Pseudechiniscus santomensis Fontoura, Pilato & Lisi, 2010, sp. nov.

Pseudechiniscus santomensis sp. nov. (Figs. 1 A–D; 2 A) Material examined: 32 specimens, one of them is a two clawed larva. Type locality: Cascata de São Nicolau (0° 16 ΄ 38 ʺN; 6 ° 38 ΄ 46 ʺE), São Tomé Island, Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe. Type repository: The holotype (slide No. 5...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fontoura, Paulo, Pilato, Giovanni, Lisi, Oscar
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617901
https://zenodo.org/record/5617901
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5617901
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Tardigrada
Heterotardigrada
Echiniscoidea
Echiniscidae
Pseudechiniscus
Pseudechiniscus santomensis
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Tardigrada
Heterotardigrada
Echiniscoidea
Echiniscidae
Pseudechiniscus
Pseudechiniscus santomensis
Fontoura, Paulo
Pilato, Giovanni
Lisi, Oscar
Pseudechiniscus santomensis Fontoura, Pilato & Lisi, 2010, sp. nov.
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Tardigrada
Heterotardigrada
Echiniscoidea
Echiniscidae
Pseudechiniscus
Pseudechiniscus santomensis
description Pseudechiniscus santomensis sp. nov. (Figs. 1 A–D; 2 A) Material examined: 32 specimens, one of them is a two clawed larva. Type locality: Cascata de São Nicolau (0° 16 ΄ 38 ʺN; 6 ° 38 ΄ 46 ʺE), São Tomé Island, Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe. Type repository: The holotype (slide No. 5401) and one paratype (slide No. 5402) are deposited in the collection of Binda & Pilato, (Museum of the Department of Animal Biology “Marcello La Greca”, University of Catania, Italy). The other paratypes including the larva (slides CII 59 - CII 89) are deposited in the collection of P. Fontoura at the Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal. Specific diagnosis: Pseudechiniscus with tiny projections on the posterior margin of the undivided pseudosegmental plate. Those projections, generally triangular in shape, are sometimes reduced into two small teeth or assume the shape of a wide protruding flap poorly developed with a central indentation; median plate 1 with a transverse fold; median plate 2 divided; median plate 3 undivided; terminal plate not faceted but with two indentations. One intersegmental platelet present on each side of the median plates 1 and 2. Ornamentation of the dorsal plates comprised of dots joined by very delicate striae. Ventral dots unjoined by striae and forming a reticular patched design. Cephalic appendages and very short filaments A , present; all other lateral, dorsal filaments, or projections, absent. Internal claws with a thin and straight spur oriented towards the claw base. No dorsal leg spines. Short papilla on hind legs present; dentate collar, absent. Description of the holotype: Female; body length 168 µm; colour reddish. Eye spots not observed either in slide mounted specimens or in live specimens. Head plate with a W-shaped fold (Fig. 1 A, arrow a). Scapular plate divided into an anterior and a posterior portion by a transverse fold (Fig. 1 A, arrow b); lateral longitudinal folds absent. Median plate 1 divided by a transverse fold into an anterior and posterior portion with clearly different sized dots (Fig. 1 A, arrow c); median plate 2 also clearly divided but dots similar in size in anterior and posterior portion (Fig 1 B, arrow a); median plate 3 undivided (Fig. 1 C, arrow a). An intersegmental platelet on each side of median plates 1 and 2 (Fig. 1 B, arrows b, c). Median and lateral longitudinal folds absent in all the median plates and in the pseudosegmental plate. Two small triangular projections, backward oriented, extending about 4.2 µm from the posterior margin of the pseudosegmental plate (Fig. 1 B, arrows d, e). Terminal plate unfaceted with two indentations. Holotype (largest) Smallest Mean values and range All the dorsal plates have a dense and regular ornamentation comprised of dots joined by very delicate striae, which are difficult to see (Fig. 2 A, arrow). Dots are slightly larger on the terminal