Lamispina kerguelarum Salazar-Vallejo 2014, n. comb.

Lamispina kerguelarum (Grube, 1877) n. comb. Figure 23 Trophonia kerguelarum Grube, 1877:539–540.— McIntosh, 1885:364–366, Pl. 44, Figs 9, 10, Pl. 23A, Figs 4–6.— Ehlers, 1897:107–108. Stylarioides kerguelarum .— Augener, 1914:42–45.— Monro, 1930:139, 1936:163, 1939:130.— Rioja, 1944:131–134, Figs 5...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2014
Subjects:
Eme
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952659
https://zenodo.org/record/4952659
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4952659
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Annelida
Polychaeta
Terebellida
Flabelligeridae
Lamispina
Lamispina kerguelarum
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Annelida
Polychaeta
Terebellida
Flabelligeridae
Lamispina
Lamispina kerguelarum
Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.
Lamispina kerguelarum Salazar-Vallejo 2014, n. comb.
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Annelida
Polychaeta
Terebellida
Flabelligeridae
Lamispina
Lamispina kerguelarum
description Lamispina kerguelarum (Grube, 1877) n. comb. Figure 23 Trophonia kerguelarum Grube, 1877:539–540.— McIntosh, 1885:364–366, Pl. 44, Figs 9, 10, Pl. 23A, Figs 4–6.— Ehlers, 1897:107–108. Stylarioides kerguelarum .— Augener, 1914:42–45.— Monro, 1930:139, 1936:163, 1939:130.— Rioja, 1944:131–134, Figs 51–53.— Fauvel, 1952:298. Stylarioides swakopianus .— Hartman, 1953:51 ( non Augener, 1918). Pherusa kerguelarum .— Hartman, 1966:43, Pl. 13, Figs 1–2 (syn.).— Rozbaczylo, 1985:160.— Knox & Cameron, 1998:72–73. Type material. Southern Indian Ocean. Two syntypes (ZMB 680), Successful Bay, Kerguelen Islands, RV Gazelle, Buchholz, coll. Additional material. Southern Indian Ocean, Kerguelen Islands. Two specimens (MNHN A183), Île du Chat, 30 m, 7 Nov. 1939, M. Jeauvel, coll. (body with very little fine sediment, not covering papillae or body surfaces; two rows of longitudinal larger papillae; 6–32 mm long, 1–3 mm wide, cephalic cage 2–8 mm long, 16–47 chaetigers; 8–14 notochaetae per fascicle; both with neurospines from chaetiger 3; smaller specimen with anterior end everted; 8 branchial scars in a single line, interbranchial nodules present, nephridial lobes present on each side between branchiae 2–3 counting from the middorsal ones). One specimen (MNHN 354) breaking in two, Morbihan Bay, 25 Sep. 1951, P. Paulian, coll. (5 mm long, 1 mm wide, cephalic cage 2 mm long, 19 chaetigers; lamispines from chaetiger 3). Two specimens (MNHN 54), juveniles, Morbihan Bay, 12 Mar. 1951, P. Paulian, coll. (7–8 mm long, 1.5 mm wide, cephalic cage 3 mm long, 19–27 chaetigers; lamispines from chaetiger 3). One specimen (MNHN 354) juvenile, broken in two, Morbihan Bay, 21 Oct. 1951, P. Paulian, coll. (5 mm long, 1 mm wide, cephalic cage 2 mm long, 19 chaetigers; lamispines from chaetiger 3). Crozet Islands. One mature female (MNHN A921), RV Marion Dufresne, Cruise 30, Sta. 60 (45°56' S, 50°32' E), Y. Sicinski, id. (17 mm long, 2 mm wide, cephalic cage 3 mm long, 33 chaetigers; 14 notochaetae in medial chaetigers). South Georgia Islands. One specimen (SMNH 55763), Pot Bay, Grytviken mouth, Swedish South Polar Expedition 1901–03, Sta. 28 (54°22' S, 36°28' W), sand and algae, 12–15 m, 24 May 1902 (9 mm long, 1.7 mm wide, cephalic cage 3 mm long, 24 chaetigers; 7 notochaetae in medial chaetigers). Description. Syntypes (ZMB 680) two anterior fragments, in poor shape, both greyish (Fig. 23A, B, D). Body cylindrical, tapered posteriorly; 10–16 mm long, 2.5–3 mm wide, cephalic cage 5–6 mm long, 19–32 chaetigers. Tunic thin, free from sediment coverage. Body papillae digitate, dorsal ones conical, with fine sediment particles adhering basally, looking fusiform, arranged in four transverse alternating series, mostly eroded over the anterior dorsal surface; better preserved posteriorly or ventrally. Anterior end not exposed, previously dissected (Fig. 23C). Prostomium damaged, low cone; eyes not seen. Caruncle short, rounded. Palps thick, corrugated; palp keels low, rounded. Lips damaged. Branchiae cirriform, thick, detached (8 branchial scars, 6 filaments seen), arranged in two rows, posterior row continuous dorsally, anterior row with two groups of branchiae, each with two filaments. Branchiae as long as palps. Nephridial lobes on branchial plate not seen. Cephalic cage chaetae twice as long as body width, arranged in short series. Chaetigers 1–2 forming cephalic cage, chaetigers 3–4 with long notochaetae, more or less directed anteriorly; chaetiger 1 with notochaetae dorsal, neurochaetae lateral, chaetiger 2 with chaetae lateral. Chaetiger 1 with 12 noto- and 6 neurochaetae; chaetiger 2 with 6 noto- and 6 neurochaetae. Anterior