Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing 1910

Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing, 1910b (Figures 1 – 3) Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing, 1910b: 629 – 631, 652, pl. 60. – Briggs, 1914: 77 – 78. – Guiler, 1952: 31. – Guiler, 1954: 541. – McCain and Steinberg: 1970: 49. – Lowry and Stoddart, 2003: 35. Type material Syntypes. 232 individuals, AM P2546, 34°0...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takeuchi, Ichiro, Lowry, James K.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4331256
https://zenodo.org/record/4331256
id ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4331256
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Caprellidae
Dodecas
Dodecas decacentrum
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Caprellidae
Dodecas
Dodecas decacentrum
Takeuchi, Ichiro
Lowry, James K.
Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing 1910
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Caprellidae
Dodecas
Dodecas decacentrum
description Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing, 1910b (Figures 1 – 3) Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing, 1910b: 629 – 631, 652, pl. 60. – Briggs, 1914: 77 – 78. – Guiler, 1952: 31. – Guiler, 1954: 541. – McCain and Steinberg: 1970: 49. – Lowry and Stoddart, 2003: 35. Type material Syntypes. 232 individuals, AM P2546, 34°03.5 ʹ S, 151°12.5 ʹ E, 2 – 3 km off Port Hacking, New South Wales, 69 m depth, sandy, 10 March 1898, Stn 35; 1 male, AM P2547, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales, 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37; 1 male, AM P3383, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales, 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37; 220 individuals, AM P46931, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37; 36 individuals (17 males, 18 mature females and 1 juvenile), AM P46917, 34°10 ʹ S, 151°11 ʹ E, 5.5 – 6.5 km off Wattamolla, New South Wales, 99 – 108 m depth, mud, 2 March 1898, Stn 57; 1 female, AM P46941, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales, 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37; 53 individuals (24 males, 25 mature and 4 immature females), AM P46942, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales, 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37; 1 male, AM P46943, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales, 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37. Additional material examined AM P46929, 5 males, 43°15 ʹ S, 147°16 ʹ E, D ’ Entrecasteaux Channel, Tasmania, 3.5 – 20 m depth, on the hydrozoan Sertularia operculata . Type locality Botany Bay and off Wattamolla, New South Wales, Australia, 69 – 108 m depth. Description Based on syntype, male, body length 18.98 mm, AM P2547 and male, 13.35 mm, AM P3383, for pereopods 6 and 7. Head and pereonite 1 combined length 2.71 mm; pereonite 2 , 1.91 mm; pereonite 3 , 2.49 mm; pereonite 4 , 3.42 mm; pereonite 5 , 4.58 mm; pereonite 6 , 3.33 mm; pereonite 7 , 0.53 mm. Head and pereonites slender. Head smooth, rounded dorsally; eye large, distinctive; head/ pereonite 1 concave along dorsal margin; pereonite 1 with paired dorsodistal projections. Antenna 1 slender; 0.67 × body length; peduncle articles 2 and 3 subequal in length; peduncular article 3 straight; flagellum 0.17 × peduncular length, with more than five articles; proximal article result of fusion of 3 – 4 articles. Antenna 2 slender; 0.33 × antenna 1 length; peduncle with several feeble setae; flagellum 0.33 × peduncular length, with seven articles. Upper lip notched, forming rounded quadrilateral projections. Mandible right side incisor with six teeth; lacinia mobilis a reverse trapezoid plate followed by one smaller plate; accessory setal row with 10 setae; palp article 2 with one lateral seta; palp article 3 setal formula 1 – 16 – 1; left side incisor with five teeth; left side lacinia mobilis with five teeth, followed by one trapezoid plate; left side accessory setal row with one bundled seta and 10 setae; palp article 2 with five lateral setae; palp article 3 setal formula 1 – 17 – 1. Lower lip finely setose on inner and outer lobes. Maxilla 1 outer plate with six stout apical setal-teeth; palp distal margin with six triangular projections, each with one slender or robust seta, with a row of slender setae. Maxilla 2 inner plate triangular with nine apical robust setae; outer plate elongate with 12 apical setae. Maxilliped inner plate (basal endite) oval, with three stout serriform setae on expanded inner half of distal margin, with one or two setae on outer half; outer plate (ischial endite) oval, 0.5 × length of inner plate (basal endite), inner margin smooth, with four setae on inner margin; palp article 2 setose on inner margin; palp article 3 with moderately dense distal setae; palp article 4 weakly falcate. Pereon. Pereonite 2 with anterolateral triangular projection, with midlateral projection, with paired anteriorly curved mid-dorsal projections, with paired anteriorly curved