and pseudosegmental plates (with respectively c. 50 and 56 dots per 100 µm 2), dorsal portion of paired plates and posterior portion of the scapular plate. Smallest dots are present on the neck plate, anterior portion of median plate 1, lateral portions of paired plates and on the intersegmental lateral platelets. Leg plates also sculptured but striae joining the dots are not visible (Fig. 1 A). Ventral ornamentation comprised of a very fine granulation (without striae joining the dots) forming transverse patches and a reticular design (Fig. 1 D). A wide patch is present in the head region, two elliptical meshes follow; after the first pair of legs alternate transverse patches of dots and transverse bands of mesh are present; in some bands all the meshes are elongate in shape, in other bands two large roughly triangular meshes are also present. Length of external and internal buccal cirri 12.8 µm and 9.4 µm respectively; cephalic papilla 4.8 µm long (Fig. 1 A, arrow d). Cirri A very short, 18.7 µm long; adjacent clava 4.8 µm long (Fig. 1 A, arrow e). Apart from the triangular projections of the pseudosegmental plate, all other lateral or dorsal cirri, or any other kind of projection are absent. No spines on legs I. Hind legs without dentate collar but with a small papilla 2.2 µm long (Fig. 1 B, arrow f). Length of the external and internal claws of the legs I, 9.0 µm and 8.0 µm respectively; on the legs II and III, external 8.0 µm and internal 8.4 µm; external and internal claws of legs IV, 8.5 µm and 9.2 µm long respectively. A very thin and straight spur oriented towards the claw base is present on internal claws (Fig. 1 D, arrows). Eggs unknown. Remarks: The quantitative and qualitative characters of the paratypes are similar to those of the holotype (Tab. 1), but a degree of variability concerning the shape of the posterior margin of the pseudosegmental plate must be stressed. Most specimens (64 %) have two triangular projections, as in the holotype (Fig. 1 B), which can be reduced to two very small teeth; other specimens (32 %) have the posterior margin slightly projected forming only one wide protruding flap, sometimes with a very soft median indentation assuming the shape of two rounded lobes (Fig. 1 C), Only one paratype (4 %) has the posterior margin of the pseudosegmental plate without any kind of projection. Etymology: The name santomensis refers to the locus typicus: São Tomé Island; santomensis = inhabiting São Tomé. Differential diagnosis: According to Kristensen (1987), two main groups of species can be distinguished within the genus Pseudechinicus Thulin, 1911: the ‘ victor group’ composed by species with trunk cirri and the ‘ suillus /conifer group’ with species characterised by the absence of trunk cirri. Pseudechiniscus santomensis sp. nov. clearly belongs to the latter. Within the ‘ suillus /conifer group’, six species have the following five important characters in common with P. santomensis sp. nov : absence of lateral papillae, presence of projections at the posterior margin of the pseudosegmental plate, scapular plate with a transverse fold, terminal plate not faceted, and cuticular ornamentation comprised of dots joined by striae. Those taxa are: P. b a r t k e i W&eogon;glarska, 1962; P. quadrilobatus Iharos, 1969 c; P. spinerectus Pilato, Binda, Napolitano & Moncada, 2001; P. gullii Pilato & Lisi 2006, P. pilatoi Li, 2007 and P. yunnanensis Wang, 2009. In addition, we must stress a problem regarding P. novaezeelandiae (Richters, 1908 a). The nominal subspecies of this species has lateral papillae, but in the subspecies aspinosus , described by Iharos (1963), these are lacking. In the description of P. novaezeelandiae , and all the subspecies, striae joining the cuticular dots were not described but we noted that they are present, even if very faint, in a specimen from New Zealand (see Pilato et al . 