Campodeinae Conde 1956

Subfamily Campodeinae Condé, 1956 Campodeinae Condé, 1956a: 94. Diagnosis (Condé 1956a) Epicuticle reticulated apparently smooth in optical microscopy, with microdenticles; presence of roseta formations; body covered with smooth to well-barbed macrosetae and setae; sensillum of third antennomere in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sendra, Alberto, Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345361
https://zenodo.org/record/4345361
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4345361
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Entognatha
Diplura
Campodeidae
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Entognatha
Diplura
Campodeidae
Sendra, Alberto
Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S.
Campodeinae Conde 1956
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Entognatha
Diplura
Campodeidae
description Subfamily Campodeinae Condé, 1956 Campodeinae Condé, 1956a: 94. Diagnosis (Condé 1956a) Epicuticle reticulated apparently smooth in optical microscopy, with microdenticles; presence of roseta formations; body covered with smooth to well-barbed macrosetae and setae; sensillum of third antennomere in dorsal or ventral position; labial pieces typical or slightly rotated in Remycampa ssp.; pronotal macrosetae formula up to 1+1 medial anterior, 1+1 lateral anterior, 1+1 lateral posterior; with or without trochanteral sensilla; with or without one dorsal femoral macrosetae; tibia with up to three short ventral macrosetae, usually only one; subequal simple claws without medial unguiculus except in Eutrichocampa hispanica Silvestri, 1932; claws with lateral crests in the genus Litocampa one pair of medial anterior and lateral anterior urotergal macrosetae at most and one or two pairs of lateral posterior urotergal macrosetae (exceptionaly three). Habitat and distribution Almost 75% of the campodeid species belongs to Campodeinae. The 300 species of Campodeinae are grouped in 28 genera (Condé 1956a; Paclt 1957; Sendra 2015). They are distributed across nearly every terrestrial subsurface habitat, except in the polar regions or those under permafrost influence. Most species of Campodeinae inhabit more-or-less humid soils, but 34 occur in cave habitats, for which they show particular adapations (= troglomorphic traits). Taxonomic key for genera and subgenera of the subfamily Campodeinae (including species of Eutrichocampa and Remycampa ) from the Euro-Mediterranean region 1. Lateral process of the pretarsus laminar and with a unique subtrapezoidal extreme; labium atypical............................................................................................................................................. 13 – Different shape of lateral process of the pretarsus, labium typical.................................................... 2 2. Unguiculus between claws absent..................................................................................................... 3 – Unguiculus between claws present................................... Eutrichocampa hispanica Silvestri, 1932 3. Laminar lateral telotarsal process with short barbs on ventral side.......................................................................................................................................... Eutrichocampa thamugadensis Condé, 1947 – Lateral telotarsal process with side-shoot sharp............. Oreocampa aff. minutella (Silvestri, 1918) – Subtrapezoidal laminar lateral telotarsal process with ending with or without pubescence................................................................................................................... Libanocampa coiffaiti Condé, 1955 – Laminar lateral telotarsal process with long barbs on ventral side.................................................... 4 – Setiform and barbed lateral telotarsal process............ Eutrichocampa helvetica Wygodzinsky, 1941 – Laminar lateral telotarsal process with barbed both sides............ Edriocampa ghigii Silvestri, 1933 – Polymorphic lateral telotarsal process...................................................... Podocampa Silvestri, 1932 – Smooth setiform lateral telotarsal process......................................................................................... 6 4. Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1; medial anterior metanotal macrosetae 1+1; medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1; lateral posterior macrosetae in some urotergites 1+1................................................................................................................ Eutrichocampa aegea Silvestri, 1933 – Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 0+0; medial anterior metanotal macrosetae 0+0; medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae 0+0; without lateral posterior macrosetae in urotergite................... 