dorsal margin of first chaetiger papillated. Chaetigers 1–3 increasing in length posteriorly. Chaetal transition from cephalic cage to body chaetae abrupt; lamispines start in chaetiger 3. Gonopodial lobes not seen. Parapodia poorly developed; chaetae emerge from body wall. Parapodia lateral; medial neuropodia ventrolateral. Notopodia 1–3 better developed, distally expanded chaetal lobes, with longer papillae. Neuropodia as low rounded lobes, with longer papillae. Noto- and neuropodia close to each other. Medial notochaetae arranged in a -shaped pattern, inner end rolling over itself. Most notochaetae multiarticulated capillaries, articles short basally, long medially and distally; external notochaetae with only long articles (Fig. 23E, inset); 9–12 notochaetae per ramus, at least as long as body width. Neurochaetae multiarticulated capillaries in chaetigers 1–2. Lamispines from chaetiger 3, arranged in transverse series, 5–7 per bundle. Each lamispine with articles short basally and medially, distally flat, hyaline, tapered into thin tips (Fig. 23F, insets). Posterior end (observed in a non-type specimen, MNHN A183) tapered to a rounded lobe; pygidium with anus terminal, without anal cirri; mature female (MNHN A921) with oocytes of about 200 µm. Variation . Morphological variations were as follows. Syntypes are short and have most lamispines broken; the remaining ones show a narrow distal portion, not as wide as seen in larger specimens. Remarks. Lamispina kerguelarum (Grube, 1877) n. comb. can be grouped with L. chilensis n. sp. by having stiff body papillae, tapered or conical, and tapered lamispines with acuminate tips. They differ by the start of lamispines, number of notochaetae in medial segments, and the number of transverse series of papillae per segment. In L. kerguelarum lamispines start in chaetiger 3, there are 9–12 notochaetae per bundle, and 4 transverse series of papillae per segment, whereas in L. chilensis lamispines start in chaetiger 4, there are less notochaetae per bundle (5), and less transverse series of papillae (2) per segment. Distribution. Originally described from the Kerguelen Islands, it has been recorded in New Zealand and several Antarctic and Subantarctic localities in shallow water (12–30 m depth). : Published as part of Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I., 2014, Revision of Pherusa Oken, 1807 (Polychaeta: Flabelligeridae), pp. 1-61 in Zootaxa 3886 (1) on pages 52-54, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3886.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4951874 : {"references": ["Grube, A. E. (1877) Annelidenausbeute von S. M. S. Gazelle. Monatsbericht der Koniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschafen zu Berlin, 1877, 507 - 554.", "McIntosh, W. C. (1885) Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 76. Challenger Reports, 12, 1 - 554. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10425", "Ehlers, E. (1897) Polychaeten. Hamburger Magalhaensische Sammelreise. Friederichsen, Hamburg, 148 pp.", "Augener, H. (1914) Polychaeta 2. Sedentaria. Die Fauna Sudwest-Australiens, 5 (1), 1 - 170.", "Monro, C. C. A. (1930) Polychaete worms. Discovery Reports, 2, 1 - 222.", "Monro, C. C. A. (1936) Polychaete worms, 2. Discovery Reports, 12, 59 - 198.", "Monro, C. C. A. (1939) Polychaeta. Reports of the British Antarctic Research Expedition 1929 - 1931, Series B, 4 (4), 87 - 156.", "Rioja, E. (1944) Estudios anelidologicos, 10. Estudio de algunos poliquetos del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. Anales del Instituto de Biologia, Mexico, 15, 115 - 138.", "Fauvel, P. (1952) Annelides polychetes recueillies aux Iles Kerguelen par le Docteur Aretas et polychetes du Museum de la meme provenance. Bulletin du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 2 eme serie, 24, 294 - 301.", "Hartman, O. (1953) Non-pelagic Polychaeta of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901 - 1903. Further Zoological Result on the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901 - 1903 N. H. Odhner (ed.), 83 pp.", "Hartman, O. (1966) Polychaeta Myzostomidae and Sedentaria of Antarctica. Antarctic Research Series, 7, 1 - 158. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1002 / 9781118669136. refs", "Rozbaczylo, N. (1985) Los anelidos poliquetos de Chile: Indice sinonimico y distribucion geografica de especies. Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Monografias Biologicas, 3, 1 - 284.", "Knox, G. A. & Cameron, D. B. (1998) The marine fauna of the Ross Sea: Polychaeta. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Biodiversity Memoir, 108, 1 - 125."]}
format Text
author Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.
