Akanthophoreus crassicauda Bird, 2007, n.sp.

Akanthophoreus crassicauda n.sp. Figures 1–3 Material examined. Holotype , 1 non-ovigerous female (KMNH IvR 500.194), station XR-12, 41º 37.67 ’– 41 º 37.08 ’N 146 º 54.19 ’– 146 º 52.72 ’E, 5473–5484 metres, 4 m ORE beam trawl, 23 September 2001. Paratypes : 1 ovigerous female, 1 post-ovigerous mal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bird, Graham J
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4668896
https://zenodo.org/record/4668896
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4668896
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Tanaidacea
Akanthophoreidae
Akanthophoreus
Akanthophoreus crassicauda
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Tanaidacea
Akanthophoreidae
Akanthophoreus
Akanthophoreus crassicauda
Bird, Graham J
Akanthophoreus crassicauda Bird, 2007, n.sp.
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Tanaidacea
Akanthophoreidae
Akanthophoreus
Akanthophoreus crassicauda
description Akanthophoreus crassicauda n.sp. Figures 1–3 Material examined. Holotype , 1 non-ovigerous female (KMNH IvR 500.194), station XR-12, 41º 37.67 ’– 41 º 37.08 ’N 146 º 54.19 ’– 146 º 52.72 ’E, 5473–5484 metres, 4 m ORE beam trawl, 23 September 2001. Paratypes : 1 ovigerous female, 1 post-ovigerous male (partially dissected) and 1 preparatory male (KMNH IvR 500.195), same locality. Diagnosis. Akanthophoreus with all pereonites shorter than broad. Pleotelson without lateral spurs. Cheliped carpus with weak shield; propodus and dactylus without crenulations. Dactylus/unguis of pereopods 1–3 short, half as long as propodus. Uropod stout, endopod articles three or four times as long as broad. Etymology. From combination of Latin crassus ‘thick’ or ‘stout’ and cauda , ‘tail’, referring to the diagnostic uropods. Description, non-ovigerous female . Body (Fig. 1 A). Fairly slender, 6.9 times as long as broad (Holotype), length 2.61 mm. Carapace. Just shorter than pereonites 1–2 together (excluding pereonal gap), 1.3 times as long as broad, with parallel margins for posterior two-thirds portion; rostrum a slight sub-triangular process. Pereonites. With weakly convex lateral margins, pereonite 1 slightly narrower posteriorly, pereonites 1–6 0.55, 0.59, 0.68, 0.69, 0.67, 0.62 times as long as broad, respectively. Pleon (Fig. 1 B). Shorter than preceding two pereonites, 14.6 % of body length, all pleonites much wider than long, with long seta on epimeral margin; each pleonite sternum rounded in lateral profile. Pleotelson (Figs 1 C). Longer than two preceding pleonites, shorter than broad, with rounded posterior margin in dorsal view obscuring deflected apex; four setae (two sensory) on posterior margin. Antennule (Fig. 1 D). Slender, about 0.75 times as long as carapace. Article 1 just over half of total length, 3.1 times as long as broad (mid-length), with disto-outer seta and sensory setae and more proximal group of three sensory setae. Article 2 sub-rectangular, 1.24 times as long as broad, with a long disto-outer seta and one smaller inner seta. Article 3 half as long as article 2, with two setae. Article 4 twice as long as article 3, 2.8 times as long as broad, with four long, quite thick setae, one small seta and one aesthetasc. Antenna (Fig. 1 E). Slender, about 0.74 times as long as antennule. Articles 1–3 short, but article 2 larger than article 3, both with dorsal seta, two on article 2. Article 4 almost half as long as antenna, about five times as long as broad, with pseudo-articulation near mid-point, accompanied by a sensory seta, terminally with two long setae and at least three sensory setae. Article 5 slender, three times as long as broad, with terminal seta. Article 6 small, with four unequal setae. Mouthparts. Labrum (Fig. 2 A) of sub-conical or sub-triangular lateral profile. Labium (Fig. 2 B) typical of genus. Maxilla not recovered. Mandibles (Figs 2 C–D) strong, with dentate incisor and molar with acuminate shape, terminally with about eight unequal spines, longer