2005). Unfortunately we were not able to examine the subspecies aspinosus and therefore we may only hypothesize that it has cuticular ornamentation similar to that of the nominal subspecies. If the hypothesis is true, P. novaezeelandiae aspinosus would also have the five characters indicated above, and therefore we have included a comparison of P. santomensis sp. nov. to this subspecies. Pseudechiniscus santomensis sp. nov. differs from P. bartkei , P. quadrilobatus, P. gullii , P. pilatoi and P. yunnanensis in having the median plate 2 divided; more dense cuticular granulation, and less visible striae joining the dots (Fig. 2). In addition, it does not have the raised margins of the cuticular plates, which are present in P. gullii, P. quadrilobatus and P. p i l a t o i the median plate 1 is divided by a transverse fold, unlike P. bartkei, P. quadrilobatus, P. pilatoi and P. yunnanensis spurs are present on the internal claws, absent in P. gullii, P. quadrilobatus, P. pilatoi and P. yunnanensis and the new species has a different ventral ornamentation to that seen on P. bartkei, P. gullii , P. quadrilobatu s and P. yunnanensis (in the description of P. pilatoi no information was supplied regarding the ventral cuticular ornamentation). Pseudechiniscus santomensis can also be distinguished from P. bartkei in having the pseudosegmental plate undivided and only one intersegmental platelet lateral to the median plates 1 and 2; from P. gullii as the pseudosegmental plate is undivided and with two marginal lobes instead of only one, and the absence of a dip between scapular plate and median plate 1; from P. quadrilobatus as the pseudosegmental plate has two marginal projections instead of only one; from P. pilatoi as the pseudosegmantal plate is not divided and has two marginal projections instead of only one, plus the terminal plate has two indentations ( n.b. the description of P. pilatoi does not note presence or absence of intersegmental lateral platelets, which may also be a distinguishing character); and from P. yunnanensis as the terminal plate has two indentations and lateral platelets are present. P. spinerectus is the species most similar to Pseudechinscus santonensis sp. nov. , but the new species differs in having the pseudosegmental plate undivided; the marginal projections of this plate less developed and never erected; lateral longitudinal folds absent in the scapular and paired plates; only one intersegmental platelet lateral to the median plates 1 and 2; striae joining the plate dots slightly less visible (Fig. 2 A and E); dots on the legs not joined by striae, and some differences in the detail of the ventral cuticular ornamentation. In addition, P. santomensis sp. nov. differs from P. spinerectus in having shorter buccal cirri (external and internal cirri 12.8 µm and 9.4 µm respectively (holotype) and 14.5 µm and 12.1 µm long respectively ( P. spinerectus specimen 135 µm long)); in having shorter cirrus A (<20 µm long in P. santomensis sp. nov. and> 32 µm in P. spinerectus ); shorter papilla of hind legs ( c. 2.2 µm in the new species and c. 3.0 in P. spinerectus ). The new species differs from P. navaezeelandiae aspinosus in having the pseudosegmental plate undivided; intersegmental lateral platelets more clearly defined; striae joining the cuticular dots more visible (if ssp aspinosus follows P. navaezeelandiae form of striae); completely different ventral cuticular ornamentation and internal claws with spurs. It is interesting to note that some authors ( e.g. Dastych, 1984; Kathman & Dastych, 1990; McInnes, 1995; Miller et al. 2001) ascribed to specimens of Pseudechiniscus suillus the ventral cuticle with small dots forming a reticular design and, with the exception of Miller et al. (2001), also a dorsal sculpture comprised of dots joined by very delicate striae. However, they also stated that this kind of sculpture seems to be characteristic of localised populations. This kind of cuticle sculpture is not usually observed in populations of P. suillus , and is not mentioned in descriptions made by taxonomists of high reputation ( e.g. Dastych, 1984; Maucci, 1986) with light microscope (phase contrast) or scanning electron microscope (Schuster et al ., 1975). According to McInnes (1995) with whom we agree, those specimens do not belong to P. suillus but to different species. For