Promecostethus Enderlein 1909

Promecostethus Enderlein, 1909 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A8C46E17-6023-4393-B527-9DDD7C82C216 Promecostethus Enderlein 1909: 535. Nuncia : Hickman 1939: 160 ( Promecostethus syn.jr. of Nuncia Loman, 1902) Promecostethus : Kury et al. 2014: 4 (restored as valid). Type species . Promecostethus unifalc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Porto, Willians, Pérez-González, Abel
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4536279
https://zenodo.org/record/4536279
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4536279
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Opiliones
Triaenonychidae
Promecostethus
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Opiliones
Triaenonychidae
Promecostethus
Porto, Willians
Pérez-González, Abel
Promecostethus Enderlein 1909
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Opiliones
Triaenonychidae
Promecostethus
description Promecostethus Enderlein, 1909 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A8C46E17-6023-4393-B527-9DDD7C82C216 Promecostethus Enderlein 1909: 535. Nuncia : Hickman 1939: 160 ( Promecostethus syn.jr. of Nuncia Loman, 1902) Promecostethus : Kury et al. 2014: 4 (restored as valid). Type species . Promecostethus unifalculatus Enderlein, 1909, by monotypy. Diagnosis: Promecostethus differs from all other triaenonychid genera by the morphology of the male genitalia that exhibits a ventral plate without a cleft, forming an arc shape, a simple capsula externa forming a dorsal plate—bigger than the ventral plate—with a wide median cleft dividing the dorsal plate into two large halves diverging apically and with lateral plate absent. It differs further by a capsula interna with latero-ventrally micro-sculpturated fused conductors, located ventral to a wide and apically blunt stylus that is ventrally curved. Promecostethus is relatively similar to Nuncia obesa obesa ( i.e. Nuncia Loman 1902, stricto sensu ) in the morphology of the dorsal scutum and ocularium, but differs in the number of stout tubercles of coxa I (two in Promecostethus and four in N. obesa obesa ), coxa II (two in Promecostethus and none in N. obesa obesa ), and in the femur of the pedipalp which has dorsal tubercles and ventral proximal tubercles longer than N. obesa obesa . Also, in N. obesa obesa the ventral plate of the penis is cleft and larger than the dorsal plate and the stylus is remarkably long and apically pointed, in contrast with Promecostethus where the penis ventral plate is entire, smaller than the dorsal plate and the stylus slightly overpasses the conductors and is wide and apically blunt. Compared to South American “ Nuncia ” ( i.e. the polyphyletic group of species not belonging to Nuncia , see Baker et al. 2020), the differences are more significant. The penis of Nuncia americana Roewer, 1961, and all Argentine and Chilean species of “ Nuncia ”, have the ventral plate cleft and several shapes of the conductors of the capsula interna : partially covering the ventral plate in N. americana , divided into two halves which are fused apically in N. chilensis (Soares, 1968), forming a bag in N. rostrata Maury, 1990, with a hood shape in N. spinulosa Maury, 1990 and tubular with apical setae in N.verrucosa Maury, 1990. The ocularium of N. chilensis and N. rostrata have an acute spine. Nuncia spinulosa has the dorsal scutum covered with stout tubercles and N. verrucosa is covered by wart shape tubercles. Promecostethus exhibits the closest similarities with the genera Calliuncus Roewer, 1931 (Australia), Neonuncia Roewer, 1915 (New Zealand), Nunciella Roewer, 1929 (Australia, New Zealand) and Nuncioides Hickman, 1958 (Australia), including the general body shape, the absence of stout tubercles on the dorsal scutum and the presence of a highly modified bifid setiferous tubercle placed proximo-ventrally on the pedipalp femur. Calliuncus differs from Promecostethus by the presence of an acute spine on the ocularium and by a penis with a ventral plate partly separated by a thin mediodistal cleft, stylus anteriorly ( i.e. dorsal) curved, and lateral plates present. Promecostethus shares with Neonuncia, Nunciella and Nuncioides a strong proximal boss on the first segment of the chelicerae of the males. Neonuncia differs from Promecostethus by the absence of microsculpture