Pseudobathytanais gibberosus Larsen & Heard 2001, n. sp.

Pseudobathytanais gibberosus n. sp. (Figs. 8 & 9) Material examined: Holotype: Non­ovigerous female, body length 2.7 mm, Slope sta. 40, 38º17,7’S. 149º11,3’E. Depth 400 m. Substrate sand, gravel, mud. 24/07­1986. Paratypes: 2 non­ovigerous females. Same locality. All material collected by G.C.B....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Larsen, Kim, Heard, Richard W.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618317
https://zenodo.org/record/4618317
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4618317
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Tanaidacea
Paratanaidae
Pseudobathytanais
Pseudobathytanais gibberosus
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Tanaidacea
Paratanaidae
Pseudobathytanais
Pseudobathytanais gibberosus
Larsen, Kim
Heard, Richard W.
Pseudobathytanais gibberosus Larsen & Heard 2001, n. sp.
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Tanaidacea
Paratanaidae
Pseudobathytanais
Pseudobathytanais gibberosus
description Pseudobathytanais gibberosus n. sp. (Figs. 8 & 9) Material examined: Holotype: Non­ovigerous female, body length 2.7 mm, Slope sta. 40, 38º17,7’S. 149º11,3’E. Depth 400 m. Substrate sand, gravel, mud. 24/07­1986. Paratypes: 2 non­ovigerous females. Same locality. All material collected by G.C.B. Poore & party on RV Franklin. Sampler: Epibenthic Sled Material held at NMV Other material : 7 non­ovigerous females, 5 mancas. Same locality. Diagnosis : First pleonite with prominent dorsal anteriorly directed process. Description (adult female) Body (Figs. 8 A & 8 B): Sub­cylindrical, approximately 8 times longer than broad. Cephalothorax (Fig. 8 C): Rostrum prominent. Shorter than pereonites 1 and 2 together, 1.4 times longer width, antero­lateral corners acute. Pereonites : Pereonite 1 wider than long, extending over cephalothorax at pereopod attachment. Pereonites 2­4 of increasing length; pereonites 4 and 5 longer than wide. Pereonite 6 subequal pereonite 2. Pleon : Pleonite 1 with dorsal anteriorly directed process (Fig. 5 D). Pleonites 2­5 length and width subequal, width approximately 4.0 length. Pleotelson longer than last pleonite. Maxilliped endites. Antennule (Fig. 8 G): longer than cephalothorax. Article 1 shorter than rest of antennule, dorsal margin with 1 short simple seta, ventral margin with 1 simple and several sensory setae medially. Article 2 about 0.3 times length of article 1, distal margin with 1 long setulated and several sensory setae. Article 3 wide than long shorter than other articles, with 1 long setulated seta. Article 4 longer than article 2, distally with 1 aesthetascs, 1 simple short­ and 5 setulated setae twice as long as antennule. Antenna (Fig. 8 H): Shorter than cephalothorax. Article 1 smooth, wider than long. Article 2 longer than other articles, with 4 simple, 1 spiniform and 1 long setulated distal setae, dorsally with several spiny scales. Article 3 shorter than article 4, with 1 spiniform seta. Article 4 length subequal to article 5, with 1 long serrated distal seta on ventral margin and 4 short sensory distal setae. Article 5 marginally shorter than article 4, with 1 long setulated distal seta of more than twice the length of the antennae. Article 6 minute with 3 long setulated distal setae of more than twice the length of the antennae. Mouthparts: Labrum not recovered. Left mandible (Fig. 8 E) with strong molar process shorter than incisor, strongly defined lacina mobilis without denticulations, incisor tridentate. Maxillule (Fig. 8 I) with 6 spiniform terminal setae and row of simple setae, palp shorter than endite. Maxilla (Fig. 8 I) ovoid. Labium (Fig. 8 F) with 2 thick setae on anterolateral corners and several spiny scales. Maxilliped (Figs. 8 J & 8 K) endites with 2 short flat teeth; palp article 1, square, 1 seta on outer margin; article 2 ovoid, inner margin shorter than outer, 2 simple and 1 setulated setae on inner margin; article 3 with 4 setulated setae; article 4 inner margin with 4 