5 5. Lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1; urosternite I 7+7 macrosetae; urosternites II–VII 4+4 macrosetae.................................................................................. Eutrichocampa remyi Condé, 1947 – Without lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae; urosternite I 4+4 macrosetae; urosternites II–VII 3+3 macrosetae.............................................................................. Eutrichocampa collina Ionescu, 1955 6. Elbow-like claws....................................................................................... Litocampa Silvestri, 1933 – Regularly curved claws...................................................................................................................... 7 7. One dorsal femoral macrosetae................................................................ Podocampa Silvestri, 1932 – Without dorsal femoral macrosetae................................................................................................... 8 8. Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1..................................................................................... 9 – Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 0+0................................................................................... 10 9. Lateral posterior macrosetae in some urotergites 2+2............ Helladocampa mahnerti Condé, 1984 – Lateral posterior macrosetae at least in urotergites 1+1 or 0+0........ Campodea s. str. Silvestri, 1932 10. Medial anterior metanotal macrosetae 1+1; medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1......................................................................................................................................... Dicampa Silvestri, 1932 – Without medial anterior metanotal macrosetae; without medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae....11 11. Lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1............................................ Monocampa Silvestri, 1932 – Without lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae................................................................................ 12 12. With 1+ l medial anterior, 1+1 lateral anterior and 1+1 lateral posterior pronotal macrosetae........................................................................................................................... Paurocampa Silvestri, 1932 – Without pronotal macrosetae........................................ Spaniocampa relicta Sendra & López, 2020 13. Lateral posterior macrosetae on metanotum; 1+1 lateral posterior macrosetae on third and fourth urotergites...................................................................................... Remycampa launeyi Condé, 1952 – Without lateral posterior macrosetae on metanotum and no lateral posterior macrosetae on third and fourth urotergites; cave-adapted traits...................... Remycampa herbanica Sendra & Oromí, 2020 : Published as part of Sendra, Alberto & Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S., 2020, Euro-Mediterranean fauna of Campodeinae (Campodeidae, Diplura), pp. 1-130 in European Journal of Taxonomy 728 on pages 18-20, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.728.1181, http://zenodo.org/record/4316883 : {"references": ["Conde B. 1956 a. Materiaux pour une monographie des Diploures Campodeides. Memoires du Museum national d'histoire naturelle Serie A - Zoologie 12: 1 - 202.", "Paclt J. 1957. Diplura. Genera Insectorum 212 E. P. Wytsman, Crainhem.", "Silvestri F. 1918. Insectes Apterygogeniens, I, Thysanoures. Voyage de Ch. Alluaud et R. Jeannel en Afrique Orientale (1911 - 1912). Resultats scientifiques: 3 - 27.", "Ionescu M. A. 1955. Diplura. Fauna Republicii Populare Romane, Insecta VII (2): 1 - 48. Rumanian Academy, Bucharest.", "Conde B. 1984. Diploures Campodeides (Insectes) de Grece (1 ere note). Revue suisse de Zoologie 91 (1): 173 - 201.", "Sendra A., Lopez H., Selfa J., Oromi P. 2020 b. Two new dipluran species unearthed from subterranean habitats of the Canary Islands (Arthropoda, Hexapoda, Entognatha). Subterranean Biology 34: 39 - 59. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / subtbiol. 34.50231"]}
format Text
author Sendra, Alberto
Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S.
author_facet Sendra, Alberto
Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S.
