Amythas membranifera Benham 1921
Amythas membranifera Benham, 1921 Figs 4, 5 A–E, J–L Amythas membranifera Benham, 1921: 102–105, pl. 10, figs 124–132. Amythas membranifera – Monro 1939: 141–142, fig. 24. Material examined ANTARCTICA • 1 ♂ (BL = 55 mm, 20 AU); Terra Nova Bay; -74.67597º S, 164.24592º E; depth 400 m; 30 Jan...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Zenodo
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4531810 https://zenodo.org/record/4531810 |
id |
ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4531810 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftdatacite |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Ampharetidae Amythas Amythas membranifera |
spellingShingle |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Ampharetidae Amythas Amythas membranifera Schiaparelli, Stefano Jirkov, Igor A. Amythas membranifera Benham 1921 |
topic_facet |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Ampharetidae Amythas Amythas membranifera |
description |
Amythas membranifera Benham, 1921 Figs 4, 5 A–E, J–L Amythas membranifera Benham, 1921: 102–105, pl. 10, figs 124–132. Amythas membranifera – Monro 1939: 141–142, fig. 24. Material examined ANTARCTICA • 1 ♂ (BL = 55 mm, 20 AU); Terra Nova Bay; -74.67597º S, 164.24592º E; depth 400 m; 30 Jan. 2014; Schiaparelli leg.; station: DR5; XXIX PNRA expedition (2013-2014); MNA- 07940 • 1 ♂ (BL = 55 mm, 19 AU); same collection data as for preceding; MNA-07939 • 1 ♂ (BL = 13 mm, 17 AU); same collection data as for preceding; MNA-07935 • 1 ♂ (BL = 45 mm, 18 AU); same collection data as for preceding; MNA-07934 • 1 spec., undetermined sex; Princess Elizabeth Land; -67.05000º, 74.48333º; depth 437 m; station: 103; BMNH 1941.3.3.126–127. Description BODY. Body (Fig. 4 A–C) short and thick. Length 13–55 mm, width 9–20 mm; girth of body spindleshaped, increasing to the middle of thorax, decreasing thereafter. PROSTOMIUM. Prostomium trilobed, middle lobe anteriorly broadly rounded; any additional structures (nuchal organs, ridges, horns etc.) absent. BUCCAL TENTACLES. Buccal tentacles numerous, short, smooth, attached behind a large-folded membrane. Lower lip broad, embracing mouth laterally and slightly latero-dorsally, covered by warts. Paleae totally absent. BRANCHIAE. Three pairs of branchiae, the outermost one originating from TC1, the innermost one from TC2, and the middle one from S2 (Fig. 5C). Branchostyles cirriform, short, organized in a straight line and showing a wide middle gap. Branchostyles and branchophores covered with warts. There are no visible nephridial papillae or nephropores. NOTOPODIA AND NEUROPODIA. 17 TC, notopodia with capillary chaetae from S3; anterior notopodia small, increasing in size from first to third pair; elevated or modified notopodia absent; 14 TU, all thoracic neuropodia well developed, with almost equal size, middle ones slightly bigger than anterior and posterior ones. Ventral shields distinct anteriorly and completely disappearing before the end of thorax. Subdivision of thorax absent. 17–20 AU; shape of neuropodia gradually changing throughout in most specimens, from tori to pinnula with marked size reduction on the thorax/abdomen transition; uncini at the margin of neuropodia. All neuropodia without cirri; typically rudimental abdominal notopodia absent. UNCINI. Uncini pectinate (Fig. 5 J–L) with 4 teeth in double row, similar from TU1 to last AU; prow absent. PYGIDIUM. Anal cirri absent. TUBE (Fig. 4 F–G). Tubes of this species appear to be formed by progressive additions of small quantities of homogeneous fine-grained sediment to form an irregular banded pattern (Fig. 4F). The interior part of the tube has a homogeneous and transparent membranous lining that isolates the body of the worm from the outer layer and that can easily be peeled off from it (Fig. 4G). Distribution This species was reported from fjords along the West Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) (Grange & Smith 2013) and in several stations from the Ross Sea (NZ NIWA “IPY-CAML” Voyage TAN0802; records retrieved from GBIF, last accession 2020 Feb. 20). Remarks Benham in the description of the new genus Amythas , stated that there were no buccal tentacles and that these were replaced by a folded membrane (Benham 1921). Hartman (1966) and Fauchald (1977) followed Benham.As it has already been stated by Monro (1939), buccal tentacles are present in Amythas as in all other Ampharetidae. The whole construction of buccal tentacles shows perfect resemblance to Terebellidae Johnston, 1846 and, at the same time, to Ampharetidae with an everted pharynx (see Jirkov 2016: fig. 3) which provides an indication of their homology and prostomial origin. The position of the uncini at the margin of the neuropodia was found to vary according to the individuals (e.g., Fig. 5 D–E). The smallest specimen examined (MNA-07935) has small rudimental abdominal notopodia and AU neuropodia more pinnuli-like (Fig. 5D). The morphology of the tube of this species was documented and described to occur in extant Sabellidae as well as in the ichnofossil Caprascolex antarcticus Schweitzer et al. , 2005 from the Antarctic Eocene of La Meseta formation (Seymour Island, Antarctica) (Schweitzer et al . 