apically; left mandible with at least bicuspid lacinia mobilis. Maxillule (Fig. 2 E) palp with two setae and endite with nine spiniform setae, two of which are pectinate. Maxilliped (Figs 2 F–G) basis fused and longer than endites, with long seta at base of each palp; endites unfused, each with weakly lobed distal margin, minutely setose lateral processes and distal seta; palp with stout articles 1–3, article 2 with three inner and one outer seta; article 3 with two long and two smaller setae; article 4 with four long and one smaller setae. Cheliped (Figs 2 H–I). With distinct pre-basal sclerite attachment. Basis with rounded free posterior margin and outer seta. Merus sub-triangular, with ventral seta. Carpus 1.9 times as long as broad, with very weak shield, two ventral setae and two dorsal setae. Propodus and terminal spine longer than carpus, 0.47 times as deep as long, dorsal crest with two processes (Fig. 2 I) with four inner spiniform setae and one outer seta near articulation with dactylus. Fixed finger with two ventral setae, and three unequal setae near incisive margin, the latter with three unequal teeth, central one bifid. Dactylus strong, without crenulations. Pereopod 1 (Fig. 3 A). Coxa annular, with seta. Basis about 3.8 times as long as broad, with dorsal plumose setae. Ischium with seta. Merus with inner slender seta and outer spiniform seta. Carpus as long as merus, rectangular, 2.2 times as long as broad, with one dorsal and one ventral terminal spiniform seta. Propodus slender, largely devoid of small spinules, 1.5 times as long as carpus, with disto-ventral spiniform seta and terminal fringe of small setae. Dactylus and unguis together just over half as long as propodus, unguis as long as dactylus, with spatulate tip. Pereopod 2 (Fig. 3 B). Similar to pereopod 1 but carpus with three spiniform setae. Propodus with a few ventral spinules. Pereopod 3 (Fig. 3 C). Similar to pereopod 2 but basis without sensory seta. Dactylus with accessory seta (possibly present on pereopods 1–2). Pereopod 4 (Fig. 3 D). With no discrete coxa. Basis slightly longer than in pereopods 1–3. Ischium with two setae. Merus with two unequal spiniform setae. Carpus rectangular, longer than merus, with three long spiniform setae and one smaller rod-like dorsal seta. Propodus longer than carpus, with two ventro-distal pectinate setae and one dorso-distal spiniform seta. Dactylus and unguis as long as propodus, dactylus with double row of spinules on inferior margin. Pereopod 5 (Fig. 3 E). Similar to pereopod 4. Pereopod 6 (Fig. 3 F). Similar to pereopods 4–5 but propodus with two additional dorso-distal spiniform setae. Pleopod (Fig. 2 J). Relatively small compared to pereopods, both rami sub-ovate. Endopod with five terminal setae. Exopod two-articled, with five terminal setae and one on small article 1. Uropod (Fig. 2 K). Relatively stout (for genus), only as long as pleotelson and half of preceding pleonite. Basal article about twice as long as broad. Exopod two-articled, barely half as long as article 1 of endopod, with one seta on article 1 and one long seta on article 2. Endopod two-articled, article 1 just over half total length of endopod, as long as basal article, just over three times as long as broad, with one long distal seta and two distal sensory setae, article 2 as long as article 1, about four times as long as broad, with one distal seta and four unequal terminal setae, with two sensory setae. Ovigerous female. Generally as non-ovigerous female, but pereon more dorso-ventrally compressed, with four pairs of oostegites; length 2.24 mm. Post-ovigerous female . As ovigerous female but lacking oostegites, length 2.22 mm. Preparatory male. Body (Fig. 1 F) generally as non-ovigerous female, but pleon (Figs 1 F–G) slightly larger, 17 % of body length, length 2.12 mm. Pleotelson similar, but specimen shows full profile of triangular apex (Fig. 1 H). Antennule (Fig. 1 I) stouter, five-articled, i.e. with additional short article. Pleopod (Fig. 2 L) proportionately larger. Remarks. This