FIGURE 4. A in Are Bryodrilus parvus Nurminen, 1970 and Bryodrilus librus (Nielsen and Christensen, 1959) (Annelida: Enchytraeidae) really different species? A revision based on DNA barcodes and morphological data

• Main Authors: Dózsa-Farkas, Klára, Porco, David, Boros, Gergely
• Format: Still Image
• Language: unknown
• Published: Zenodo 2012
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Taxonomy; Svalbard; Canada; Christensen
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5249393; https://zenodo.org/record/5249393

FIGURE 4. A. Nephridium in 9/10, ectal duct originates medioventrally (marked with black arrow). Stained, on slide. Ellef Island, Canada. B. Nephridia in posterior segments, ectal duct originates posteroventrally (marked with black arrow, i = intestine). In vivo. Mezőföld, Hungary. C. Coelomocytes (marked with black arrow). In vivo. Kiskunság, Hungary. D. Coelomocytes (marked with black arrows). In vivo. Russebukta, Svalbard. E. Sperm funnel (marked with black arrow) Stained, on slide. Ellef Island, Canada. F. Sperm funnel (marked with black arrow) In vivo. Mezőföld, Hungary. : Published as part of Dózsa-Farkas, Klára, Porco, David & Boros, Gergely, 2012, Are Bryodrilus parvus Nurminen, 1970 and Bryodrilus librus (Nielsen and Christensen, 1959) (Annelida: Enchytraeidae) really different species? A revision based on DNA barcodes and morphological data, pp. 38-50 in Zootaxa 3276 (1) on page 46, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3276.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/5249382