this reason we think superfluous to compare P. santomensis sp. nov . with populations belonging to undetermined species. : Published as part of Fontoura, Paulo, Pilato, Giovanni & Lisi, Oscar, 2010, First record of Tardigrada from São Tomé (Gulf of Guinea, Western Equatorial Africa) and description of Pseudechiniscus santomensis sp. nov. (Heterotardigrada: Echiniscidae), pp. 31-42 in Zootaxa 2564 on pages 32-37, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.197214 : {"references": ["Kristensen, R. M. (1987) Generic revision of the Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada), with a discussion of the origin of the family. In: Bertolani R. (Ed.), Biology of Tardigrades. Selected Symposia and Monographs, U. Z. I., 1. Mucchi Editore, Modena Italy, 261 - 335.", "Thulin, G. (1911) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Tardigradenfauna Schwedens. Arkiv for Zoologi Stockholm, 7, 1 - 60.", "Weglarska, B. (1962) Die Tardigraden Vietnams. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemoslovenicae, XXVI, 4, 300 - 307.", "Iharos, G. (1969 c) Einige Angaben zur Tardigraden-Fauna Vietnams. Opuscula Zoologica Budapest, 9 (2), 273 - 277.", "Pilato, G., Binda, M. G., Napolitano, A. & Moncada, E. (2001) Notes on South American tardigrades with the description of two new species: Pseudechiniscus spinerectus and Macrobiotus danielae. Tropical Zoology, 14, 223 - 231.", "Li, X. (2007) Tardigrades from the Tsinling Mountains, central China with descriptions of two new species of Echiniscidae (Tardigrada). Journal of Natural History, 41 (41 - 44), 2719 - 2739.", "Wang, L. (2009) Tardigrades from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau (China) with description of two new species in the genera Mixibius (Eutardigrada: Hypsibiidae) and Pseudechiniscus (Heterotardigrada: Echiniscidae). Journal of Natural History, 43 (41), 2553 - 2570.", "Richters, F. (1908 a) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Moosfauna Australiens und der Inseln des Pacifischen Oceans. Zoologische Jahrbucher, Abteilung fur Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere, Jena, 26, 196 - 213.", "Iharos, G. (1963) The zoological results of Gy. Topal's collectings in South Argentina. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, Pars Zoologica, 55, 293 - 299.", "Pilato, G., Binda, M. G. & Lisi, O. (2005) Remarks on some Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada) from New Zealand with the description of two new species. Zootaxa, 1027, 27.45.", "Dastych, H. (1984) The Tardigrada from Antarctic with descriptions of new species. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 27, 377 - 436.", "Kathman, R. D. & Dastych, H. (1990) Some Echiniscidae (Tardigrada: Heterotardigrada) from Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 699 - 706.", "McInnes, S. J. (1995) Tardigrades from Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, with particular reference to freshwater species. Journal of Natural History, 29, 1419 - 1445.", "Miller, W. R., Horning, D. S. & Heatwole, H. F. (2001) Tardigrades of the Australian Antarctic: Macquarie Island, sub- Antarctica. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 240, 475 - 491.", "Maucci, W. (1986) Tardigrada. In: Fauna d'Italia, 34, 1 - 338. Calderini, Bologna.", "Schuster, R. O., Grigarick, A. A. & Toftner, E. C. (1975) Ultrastructure of tardigrade cuticle. Memorie dell'Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia, 32, Suppl., 337 - 375."]}
format Text
author Fontoura, Paulo
Pilato, Giovanni
Lisi, Oscar
author_facet Fontoura, Paulo
Pilato, Giovanni
Lisi, Oscar
author_sort Fontoura, Paulo
title Pseudechiniscus santomensis Fontoura, Pilato & Lisi, 2010, sp. nov.
title_short Pseudechiniscus santomensis Fontoura, Pilato & Lisi, 2010, sp. nov.
title_full Pseudechiniscus santomensis Fontoura, Pilato & Lisi, 2010, sp. nov.
title_fullStr Pseudechiniscus santomensis Fontoura, Pilato & Lisi, 2010, sp. nov.
title_full_unstemmed Pseudechiniscus santomensis Fontoura, Pilato & Lisi, 2010, sp. nov.
title_sort pseudechiniscus santomensis fontoura, pilato & lisi, 2010, sp. nov.
