Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy. The 1886

Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy, 1886 (Figs 1C, 2, 3B, 4B; Tables 2 & 3) Latrunculia apicalis Ridley and Dendy, 1886: 492; 1887: 239, PL. XLIV FIG. 4, PL. XLV FIGS 9A–C [in part] Holotype material. BMNH 1887.5.2.88, ethanol preserved sample (a wet, dark deep chocolate brown s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samaai, Toufiek, Gibbons, Mark J., Kelly, Michelle
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057845
https://zenodo.org/record/5057845
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5057845
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Porifera
Demospongiae
Poecilosclerida
Latrunculiidae
Latrunculia
Latrunculia apicalis
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Porifera
Demospongiae
Poecilosclerida
Latrunculiidae
Latrunculia
Latrunculia apicalis
Samaai, Toufiek
Gibbons, Mark J.
Kelly, Michelle
Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy. The 1886
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Porifera
Demospongiae
Poecilosclerida
Latrunculiidae
Latrunculia
Latrunculia apicalis
description Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy, 1886 (Figs 1C, 2, 3B, 4B; Tables 2 & 3) Latrunculia apicalis Ridley and Dendy, 1886: 492; 1887: 239, PL. XLIV FIG. 4, PL. XLV FIGS 9A–C [in part] Holotype material. BMNH 1887.5.2.88, ethanol preserved sample (a wet, dark deep chocolate brown subsample of specimen, 2 x 10 x 10 cm was examined) and microscope­slides, Kerguelen , off Christmas Harbour, January 29, 1874; depth 126 m, Challenger Expedition. Description. Massive, semispherical sponge, 6 x 7.5 x 8 cm diameter, with broad base and convex upper surface (Fig. 3B). Surface smooth but sandpapery to the touch, with volcano­ and cylindrical­shaped oscules, 6 mm high, and truncate mammiform areolate porefields 2 x 2 mm in diameter. Ectosome thick, leathery, not separable from underlying choanosome. Colour in life dark brown, in preservative pale yellow. Skeleton. The choanosomal skeleton is a very irregular polygonal­meshed reticulation formed by wispy tracts of smooth styles (Fig. 4B). These tracts range in width from 91–136 µm thick, forming meshes that are 230 µm wide. Towards the surface the spicules tend to be vertically arranged. The surface of the ectosome consists of an erect layer of aciculodiscorhabds. Beneath the discorhabds in the ectosome is a thick paratangential layer of densely interlocking megascleres, approximately 730 µm wide. Spicules. Megascleres: styles are smooth, centrally thickened, fusiform and slightly sinuous 406 (382–436) x 16 (16) m, n=20. Microscleres (Fig. 1C): aciculodiscorhabds, basal whorl closely associated with the manubrium, followed by a smooth slender cylindrical shaft 11 m long and 5 m wide. The median whorl is circular, broad, flat and horizontally arrange, 25 m in diameter, being the largest of the four whorls. The median whorl is divided into three distinct segments each possessing 7–8 denticulate margins or spines. The subsidiary whorl is 20 m in diameter, and divided into three discrete segments each with six denticulate margins or spines. The spines of the apical whorl are slanted upwards and not divided into segments, so that whorls ends in a crown­like tuft of acute spined projections. Projecting beyond the apical whorl is a smooth slender, fusiform acicula (apical projection) ~ 46 m long. The base of the acicula is armoured with two horizontally arranged whorls of spines that are followed by the smooth slender acicula. Anisodiscorhabd length, 74 (53–83) m, n=20. Substratum, depth range, and ecology. Found on sandy and muddy environments at a depth of 126. Geographic distribution (Fig. 2). Kerguelen Islands. Remarks. Ridley and Dendy (1886) first described this species in a preliminary report of the Challenger Expedition. The most characteristic feature of this species (and from which the specific name has been derived), is the apical prolongation (acicula) of the aciculodiscorhabd. Ridley and Dendy (1887) described two specimens under the name Latrunculia apicalis from the same geographical area and although they indicated various slight differences between the two specimens, they considered both to be species of Latrunculia apicalis as stated by them…"we have, during the course of our description, indicated various slight differences between the specimens from the two localities, but there is nothing to justify us in separating them specifically". In their description however, Ridley and Dendy (1887) failed to mention that one of their specimens (from station 320) possessed two types of anisodiscorhabds. After examining the two specimens in question BMNH 1887.5.2.88 (Type) and BMNH 1887.5.2.84a (Type), the latter (BMNH 1887.5.2.84a) is considered a species of Latrunculia biformis Kirkpatrick (see below on this species) (Table 2 & 3). BMNH 1887.5.2.88 (Type) differs from BMNH 1887.5.2.84a in that the surface of the ectosome is lined with an erect layer of single aciculodiscorhabds and a multitude of oscules and areolate porefields. Although there is a great variability in the length of the acicula of the aciculodiscorhabd within BMNH 1887.5.2.88 ( Latrunculia apicalis ), all possess an extended smooth acicula, indicating that only one type of anisodiscorhabd is present within this species. The ontogeny of the developing spicule also conforms to that described by Dendy (1921). Latrunculia apicalis has not been recorded since from the same or any other locality : Published as part of Samaai, Toufiek, Gibbons, Mark J. & Kelly, Michelle, 2006, Revision of the genus Latrunculia du Bocage, 1869 Porifera: Demospongiae: Latrunculiidae) with descriptions of new species from New Caledonia and the Northeastern Pacific (, pp. 1-71 in Zootaxa 1127 (1) on pages 17-19, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1127.