphipods of the genus Cryptodius Moore, 1992 (Amphipoda: Ochlesidae) from the coastal waters of Sakhalin Island (Far East of Russia), pp. 501-519 in Zootaxa 4603 (3) on pages 503-504, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4603.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/2702315 : {"references": ["Moore, P. G. (1992) A study on amphipods from the superfamily Stegocephaloidea Dana 1852 from the northeastern Pacific region: systematics and distributional ecology. Journal of Natural History, 26, 905 - 936. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222939200770551", "Berge J., Vader, W. & Coleman, C. O. (1998) A cladistic analysis of the amphipod families Ochlesidae and Odiidae, with description of new species and genus. Crustaceans and the Biodiversity Crisis: Proceeding of the Fourth International Congress, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 20 - 24 July, 1998, 1, 239 - 265.", "Kim, Y-H. & Hong, S-S. (2014) First recorded family Odiidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridea) from the Korean coast, with description of newly recorded species. Animal systematic, evolution and diversity, 30 (2), 137 - 143. https: // doi. org / 10.5635 / ASED. 2014.30.2.137", "Liljeborg, W. (1865) On the Lysianassa magella nica H. Milne Edwards, and on the Crustacea of the suborder Amphipoda and subfamily Lysianassina found an [sic] the coast of Sweden and Norway. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis, Series 3, 6, 1 - 38.", "Gurjanova, E. F. (1951) Bokoplavy morei SSSR i sopredel'nykh vod (Amphipoda-Gammaridea). AN SSSR. Opredeliteli po Faune SSSR, 41, 1 - 1029. [in Russian]", "Barnard, J. L. & Karaman, G. S. (1991) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda (except marine gammaroids). Part 1. Records of the Australian Museum, 13 (Supplement), 1 - 417. https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0812 - 7387.13.1991.91", "Bruggen, E. von der. (1907) Zwei neue Amphipoden-Arten aus Wladiwostok. Annuaire du Musee zoologique de L'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St. - Petersbourg, XIII, 478 - 483.", "Ariyama, H. (2011) Six species of the family Odiidae (Crustacea Amphipoda) from Japan, with descriptions of a new genus and four new species. Bulletin of the National Museum of Natural Sciences, Series A, 5 (Supplement), 1 - 39.", "Gurjanova, E. F. (1938) Amphipoda Gammroidea of Siaukhu Bay and Sudzukhe Bay (Japan Sea). Reports of the Japan Sea hydrobiological expedition of the Zoological institute of the Academy of Science of the USSR in 1934, Part 1, 241 - 404."]} |
---|