author_sort Sendra, Alberto
title Campodeinae Conde 1956
title_short Campodeinae Conde 1956
title_full Campodeinae Conde 1956
title_fullStr Campodeinae Conde 1956
title_full_unstemmed Campodeinae Conde 1956
title_sort campodeinae conde 1956
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2020
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345361
https://zenodo.org/record/4345361
long_lat ENVELOPE(-63.567,-63.567,-64.850,-64.850)
geographic Lopez
geographic_facet Lopez
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/4316883
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFF4FF8AFC2DFFF72B78A30FDC54ED27
http://zoobank.org/F8DAFD36-2878-438D-B7C0-B8D05531EC5C
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.728.1181
http://zenodo.org/record/4316883
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFF4FF8AFC2DFFF72B78A30FDC54ED27
http://zoobank.org/F8DAFD36-2878-438D-B7C0-B8D05531EC5C
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345362
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345361
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.728.1181
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345362
_version_ 1766167059729743872
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4345361 2023-05-15T17:58:27+02:00 Campodeinae Conde 1956 Sendra, Alberto Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S. 2020 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345361 https://zenodo.org/record/4345361 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/4316883 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFF4FF8AFC2DFFF72B78A30FDC54ED27 http://zoobank.org/F8DAFD36-2878-438D-B7C0-B8D05531EC5C https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.728.1181 http://zenodo.org/record/4316883 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFF4FF8AFC2DFFF72B78A30FDC54ED27 http://zoobank.org/F8DAFD36-2878-438D-B7C0-B8D05531EC5C https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345362 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Entognatha Diplura Campodeidae Text Taxonomic treatment article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2020 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345361 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.728.1181 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4345362 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Subfamily Campodeinae Condé, 1956 Campodeinae Condé, 1956a: 94. Diagnosis (Condé 1956a) Epicuticle reticulated apparently smooth in optical microscopy, with microdenticles; presence of roseta formations; body covered with smooth to well-barbed macrosetae and setae; sensillum of third antennomere in dorsal or ventral position; labial pieces typical or slightly rotated in Remycampa ssp.; pronotal macrosetae formula up to 1+1 medial anterior, 1+1 lateral anterior, 1+1 lateral posterior; with or without trochanteral sensilla; with or without one dorsal femoral macrosetae; tibia with up to three short ventral macrosetae, usually only one; subequal simple claws without medial unguiculus except in Eutrichocampa hispanica Silvestri, 1932; claws with lateral crests in the genus Litocampa one pair of medial anterior and lateral anterior urotergal macrosetae at most and one or two pairs of lateral posterior urotergal macrosetae (exceptionaly three). Habitat and distribution Almost 75% of the campodeid species belongs to Campodeinae. The 300 species of Campodeinae are grouped in 28 genera (Condé 1956a; Paclt 1957; Sendra 2015). They are distributed across nearly every terrestrial subsurface habitat, except in the polar regions or those under permafrost influence. Most species of Campodeinae inhabit more-or-less humid soils, but 34 occur in cave habitats, for which they show particular adapations (= troglomorphic traits). Taxonomic key for genera and subgenera of the subfamily Campodeinae (including species of Eutrichocampa and Remycampa ) from the Euro-Mediterranean region 1. Lateral process of the pretarsus laminar and with a unique subtrapezoidal extreme; labium atypical............................................................................................................................................. 13 – Different shape of lateral process of the pretarsus, labium typical.................................................... 2 2. Unguiculus between claws absent..................................................................................................... 3 – Unguiculus between claws present................................... Eutrichocampa hispanica Silvestri, 1932 3. Laminar lateral telotarsal process with short barbs on ventral side.......................................................................................................................................... Eutrichocampa thamugadensis Condé, 1947 – Lateral telotarsal process with side-shoot sharp............. Oreocampa aff. minutella (Silvestri, 1918) – Subtrapezoidal laminar lateral telotarsal process with ending with or without pubescence................................................................................................................... Libanocampa coiffaiti Condé, 1955 – Laminar lateral telotarsal process with long barbs on ventral side.................................................... 4 – Setiform and barbed lateral telotarsal process............ Eutrichocampa helvetica Wygodzinsky, 1941 – Laminar lateral telotarsal process with barbed both sides............ Edriocampa ghigii Silvestri, 1933 – Polymorphic lateral telotarsal process...................................................... Podocampa Silvestri, 1932 – Smooth setiform lateral telotarsal process......................................................................................... 6 4. Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1; medial anterior metanotal macrosetae 1+1; medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1; lateral posterior macrosetae in some urotergites 1+1................................................................................................................ Eutrichocampa aegea Silvestri, 1933 – Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 0+0; medial anterior metanotal macrosetae 0+0; medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae 0+0; without lateral posterior macrosetae in urotergite................... 5 5. Lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1; urosternite I 7+7 macrosetae; urosternites II–VII 4+4 macrosetae.................................................................................. Eutrichocampa remyi Condé, 1947 – Without lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae; urosternite I 4+4 macrosetae; urosternites II–VII 3+3 macrosetae.............................................................................. Eutrichocampa collina Ionescu, 1955 6. Elbow-like claws....................................................................................... Litocampa Silvestri, 1933 – Regularly curved claws...................................................................................................................... 7 7. One dorsal femoral macrosetae................................................................ Podocampa Silvestri, 1932 – Without dorsal femoral macrosetae................................................................................................... 8 8. Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1..................................................................................... 9 – Lateral posterior mesonotal macrosetae 0+0................................................................................... 10 9. Lateral posterior macrosetae in some urotergites 2+2............ Helladocampa mahnerti Condé, 1984 – Lateral posterior macrosetae at least in urotergites 1+1 or 0+0........ Campodea s. str. Silvestri, 1932 10. Medial anterior metanotal macrosetae 1+1; medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1......................................................................................................................................... Dicampa Silvestri, 1932 – Without medial anterior metanotal macrosetae; without medial anterior mesonotal macrosetae....11 11. Lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae 1+1............................................ Monocampa Silvestri, 1932 – Without lateral anterior mesonotal macrosetae................................................................................ 12 12. With 1+ l medial anterior, 1+1 lateral anterior and 1+1 lateral posterior pronotal macrosetae........................................................................................................................... Paurocampa Silvestri, 1932 – Without pronotal macrosetae........................................ Spaniocampa relicta Sendra & López, 2020 13. Lateral posterior macrosetae on metanotum; 1+1 lateral posterior macrosetae on third and fourth urotergites...................................................................................... Remycampa launeyi Condé, 1952 – Without lateral posterior macrosetae on metanotum and no lateral posterior macrosetae on third and fourth urotergites; cave-adapted traits...................... Remycampa herbanica Sendra & Oromí, 2020 : Published as part of Sendra, Alberto & Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S., 2020, Euro-Mediterranean fauna of Campodeinae (Campodeidae, Diplura), pp. 1-130 in European Journal of Taxonomy 728 on pages 18-20, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.728.1181, http://zenodo.org/record/4316883 : {"references": ["Conde B. 1956 a. Materiaux pour une monographie des Diploures Campodeides. Memoires du Museum national d'histoire naturelle Serie A - Zoologie 12: 1 - 202.", "Paclt J. 1957. Diplura. Genera Insectorum 212 E. P. Wytsman, Crainhem.", "Silvestri F. 1918. Insectes Apterygogeniens, I, Thysanoures. Voyage de Ch. Alluaud et R. Jeannel en Afrique Orientale (1911 - 1912). Resultats scientifiques: 3 - 27.", "Ionescu M. A. 1955. Diplura. Fauna Republicii Populare Romane, Insecta VII (2): 1 - 48. Rumanian Academy, Bucharest.", "Conde B. 1984. Diploures Campodeides (Insectes) de Grece (1 ere note). Revue suisse de Zoologie 91 (1): 173 - 201.", "Sendra A., Lopez H., Selfa J., Oromi P. 2020 b. Two new dipluran species unearthed from subterranean habitats of the Canary Islands (Arthropoda, Hexapoda, Entognatha). Subterranean Biology 34: 39 - 59. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / subtbiol. 34.50231"]} Text permafrost DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Lopez ENVELOPE(-63.567,-63.567,-64.850,-64.850)