2005: figs 3b, 4). In situ images of tubes of this species are available in Grange & Smith (2013: fig. 2c). : Published as part of Schiaparelli, Stefano & Jirkov, Igor A., 2021, Contribution to the taxonomic knowledge of Ampharetidae (Annelida) from Antarctica with the description of Amage giacomobovei sp. nov., pp. 125-145 in European Journal of Taxonomy 733 on pages 135-138, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.733.1227, http://zenodo.org/record/4529795 : {"references": ["Benham W. B. 1921. Polychaeta. Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911 - 1914, Scientific Reports, Series C - Zoology and Botany 6 (3): 1 - 128. Australasian Antarctic Expedition, Sydney. Available from https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 16201 [accessed 22 Jan. 2021].", "Monro C. C. A. 1939. Polychaeta. B. A. N. Z. Antarctic Research Expedition Reports. Series B 4 (4): 87 - 156.", "Malmgren A. J. 1866. Nordiska Hafs-Annulater. Ofversigt af Koniglich Vetenskapsakademiens Forhandlingar, Stockholm 22 (3): 355 - 410. Available from https: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 32339631 [accessed 22 Jan. 2021].", "Verrill A. E. 1873. XVIII. Report upon the invertebrate animals of Vineyard Sound and the adjacent waters, with an account of the physical characters of the region. Report on the Condition of the Sea Fisheries of the south Coast of New England 1: 295 - 778. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 11688", "Grange L. & Smith C. R. 2013. Megafaunal communities in rapidly warming fjords along the West Antarctic Peninsula: hotspots of abundance and beta diversity. PLoS ONE 8: e 77917. https: // doi. org / 10.1371 / journal. pone. 0077917", "Hartman O. 1966 Polychaeta Myzostomidae and Sedentaria of Antarctica. Antarctic Research Series 7. American Geophysical Union, Washington D. C. https: // doi. org / 10.1029 / AR 007", "Fauchald K. 1977. The Polychaete Worms. Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Science Series, 28. Available from https: // repository. si. edu / handle / 10088 / 3435 [accessed 22 Jan. 2021].", "Jirkov I. A. 2016. Lysippe nikiti sp. nov. (Polychaeta, Terebellomorpha) from the deep Pacific and Indian Oceans with an amendment to the generic diagnosis of Lysippe. Zootaxa 4117 (1): 125 - 134. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4117.1.7", "Schweitzer C. E., Feldmann R. M., Marenssi S. & Waugh D. A. 2005. Remarkably preserved annelid worms from the La Meseta Formation (Eocene), Seymour Island, Antarctica. Palaeontology 48 (1): 1 - 13. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1475 - 4983.2004.00440. x"]} |
format |
Text |
author |
Schiaparelli, Stefano Jirkov, Igor A. |
author_facet |
Schiaparelli, Stefano Jirkov, Igor A. |
author_sort |
Schiaparelli, Stefano |
title |
Amythas membranifera Benham 1921 |
title_short |
Amythas membranifera Benham 1921 |
title_full |
Amythas membranifera Benham 1921 |
title_fullStr |
Amythas membranifera Benham 1921 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Amythas membranifera Benham 1921 |
title_sort |
amythas membranifera benham 1921 |
publisher |
Zenodo |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4531810 https://zenodo.org/record/4531810 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-56.767,-56.767,-64.283,-64.283) ENVELOPE(-56.750,-56.750,-64.283,-64.283) ENVELOPE(-66.117,-66.117,-65.750,-65.750) ENVELOPE(80.367,80.367,-68.500,-68.500) ENVELOPE(-64.111,-64.111,-65.522,-65.522) |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Ross Sea Terra Nova Bay Pacific Indian Seymour Seymour Island Malmgren Princess Elizabeth Land Waugh |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Ross Sea Terra Nova Bay Pacific Indian Seymour Seymour Island Malmgren Princess Elizabeth Land Waugh |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica antarcticus IPY Princess Elizabeth Land Ross Sea Seymour Island |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica antarcticus IPY Princess Elizabeth Land Ross Sea Seymour Island |
op_relation |