species is easily distinguished from other sympatric Akanthophoreus taxa by its relatively stout uropods, ‘ordinary’ chelipeds, short dactylus/unguis in pereopods 1–3 and the latter with a relatively ‘smooth’ carpus and propodus. A very similar, or possibly conspecific, species remains undescribed from the Iceland-Greenland region, some specimens of which were identified by Hansen (1913) as Leptognathia hanseni (i.e. the type material is a mixture of two species – Bird ined .). Distribution. Kurile-Kamchatka Trench, 5473–5484 metres. : Published as part of Bird, Graham J, 2007, Family incertae cedis *, pp. 121-149 in Zootaxa 1599 on pages 123-127, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.178710 : {"references": ["Hansen, H. J. (1913) Crustacea Malacostraca, II, IV, The Order Tanaidacea. Danish Ingolf Expedition, 3 (3), 1 - 145."]}
format Text
author Bird, Graham J
author_facet Bird, Graham J
author_sort Bird, Graham J
title Akanthophoreus crassicauda Bird, 2007, n.sp.
title_short Akanthophoreus crassicauda Bird, 2007, n.sp.
title_full Akanthophoreus crassicauda Bird, 2007, n.sp.
title_fullStr Akanthophoreus crassicauda Bird, 2007, n.sp.
title_full_unstemmed Akanthophoreus crassicauda Bird, 2007, n.sp.
title_sort akanthophoreus crassicauda bird, 2007, n.sp.
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2007
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4668896
https://zenodo.org/record/4668896
long_lat ENVELOPE(9.895,9.895,63.645,63.645)
geographic Greenland
Seta
geographic_facet Greenland
Seta
genre Greenland
Iceland
Kamchatka
genre_facet Greenland
Iceland
Kamchatka
op_relation http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC8FFDBFFEC036CFFC0FFC51266FF90
http://zoobank.org/B1BE5355-CE13-4C80-8DC7-5F1DB5547F1B
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178710
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC8FFDBFFEC036CFFC0FFC51266FF90
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178711
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178712
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178713
http://zoobank.org/B1BE5355-CE13-4C80-8DC7-5F1DB5547F1B
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4668895
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4668896
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178710
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178711
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178712
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178713
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4668895
_version_ 1766020630706126848
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4668896 2023-05-15T16:30:51+02:00 Akanthophoreus crassicauda Bird, 2007, n.sp. Bird, Graham J 2007 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4668896 https://zenodo.org/record/4668896 unknown Zenodo http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC8FFDBFFEC036CFFC0FFC51266FF90 http://zoobank.org/B1BE5355-CE13-4C80-8DC7-5F1DB5547F1B https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178710 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFC8FFDBFFEC036CFFC0FFC51266FF90 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178711 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178712 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178713 http://zoobank.org/B1BE5355-CE13-4C80-8DC7-5F1DB5547F1B https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4668895 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Malacostraca Tanaidacea Akanthophoreidae Akanthophoreus Akanthophoreus crassicauda article-journal ScholarlyArticle Text Taxonomic treatment 2007 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4668896 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178710 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178711 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178712 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.178713 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4668895 