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5057828 : {"references": ["Ridley, R. S and Dendy, O. (1886) Preliminary report on the Monaxonida collected by H. M. S. ' Challenger. ' Part II. Annals and Magazines of Natural History, series 5, 18, 119 - 121", "Ridley, S. O. & Dendy, A. (1887) Report on the Monaxonida collected by H. M. S.", "Kirkpatrick, R. (1908) Porifera (Sponges). II. Tetraxonida, Dendy. National Antarctic Expedition, 1901 - 1904 Natural History, 4 (2), 1 - 56.", "Topsent, E. (1905) Spongiaires des Acores. Resultats Des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I, Monaco, 25, 1 - 280, pls 1 - 18.", "Dendy, A. (1921) The tetraxonid sponge spicule: a study in evolution. Acta Zoologica, 1921, 95 - 152."]}
format Text
author Samaai, Toufiek
Gibbons, Mark J.
Kelly, Michelle
author_facet Samaai, Toufiek
Gibbons, Mark J.
Kelly, Michelle
author_sort Samaai, Toufiek
title Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy. The 1886
title_short Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy. The 1886
title_full Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy. The 1886
title_fullStr Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy. The 1886
title_full_unstemmed Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy. The 1886
title_sort latrunculia (latrunculia) apicalis ridley and dendy. the 1886
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2006
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057845
https://zenodo.org/record/5057845
long_lat ENVELOPE(-58.017,-58.017,-61.850,-61.850)
geographic Antarctic
Kerguelen
Kerguelen Islands
Pacific
Ridley
geographic_facet Antarctic
Kerguelen
Kerguelen Islands
Pacific
Ridley
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Kerguelen Islands
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Kerguelen Islands
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/5057828
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFB46370135EFFB9FFDFFFBE3668F90A
http://zoobank.org/E3B8BACE-1E5B-4E07-AB94-A4947F966483
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1127.1.1
http://zenodo.org/record/5057828
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFB46370135EFFB9FFDFFFBE3668F90A
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057830
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057832
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057840
http://zoobank.org/E3B8BACE-1E5B-4E07-AB94-A4947F966483
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057846
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057845
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1127.1.1
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057830
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057832
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057840
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057846
_version_ 1766166036749484032
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.5057845 2023-05-15T13:42:17+02:00 Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy. The 1886 Samaai, Toufiek Gibbons, Mark J. Kelly, Michelle 2006 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057845 https://zenodo.org/record/5057845 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/5057828 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFB46370135EFFB9FFDFFFBE3668F90A http://zoobank.org/E3B8BACE-1E5B-4E07-AB94-A4947F966483 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1127.1.1 http://zenodo.org/record/5057828 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFB46370135EFFB9FFDFFFBE3668F90A https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057830 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057832 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057840 http://zoobank.org/E3B8BACE-1E5B-4E07-AB94-A4947F966483 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057846 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Porifera Demospongiae Poecilosclerida Latrunculiidae Latrunculia Latrunculia apicalis Text Taxonomic treatment article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2006 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057845 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1127.1.1 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057830 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057832 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057840 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057846 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Latrunculia (Latrunculia) apicalis Ridley and Dendy, 1886 (Figs 1C, 2, 3B, 4B; Tables 2 & 3) Latrunculia apicalis Ridley and Dendy, 1886: 492; 1887: 239, PL. XLIV FIG. 4, PL. XLV FIGS 9A–C [in part] Holotype material. BMNH 1887.5.2.88, ethanol preserved sample (a wet, dark deep chocolate brown