in the capsula interna and the presence of a cleft in the ventral plate of the penis. Nunciella and Nuncioides differ from Promecostethus by the presence of a ventral plate with a cleft, except in Nunciella badia (Hickman, 1958) and Nunciella dentata (Hickman, 1958). Almost all species of Nunciella differ from Promecostethus by the presence of a lateral plate on the penis; however, there is no information about the genital morphology of Nunciella cheliplus Roewer, 1931, Nunciella granulata Roewer, 1931 or Nunciella parvula Roewer, 1931. Distribution . Endemic to the Crozet Islands : Published as part of Porto, Willians & Pérez-González, Abel, 2020, Redescription of Promecostethus unifalculatus, the only known harvestman from Crozet Islands (Opiliones: Triaenonychidae), pp. 120-130 in Zootaxa 4861 (1) on pages 122-123, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4861.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/4414662 : {"references": ["Enderlein, G. (1909) Die Spinnen der Crozet-Inseln und von Kerguelen. In: Drygalski, E. von (Ed.), Deutsche Sudpolar-Expedition 1901 - 1903. Georg Reimer, Berlin, pp. 535 - 540.", "Hickman, V. V. (1939) Opiliones and Araneae. In: Johnston, H. (Ed.), B. A. N. Z. Antarctic research expedition, 1929 - 1931. B. A. N. Z. A. R. Expedition Committee, Adelaide, pp. 159 - 187.", "Loman, J. C. C. (1902) Neue aussereuropaische Opilioniden. Zoologische Jahrbucher, 16, 163 - 216. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 17151", "Kury, A., Mendes, A. & Souza, D. (2014) World Checklist of Opiliones species (Arachnida). Part 1: Laniatores-Travunioidea and Triaenonychoidea. Biodiversity Data Journal 2, e 4094. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / BDJ. 2. e 4094", "Baker, C. M., Sheridan, K., Derkarabetian, S., Perez-Gonzalez, A., Velez, S. & Giribet, G. (2020) Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the temperate Gondwanan family Triaenonychidae (Opiliones: Laniatores) reveals pre-Gondwanan regionalization, common vicariance, and rare dispersal. Invertebrate Systematics, 34, 637 - 660. https: // doi. org / 10.1071 / IS 19069", "Roewer, C. F. (1961) Opiliones aus Sud-Chile. Senckenbergiana Biologica, 42, 99 - 104.", "Soares, H. E. M. (1968) Contribuicao ao estudo dos opilioes do Chile (Opiliones: Gonyleptidae, Triaenonychidae). Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, 21, 259 - 272.", "Maury, E. A. (1990) Triaenonychidae sudamericanos. VI. Tres nuevas especies del genero Nuncia Loman 1902 (Opiliones, Laniatores). Boletin de la Sociedad de Biologia de Concepcion, 61, 103 - 119.", "Roewer, C. F. (1931) Uber Triaenonychiden (6. Erganzung der \" Weberknechte der Erde \", 1923). Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 138 (1), 137 - 185.", "Roewer, C. F. (1915) Die Familie der Triaenonychidae der Opiliones-Laniatores. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, 80, 61 - 168.", "Roewer, C. F. (1929) Contributions to the fauna of Rottnest Island. No. V. Opiliones in the Western Australian Museum. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 15, 95 - 98.", "Hickman, V. V. (1958) Some Tasmanian harvestmen of the Family Triaenonychidae (Sub-Order Laniatores). Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 92, 1 - 116."]}
format Text
author Porto, Willians
Pérez-González, Abel
author_facet Porto, Willians
Pérez-González, Abel
author_sort Porto, Willians
title Promecostethus Enderlein 1909
title_short Promecostethus Enderlein 1909
title_full Promecostethus Enderlein 1909
title_fullStr Promecostethus Enderlein 1909
title_full_unstemmed Promecostethus Enderlein 1909
title_sort promecostethus enderlein 1909
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2020
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4536279
https://zenodo.org/record/4536279
long_lat ENVELOPE(-58.250,-58.250,-63.917,-63.917)
ENVELOPE(-86.200,-86.200,-77.800,-77.800)
ENVELOPE(-69.117,-69.117,-68.517,-68.517)
ENVELOPE(-61.000,-61.000,-64.717,-64.717)
geographic Antarctic
Kerguelen
New Zealand
Argentine
Gonzalez
Reimer
Perez
Drygalski
geographic_facet Antarctic
Kerguelen
New Zealand
Argentine
Gonzalez
Reimer
Perez
Drygalski
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Crozet Islands
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Crozet Islands
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/4414662
