Hymedesmia (Hymedesmia) noramaloneae Goodwin & Berman & Hendry 2019, sp. nov.
Hymedesmia ( Hymedesmia ) noramaloneae sp. nov. (Figure 9, Table 6) lsid:zoobank.org:act: D3D74DBA-258E-4FAB-8E5F-343DD3FB562B Type material. Holotype: BELUM. Mc 2015.701 Vieugue Island (65°38.758’S, 65° 12.540’W), depth 10–22 m; collected by C. Goodwin and E. Priestley, 23/02/2015. Paratype: BELUM....
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Zenodo
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5584973 https://zenodo.org/record/5584973 |
id |
ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5584973 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftdatacite |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Porifera Demospongiae Poecilosclerida Hymedesmiidae Hymedesmia Hymedesmia noramaloneae |
spellingShingle |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Porifera Demospongiae Poecilosclerida Hymedesmiidae Hymedesmia Hymedesmia noramaloneae Goodwin, Claire E. Berman, Jade Hendry, Katharine R. Hymedesmia (Hymedesmia) noramaloneae Goodwin & Berman & Hendry 2019, sp. nov. |
topic_facet |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Porifera Demospongiae Poecilosclerida Hymedesmiidae Hymedesmia Hymedesmia noramaloneae |
description |
Hymedesmia ( Hymedesmia ) noramaloneae sp. nov. (Figure 9, Table 6) lsid:zoobank.org:act: D3D74DBA-258E-4FAB-8E5F-343DD3FB562B Type material. Holotype: BELUM. Mc 2015.701 Vieugue Island (65°38.758’S, 65° 12.540’W), depth 10–22 m; collected by C. Goodwin and E. Priestley, 23/02/2015. Paratype: BELUM.Mc2015.722and BELUM. Mc 2015.726 Port Charcot, Booth Island (65°03.853’S, 64° 01.868’W), depth 6–16 m; collected by C. Goodwin and E. Priestley, 23/02/2015. Other specimens: BELUM. Mc 2015.601 Grotto Island, Verdansky Base (Site 1) (65°14.615’S, 64° 15.019’W), depth 14–24 m. BELUM. Mc 2015.734 Port Charcot, Booth Island (65°03.853’S, 64° 01.868’W), depth 6–16 m. Diagnosis. Hymedesmia ( Hymedesmia ) with tornote ectosomal spicules (245–358 µm long) and two categories of acanthostyles (267–633 and 137–208 µm long), the larger of which are only spined for their basal third. Etymology. Named after Nora Malone, daughter of Jade Berman, who was born a few months after the expedition. External morphology. In situ appearance (Figure 9A): Very thin pale yellow encrusting sponge forming patches up to 20 cm in diameter. Surface covered with an irregular pattern of veins and pores sieves—pore sieves do not have rims so are less distinct than in many other Hymedesmia species. Preserved appearance. Firm white crust, 1 mm thick. Skeleton (Figure 9B): Hymedesmoid with a basal layer of primary and secondary acanthostyles and ascending columns (5–15 spicules thick) of tornotes. Chelae sparsely scattered throughout tissue. Spicules (for measurements of all specimens see Table 6). Primary acanthostyles (Figure 9C). With a tylote head. The head and up to the lower 1/3 of the shaft are spined with small conical spines but the majority of the shaft is smooth. The shaft is often slightly curved. Secondary acanthostyles (Figure 9D). With a tylote head. Entirely spined with small conical spines but these are densest at the head and become slightly sparser towards the tip. Ectosomal tornotes (Figure 9E, F): Anisotornotes, sometimes with one slightly rounded end so style-like in form, others with two pointed ends. Arcuate chelae (Figure 9G): Normal arcuate chelae with a slight bend in the shaft and three, fairly short, rounded alae on each end. Remarks. Of the 13 species of Hymedesmia ( Hymedesmia ) recorded from the region (see Goodwin et al. 2012) three possess two categories of acanthostyles and have tornotes as ectosomal spicules: H. antarctica Boury-Esnault & Van Beveren, 1982, H. mariondufresni Boury-Esnault & Van Beveren 1982, and H. barnesi Goodwin, Brewin & Brickle 2012. H. barnesi can be distinguished as it has smaller primary acanthostyles (272–392 µm) and is bright orange when living. Boury-Esnault & Van Beveren (1982) note that the primary difference between H. antarctica and H. mariondufresni is that the tornotes of the latter are shorter than the acanthostyles, whilst the reverse is true for the former. On this basis our specimen would be closer to H. mariondufresni , the tornotes of our species are certainly much shorter than those in H. antarctica (422–593 µm). However, the primary acanthostyles of H. mariondufresni are smaller and thinner than those in our specimens (243–512 by 13–25 µm) and only smooth at the end of the shaft, whereas the primary acanthostyles of our specimens are normally only spined for the basal third. Distribution. Currently only known from the type and holotype localities. : Published as part of Goodwin, Claire E., Berman, Jade & Hendry, Katharine R., 2019, Demosponges from the sublittoral and shallow-circalittoral (<24 m depth) Antarctic Peninsula with a description of four new species and notes on in situ identification characteristics, pp. 461-508 in Zootaxa 4658 (3) on pages 480-482, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4658.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/3376028 : {"references": ["Goodwin, C., Brewin, P. E. & Brickle, P. (2012) Sponge biodiversity of South Georgia island with descriptions of fifteen new species. Zootaxa, 3542, 1 - 48. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3542.1.1", "Boury-Esnault, N. & Van Beveren, M. (1982) Les Demosponges du plateau continental de Kerguelen-Heard. Comit national francais des recherches antarctiques, 52, 1 - 175."]} |
