Collective and Stochastic Motion in the Time-Dependent Schrodinger Equation

Addendum Feb. 4, 2021 In this note, a potential of .5kxx + f(t)x is considered together with a product wavefunction Wa(y,t)exp(i y db/dt) where y=x-b(t). Product wavefunctions when inserted into the Schrodinger equation lead to two equations. The first may be chosen to depend only on one product e.g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ruggeri, Francesco R.
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2021
Subjects:
Dy
IPY
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4486594
https://zenodo.org/record/4486594
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4486594
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic time dependent Schrodinger equation
stochastic motion
collective motion
spellingShingle time dependent Schrodinger equation
stochastic motion
collective motion
Ruggeri, Francesco R.
Collective and Stochastic Motion in the Time-Dependent Schrodinger Equation
topic_facet time dependent Schrodinger equation
stochastic motion
collective motion
description Addendum Feb. 4, 2021 In this note, a potential of .5kxx + f(t)x is considered together with a product wavefunction Wa(y,t)exp(i y db/dt) where y=x-b(t). Product wavefunctions when inserted into the Schrodinger equation lead to two equations. The first may be chosen to depend only on one product e.g. Wa. In this case, it is a harmonic oscillator Schrodinger equation with an extra c(t)Wa term which may be handled by a pure time phase i.e. exp(i Integral (0,t) c(t1)dt1)). The second equation incorporates the potentail f(t)x and involves a coupling term -1/m dWa/dy d/dy exp(i y db/dt). This term, however, is exactly canceled by a term from i d/dt (partial) Wa(y-b(t)) exp(i y db/dt) so the coupling is eliminated. Thus, one has a second differential equation in b(t) linked to the potential f(t)x or f(t)y- f(t)b(t) which is completely uncoupled. Thus, there are two decoupled types of motion. Harmonic motion in y=x-b(t) and collective motion related to b(t) linked directly to f(t). Addendum Feb. 3, 2021 The term -1/2m d/dy d/dy W1 in ((6)) is db/dt db/dt (1/2m) and is incorporated in c(t)Wo in equation ((5)). Also i d/dt (partial) {exp(i(x-b/m)db/dt) W(x-b/m)) = -i/m dW/dy db/dt +(1/m)db/dtdb/dt -yd/dt db/dt as seen in the equation directly below ((6)) on the LHS. An extra pure time piece is added i.e. +(1/m)db/dtdb/dt. The “time-independent” Schrodinger equation appears to be directly related to stochastic motion, we argue. If there is no potential, the wavefunction exp(ipx) is statistical, indicating periodic motion with a norm of one for all x. If a time-independent potential is added, it may be decomposed as V(x)=Sum over k Vk exp(ikx). Thus, time is present not just in exp(-iEt), but in the stochastic behaviour of the potential which is only V(x) on average. At each time, one does not know which Vk acts. Thus, the time-independent Schrodinger equation could perhaps be called the purely stochastic Schrodinger equation. It is possible to have a time dependent Schrodinger equation with a time dependent potential. Sometimes the time in the potential is hidden by a variable change as the equation involves partial derivatives. We try to argue that this potential contributes to collective motion. Time is already present in V(x), but in a stochastic manner. Explicit time (or a time related variable change) means a lack of stochasticity as one follows the potential in a predictable manner in time. It is possible that collective motion may be associated with a reference frame. For example, one may remove center-of-mass motion and consider only internal motion i.e. the quantum stochastic internal behaviour. In this note, we briefly examine two examples. The first is a free quantum particle viewed from a constantly accelerating frame as discussed in (1). In such a frame, the free particle appears as a particle in a gravitational potential +mgx1, but x1= x-X(t) so X(t) suggests collective motion. One may argue that x represents stochastic motion, but this is not necessarily the case because one may have collective potential energy linked to collective kinetic energy. In other words, id/dt partial W may yield a term which cancels mgx indicating that it does not act as Sum Vk exp(ikx). The second example involves a quantum oscillator with an extra xf(t) potential. We argue that this leads to collective motion as the problem may be recast in terms of a variable y=x- b(t) and solved as a “time-independent oscillator” in y as discussed in (2). Again, there exists the notion of a kind of collective motion or extra frame which leads to a phase factor exp(iy d/dt partial b(t)) as the stochastic quantum behaviour defines the physical density and the phase term exp(i phase) disappears from the density). In such a case, W(y) the time-independent oscillator solution may be written as: Sum over p a(p) exp(ipy), but y contains t so the statistical nature of exp(ipy) is somewhat altered frome exp(ipx) i.e. there is an extra time related phase exp(i p f(t)) which has the appearance of a kind of collective motion as all p values are in synch with the same f(t) which may be sin(wt) for example.
format Report
author Ruggeri, Francesco R.
author_facet Ruggeri, Francesco R.
author_sort Ruggeri, Francesco R.