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2010
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617901
https://zenodo.org/record/5617901
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
ENVELOPE(-45.500,-45.500,-60.583,-60.583)
ENVELOPE(-45.595,-45.595,-60.708,-60.708)
ENVELOPE(-159.667,-159.667,-86.333,-86.333)
geographic Antarctic
Canada
New Zealand
Argentina
British Columbia
South Orkney Islands
Signy Island
Kristensen
geographic_facet Antarctic
Canada
New Zealand
Argentina
British Columbia
South Orkney Islands
Signy Island
Kristensen
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Macquarie Island
Signy Island
South Orkney Islands
Tardigrade
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Macquarie Island
Signy Island
South Orkney Islands
Tardigrade
op_relation http://publication.plazi.org/id/21553072FFE68026EB56DB69FFF2FFC1
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197214
http://publication.plazi.org/id/21553072FFE68026EB56DB69FFF2FFC1
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197215
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197216
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617902
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617901
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197214
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197215
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197216
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617902
_version_ 1766272650940776448
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5617901 2023-05-15T14:02:23+02:00 Pseudechiniscus santomensis Fontoura, Pilato & Lisi, 2010, sp. nov. Fontoura, Paulo Pilato, Giovanni Lisi, Oscar 2010 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617901 https://zenodo.org/record/5617901 unknown Zenodo http://publication.plazi.org/id/21553072FFE68026EB56DB69FFF2FFC1 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197214 http://publication.plazi.org/id/21553072FFE68026EB56DB69FFF2FFC1 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197215 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197216 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617902 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Tardigrada Heterotardigrada Echiniscoidea Echiniscidae Pseudechiniscus Pseudechiniscus santomensis Taxonomic treatment article-journal Text ScholarlyArticle 2010 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617901 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197214 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197215 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.197216 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617902 2022-02-08T12:40:44Z Pseudechiniscus santomensis sp. nov. (Figs. 1 A–D; 2 A) Material examined: 32 specimens, one of them is a two clawed larva. Type locality: Cascata de São Nicolau (0° 16 ΄ 38 ʺN; 6 ° 38 ΄ 46 ʺE), São Tomé Island, Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe. Type repository: The holotype (slide No. 5401) and one paratype (slide No. 5402) are deposited in the collection of Binda & Pilato, (Museum of the Department of Animal Biology “Marcello La Greca”, University of Catania, Italy). The other paratypes including the larva (slides CII 59 - CII 89) are deposited in the collection of P. Fontoura at the Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal. Specific diagnosis: Pseudechiniscus with tiny projections on the posterior margin of the undivided pseudosegmental plate. Those projections, generally triangular in shape, are sometimes reduced into two small teeth or assume the shape of a wide protruding flap poorly developed with a central indentation; median plate 1 with a transverse fold; median plate 2 divided; median plate 3 undivided; terminal plate not faceted but with two indentations. One intersegmental platelet present on each side of the median plates 1 and 2. Ornamentation of the dorsal plates comprised of dots joined by very delicate striae. Ventral dots unjoined by striae and forming a reticular patched design. Cephalic appendages and very short filaments A , present; all other lateral, dorsal filaments, or projections, absent. Internal claws with a thin and straight spur oriented towards the claw base. No dorsal leg spines. Short papilla on hind legs present; dentate collar, absent. Description of the holotype: Female; body length 168 µm; colour reddish. Eye spots not observed either in