Data From: Prevalence and risk factors of Anaplasma infections in eastern moose (Alces alces americana) and winter ticks (Dermacentor albipictus) in Maine, United States

• Main Authors: Elliott, James, Dickson, Caroline, Lee, Kantar, O'Neal, Matthew, Lichtenwalner, Anne, Bryant, Ann, Jakubas, Walter, Pekins, Peter, De Urioste-Stone, Sandra, Kamath, Pauline
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: Zenodo 2021
• Subjects: Alces alces
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4681271; https://zenodo.org/record/4681271

Eastern moose ( Alces alces americana ) are heavily parasitized by winter ticks ( Dermacentor albipictus ), the dominant cause of increased calf mortality in the northeastern United States. Although much work has focused on the direct negative effects of winter tick on moose, it remains unknown whether diseases transmitted by ticks may also affect moose health, or pose a risk to other species. In this study, we explored the role that moose and winter ticks play in transmission of the tick-borne bacterial pathogen, Anaplasma , which causes mild to severe illness in humans and domestic animals. Our objectives were to (1) estimate the prevalence of Anaplasma spp. in moose and winter tick, (2) determine the phylogenetic placement of these strains with respect to those found in other hosts and vectors, and (3) explore risk factors of Anaplasma infection in moose. A total of 157 moose (142 calves, 15 adults) were captured in western ( n = 83) and northern ( n = 74) Maine in 2017 and 2018. We screened for Anaplasma spp. in moose whole blood samples using a genus-specific PCR assay targeting the 16S rRNA gene. We found that over half (54%) of the moose were infected with Anaplasma bacteria, with a greater proportion of moose harboring Anaplasma -infections in the western (67%) versus northern study areas (38%). Male moose also exhibited a higher prevalence than females (63% vs. 47%). In contrast, Anaplasma prevalence in winter ticks was low (<1%). Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis revealed that the single Anaplasma strain in moose was highly divergent from the strain in winter ticks, and most closely related to an uncharacterized North American cervid strain. We conclude that winter ticks are unlikely to play a significant role in Anaplasma transmission to moose, however high infection prevalence warrants further investigation into the impacts of the disease on moose health. : Detailed information on the metadata is provided within the data file. Funding provided by: National Institute of Food and Agriculture Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005825 Award Number: ME021908Funding provided by: National Institute of Food and Agriculture Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005825 Award Number: ME041504Funding provided by: University of Maine Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011130 Award Number: : Blood samples were collected from moose during live captures, along with associated data on year, location in Maine (by Wildlife Management District, WMD), age (adult, calf), and sex (female, male). Winter ticks were collected from moose, and blacklegged ticks collected from the environment. Whole genomic DNA was extracted from biological samples from both moose and ticks, and used in genetic-based analyes for the detection of the bacteria of the genus Anaplasma. Tick samples were pooled for this analysis, with pool sizes varying between 1-5 ticks. When possible, sex (female, male, mixed) and life stage (adult, nymph) were idenified for each tick pool.