2022-03-10T14:52:08Z Akanthophoreus crassicauda n.sp. Figures 1–3 Material examined. Holotype , 1 non-ovigerous female (KMNH IvR 500.194), station XR-12, 41º 37.67 ’– 41 º 37.08 ’N 146 º 54.19 ’– 146 º 52.72 ’E, 5473–5484 metres, 4 m ORE beam trawl, 23 September 2001. Paratypes : 1 ovigerous female, 1 post-ovigerous male (partially dissected) and 1 preparatory male (KMNH IvR 500.195), same locality. Diagnosis. Akanthophoreus with all pereonites shorter than broad. Pleotelson without lateral spurs. Cheliped carpus with weak shield; propodus and dactylus without crenulations. Dactylus/unguis of pereopods 1–3 short, half as long as propodus. Uropod stout, endopod articles three or four times as long as broad. Etymology. From combination of Latin crassus ‘thick’ or ‘stout’ and cauda , ‘tail’, referring to the diagnostic uropods. Description, non-ovigerous female . Body (Fig. 1 A). Fairly slender, 6.9 times as long as broad (Holotype), length 2.61 mm. Carapace. Just shorter than pereonites 1–2 together (excluding pereonal gap), 1.3 times as long as broad, with parallel margins for posterior two-thirds portion; rostrum a slight sub-triangular process. Pereonites. With weakly convex lateral margins, pereonite 1 slightly narrower posteriorly, pereonites 1–6 0.55, 0.59, 0.68, 0.69, 0.67, 0.62 times as long as broad, respectively. Pleon (Fig. 1 B). Shorter than preceding two pereonites, 14.6 % of body length, all pleonites much wider than long, with long seta on epimeral margin; each pleonite sternum rounded in lateral profile. Pleotelson (Figs 1 C). Longer than two preceding pleonites, shorter than broad, with rounded posterior margin in dorsal view obscuring deflected apex; four setae (two sensory) on posterior margin. Antennule (Fig. 1 D). Slender, about 0.75 times as long as carapace. Article 1 just over half of total length, 3.1 times as long as broad (mid-length), with disto-outer seta and sensory setae and more proximal group of three sensory setae. Article 2 sub-rectangular, 1.24 times as long as broad, with a long disto-outer seta and one smaller inner seta. Article 3 half as long as article 2, with two setae. Article 4 twice as long as article 3, 2.8 times as long as broad, with four long, quite thick setae, one small seta and one aesthetasc. Antenna (Fig. 1 E). Slender, about 0.74 times as long as antennule. Articles 1–3 short, but article 2 larger than article 3, both with dorsal seta, two on article 2. Article 4 almost half as long as antenna, about five times as long as broad, with pseudo-articulation near mid-point, accompanied by a sensory seta, terminally with two long setae and at least three sensory setae. Article 5 slender, three times as long as broad, with terminal seta. Article 6 small, with four unequal setae. Mouthparts. Labrum (Fig. 2 A) of sub-conical or sub-triangular lateral profile. Labium (Fig. 2 B) typical of genus. Maxilla not recovered. Mandibles (Figs 2 C–D) strong, with dentate incisor and molar with acuminate shape, terminally with about eight unequal spines, longer apically; left mandible with at least bicuspid lacinia mobilis. Maxillule (Fig. 2 E) palp with two setae and endite with nine spiniform setae, two of which are pectinate. Maxilliped (Figs 2 F–G) basis fused and longer than endites, with long seta at base of each palp; endites unfused, each with weakly lobed distal margin, minutely setose lateral processes and distal seta; palp with stout articles 1–3, article 2 with three inner and one outer seta; article 3 with two long and two smaller setae; article 4 with four long and one smaller setae. Cheliped (Figs 2 H–I). With distinct pre-basal sclerite attachment. Basis with rounded free posterior margin and outer seta. Merus sub-triangular, with ventral seta. Carpus 1.9 times as long as broad, with very weak shield, two ventral setae and two dorsal setae. Propodus and terminal spine longer than carpus, 0.47 times as deep as long, dorsal crest with two processes (Fig. 2 I) with four inner spiniform setae and one outer seta near articulation with