slide mounted specimens or in live specimens. Head plate with a W-shaped fold (Fig. 1 A, arrow a). Scapular plate divided into an anterior and a posterior portion by a transverse fold (Fig. 1 A, arrow b); lateral longitudinal folds absent. Median plate 1 divided by a transverse fold into an anterior and posterior portion with clearly different sized dots (Fig. 1 A, arrow c); median plate 2 also clearly divided but dots similar in size in anterior and posterior portion (Fig 1 B, arrow a); median plate 3 undivided (Fig. 1 C, arrow a). An intersegmental platelet on each side of median plates 1 and 2 (Fig. 1 B, arrows b, c). Median and lateral longitudinal folds absent in all the median plates and in the pseudosegmental plate. Two small triangular projections, backward oriented, extending about 4.2 µm from the posterior margin of the pseudosegmental plate (Fig. 1 B, arrows d, e). Terminal plate unfaceted with two indentations. Holotype (largest) Smallest Mean values and range All the dorsal plates have a dense and regular ornamentation comprised of dots joined by very delicate striae, which are difficult to see (Fig. 2 A, arrow). Dots are slightly larger on the terminal and pseudosegmental plates (with respectively c. 50 and 56 dots per 100 µm 2), dorsal portion of paired plates and posterior portion of the scapular plate. Smallest dots are present on the neck plate, anterior portion of median plate 1, lateral portions of paired plates and on the intersegmental lateral platelets. Leg plates also sculptured but striae joining the dots are not visible (Fig. 1 A). Ventral ornamentation comprised of a very fine granulation (without striae joining the dots) forming transverse patches and a reticular design (Fig. 1 D). A wide patch is present in the head region, two elliptical meshes follow; after the first pair of legs alternate transverse patches of dots and transverse bands of mesh are present; in some bands all the meshes are elongate in shape, in other bands two large roughly triangular meshes are also present. Length of external and internal buccal cirri 12.8 µm and 9.4 µm respectively; cephalic papilla 4.8 µm long (Fig. 1 A, arrow d). Cirri A very short, 18.7 µm long; adjacent clava 4.8 µm long (Fig. 1 A, arrow e). Apart from the triangular projections of the pseudosegmental plate, all other lateral or dorsal cirri, or any other kind of projection are absent. No spines on legs I. Hind legs without dentate collar but with a small papilla 2.2 µm long (Fig. 1 B, arrow f). Length of the external and internal claws of the legs I, 9.0 µm and 8.0 µm respectively; on the legs II and III, external 8.0 µm and internal 8.4 µm; external and internal claws of legs IV, 8.5 µm and 9.2 µm long respectively. A very thin and straight spur oriented towards the claw base is present on internal claws (Fig. 1 D, arrows). Eggs unknown. Remarks: The quantitative and qualitative characters of the paratypes are similar to those of the holotype (Tab. 1), but a degree of variability concerning the shape of the posterior margin of the pseudosegmental plate must be stressed. Most specimens (64 %) have two triangular projections, as in the holotype (Fig. 1 B), which can be reduced to two very small teeth; other specimens (32 %) have the posterior margin slightly projected forming only one wide protruding flap, sometimes with a very soft median indentation assuming the shape of two rounded lobes (Fig. 1 C), Only one paratype (4 %) has the posterior margin of the pseudosegmental plate without any kind of projection. Etymology: The name santomensis refers to the locus typicus: São Tomé Island; santomensis = inhabiting São Tomé. Differential diagnosis: According to Kristensen (1987), two main groups of species can be distinguished within the genus Pseudechinicus Thulin, 1911: the ‘ victor group’ composed by species with trunk cirri and the ‘ suillus /conifer group’ with species characterised by the absence of trunk cirri. Pseudechiniscus santomensis sp. nov. clearly belongs to the latter. Within the ‘ suillus /conifer group’, six species have the following five important characters in common with P. santomensis sp. nov : absence of lateral papillae, presence of projections at the posterior margin of the pseudosegmental plate, scapular plate with a transverse fold, terminal plate not faceted, and cuticular ornamentation comprised of dots joined by striae. Those taxa are: P. b a r t k e i W&eogon;glarska, 1962; P. quadrilobatus Iharos, 1969 c; P. spinerectus Pilato, Binda, Napolitano & Moncada, 2001; P. gullii Pilato & Lisi 2006, P. pilatoi Li, 2007 and P. yunnanensis Wang, 2009. In addition, we must stress a problem regarding P. novaezeelandiae (Richters, 1908 a). The nominal subspecies of this species has lateral papillae, but in the subspecies aspinosus , described by Iharos (1963), these are lacking. In the description of P. novaezeelandiae , and all the subspecies, striae joining the cuticular dots were not described but we noted that they are present, even if very faint, in a specimen from New Zealand (see Pilato et al . 