author_facet Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.
author_sort Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.
title Lamispina kerguelarum Salazar-Vallejo 2014, n. comb.
title_short Lamispina kerguelarum Salazar-Vallejo 2014, n. comb.
title_full Lamispina kerguelarum Salazar-Vallejo 2014, n. comb.
title_fullStr Lamispina kerguelarum Salazar-Vallejo 2014, n. comb.
title_full_unstemmed Lamispina kerguelarum Salazar-Vallejo 2014, n. comb.
title_sort lamispina kerguelarum salazar-vallejo 2014, n. comb.
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2014
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952659
https://zenodo.org/record/4952659
long_lat ENVELOPE(168.683,168.683,-77.517,-77.517)
ENVELOPE(-36.509,-36.509,-54.281,-54.281)
ENVELOPE(-60.811,-60.811,-62.471,-62.471)
ENVELOPE(-58.667,-58.667,-62.250,-62.250)
ENVELOPE(-64.300,-64.300,-66.633,-66.633)
geographic Antarctic
Ross Sea
Kerguelen
Kerguelen Islands
Indian
New Zealand
Argentino
McIntosh
Grytviken
Noto
Eme
Friederichsen
geographic_facet Antarctic
Ross Sea
Kerguelen
Kerguelen Islands
Indian
New Zealand
Argentino
McIntosh
Grytviken
Noto
Eme
Friederichsen
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Crozet Islands
Kerguelen Islands
Ross Sea
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Crozet Islands
Kerguelen Islands
Ross Sea
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/4951874
http://publication.plazi.org/id/8670FFAB3246FF9AFFA0FF872F77FFEA
http://zoobank.org/6ADD860C-D60C-448D-BC11-19EDB74013EE
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3886.1.1
http://zenodo.org/record/4951874
http://publication.plazi.org/id/8670FFAB3246FF9AFFA0FF872F77FFEA
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952008
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951934
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951940
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951900
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951906
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951914
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951876
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951884
http://zoobank.org/6ADD860C-D60C-448D-BC11-19EDB74013EE
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952660
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952659
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3886.1.1
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952008
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951934
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951940
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951900
https:
_version_ 1766046070981263360
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4952659 2023-05-15T13:33:47+02:00 Lamispina kerguelarum Salazar-Vallejo 2014, n. comb. Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. 2014 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952659 https://zenodo.org/record/4952659 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/4951874 http://publication.plazi.org/id/8670FFAB3246FF9AFFA0FF872F77FFEA http://zoobank.org/6ADD860C-D60C-448D-BC11-19EDB74013EE https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3886.1.1 http://zenodo.org/record/4951874 http://publication.plazi.org/id/8670FFAB3246FF9AFFA0FF872F77FFEA https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952008 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951934 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951940 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951900 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951906 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951914 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951876 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951884 http://zoobank.org/6ADD860C-D60C-448D-BC11-19EDB74013EE https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952660 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Flabelligeridae Lamispina Lamispina kerguelarum Text Taxonomic treatment article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2014 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952659 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3886.1.1 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4952008 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951934 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951940 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4951900 https: 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Lamispina kerguelarum (Grube, 1877) n. comb. Figure 23 Trophonia kerguelarum Grube, 1877:539–540.