dactylus. Fixed finger with two ventral setae, and three unequal setae near incisive margin, the latter with three unequal teeth, central one bifid. Dactylus strong, without crenulations. Pereopod 1 (Fig. 3 A). Coxa annular, with seta. Basis about 3.8 times as long as broad, with dorsal plumose setae. Ischium with seta. Merus with inner slender seta and outer spiniform seta. Carpus as long as merus, rectangular, 2.2 times as long as broad, with one dorsal and one ventral terminal spiniform seta. Propodus slender, largely devoid of small spinules, 1.5 times as long as carpus, with disto-ventral spiniform seta and terminal fringe of small setae. Dactylus and unguis together just over half as long as propodus, unguis as long as dactylus, with spatulate tip. Pereopod 2 (Fig. 3 B). Similar to pereopod 1 but carpus with three spiniform setae. Propodus with a few ventral spinules. Pereopod 3 (Fig. 3 C). Similar to pereopod 2 but basis without sensory seta. Dactylus with accessory seta (possibly present on pereopods 1–2). Pereopod 4 (Fig. 3 D). With no discrete coxa. Basis slightly longer than in pereopods 1–3. Ischium with two setae. Merus with two unequal spiniform setae. Carpus rectangular, longer than merus, with three long spiniform setae and one smaller rod-like dorsal seta. Propodus longer than carpus, with two ventro-distal pectinate setae and one dorso-distal spiniform seta. Dactylus and unguis as long as propodus, dactylus with double row of spinules on inferior margin. Pereopod 5 (Fig. 3 E). Similar to pereopod 4. Pereopod 6 (Fig. 3 F). Similar to pereopods 4–5 but propodus with two additional dorso-distal spiniform setae. Pleopod (Fig. 2 J). Relatively small compared to pereopods, both rami sub-ovate. Endopod with five terminal setae. Exopod two-articled, with five terminal setae and one on small article 1. Uropod (Fig. 2 K). Relatively stout (for genus), only as long as pleotelson and half of preceding pleonite. Basal article about twice as long as broad. Exopod two-articled, barely half as long as article 1 of endopod, with one seta on article 1 and one long seta on article 2. Endopod two-articled, article 1 just over half total length of endopod, as long as basal article, just over three times as long as broad, with one long distal seta and two distal sensory setae, article 2 as long as article 1, about four times as long as broad, with one distal seta and four unequal terminal setae, with two sensory setae. Ovigerous female. Generally as non-ovigerous female, but pereon more dorso-ventrally compressed, with four pairs of oostegites; length 2.24 mm. Post-ovigerous female . As ovigerous female but lacking oostegites, length 2.22 mm. Preparatory male. Body (Fig. 1 F) generally as non-ovigerous female, but pleon (Figs 1 F–G) slightly larger, 17 % of body length, length 2.12 mm. Pleotelson similar, but specimen shows full profile of triangular apex (Fig. 1 H). Antennule (Fig. 1 I) stouter, five-articled, i.e. with additional short article. Pleopod (Fig. 2 L) proportionately larger. Remarks. This species is easily distinguished from other sympatric Akanthophoreus taxa by its relatively stout uropods, ‘ordinary’ chelipeds, short dactylus/unguis in pereopods 1–3 and the latter with a relatively ‘smooth’ carpus and propodus. A very similar, or possibly conspecific, species remains undescribed from the Iceland-Greenland region, some specimens of which were identified by Hansen (1913) as Leptognathia hanseni (i.e. the type material is a mixture of two species – Bird ined .). Distribution. Kurile-Kamchatka Trench, 5473–5484 metres. : Published as part of Bird, Graham J, 2007, Family incertae cedis *, pp. 121-149 in Zootaxa 1599 on pages 123-127, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.178710 : {"references": ["Hansen, H. J. (1913) Crustacea Malacostraca, II, IV, The Order Tanaidacea. Danish Ingolf Expedition, 3 (3), 1 - 145."]} Text Greenland Iceland Kamchatka DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Greenland Seta ENVELOPE(9.895,9.895,63.645,63.645)