setulated distal setae and several fine setules, outer margin with 1 setulated seta. Epignath smooth, as long as maxillule endite. Cheliped (Fig. 9 A): Articulated to cephalothorax with triangular sclerite. Basis smooth, twice as long as wide. Merus ovoid, with 1 simple seta medially on ventral margin. Carpus oval, as long as basis, with 2 simple setae on ventral margin and 1 on dorsal margin. Propodus (Fig. 2 K) with row of serrated setae flanking dactyl insertion. Fixed finger with strong spine, 1 simple seta on ventral margin, 3 on cutting edge. Dactylus narrow, with 2 spiniform setae on ventral margin. Oostegites: no ovigerous specimens found. Pereopod 1 (Fig. 9 B): Coxa but distinct. Basis width increases distally, smooth. Ischium width subequal length, with 1 simple seta on ventral margin, Merus width increases distally, with 1 simple distal seta on ventral margin. Carpus less than half as long as merus, with 3 simple distal setae. Propodus shorter than merus, tapering distally, with 4 simple distal setae and. Dactyl and terminal spine not fused, together as long as propodus. Pereopod 2 (Fig. 9 C): Similar to pereopod 1 except: Basis shorter than on pereopod 1, with 1 dorsal seta. Ischium, with 2 ventral setae. Merus about 70 % shorter than on pereopod 1, with 2 simple ventral setae. Carpus with 1 spiniform distal seta. Propodus less elongated, with 3 simple distal setae. Pereopod 3 (Fig. 9 D): Similar to pereopod 2 but: Ischium with 2 ventral­ and 1 dorsal setule. Merus smooth. Pereopod 4 (Fig. 9 E): lateral coxa absent. Basis stout, as long as rest of pereopod, with 2 simple and 1 sensory ventral­ and 1 dorsal setae. Ischium smooth. Merus shorter than carpus with several denticulated scales. Carpus longer than ischium and merus together, with denticulate cuticular scales and 2 short stout denticulated distal setae. Propodus longer than dactylus, with 1 simple dorsal seta, 1 long distal­ and 2 ventral spiniform setae. Dactyl and terminal spine fused into a claw with denticles. Pereopod 5 (Fig. 9 F): As pereopod 4, except: Basis stouter. Merus triangular, with 1 heavy denticulated spiniform seta and numerous spiny scales. Carpus with 3 heavy denticulated spiniform setae and spiny scale. Propodus without dorsal seta. Pereopod 6 (Fig. 9 G): As pereopod 4 except: Basis longer and with only 1 dorsal seta. Merus with 1 spiniform seta and without denticulated scales. Carpus with 1 simple and 1 spiniform setae and spiny scale. Propodus with 2 spiniform ventral setae and 3 serrated distal setae. Pleopods (Fig. 9 H): All 5 pairs similar. Protopod trapezoidal. Exopod armed with 18 plumose setae with gap between the most proximal and rest. Endopod with 13 plumose setae with gap between the 2 terminal ones and rest. Uropods (Fig. 9 I): Protopod smooth, quadrate. Endopod with 1 article, width decreasing 0.3 midlength, with 1 simple and 2 sensory setae at midlength, 7 simple distal setae. Exopod with 1 article, 1 simple seta at midlength, 2 long simple distal setae. Male: unknown. Etymology: Named after the characteristic dorsal projection of pleonite 1. (Latin: Gibberosus = Hunchback ). Remarks: Pseudobathytanais gibberosus differs from the only other species in the genus, P. shtokmani Kudinova­Pasternak, 1990, by the prominent dorsal projection on the first pleonite. Members of this genus can be distinguished from Bathytanais by the lack of a ventral process on antenna article 2. Two of the 12 specimens of P. gibberosus examined during our study were parasitized with tantulocarids, a order of crustaceans presently known only from tanaidomorphan hosts. We observed only the expanded trunk­sac stages and these were attached to the pleotelson of the two infected specimens. This constitutes the first record for these parasites on a member of the family Paratanaididae and the first known occurrence for tantulocarids from the Indo­Pacific. Tantulocarids have been previously reported from the genera Typhlotanais and Leptognathia in the North Atlantic (Boxhall et al. 1989). The tubes of P. gibberosus are remarkably solid and are built from coarse gravel and sponge spicules. : Published as part of Larsen, Kim & Heard, Richard W., 2001, A new tanaidacean subfamily, Bathytanaidinae (Crustacea: Paratanaididae), from the Australian continental shelf and slope, pp. 1-22 in Zootaxa 19 on pages 16-20, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4618295 : {"references": ["Kudinova-Pasternak, R. K. (1990) Tanaidacea (Crustacea, Malacostraca) of the underwater Ridge Naska in the Pacific. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 69 (12), 135 - 140.", "Boxhall, G. A., Huys, R. & Lincoln, R. J. (1989) A new species of Microdajus (Crustacea; Tantulocarida) parasitic on a tanaid in the northeastern Atlantic, with observations on M. langi Greve. Systematic Parasitology, 14, 17 - 30."]}
format Text
author Larsen, Kim
Heard, Richard W.
author_facet Larsen, Kim
Heard, Richard W.
author_sort Larsen, Kim
title Pseudobathytanais gibberosus Larsen & Heard 2001, n. sp.
title_short Pseudobathytanais gibberosus Larsen & Heard 2001, n. sp.
title_full Pseudobathytanais gibberosus Larsen & Heard 2001, n. sp.
title_fullStr Pseudobathytanais gibberosus Larsen & Heard 2001, n. sp.
title_full_unstemmed Pseudobathytanais gibberosus Larsen & Heard 2001, n. sp.
title_sort pseudobathytanais gibberosus larsen & heard 2001, n. sp.
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2001
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618317
https://zenodo.org/record/4618317
long_lat ENVELOPE(9.895,9.895,63.645,63.645)
geographic Pacific
Seta
geographic_facet Pacific
Seta
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFDAFFDBFFA867690A1BFD79FFF9FFBA
http://zoobank.org/B9B4322E-4550-46A7-A34B-3A8392156A7C
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618295
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFDAFFDBFFA867690A1BFD79FFF9FFBA
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155424
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618309
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155421
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155418
http://zoobank.org/B9B4322E-4550-46A7-A34B-3A8392156A7C
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618316
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618317
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618295
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155424
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618309
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155421
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155418
https://doi.
_version_ 1766137715301023744
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4618317 2023-05-15T17:37:39+02:00 Pseudobathytanais gibberosus Larsen & Heard 2001, n. sp. Larsen, Kim Heard, Richard W. 2001 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618317 https://zenodo.org/record/4618317 unknown Zenodo http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFDAFFDBFFA867690A1BFD79FFF9FFBA http://zoobank.org/B9B4322E-4550-46A7-A34B-3A8392156A7C https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618295 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFDAFFDBFFA867690A1BFD79FFF9FFBA https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155424 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618309 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155421 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155418 http://zoobank.org/B9B4322E-4550-46A7-A34B-3A8392156A7C https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618316 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Malacostraca Tanaidacea Paratanaidae Pseudobathytanais Pseudobathytanais gibberosus article-journal ScholarlyArticle Text Taxonomic treatment 2001 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618317 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618295 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155424 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618309 