title Collective and Stochastic Motion in the Time-Dependent Schrodinger Equation
title_short Collective and Stochastic Motion in the Time-Dependent Schrodinger Equation
title_full Collective and Stochastic Motion in the Time-Dependent Schrodinger Equation
title_fullStr Collective and Stochastic Motion in the Time-Dependent Schrodinger Equation
title_full_unstemmed Collective and Stochastic Motion in the Time-Dependent Schrodinger Equation
title_sort collective and stochastic motion in the time-dependent schrodinger equation
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2021
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4486594
https://zenodo.org/record/4486594
long_lat ENVELOPE(11.369,11.369,64.834,64.834)
geographic Dy
geographic_facet Dy
genre IPY
genre_facet IPY
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4486593
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
cc-by-4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4486594
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4486593
_version_ 1766046921093283840
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4486594 2023-05-15T16:55:53+02:00 Collective and Stochastic Motion in the Time-Dependent Schrodinger Equation Ruggeri, Francesco R. 2021 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4486594 https://zenodo.org/record/4486594 unknown Zenodo https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4486593 Open Access Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode cc-by-4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY time dependent Schrodinger equation stochastic motion collective motion Preprint Text article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2021 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4486594 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4486593 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Addendum Feb. 4, 2021 In this note, a potential of .5kxx + f(t)x is considered together with a product wavefunction Wa(y,t)exp(i y db/dt) where y=x-b(t). Product wavefunctions when inserted into the Schrodinger equation lead to two equations. The first may be chosen to depend only on one product e.g. Wa. In this case, it is a harmonic oscillator Schrodinger equation with an extra c(t)Wa term which may be handled by a pure time phase i.e. exp(i Integral (0,t) c(t1)dt1)). The second equation incorporates the potentail f(t)x and involves a coupling term -1/m dWa/dy d/dy exp(i y db/dt). This term, however, is exactly canceled by a term from i d/dt (partial) Wa(y-b(t)) exp(i y db/dt) so the coupling is eliminated. Thus, one has a second differential equation in b(t) linked to the potential f(t)x or f(t)y- f(t)b(t) which is completely uncoupled. Thus, there are two decoupled types of motion. Harmonic motion in y=x-b(t) and collective motion related to b(t) linked directly to f(t). Addendum Feb. 3, 2021 The term -1/2m d/dy d/dy W1 in ((6)) is db/dt db/dt (1/2m) and is incorporated in c(t)Wo in equation ((5)). Also i d/dt (partial) {exp(i(x-b/m)db/dt) W(x-b/m)) = -i/m dW/dy db/dt +(1/m)db/dtdb/dt -yd/dt db/dt as seen in the equation directly below ((6)) on the LHS. An extra pure time piece is added i.e. +(1/m)db/dtdb/dt. The “time-independent” Schrodinger equation appears to be directly related to stochastic motion, we argue. If there is no potential, the wavefunction exp(ipx) is statistical, indicating periodic motion with a norm of one for all x. If a time-independent potential is added, it may be decomposed as V(x)=Sum over k Vk exp(ikx). Thus, time is present not just in exp(-iEt), but in the stochastic behaviour of the potential which is only V(x) on average. At each time, one does not know which Vk acts. Thus, the time-independent Schrodinger equation could perhaps be called the purely stochastic Schrodinger equation. It is possible to have a time dependent Schrodinger equation with a time dependent potential. Sometimes the time in the potential is hidden by a variable change as the equation involves partial derivatives. We try to argue that this potential contributes to collective motion. Time is already present in V(x), but in a stochastic manner. Explicit time (or a time related variable change) means a lack of stochasticity as one follows the potential in a predictable manner in time. It is possible that collective motion may be associated with a reference frame. For example, one may remove center-of-mass motion and consider only internal motion i.e. the quantum stochastic internal behaviour. In this note, we briefly examine two examples. The first is a free quantum particle viewed from a constantly accelerating frame as discussed in (1). In such a frame, the free particle appears as a particle in a gravitational potential +mgx1, but x1= x-X(t) so X(t) suggests collective motion. One may argue that x represents stochastic motion, but this is not necessarily the case because one may have collective potential energy linked to collective kinetic energy. In other words, id/dt partial W may yield a term which cancels mgx indicating that it does not act as Sum Vk exp(ikx). The second example involves a quantum oscillator with an extra xf(t) potential. We argue that this leads to collective motion as the problem may be recast in terms of a variable y=x- b(t) and solved as a “time-independent oscillator” in y as discussed in (2). Again, there exists the notion of a kind of collective motion or extra frame which leads to a phase factor exp(iy d/dt partial b(t)) as the stochastic quantum behaviour defines the physical density and the phase term exp(i phase) disappears from the density). In such a case, W(y) the time-independent oscillator solution may be written as: Sum over p a(p) exp(ipy), but y contains t so the statistical nature of exp(ipy) is somewhat altered frome exp(ipx) i.e. there is an extra time related phase exp(i p f(t)) which has the appearance of a kind of collective motion as all p values are in synch with the same f(t) which may be sin(wt) for example. Report IPY DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Dy ENVELOPE(11.369,11.369,64.834,64.834)