Doris verrucosa LINNAEUS 1758

• Main Author: Valdés, Ángel
• Format: Text
• Language: unknown
• Published: Zenodo 2002
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Taxonomy; Animalia; Mollusca; Gastropoda; Nudibranchia; Dorididae; Doris; Doris verrucosa; Indian; Perez; Nautilus; Eme; Northwest Atlantic
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5110228; https://zenodo.org/record/5110228

DORIS VERRUCOSA LINNAEUS, 1758 (FIGS 2, 3) Doris verrucosa Linnaeus, 1758: 653. Doris derelicta Fischer, 1867: 7–8. Doris biscayensis Fischer, 1872: 6–8. Staurodoris januari Bergh, 1878a: 583–585, pl. 63, fig. 24, pl. 64, figs 8-12. Staurodoris verrucosa var. mollis Eliot, 1906a: 338– 339. Staurodoris bobretzkii Gadzikiewicz, 1907: 509–510. Type material Doris verrucosa Linnaeus, NEOTYPE (designated by Bouchet & Valdés, 2000 and validated by Opinion 1980 - ICZN, 2001): Castropol, Asturias, Spain, leg. J. Cigarría (MNHN). Doris derelicta Fischer, NEOTYPE (designated by Bouchet & Valdés, 2000): Castropol, Asturias, Spain, leg. J. Cigarría (MNHN). The type material of Staurodoris januari Bergh could not be located at ZMUC and is presumed lost; the original type locality is near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Additional material Naples, Italy 1898, three specimens, 28–33 mm preserved length, leg. F. M. MacFarland (CASIZ 082119). External morphology The external morphology of this species has been described and illustrated by many authors. Three recent examples can be found in the papers by Schmekel (1968), Ortea, Pérez & Llera (1982) and Thompson & Brown (1984). The general colour of the living animals is uniformly yellow to yellowish-grey. The whole dorsum is covered with hemispherical tubercles varying in size (Fig. 2D). The largest tubercles are situated in the central region of the body. The rhinophoral sheath has one prominent, stalked tubercle on each side. The branchial sheath has 8–12 stalked tubercles all around. There are 13–18 unipinnate branchial leaves, forming a circle. The anal papilla is prominent, situated in the centre of the branchial circle of leaves. The rhinophores are elongate, having 11 lamellae in a 28-mm preserved length specimen. Ventrally there are no oral tentacles, but two blunt prolongations on each side of the mouth opening (Fig. 3F). The anterior border of the foot is grooved but not notched. Anatomy The posterior end of the glandular portion of the oral tube has six strong retractor muscles (Fig. 3D) which attach to the body wall. The oval, muscular buccal bulb has two additional muscles attached; two long salivary glands connect with it at each side of the oesophageal junction. The buccal bulb is as long as the glandular portion of the oral tube. The labial cuticle is smooth. The radular formula is 38 ¥ (50.0.50) in a 33- mm long specimen. Rachidian teeth are absent. The lateral teeth are narrow and elongate, having a single cusp and lacking denticles (Fig. 2A). The teeth from the middle portion of the half-row are larger than those closer to the medial portion of the radula (Fig. 2B). The outermost teeth are smaller and also lack denticles (Fig. 2C). The oesophagus is short, convoluted and connects directly to the stomach (Fig. 3A). The ampulla is very large and branches into a short oviduct and the prostate (Fig. 3C). The oviduct enters the female gland mass near to its centre. The prostate is tubular, folded and granular (Fig. 3B). It connects with a long duct that narrows and expands again into the long ejaculatory portion of the deferent duct. The muscular deferent duct opens into a common atrium with the vagina. The vagina is long and undulate. Near to its proximal end it joins the duct connecting the bursa copulatrix and the seminal receptacle. The uterine duct also leads from this duct. The bursa copulatrix is irregular in shape, about twice as large as the seminal receptacle (Fig. 3C). In the central nervous system (Fig. 3E) the cerebral and pleural ganglia are more or less fused and distinct from the pedal ganglia. There are four cerebral nerves leading from the right cerebral ganglion and five from the left one, and four pleural nerves leading from each pleural ganglion. There is no separate abdominal ganglion on the right side of the visceral loop. The buccal ganglia are near to the rest of the central nervous system, joined to the cerebral ganglia by two relatively short nerves. Gastro-oesophageal, rhinophoral and optical ganglia are present. The pedal ganglia are clearly separated, having three nerves leading from each one. The pedal and parapedal commissures are enveloped together, and also partially enveloped with the visceral loop. The circulatory system (Fig. 3A) consists of a large heart and a single large blood gland situated over the central nervous system. Remarks Doris verrucosa , in the sense of the neotype proposed by Bouchet & Valdés (2000) and other many authors (e.g. Schmekel, 1968; Ortea et al ., 1982; Thompson & Brown, 1984), is a well-known species distributed through the Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts of Europe down to the Canary Islands. Records from the Atlantic coast of the Americas probably belong to this species (Marcus, 1955; Franz, 1970). Indeed, Doris januari Bergh, 1878, originally described from Brazil, is very likely a synonym (Thompson & Brown, 1984). Gosliner’s (1987) reference to South Africa probably represents a distinct species. Fischer (1867), recognized that the specific name Doris verrucosa Linnaeus originally refers to a species from the Indian Ocean and cannot be used for a European species. For the latter he introduced