— McIntosh, 1885:364–366, Pl. 44, Figs 9, 10, Pl. 23A, Figs 4–6.— Ehlers, 1897:107–108. Stylarioides kerguelarum .— Augener, 1914:42–45.— Monro, 1930:139, 1936:163, 1939:130.— Rioja, 1944:131–134, Figs 51–53.— Fauvel, 1952:298. Stylarioides swakopianus .— Hartman, 1953:51 ( non Augener, 1918). Pherusa kerguelarum .— Hartman, 1966:43, Pl. 13, Figs 1–2 (syn.).— Rozbaczylo, 1985:160.— Knox & Cameron, 1998:72–73. Type material. Southern Indian Ocean. Two syntypes (ZMB 680), Successful Bay, Kerguelen Islands, RV Gazelle, Buchholz, coll. Additional material. Southern Indian Ocean, Kerguelen Islands. Two specimens (MNHN A183), Île du Chat, 30 m, 7 Nov. 1939, M. Jeauvel, coll. (body with very little fine sediment, not covering papillae or body surfaces; two rows of longitudinal larger papillae; 6–32 mm long, 1–3 mm wide, cephalic cage 2–8 mm long, 16–47 chaetigers; 8–14 notochaetae per fascicle; both with neurospines from chaetiger 3; smaller specimen with anterior end everted; 8 branchial scars in a single line, interbranchial nodules present, nephridial lobes present on each side between branchiae 2–3 counting from the middorsal ones). One specimen (MNHN 354) breaking in two, Morbihan Bay, 25 Sep. 1951, P. Paulian, coll. (5 mm long, 1 mm wide, cephalic cage 2 mm long, 19 chaetigers; lamispines from chaetiger 3). Two specimens (MNHN 54), juveniles, Morbihan Bay, 12 Mar. 1951, P. Paulian, coll. (7–8 mm long, 1.5 mm wide, cephalic cage 3 mm long, 19–27 chaetigers; lamispines from chaetiger 3). One specimen (MNHN 354) juvenile, broken in two, Morbihan Bay, 21 Oct. 1951, P. Paulian, coll. (5 mm long, 1 mm wide, cephalic cage 2 mm long, 19 chaetigers; lamispines from chaetiger 3). Crozet Islands. One mature female (MNHN A921), RV Marion Dufresne, Cruise 30, Sta. 60 (45°56' S, 50°32' E), Y. Sicinski, id. (17 mm long, 2 mm wide, cephalic cage 3 mm long, 33 chaetigers; 14 notochaetae in medial chaetigers). South Georgia Islands. One specimen (SMNH 55763), Pot Bay, Grytviken mouth, Swedish South Polar Expedition 1901–03, Sta. 28 (54°22' S, 36°28' W), sand and algae, 12–15 m, 24 May 1902 (9 mm long, 1.7 mm wide, cephalic cage 3 mm long, 24 chaetigers; 7 notochaetae in medial chaetigers). Description. Syntypes (ZMB 680) two anterior fragments, in poor shape, both greyish (Fig. 23A, B, D). Body cylindrical, tapered posteriorly; 10–16 mm long, 2.5–3 mm wide, cephalic cage 5–6 mm long, 19–32 chaetigers. Tunic thin, free from sediment coverage. Body papillae digitate, dorsal ones conical, with fine sediment particles adhering basally, looking fusiform, arranged in four transverse alternating series, mostly eroded over the anterior dorsal surface; better preserved posteriorly or ventrally. Anterior end not exposed, previously dissected (Fig. 23C). Prostomium damaged, low cone; eyes not seen. Caruncle short, rounded. Palps thick, corrugated; palp keels low, rounded. Lips damaged. Branchiae cirriform, thick, detached (8 branchial scars, 6 filaments seen), arranged in two rows, posterior row continuous dorsally, anterior row with two groups of branchiae, each with two filaments. Branchiae as long as palps. Nephridial lobes on branchial plate not seen. Cephalic cage chaetae twice as long as body width, arranged in short series. Chaetigers 1–2 forming cephalic cage, chaetigers 3–4 with long notochaetae, more or less directed anteriorly; chaetiger 1 with notochaetae dorsal, neurochaetae lateral, chaetiger 2 with chaetae lateral. Chaetiger 1 with 12 noto- and 6 neurochaetae; chaetiger 2 with 6 noto- and 6 neurochaetae. Anterior dorsal margin of first chaetiger papillated. Chaetigers 1–3 increasing in length posteriorly. Chaetal transition from cephalic cage to body chaetae abrupt; lamispines start in chaetiger 3. Gonopodial lobes not seen. Parapodia poorly developed; chaetae emerge from body wall. Parapodia lateral; medial neuropodia ventrolateral. Notopodia 1–3 better developed, distally expanded chaetal lobes, with longer papillae. Neuropodia as low rounded lobes, with longer papillae. Noto- and neuropodia close to each other. Medial notochaetae arranged in a -shaped pattern, inner end rolling over itself. Most notochaetae multiarticulated capillaries, articles short basally, long medially and