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155421 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155418 https://doi. 2022-03-10T15:48:21Z Pseudobathytanais gibberosus n. sp. (Figs. 8 & 9) Material examined: Holotype: Non­ovigerous female, body length 2.7 mm, Slope sta. 40, 38º17,7’S. 149º11,3’E. Depth 400 m. Substrate sand, gravel, mud. 24/07­1986. Paratypes: 2 non­ovigerous females. Same locality. All material collected by G.C.B. Poore & party on RV Franklin. Sampler: Epibenthic Sled Material held at NMV Other material : 7 non­ovigerous females, 5 mancas. Same locality. Diagnosis : First pleonite with prominent dorsal anteriorly directed process. Description (adult female) Body (Figs. 8 A & 8 B): Sub­cylindrical, approximately 8 times longer than broad. Cephalothorax (Fig. 8 C): Rostrum prominent. Shorter than pereonites 1 and 2 together, 1.4 times longer width, antero­lateral corners acute. Pereonites : Pereonite 1 wider than long, extending over cephalothorax at pereopod attachment. Pereonites 2­4 of increasing length; pereonites 4 and 5 longer than wide. Pereonite 6 subequal pereonite 2. Pleon : Pleonite 1 with dorsal anteriorly directed process (Fig. 5 D). Pleonites 2­5 length and width subequal, width approximately 4.0 length. Pleotelson longer than last pleonite. Maxilliped endites. Antennule (Fig. 8 G): longer than cephalothorax. Article 1 shorter than rest of antennule, dorsal margin with 1 short simple seta, ventral margin with 1 simple and several sensory setae medially. Article 2 about 0.3 times length of article 1, distal margin with 1 long setulated and several sensory setae. Article 3 wide than long shorter than other articles, with 1 long setulated seta. Article 4 longer than article 2, distally with 1 aesthetascs, 1 simple short­ and 5 setulated setae twice as long as antennule. Antenna (Fig. 8 H): Shorter than cephalothorax. Article 1 smooth, wider than long. Article 2 longer than other articles, with 4 simple, 1 spiniform and 1 long setulated distal setae, dorsally with several spiny scales. Article 3 shorter than article 4, with 1 spiniform seta. Article 4 length subequal to article 5, with 1 long serrated distal seta on ventral margin and 4 short sensory distal setae. Article 5 marginally shorter than article 4, with 1 long setulated distal seta of more than twice the length of the antennae. Article 6 minute with 3 long setulated distal setae of more than twice the length of the antennae. Mouthparts: Labrum not recovered. Left mandible (Fig. 8 E) with strong molar process shorter than incisor, strongly defined lacina mobilis without denticulations, incisor tridentate. Maxillule (Fig. 8 I) with 6 spiniform terminal setae and row of simple setae, palp shorter than endite. Maxilla (Fig. 8 I) ovoid. Labium (Fig. 8 F) with 2 thick setae on anterolateral corners and several spiny scales. Maxilliped (Figs. 8 J & 8 K) endites with 2 short flat teeth; palp article 1, square, 1 seta on outer margin; article 2 ovoid, inner margin shorter than outer, 2 simple and 1 setulated setae on inner margin; article 3 with 4 setulated setae; article 4 inner margin with 4 setulated distal setae and several fine setules, outer margin with 1 setulated seta. Epignath smooth, as long as maxillule endite. Cheliped (Fig. 9 A): Articulated to cephalothorax with triangular sclerite. Basis smooth, twice as long as wide. Merus ovoid, with 1 simple seta medially on ventral margin. Carpus oval, as long as basis, with 2 simple setae on ventral margin and 1 on dorsal margin. Propodus (Fig. 2 K) with row of serrated setae flanking dactyl insertion. Fixed finger with strong spine, 1 simple seta on ventral margin, 3 on cutting edge. Dactylus narrow, with 2 spiniform setae on ventral margin. Oostegites: no ovigerous specimens found. Pereopod 1 (Fig. 9 B): Coxa but distinct. Basis width increases distally, smooth. Ischium width subequal length, with 1 simple seta on ventral margin, Merus width increases distally, with 1 simple distal seta on ventral margin. Carpus less than half as long as merus, with 3 