format |
Text |
author |
Goodwin, Claire E. Berman, Jade Hendry, Katharine R. |
author_facet |
Goodwin, Claire E. Berman, Jade Hendry, Katharine R. |
author_sort |
Goodwin, Claire E. |
title |
Hymedesmia (Hymedesmia) noramaloneae Goodwin & Berman & Hendry 2019, sp. nov. |
title_short |
Hymedesmia (Hymedesmia) noramaloneae Goodwin & Berman & Hendry 2019, sp. nov. |
title_full |
Hymedesmia (Hymedesmia) noramaloneae Goodwin & Berman & Hendry 2019, sp. nov. |
title_fullStr |
Hymedesmia (Hymedesmia) noramaloneae Goodwin & Berman & Hendry 2019, sp. nov. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hymedesmia (Hymedesmia) noramaloneae Goodwin & Berman & Hendry 2019, sp. nov. |
title_sort |
hymedesmia (hymedesmia) noramaloneae goodwin & berman & hendry 2019, sp. nov. |
publisher |
Zenodo |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5584973 https://zenodo.org/record/5584973 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(139.017,139.017,-69.367,-69.367) ENVELOPE(-36.750,-36.750,-54.250,-54.250) ENVELOPE(-85.600,-85.600,-77.867,-77.867) ENVELOPE(161.883,161.883,-75.183,-75.183) ENVELOPE(-62.833,-62.833,-65.100,-65.100) ENVELOPE(-64.252,-64.252,-65.242,-65.242) ENVELOPE(-63.996,-63.996,-65.087,-65.087) ENVELOPE(-64.267,-64.267,-65.233,-65.233) ENVELOPE(162.400,162.400,-76.117,-76.117) |
geographic |
Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Kerguelen Charcot South Georgia Island Malone Priestley Goodwin Grotto Booth Island Grotto Island Port Charcot |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Kerguelen Charcot South Georgia Island Malone Priestley Goodwin Grotto Booth Island Grotto Island Port Charcot |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica Antarctique* Booth Island Grotto Island South Georgia Island |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica Antarctique* Booth Island Grotto Island South Georgia Island |
op_relation |
http://zenodo.org/record/3376028 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF89FF95FFC9FF99FFCEFFD4FFA5DF62 http://zoobank.org/D926CCEC-56EF-4E9A-98BE-CEB4D4D3D60A https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4658.3.3 http://zenodo.org/record/3376028 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF89FF95FFC9FF99FFCEFFD4FFA5DF62 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3376048 http://zoobank.org/D926CCEC-56EF-4E9A-98BE-CEB4D4D3D60A https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5584974 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit |
op_rights |
Open Access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5584973 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4658.3.3 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3376048 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5584974 |
_version_ |
1766260479201640448 |
spelling |
ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5584973 2023-05-15T13:54:31+02:00 Hymedesmia (Hymedesmia) noramaloneae Goodwin & Berman & Hendry 2019, sp. nov. Goodwin, Claire E. Berman, Jade Hendry, Katharine R. 2019 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5584973 https://zenodo.org/record/5584973 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/3376028 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF89FF95FFC9FF99FFCEFFD4FFA5DF62 http://zoobank.org/D926CCEC-56EF-4E9A-98BE-CEB4D4D3D60A https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4658.3.3 http://zenodo.org/record/3376028 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF89FF95FFC9FF99FFCEFFD4FFA5DF62 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3376048 http://zoobank.org/D926CCEC-56EF-4E9A-98BE-CEB4D4D3D60A https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5584974 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Porifera Demospongiae Poecilosclerida Hymedesmiidae Hymedesmia Hymedesmia noramaloneae Text Taxonomic treatment article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2019 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5584973 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4658.3.3 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3376048 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5584974 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Hymedesmia ( Hymedesmia ) noramaloneae