http://zenodo.org/record/4529795 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF917C26F71AFFD0534AF632FFF56A14 http://zoobank.org/1AAE62AF-ABD9-4930-B1DE-2C05F66BEC4A https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.733.1227 http://zenodo.org/record/4529795 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF917C26F71AFFD0534AF632FFF56A14 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529805 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529807 http://zoobank.org/1AAE62AF-ABD9-4930-B1DE-2C05F66BEC4A https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4531811 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit |
op_rights |
Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_rightsnorm |
CC0 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4531810 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.733.1227 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529805 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529807 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4531811 |
_version_ |
1766203635977420800 |
spelling |
ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4531810 2023-05-15T13:44:35+02:00 Amythas membranifera Benham 1921 Schiaparelli, Stefano Jirkov, Igor A. 2021 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4531810 https://zenodo.org/record/4531810 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/4529795 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF917C26F71AFFD0534AF632FFF56A14 http://zoobank.org/1AAE62AF-ABD9-4930-B1DE-2C05F66BEC4A https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.733.1227 http://zenodo.org/record/4529795 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF917C26F71AFFD0534AF632FFF56A14 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529805 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529807 http://zoobank.org/1AAE62AF-ABD9-4930-B1DE-2C05F66BEC4A https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4531811 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Ampharetidae Amythas Amythas membranifera Taxonomic treatment article-journal Text ScholarlyArticle 2021 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4531810 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.733.1227 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529805 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4529807 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4531811 2022-02-09T14:06:04Z Amythas membranifera Benham, 1921 Figs 4, 5 A–E, J–L Amythas membranifera Benham, 1921: 102–105, pl. 10, figs 124–132. Amythas membranifera – Monro 1939: 141–142, fig. 24. Material examined ANTARCTICA • 1 ♂ (BL = 55 mm, 20 AU); Terra Nova Bay; -74.67597º S, 164.24592º E; depth 400 m; 30 Jan. 2014; Schiaparelli leg.; station: DR5; XXIX PNRA expedition (2013-2014); MNA- 07940 • 1 ♂ (BL = 55 mm, 19 AU); same collection data as for preceding; MNA-07939 • 1 ♂ (BL = 13 mm, 17 AU); same collection data as for preceding; MNA-07935 • 1 ♂ (BL = 45 mm, 18 AU); same collection data as for preceding; MNA-07934 • 1 spec., undetermined sex; Princess Elizabeth Land; -67.05000º, 74.48333º; depth 437 m; station: 103; BMNH 1941.3.3.126–127. Description BODY. Body (Fig. 4 A–C) short and thick. Length 13–55 mm, width 9–20 mm; girth of body spindleshaped, increasing to the middle of thorax, decreasing thereafter. PROSTOMIUM. Prostomium trilobed, middle lobe anteriorly broadly rounded; any additional structures (nuchal organs, ridges, horns etc.) absent. BUCCAL TENTACLES. Buccal tentacles numerous, short, smooth, attached behind a large-folded membrane. Lower lip broad, embracing mouth laterally and slightly latero-dorsally, covered by warts. Paleae totally absent. BRANCHIAE. Three pairs of branchiae, the outermost one originating from TC1, the innermost one from TC2, and the middle one from S2 (Fig. 5C). Branchostyles cirriform, short, organized in a straight line and showing a wide middle gap. Branchostyles and branchophores covered with warts. There are no visible nephridial papillae or nephropores. NOTOPODIA AND NEUROPODIA. 17 TC, notopodia with capillary chaetae from S3; anterior notopodia small, increasing in size from first to third pair; elevated or modified notopodia absent; 14 TU, all thoracic neuropodia well developed, with almost equal size, middle ones slightly bigger than anterior and posterior ones. Ventral shields distinct anteriorly and completely disappearing before the end of thorax. Subdivision of thorax absent. 