simple distal setae. Propodus shorter than merus, tapering distally, with 4 simple distal setae and. Dactyl and terminal spine not fused, together as long as propodus. Pereopod 2 (Fig. 9 C): Similar to pereopod 1 except: Basis shorter than on pereopod 1, with 1 dorsal seta. Ischium, with 2 ventral setae. Merus about 70 % shorter than on pereopod 1, with 2 simple ventral setae. Carpus with 1 spiniform distal seta. Propodus less elongated, with 3 simple distal setae. Pereopod 3 (Fig. 9 D): Similar to pereopod 2 but: Ischium with 2 ventral­ and 1 dorsal setule. Merus smooth. Pereopod 4 (Fig. 9 E): lateral coxa absent. Basis stout, as long as rest of pereopod, with 2 simple and 1 sensory ventral­ and 1 dorsal setae. Ischium smooth. Merus shorter than carpus with several denticulated scales. Carpus longer than ischium and merus together, with denticulate cuticular scales and 2 short stout denticulated distal setae. Propodus longer than dactylus, with 1 simple dorsal seta, 1 long distal­ and 2 ventral spiniform setae. Dactyl and terminal spine fused into a claw with denticles. Pereopod 5 (Fig. 9 F): As pereopod 4, except: Basis stouter. Merus triangular, with 1 heavy denticulated spiniform seta and numerous spiny scales. Carpus with 3 heavy denticulated spiniform setae and spiny scale. Propodus without dorsal seta. Pereopod 6 (Fig. 9 G): As pereopod 4 except: Basis longer and with only 1 dorsal seta. Merus with 1 spiniform seta and without denticulated scales. Carpus with 1 simple and 1 spiniform setae and spiny scale. Propodus with 2 spiniform ventral setae and 3 serrated distal setae. Pleopods (Fig. 9 H): All 5 pairs similar. Protopod trapezoidal. Exopod armed with 18 plumose setae with gap between the most proximal and rest. Endopod with 13 plumose setae with gap between the 2 terminal ones and rest. Uropods (Fig. 9 I): Protopod smooth, quadrate. Endopod with 1 article, width decreasing 0.3 midlength, with 1 simple and 2 sensory setae at midlength, 7 simple distal setae. Exopod with 1 article, 1 simple seta at midlength, 2 long simple distal setae. Male: unknown. Etymology: Named after the characteristic dorsal projection of pleonite 1. (Latin: Gibberosus = Hunchback ). Remarks: Pseudobathytanais gibberosus differs from the only other species in the genus, P. shtokmani Kudinova­Pasternak, 1990, by the prominent dorsal projection on the first pleonite. Members of this genus can be distinguished from Bathytanais by the lack of a ventral process on antenna article 2. Two of the 12 specimens of P. gibberosus examined during our study were parasitized with tantulocarids, a order of crustaceans presently known only from tanaidomorphan hosts. We observed only the expanded trunk­sac stages and these were attached to the pleotelson of the two infected specimens. This constitutes the first record for these parasites on a member of the family Paratanaididae and the first known occurrence for tantulocarids from the Indo­Pacific. Tantulocarids have been previously reported from the genera Typhlotanais and Leptognathia in the North Atlantic (Boxhall et al. 1989). The tubes of P. gibberosus are remarkably solid and are built from coarse gravel and sponge spicules. : Published as part of Larsen, Kim & Heard, Richard W., 2001, A new tanaidacean subfamily, Bathytanaidinae (Crustacea: Paratanaididae), from the Australian continental shelf and slope, pp. 1-22 in Zootaxa 19 on pages 16-20, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4618295 : {"references": ["Kudinova-Pasternak, R. K. (1990) Tanaidacea (Crustacea, Malacostraca) of the underwater Ridge Naska in the Pacific. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 69 (12), 135 - 140.", "Boxhall, G. A., Huys, R. & Lincoln, R. J. (1989) A new species of Microdajus (Crustacea; Tantulocarida) parasitic on a tanaid in the northeastern Atlantic, with observations on M. langi Greve. Systematic Parasitology, 14, 17 - 30."]} Text North Atlantic DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Pacific Seta ENVELOPE(9.895,9.895,63.645,63.645)