http://publication.plazi.org/id/AA6FE53EFFCCFF94FFC8FF84E6548201
http://zoobank.org/3102500D-D5EF-4782-9E3C-969F7D3E74B4
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4861.1.8
http://zenodo.org/record/4414662
http://publication.plazi.org/id/AA6FE53EFFCCFF94FFC8FF84E6548201
http://zoobank.org/3102500D-D5EF-4782-9E3C-969F7D3E74B4
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4536278
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4536279
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4861.1.8
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4536278
_version_ 1766016720704634880
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4536279 2023-05-15T13:31:12+02:00 Promecostethus Enderlein 1909 Porto, Willians Pérez-González, Abel 2020 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4536279 https://zenodo.org/record/4536279 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/4414662 http://publication.plazi.org/id/AA6FE53EFFCCFF94FFC8FF84E6548201 http://zoobank.org/3102500D-D5EF-4782-9E3C-969F7D3E74B4 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4861.1.8 http://zenodo.org/record/4414662 http://publication.plazi.org/id/AA6FE53EFFCCFF94FFC8FF84E6548201 http://zoobank.org/3102500D-D5EF-4782-9E3C-969F7D3E74B4 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4536278 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Opiliones Triaenonychidae Promecostethus Taxonomic treatment article-journal Text ScholarlyArticle 2020 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4536279 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4861.1.8 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4536278 2022-02-09T14:10:36Z Promecostethus Enderlein, 1909 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A8C46E17-6023-4393-B527-9DDD7C82C216 Promecostethus Enderlein 1909: 535. Nuncia : Hickman 1939: 160 ( Promecostethus syn.jr. of Nuncia Loman, 1902) Promecostethus : Kury et al. 2014: 4 (restored as valid). Type species . Promecostethus unifalculatus Enderlein, 1909, by monotypy. Diagnosis: Promecostethus differs from all other triaenonychid genera by the morphology of the male genitalia that exhibits a ventral plate without a cleft, forming an arc shape, a simple capsula externa forming a dorsal plate—bigger than the ventral plate—with a wide median cleft dividing the dorsal plate into two large halves diverging apically and with lateral plate absent. It differs further by a capsula interna with latero-ventrally micro-sculpturated fused conductors, located ventral to a wide and apically blunt stylus that is ventrally curved. Promecostethus is relatively similar to Nuncia obesa obesa ( i.e. Nuncia Loman 1902, stricto sensu ) in the morphology of the dorsal scutum and ocularium, but differs in the number of stout tubercles of coxa I (two in Promecostethus and four in N. obesa obesa ), coxa II (two in Promecostethus and none in N. obesa obesa ), and in the femur of the pedipalp which has dorsal tubercles and ventral proximal tubercles longer than N. obesa obesa . Also, in N. obesa obesa the ventral plate of the penis is cleft and larger than the dorsal plate and the stylus is remarkably long and apically pointed, in contrast with Promecostethus where the penis ventral plate is entire, smaller than the dorsal plate and the stylus slightly overpasses the conductors and is wide and apically blunt. Compared to South American “ Nuncia ” ( i.e. the polyphyletic group of species not belonging to Nuncia , see Baker et al. 2020), the differences are more significant. The penis of Nuncia americana Roewer, 1961, and all Argentine and Chilean species of “ Nuncia ”, have the ventral plate cleft and several shapes of the conductors of the capsula interna : partially covering the ventral plate in N. americana , divided into two halves which are fused apically in N. chilensis (Soares, 1968), forming a bag in N. rostrata Maury, 1990, with a hood shape in N. spinulosa Maury, 1990 and tubular with apical setae in N.verrucosa Maury, 1990. The ocularium of N. chilensis and N. rostrata have an acute spine. Nuncia spinulosa has the dorsal scutum covered with stout tubercles and N. verrucosa is covered by wart shape tubercles. Promecostethus exhibits the closest similarities with the genera Calliuncus Roewer, 1931 (Australia), Neonuncia Roewer, 1915 (New Zealand), Nunciella Roewer, 1929 (Australia, New Zealand) and Nuncioides Hickman, 1958 (Australia), including the general body shape, the absence of stout tubercles on the dorsal scutum and the presence of a highly modified bifid setiferous tubercle placed proximo-ventrally on the pedipalp femur. Calliuncus differs from Promecostethus by the presence of an acute spine on the ocularium and by a penis with a ventral plate partly separated by a thin mediodistal cleft, stylus anteriorly ( i.e. dorsal) curved, and lateral plates present. Promecostethus shares with Neonuncia, Nunciella and Nuncioides a strong proximal boss on the first segment of the chelicerae of the males. Neonuncia differs from Promecostethus by the absence of microsculpture in the capsula interna and the presence of a cleft in the ventral plate of the penis. Nunciella and Nuncioides differ from Promecostethus by the presence of a ventral plate with a cleft, except in Nunciella badia (Hickman, 1958) and Nunciella dentata (Hickman, 1958). Almost all species of Nunciella differ from Promecostethus by the presence of a lateral plate on the penis; however, there is no information about the genital morphology of Nunciella cheliplus Roewer, 1931, Nunciella granulata Roewer, 1931 or Nunciella parvula Roewer, 1931. Distribution . Endemic to the Crozet Islands : Published as part of Porto, Willians & Pérez-González, Abel, 2020, Redescription of Promecostethus unifalculatus, the only known harvestman from Crozet Islands (Opiliones: Triaenonychidae), pp. 120-130 in Zootaxa 4861 (1) on pages 122-123, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4861.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/4414662 : {"references": ["Enderlein, G. (1909) Die Spinnen der Crozet-Inseln und von Kerguelen. In: Drygalski, E. von (Ed.), Deutsche Sudpolar-Expedition 1901 - 1903. Georg Reimer, Berlin, pp. 535 - 540.", "Hickman, V. V. (1939) Opiliones and Araneae. In: Johnston, H. (Ed.), B. A. N. Z. Antarctic research expedition, 1929 - 1931. B. A. N. Z. A. R. Expedition Committee, Adelaide, pp. 159 - 187.", "Loman, J. C. C. (1902) Neue aussereuropaische Opilioniden. Zoologische Jahrbucher, 16, 163 - 216. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 17151", "Kury, A., Mendes, A. & Souza, D. (2014) World Checklist of Opiliones species (Arachnida). Part 1: Laniatores-Travunioidea and Triaenonychoidea. Biodiversity Data Journal 2, e 4094. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / BDJ. 2. e 4094", "Baker, C. M., Sheridan, K., Derkarabetian, S., Perez-Gonzalez, A., Velez, S. & Giribet, G. (2020) Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the temperate Gondwanan family Triaenonychidae (Opiliones: Laniatores) reveals pre-Gondwanan regionalization, common vicariance, and rare dispersal. Invertebrate Systematics, 34, 637 - 660. https: // doi. org / 10.1071 / IS 19069", "Roewer, C. F. (1961) Opiliones aus Sud-Chile. Senckenbergiana Biologica, 42, 99 - 104.", "Soares, H. E. M. (1968) Contribuicao ao estudo dos opilioes do Chile (Opiliones: Gonyleptidae, Triaenonychidae). Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, 21, 259 - 272.", "Maury, E. A. (1990) Triaenonychidae sudamericanos. VI. Tres nuevas especies del genero Nuncia Loman 1902 (Opiliones, Laniatores). Boletin de la Sociedad de Biologia de Concepcion, 61, 103 - 119.", "Roewer, C. F. (1931) Uber Triaenonychiden (6. Erganzung der \" Weberknechte der Erde \", 1923). Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 138 (1), 137 - 185.", "Roewer, C. F. (1915) Die Familie der Triaenonychidae der Opiliones-Laniatores. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, 80, 61 - 168.", "Roewer, C. F. (1929) Contributions to the fauna of Rottnest Island. No. V. Opiliones in the Western Australian Museum. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 15, 95 - 98.", "Hickman, V. V. (1958) Some Tasmanian harvestmen of the Family Triaenonychidae (Sub-Order Laniatores). Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 92, 1 - 116."]} Text Antarc* Antarctic Crozet Islands DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Kerguelen New Zealand Argentine Gonzalez ENVELOPE(-58.250,-58.250,-63.917,-63.917) Reimer ENVELOPE(-86.200,-86.200,-77.800,-77.800) Perez ENVELOPE(-69.117,-69.117,-68.517,-68.517) Drygalski ENVELOPE(-61.000,-61.000,-64.717,-64.717)