the name Doris derelicta . Bouchet & Valdés (2000) proposed designating the same specimen as the neotype of Doris verrucosa Linnaeus and Doris derelicta P. Fischer, so these two names would become objective synonyms. They also proposed that Doris derelicta P. Fischer should be placed in the Official List of Rejected and Invalid Specific Names in Zoology. These proposals were endorsed by the ruling of the ICZN in Opinion 1980 (ICZN, 2001). Doris biscayensis was described by Fischer (1872) with the same characteristics of Doris verrucosa . The uniform pale yellow colour, the presence of two tubercles in the rhinophoral sheath (one on each side), the presence of 13 unipinnate branchial leaves arranged in a circle, and the absence of oral tentacles, are the main diagnostic features of this species. Doris verrucosa is the only species from the Atlantic coast of Europe that has this combination of external characteristics. The variety mollis of Staurodoris verrucosa described by Eliot (1906a), is also identical to Doris verrucosa and is here regarded as a synonym. Gadzikiewicz (1907) described Staurodoris bobretzkii on the basis of several specimens collected from the Black Sea, characterized by having a bright orange body covered by large tubercles spotted in black. The eight branchial leaves have the same colour as the body and vary in size, the anterior ones being much longer than the posterior ones. The gill and rhinophoral sheaths are surrounded by tubercles similar to the dorsal tubercles. The tubercles around the gill sheath are much larger than the ones around the rhinophoral sheaths. This description fits with the characteristics of D. verrucosa described above, and both names are regarded as synonyms. The three names discussed in this paragraph have been already considered by Thompson & Brown (1984) as synonyms of Doris verrucosa . Thompson & Brown (1984) also included Doris seposita P. Fischer, 1872 and Doris eubalia P. Fischer, 1872 in the synonymy of Doris verrucosa . However, these two species are easily differentiated from D. verrucosa on the basis of their external morphology. Doris eubalia is characterized by the presence of large, dark tubercles surrounded by a purple area (Fischer, 1872). This and other features of this species are very similar to those of Doris sticta Iredale & O’Donoghue, 1923, and both names are probably synonyms. Doris seposita is an uncertain species. According to Fischer (1872) it is different from Doris biscayensis (= Doris verrucosa ) in having a different rhinophoral morphology, a small number of branchial leaves, the dorsal tubercles more compacted and a darker colour. It is difficult, however, a definitive identification of this species based on the original description, and anatomical studies would be necessary. Unfortunately, the type material of Doris seposita could not be located in MNHN, and is presumed lost. : Published as part of Valdés, Ángel, 2002, A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia), pp. 535-636 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 136 (4) on pages 543-546, DOI: 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00039.x, http://zenodo.org/record/4634200 : {"references": ["Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema Naturae, ed. 10, Vol. 1. Holmiae: Salvii.", "Fischer P. 1867. Catalogue des Nudibranches et Cephalopodes des cotes oceaniques de la France. Journal de Conchyliologie 3 (15): 5 - 15.", "Fischer P. 1872. Catalogue des Nudibranches et Cephalopodes des cotes oceaniques de la France (2 eme Supplement). Journal de Conchyliologie 3 (20): 5 - 26.", "Bergh R. 1878 a. Malacologische Untersuchungen. In: Semper C, ed. Reisen im Archipel der Philippinen, theil 2, heft 13. Wiesbaden: Kreidel, 547 - 602, plates 62 - 65.", "Eliot CN. 1906 a. Notes on some British nudibranchs. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 7: 333 - 382, plates 11 - 12.", "Gadzikiewicz W. 1907. Das plotzliche Auftreten einer vergleichsweise grossen Zahl von Dorididae cryptobranchoatae (Staurodoris brobetzkii n. sp.) in den Meeresbuchten bei Sebastopol. Biologisches Centralblatter 27: 508 - 510.", "Bouchet P, Valdes A. 2000. Case 3088. Doris verrucosa Linnaeus, 1758 (Mollusca, Gastropoda): a proposed conservation of the generic and specific names by designation of a neotype. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 57: 74 - 80.", "ICZN. 2001. Opinion 1980. Doris verrucosa Linnaeus, 1758 (Mollusca, Gastropoda): generic and specific names conserved by the designation of a neotype. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 58: 237 - 238.", "Schmekel L. 1968. Die Gattung Doris (Gastr. Nudibranchia) im Golf von Neapel. Pubbliccazione della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli 36: 167 - 187.", "Ortea JA, Perez JM, Llera EM. 1982. Moluscos opistobranquios recolectados durante el Plan de Bentos Circuncanario. Cuadernos del Crinas 3: 5 - 45, plates 1 - 2.", "Thompson TE, Brown GH. 1984. Biology of Opisthobranch Molluscs, 2. London: The Ray Society.", "Marcus Er. 1955. Opisthobranchia from Brazil. Boletim da Facultade de Filosofia, Ciencias e Letras da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Zoologia 20: 89 - 261, plates 1 - 30.", "Franz DR. 1970. The distribution of the nudibranch Doris verrucosa Linne in the northwest Atlantic. Nautilus 83: 80 - 85.", "Gosliner TM. 1987. Nudibranchs of Southern Africa. A Guide to Opsithobranch Molluscs of Southern Africa. Monterey: Sea Challengers.", "Iredale T, O'Donoghue CH. 1923. List of British nudibranchiate Mollusca. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 15: 195 - 233."]}