2005). Unfortunately we were not able to examine the subspecies aspinosus and therefore we may only hypothesize that it has cuticular ornamentation similar to that of the nominal subspecies. If the hypothesis is true, P. novaezeelandiae aspinosus would also have the five characters indicated above, and therefore we have included a comparison of P. santomensis sp. nov. to this subspecies. Pseudechiniscus santomensis sp. nov. differs from P. bartkei , P. quadrilobatus, P. gullii , P. pilatoi and P. yunnanensis in having the median plate 2 divided; more dense cuticular granulation, and less visible striae joining the dots (Fig. 2). In addition, it does not have the raised margins of the cuticular plates, which are present in P. gullii, P. quadrilobatus and P. p i l a t o i the median plate 1 is divided by a transverse fold, unlike P. bartkei, P. quadrilobatus, P. pilatoi and P. yunnanensis spurs are present on the internal claws, absent in P. gullii, P. quadrilobatus, P. pilatoi and P. yunnanensis and the new species has a different ventral ornamentation to that seen on P. bartkei, P. gullii , P. quadrilobatu s and P. yunnanensis (in the description of P. pilatoi no information was supplied regarding the ventral cuticular ornamentation). Pseudechiniscus santomensis can also be distinguished from P. bartkei in having the pseudosegmental plate undivided and only one intersegmental platelet lateral to the median plates 1 and 2; from P. gullii as the pseudosegmental plate is undivided and with two marginal lobes instead of only one, and the absence of a dip between scapular plate and median plate 1; from P. quadrilobatus as the pseudosegmental plate has two marginal projections instead of only one; from P. pilatoi as the pseudosegmantal plate is not divided and has two marginal projections instead of only one, plus the terminal plate has two indentations ( n.b. the description of P. pilatoi does not note presence or absence of intersegmental lateral platelets, which may also be a distinguishing character); and from P. yunnanensis as the terminal plate has two indentations and lateral platelets are present. P. spinerectus is the species most similar to Pseudechinscus santonensis sp. nov. , but the new species differs in having the pseudosegmental plate undivided; the marginal projections of this plate less developed and never erected; lateral longitudinal folds absent in the scapular and paired plates; only one intersegmental platelet lateral to the median plates 1 and 2; striae joining the plate dots slightly less visible (Fig. 2 A and E); dots on the legs not joined by striae, and some differences in the detail of the ventral cuticular ornamentation. In addition, P. santomensis sp. nov. differs from P. spinerectus in having shorter buccal cirri (external and internal cirri 12.8 µm and 9.4 µm respectively (holotype) and 14.5 µm and 12.1 µm long respectively ( P. spinerectus specimen 135 µm long)); in having shorter cirrus A (<20 µm long in P. santomensis sp. nov. and> 32 µm in P. spinerectus ); shorter papilla of hind legs ( c. 2.2 µm in the new species and c. 3.0 in P. spinerectus ). The new species differs from P. navaezeelandiae aspinosus in having the pseudosegmental plate undivided; intersegmental lateral platelets more clearly defined; striae joining the cuticular dots more visible (if ssp aspinosus follows P. navaezeelandiae form of striae); completely different ventral cuticular ornamentation and internal claws with spurs. It is interesting to note that some authors ( e.g. Dastych, 1984; Kathman & Dastych, 1990; McInnes, 1995; Miller et al. 2001) ascribed to specimens of Pseudechiniscus suillus the ventral cuticle with small dots forming a reticular design and, with the exception of Miller et al. (2001), also a dorsal sculpture comprised of dots joined by very delicate