FIGURE 4. A in Are Bryodrilus parvus Nurminen, 1970 and Bryodrilus librus (Nielsen and Christensen, 1959) (Annelida: Enchytraeidae) really different species? A revision based on DNA barcodes and morphological data

FIGURE 4. A. Nephridium in 9/10, ectal duct originates medioventrally (marked with black arrow). Stained, on slide. Ellef Island, Canada. B. Nephridia in posterior segments, ectal duct originates posteroventrally (marked with black arrow, i = intestine). In vivo. Mezőföld, Hungary. C. Coelomocytes (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dózsa-Farkas, Klára, Porco, David, Boros, Gergely
Format: Still Image
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2012
Subjects:
Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Svalbard
Canada
Christensen
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5249393
https://zenodo.org/record/5249393
Description
Summary:FIGURE 4. A. Nephridium in 9/10, ectal duct originates medioventrally (marked with black arrow). Stained, on slide. Ellef Island, Canada. B. Nephridia in posterior segments, ectal duct originates posteroventrally (marked with black arrow, i = intestine). In vivo. Mezőföld, Hungary. C. Coelomocytes (marked with black arrow). In vivo. Kiskunság, Hungary. D. Coelomocytes (marked with black arrows). In vivo. Russebukta, Svalbard. E. Sperm funnel (marked with black arrow) Stained, on slide. Ellef Island, Canada. F. Sperm funnel (marked with black arrow) In vivo. Mezőföld, Hungary. : Published as part of Dózsa-Farkas, Klára, Porco, David & Boros, Gergely, 2012, Are Bryodrilus parvus Nurminen, 1970 and Bryodrilus librus (Nielsen and Christensen, 1959) (Annelida: Enchytraeidae) really different species? A revision based on DNA barcodes and morphological data, pp. 38-50 in Zootaxa 3276 (1) on page 46, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3276.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/5249382

Similar Items