distally; external notochaetae with only long articles (Fig. 23E, inset); 9–12 notochaetae per ramus, at least as long as body width. Neurochaetae multiarticulated capillaries in chaetigers 1–2. Lamispines from chaetiger 3, arranged in transverse series, 5–7 per bundle. Each lamispine with articles short basally and medially, distally flat, hyaline, tapered into thin tips (Fig. 23F, insets). Posterior end (observed in a non-type specimen, MNHN A183) tapered to a rounded lobe; pygidium with anus terminal, without anal cirri; mature female (MNHN A921) with oocytes of about 200 µm. Variation . Morphological variations were as follows. Syntypes are short and have most lamispines broken; the remaining ones show a narrow distal portion, not as wide as seen in larger specimens. Remarks. Lamispina kerguelarum (Grube, 1877) n. comb. can be grouped with L. chilensis n. sp. by having stiff body papillae, tapered or conical, and tapered lamispines with acuminate tips. They differ by the start of lamispines, number of notochaetae in medial segments, and the number of transverse series of papillae per segment. In L. kerguelarum lamispines start in chaetiger 3, there are 9–12 notochaetae per bundle, and 4 transverse series of papillae per segment, whereas in L. chilensis lamispines start in chaetiger 4, there are less notochaetae per bundle (5), and less transverse series of papillae (2) per segment. Distribution. Originally described from the Kerguelen Islands, it has been recorded in New Zealand and several Antarctic and Subantarctic localities in shallow water (12–30 m depth). : Published as part of Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I., 2014, Revision of Pherusa Oken, 1807 (Polychaeta: Flabelligeridae), pp. 1-61 in Zootaxa 3886 (1) on pages 52-54, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3886.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4951874 : {"references": ["Grube, A. E. (1877) Annelidenausbeute von S. M. S. Gazelle. Monatsbericht der Koniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschafen zu Berlin, 1877, 507 - 554.", "McIntosh, W. C. (1885) Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 76. Challenger Reports, 12, 1 - 554. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10425", "Ehlers, E. (1897) Polychaeten. Hamburger Magalhaensische Sammelreise. Friederichsen, Hamburg, 148 pp.", "Augener, H. (1914) Polychaeta 2. Sedentaria. Die Fauna Sudwest-Australiens, 5 (1), 1 - 170.", "Monro, C. C. A. (1930) Polychaete worms. Discovery Reports, 2, 1 - 222.", "Monro, C. C. A. (1936) Polychaete worms, 2. Discovery Reports, 12, 59 - 198.", "Monro, C. C. A. (1939) Polychaeta. Reports of the British Antarctic Research Expedition 1929 - 1931, Series B, 4 (4), 87 - 156.", "Rioja, E. (1944) Estudios anelidologicos, 10. Estudio de algunos poliquetos del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. Anales del Instituto de Biologia, Mexico, 15, 115 - 138.", "Fauvel, P. (1952) Annelides polychetes recueillies aux Iles Kerguelen par le Docteur Aretas et polychetes du Museum de la meme provenance. Bulletin du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 2 eme serie, 24, 294 - 301.", "Hartman, O. (1953) Non-pelagic Polychaeta of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901 - 1903. Further Zoological Result on the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901 - 1903 N. H. Odhner (ed.), 83 pp.", "Hartman, O. (1966) Polychaeta Myzostomidae and Sedentaria of Antarctica. Antarctic Research Series, 7, 1 - 158. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1002 / 9781118669136. refs", "Rozbaczylo, N. (1985) Los anelidos poliquetos de Chile: Indice sinonimico y distribucion geografica de especies. Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Monografias Biologicas, 3, 1 - 284.", "Knox, G. A. & Cameron, D. B. (1998) The marine fauna of the Ross Sea: Polychaeta. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Biodiversity Memoir, 108, 1 - 125."]} Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Crozet Islands Kerguelen Islands Ross Sea DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Ross Sea Kerguelen Kerguelen Islands Indian New Zealand Argentino McIntosh ENVELOPE(168.683,168.683,-77.517,-77.517) Grytviken ENVELOPE(-36.509,-36.509,-54.281,-54.281) Noto ENVELOPE(-60.811,-60.811,-62.471,-62.471) Eme ENVELOPE(-58.667,-58.667,-62.250,-62.250) Friederichsen ENVELOPE(-64.300,-64.300,-66.633,-66.633)