striae. However, they also stated that this kind of sculpture seems to be characteristic of localised populations. This kind of cuticle sculpture is not usually observed in populations of P. suillus , and is not mentioned in descriptions made by taxonomists of high reputation ( e.g. Dastych, 1984; Maucci, 1986) with light microscope (phase contrast) or scanning electron microscope (Schuster et al ., 1975). According to McInnes (1995) with whom we agree, those specimens do not belong to P. suillus but to different species. For this reason we think superfluous to compare P. santomensis sp. nov . with populations belonging to undetermined species. : Published as part of Fontoura, Paulo, Pilato, Giovanni & Lisi, Oscar, 2010, First record of Tardigrada from São Tomé (Gulf of Guinea, Western Equatorial Africa) and description of Pseudechiniscus santomensis sp. nov. (Heterotardigrada: Echiniscidae), pp. 31-42 in Zootaxa 2564 on pages 32-37, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.197214 : {"references": ["Kristensen, R. M. (1987) Generic revision of the Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada), with a discussion of the origin of the family. In: Bertolani R. (Ed.), Biology of Tardigrades. Selected Symposia and Monographs, U. Z. I., 1. Mucchi Editore, Modena Italy, 261 - 335.", "Thulin, G. (1911) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Tardigradenfauna Schwedens. Arkiv for Zoologi Stockholm, 7, 1 - 60.", "Weglarska, B. (1962) Die Tardigraden Vietnams. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemoslovenicae, XXVI, 4, 300 - 307.", "Iharos, G. (1969 c) Einige Angaben zur Tardigraden-Fauna Vietnams. Opuscula Zoologica Budapest, 9 (2), 273 - 277.", "Pilato, G., Binda, M. G., Napolitano, A. & Moncada, E. (2001) Notes on South American tardigrades with the description of two new species: Pseudechiniscus spinerectus and Macrobiotus danielae. Tropical Zoology, 14, 223 - 231.", "Li, X. (2007) Tardigrades from the Tsinling Mountains, central China with descriptions of two new species of Echiniscidae (Tardigrada). Journal of Natural History, 41 (41 - 44), 2719 - 2739.", "Wang, L. (2009) Tardigrades from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau (China) with description of two new species in the genera Mixibius (Eutardigrada: Hypsibiidae) and Pseudechiniscus (Heterotardigrada: Echiniscidae). Journal of Natural History, 43 (41), 2553 - 2570.", "Richters, F. (1908 a) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Moosfauna Australiens und der Inseln des Pacifischen Oceans. Zoologische Jahrbucher, Abteilung fur Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere, Jena, 26, 196 - 213.", "Iharos, G. (1963) The zoological results of Gy. Topal's collectings in South Argentina. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, Pars Zoologica, 55, 293 - 299.", "Pilato, G., Binda, M. G. & Lisi, O. (2005) Remarks on some Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada) from New Zealand with the description of two new species. Zootaxa, 1027, 27.45.", "Dastych, H. (1984) The Tardigrada from Antarctic with descriptions of new species. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 27, 377 - 436.", "Kathman, R. D. & Dastych, H. (1990) Some Echiniscidae (Tardigrada: Heterotardigrada) from Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 699 - 706.", "McInnes, S. J. (1995) Tardigrades from Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, with particular reference to freshwater species. Journal of Natural History, 29, 1419 - 1445.", "Miller, W. R., Horning, D. S. & Heatwole, H. F. (2001) Tardigrades of the Australian Antarctic: Macquarie Island, sub- Antarctica. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 240, 475 - 491.", "Maucci, W. (1986) Tardigrada. In: Fauna d'Italia, 34, 1 - 338. Calderini, Bologna.", "Schuster, R. O., Grigarick, A. A. & Toftner, E. C. (1975) Ultrastructure of tardigrade cuticle. Memorie dell'Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia, 32, Suppl., 337 - 375."]} Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Macquarie Island Signy Island South Orkney Islands Tardigrade DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Canada New Zealand Argentina British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) South Orkney Islands ENVELOPE(-45.500,-45.500,-60.583,-60.583) Signy Island ENVELOPE(-45.595,-45.595,-60.708,-60.708) Kristensen ENVELOPE(-159.667,-159.667,-86.333,-86.333)