subsample of specimen, 2 x 10 x 10 cm was examined) and microscope­slides, Kerguelen , off Christmas Harbour, January 29, 1874; depth 126 m, Challenger Expedition. Description. Massive, semispherical sponge, 6 x 7.5 x 8 cm diameter, with broad base and convex upper surface (Fig. 3B). Surface smooth but sandpapery to the touch, with volcano­ and cylindrical­shaped oscules, 6 mm high, and truncate mammiform areolate porefields 2 x 2 mm in diameter. Ectosome thick, leathery, not separable from underlying choanosome. Colour in life dark brown, in preservative pale yellow. Skeleton. The choanosomal skeleton is a very irregular polygonal­meshed reticulation formed by wispy tracts of smooth styles (Fig. 4B). These tracts range in width from 91–136 µm thick, forming meshes that are 230 µm wide. Towards the surface the spicules tend to be vertically arranged. The surface of the ectosome consists of an erect layer of aciculodiscorhabds. Beneath the discorhabds in the ectosome is a thick paratangential layer of densely interlocking megascleres, approximately 730 µm wide. Spicules. Megascleres: styles are smooth, centrally thickened, fusiform and slightly sinuous 406 (382–436) x 16 (16) m, n=20. Microscleres (Fig. 1C): aciculodiscorhabds, basal whorl closely associated with the manubrium, followed by a smooth slender cylindrical shaft 11 m long and 5 m wide. The median whorl is circular, broad, flat and horizontally arrange, 25 m in diameter, being the largest of the four whorls. The median whorl is divided into three distinct segments each possessing 7–8 denticulate margins or spines. The subsidiary whorl is 20 m in diameter, and divided into three discrete segments each with six denticulate margins or spines. The spines of the apical whorl are slanted upwards and not divided into segments, so that whorls ends in a crown­like tuft of acute spined projections. Projecting beyond the apical whorl is a smooth slender, fusiform acicula (apical projection) ~ 46 m long. The base of the acicula is armoured with two horizontally arranged whorls of spines that are followed by the smooth slender acicula. Anisodiscorhabd length, 74 (53–83) m, n=20. Substratum, depth range, and ecology. Found on sandy and muddy environments at a depth of 126. Geographic distribution (Fig. 2). Kerguelen Islands. Remarks. Ridley and Dendy (1886) first described this species in a preliminary report of the Challenger Expedition. The most characteristic feature of this species (and from which the specific name has been derived), is the apical prolongation (acicula) of the aciculodiscorhabd. Ridley and Dendy (1887) described two specimens under the name Latrunculia apicalis from the same geographical area and although they indicated various slight differences between the two specimens, they considered both to be species of Latrunculia apicalis as stated by them…"we have, during the course of our description, indicated various slight differences between the specimens from the two localities, but there is nothing to justify us in separating them specifically". In their description however, Ridley and Dendy (1887) failed to mention that one of their specimens (from station 320) possessed two types of anisodiscorhabds. After examining the two specimens in question BMNH 1887.5.2.88 (Type) and BMNH 1887.5.2.84a (Type), the latter (BMNH 1887.5.2.84a) is considered a species of Latrunculia biformis Kirkpatrick (see below on this species) (Table 2 & 3). BMNH 1887.5.2.88 (Type) differs from BMNH 1887.5.2.84a in that the surface of the ectosome is lined with an erect layer of single aciculodiscorhabds and a multitude of oscules and areolate porefields. Although there is a great variability in the length of the acicula of the aciculodiscorhabd within BMNH 1887.5.2.88 ( Latrunculia apicalis ), all possess an extended smooth acicula, indicating that only one type of anisodiscorhabd is present within this species. The ontogeny of the developing spicule also conforms to that described by Dendy (1921). Latrunculia apicalis has not been recorded since from the same or any other locality : Published as part of Samaai, Toufiek, Gibbons, Mark J. & Kelly, Michelle, 2006, Revision of the genus Latrunculia du Bocage, 1869 Porifera: Demospongiae: Latrunculiidae) with descriptions of new species from New Caledonia and the Northeastern Pacific (, pp. 1-71 in Zootaxa 1127 (1) on pages 17-19, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1127.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5057828 : {"references": ["Ridley, R. S and Dendy, O. (1886) Preliminary report on the Monaxonida collected by H. M. S. ' Challenger. ' Part II. Annals and Magazines of Natural History, series 5, 18, 119 - 121", "Ridley, S. O. & Dendy, A. (1887) Report on the Monaxonida collected by H. M. S.", "Kirkpatrick, R. (1908) Porifera (Sponges). II. Tetraxonida, Dendy. National Antarctic Expedition, 1901 - 1904 Natural History, 4 (2), 1 - 56.", "Topsent, E. (1905) Spongiaires des Acores. Resultats Des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I, Monaco, 25, 1 - 280, pls 1 - 18.", "Dendy, A. (1921) The tetraxonid sponge spicule: a study in evolution. Acta Zoologica, 1921, 95 - 152."]} Text Antarc* Antarctic Kerguelen Islands DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Kerguelen Kerguelen Islands Pacific Ridley ENVELOPE(-58.017,-58.017,-61.850,-61.850)