17–20 AU; shape of neuropodia gradually changing throughout in most specimens, from tori to pinnula with marked size reduction on the thorax/abdomen transition; uncini at the margin of neuropodia. All neuropodia without cirri; typically rudimental abdominal notopodia absent. UNCINI. Uncini pectinate (Fig. 5 J–L) with 4 teeth in double row, similar from TU1 to last AU; prow absent. PYGIDIUM. Anal cirri absent. TUBE (Fig. 4 F–G). Tubes of this species appear to be formed by progressive additions of small quantities of homogeneous fine-grained sediment to form an irregular banded pattern (Fig. 4F). The interior part of the tube has a homogeneous and transparent membranous lining that isolates the body of the worm from the outer layer and that can easily be peeled off from it (Fig. 4G). Distribution This species was reported from fjords along the West Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) (Grange & Smith 2013) and in several stations from the Ross Sea (NZ NIWA “IPY-CAML” Voyage TAN0802; records retrieved from GBIF, last accession 2020 Feb. 20). Remarks Benham in the description of the new genus Amythas , stated that there were no buccal tentacles and that these were replaced by a folded membrane (Benham 1921). Hartman (1966) and Fauchald (1977) followed Benham.As it has already been stated by Monro (1939), buccal tentacles are present in Amythas as in all other Ampharetidae. The whole construction of buccal tentacles shows perfect resemblance to Terebellidae Johnston, 1846 and, at the same time, to Ampharetidae with an everted pharynx (see Jirkov 2016: fig. 3) which provides an indication of their homology and prostomial origin. The position of the uncini at the margin of the neuropodia was found to vary according to the individuals (e.g., Fig. 5 D–E). The smallest specimen examined (MNA-07935) has small rudimental abdominal notopodia and AU neuropodia more pinnuli-like (Fig. 5D). The morphology of the tube of this species was documented and described to occur in extant Sabellidae as well as in the ichnofossil Caprascolex antarcticus Schweitzer et al. , 2005 from the Antarctic Eocene of La Meseta formation (Seymour Island, Antarctica) (Schweitzer et al . 2005: figs 3b, 4). In situ images of tubes of this species are available in Grange & Smith (2013: fig. 2c). : Published as part of Schiaparelli, Stefano & Jirkov, Igor A., 2021, Contribution to the taxonomic knowledge of Ampharetidae (Annelida) from Antarctica with the description of Amage giacomobovei sp. nov., pp. 125-145 in European Journal of Taxonomy 733 on pages 135-138, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.733.1227, http://zenodo.org/record/4529795 : {"references": ["Benham W. B. 1921. Polychaeta. Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911 - 1914, Scientific Reports, Series C - Zoology and Botany 6 (3): 1 - 128. Australasian Antarctic Expedition, Sydney. Available from https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 16201 [accessed 22 Jan. 2021].", "Monro C. C. A. 1939. Polychaeta. B. A. N. Z. Antarctic Research Expedition Reports. Series B 4 (4): 87 - 156.", "Malmgren A. J. 1866. Nordiska Hafs-Annulater. Ofversigt af Koniglich Vetenskapsakademiens Forhandlingar, Stockholm 22 (3): 355 - 410. Available from https: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 32339631 [accessed 22 Jan. 2021].", "Verrill A. E. 1873. XVIII. Report upon the invertebrate animals of Vineyard Sound and the adjacent waters, with an account of the physical characters of the region. Report on the Condition of the Sea Fisheries of the south Coast of New England 1: 295 - 778. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 11688", "Grange L. & Smith C. R. 2013. Megafaunal communities in rapidly warming fjords along the West Antarctic Peninsula: hotspots of abundance and beta diversity. PLoS ONE 8: e 77917. https: // doi. org / 10.1371 / journal. pone. 0077917", "Hartman O. 1966 Polychaeta Myzostomidae and Sedentaria of Antarctica. Antarctic Research Series 7. American Geophysical Union, Washington D. C. https: // doi. org / 10.1029 / AR 007", "Fauchald K. 1977. The Polychaete Worms. Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Science Series, 28. Available from https: // repository. si. edu / handle / 10088 / 3435 [accessed 22 Jan. 2021].", "Jirkov I. A. 2016. Lysippe nikiti sp. nov. (Polychaeta, Terebellomorpha) from the deep Pacific and Indian Oceans with an amendment to the generic diagnosis of Lysippe. Zootaxa 4117 (1): 125 - 134. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4117.1.7", "Schweitzer C. E., Feldmann R. M., Marenssi S. & Waugh D. A. 2005. Remarkably preserved annelid worms from the La Meseta Formation (Eocene), Seymour Island, Antarctica. Palaeontology 48 (1): 1 - 13. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1475 - 4983.2004.00440. x"]} Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica antarcticus IPY Princess Elizabeth Land Ross Sea Seymour Island DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Ross Sea Terra Nova Bay Pacific Indian Seymour ENVELOPE(-56.767,-56.767,-64.283,-64.283) Seymour Island ENVELOPE(-56.750,-56.750,-64.283,-64.283) Malmgren ENVELOPE(-66.117,-66.117,-65.750,-65.750) Princess Elizabeth Land ENVELOPE(80.367,80.367,-68.500,-68.500) Waugh ENVELOPE(-64.111,-64.111,-65.522,-65.522) |