sp. nov. (Figure 9, Table 6) lsid:zoobank.org:act: D3D74DBA-258E-4FAB-8E5F-343DD3FB562B Type material. Holotype: BELUM. Mc 2015.701 Vieugue Island (65°38.758’S, 65° 12.540’W), depth 10–22 m; collected by C. Goodwin and E. Priestley, 23/02/2015. Paratype: BELUM.Mc2015.722and BELUM. Mc 2015.726 Port Charcot, Booth Island (65°03.853’S, 64° 01.868’W), depth 6–16 m; collected by C. Goodwin and E. Priestley, 23/02/2015. Other specimens: BELUM. Mc 2015.601 Grotto Island, Verdansky Base (Site 1) (65°14.615’S, 64° 15.019’W), depth 14–24 m. BELUM. Mc 2015.734 Port Charcot, Booth Island (65°03.853’S, 64° 01.868’W), depth 6–16 m. Diagnosis. Hymedesmia ( Hymedesmia ) with tornote ectosomal spicules (245–358 µm long) and two categories of acanthostyles (267–633 and 137–208 µm long), the larger of which are only spined for their basal third. Etymology. Named after Nora Malone, daughter of Jade Berman, who was born a few months after the expedition. External morphology. In situ appearance (Figure 9A): Very thin pale yellow encrusting sponge forming patches up to 20 cm in diameter. Surface covered with an irregular pattern of veins and pores sieves—pore sieves do not have rims so are less distinct than in many other Hymedesmia species. Preserved appearance. Firm white crust, 1 mm thick. Skeleton (Figure 9B): Hymedesmoid with a basal layer of primary and secondary acanthostyles and ascending columns (5–15 spicules thick) of tornotes. Chelae sparsely scattered throughout tissue. Spicules (for measurements of all specimens see Table 6). Primary acanthostyles (Figure 9C). With a tylote head. The head and up to the lower 1/3 of the shaft are spined with small conical spines but the majority of the shaft is smooth. The shaft is often slightly curved. Secondary acanthostyles (Figure 9D). With a tylote head. Entirely spined with small conical spines but these are densest at the head and become slightly sparser towards the tip. Ectosomal tornotes (Figure 9E, F): Anisotornotes, sometimes with one slightly rounded end so style-like in form, others with two pointed ends. Arcuate chelae (Figure 9G): Normal arcuate chelae with a slight bend in the shaft and three, fairly short, rounded alae on each end. Remarks. Of the 13 species of Hymedesmia ( Hymedesmia ) recorded from the region (see Goodwin et al. 2012) three possess two categories of acanthostyles and have tornotes as ectosomal spicules: H. antarctica Boury-Esnault & Van Beveren, 1982, H. mariondufresni Boury-Esnault & Van Beveren 1982, and H. barnesi Goodwin, Brewin & Brickle 2012. H. barnesi can be distinguished as it has smaller primary acanthostyles (272–392 µm) and is bright orange when living. Boury-Esnault & Van Beveren (1982) note that the primary difference between H. antarctica and H. mariondufresni is that the tornotes of the latter are shorter than the acanthostyles, whilst the reverse is true for the former. On this basis our specimen would be closer to H. mariondufresni , the tornotes of our species are certainly much shorter than those in H. antarctica (422–593 µm). However, the primary acanthostyles of H. mariondufresni are smaller and thinner than those in our specimens (243–512 by 13–25 µm) and only smooth at the end of the shaft, whereas the primary acanthostyles of our specimens are normally only spined for the basal third. Distribution. Currently only known from the type and holotype localities. : Published as part of Goodwin, Claire E., Berman, Jade & Hendry, Katharine R., 2019, Demosponges from the sublittoral and shallow-circalittoral (<24 m depth) Antarctic Peninsula with a description of four new species and notes on in situ identification characteristics, pp. 461-508 in Zootaxa 4658 (3) on pages 480-482, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4658.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/3376028 : {"references": ["Goodwin, C., Brewin, P. E. & Brickle, P. (2012) Sponge biodiversity of South Georgia island with descriptions of fifteen new species. Zootaxa, 3542, 1 - 48. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3542.1.1", "Boury-Esnault, N. & Van Beveren, M. (1982) Les Demosponges du plateau continental de Kerguelen-Heard. Comit national francais des recherches antarctiques, 52, 1 - 175."]} Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica Antarctique* Booth Island Grotto Island South Georgia Island DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Kerguelen Charcot ENVELOPE(139.017,139.017,-69.367,-69.367) South Georgia Island ENVELOPE(-36.750,-36.750,-54.250,-54.250) Malone ENVELOPE(-85.600,-85.600,-77.867,-77.867) Priestley ENVELOPE(161.883,161.883,-75.183,-75.183) Goodwin ENVELOPE(-62.833,-62.833,-65.100,-65.100) Grotto ENVELOPE(-64.252,-64.252,-65.242,-65.242) Booth Island ENVELOPE(-63.996,-63.996,-65.087,-65.087) Grotto Island ENVELOPE(-64.267,-64.267,-65.233,-65.233) Port Charcot ENVELOPE(162.400,162.400,-76.117,-76.117) |