dorsodistal projections. Pereonite 3 with paired mid-dorsal projections. Pereonite 4 with paired small mid-dorsal projections. Pereonite 5 longest. Gnathopod 1 propodus triangular, with four rows of submarginal setae near dorsal margin; palm begins about 1/4 along posterior margin, smooth, with two robust setae near corner of palm; dactylus curved. Gnathopod 2 situated near middle of pereonite 2; gill length about 4.5 × width, 1/2 × pereonite length; coxa vestigial; basis 2.2 × length of pereonite 2; carpus 0.55 × basis length; propodus elongate, subrectangular, large, length 2.6 × width, anterodistal margin straight; palm proximal projection with three robust (one large and two small) setae, palm margin straight, smooth, with narrow well-developed distal shelf with two small triangular projections distally. Pereopod 3 very slender; gill length about 1/2 × corresponding pereonite, curved anteriorly; basis to carpus straight and cylindrical; basis longer than other pereopod articles, 2/5 × the pereopod length; propodus without distal palm and robust setae; dactylus spatulate. Gill 4 length about 1/4 × corresponding pereonite. Pereopod 5 broad; articulation between articles 1 and 2 oblique; dactylus medium length, falcate. Pereopod 6 basis longer than propodus; carpus with four robust setae and one slender seta on anterior margin; propodus with two pairs of robust setae on proximal margin and one robust and one slender seta; dactylus curved, not setose. Pereopod 7 basis shorter than propodus; merus subequal in length to basis; carpus longer than basis with five robust setae; propodus and dactylus similar to those of pereopod 6. Pleon. Pleopod one pair, tiny. Uropod 1 peduncle elongate, about 6 – 8 × width; ramus 0.2 × peduncular length. Uropod 2 peduncle about 5 – 6 × width, shorter than uropod 1; ramus 0.5 × peduncular length. Female (sexually dimorphic characters). Based on female syntype, body length 16.67 mm, AM P 46941. Antenna 1 about 0.5 × body length; flagellum 0.25 × peduncular length. Length of head and pereonite 1 combined length 1.47 mm, and each length of pereonites 2–7 , 1.91 mm, 1.82 mm, 2.98 mm, 4.58 mm, 3.24 mm and 0.67 mm, respectively. Gnathopod 2 situated near anterior end of pereonite 2; palm margin of propodus convex, with one small triangular projection distally. Gill 3 length about as long as corresponding pereonite, distal part curved posteriorly. Gill 4 length about 1/3 × corresponding pereonite. Remarks Of the seven species of Dodecas , two species, D. decacentrum Stebbing, 1910b and D. hexacentrum Mayer, 1903, have been reported along the coasts of New South Wales and redescribed in the present study. Guiler (1954) synonymized D. decacentrum with D. hexacentrum based on the Tasmanian specimens. Dodecas decacentrum is, however, easily distinguished from D. hexacentrum , which coexists along the New South Wales coasts by the following diagnosis: (1) in D. decacentrum pereonite 2 possesses a pair of dorsodistal projections in addition to mid-dorsal projections on pereonite 2, while in D. hexacentrum the pereonite 2 lacks the dorsodistal ones; (2) in D. decacentrum pereonites 3 – 4 possess a pair of mid-dorsal projections, while in D. hexacentrum pereonites 3 – 4 lack these projections; (3) gills on pereonites 2 and 3 of male D. decacentrum are half the length of the corresponding pereonites, whereas those of male D. hexacentrum are longer than the corresponding pereonites; (4) in D. decacentrum the carpus of pereopods 6 and 7 are elongated with four or five spines along the anterior margin, while in D. hexacentrum the carpus of pereopods 6 and 7 lacks anterior spines. The other five species have been reported so far from Tasmania and sub-Antarctic and Antarctic regions. Especially, D. grandimanus Guiler, 1954 and D. tasmaniensis Guiler, 1954 were established based on specimens which were collected from off Mountain Creek, Tasmania by Guiler (1954). Guerra-García and Takeuchi (2004) showed the lateral view of a male and a mature female of D. tasmaniensis Guiler, 1954 from Tasmania. The male, 9.41 mm in body length, is a little smaller than a mature female, 9.47 mm in body length, in both Guerra-García and Takeuchi (2004). The figure of the male indicates the presence of paired posterodorsal projections on pereonite 1, midlateral projection, paired anteriorly curved mid-dorsal projections, and anteriorly curved dorsodistal projection on pereonite 2 and paired mid-dorsal projections on pereonite 3 (see Guerra-García and Takeuchi 2004, fig. 3A). These characteristics show the close relationship of D. tasmaniensis to D. decacentrum (Guerra-García and Takeuchi 2004). However, the male specimen of D. tasmaniensis might not be a fully grown male, which fits precisely the species diagnosis of the present study, since in D. decacentrum and D. hexacentrum males grow larger than females (see Figures 1 and 4) similar to Caprella (see Takeuchi and Hirano 1991; Nakajima and Takeuchi 2008). Moreover, the lateral figure of a mature female of D. tasmaniensis lacks the posterodorsal projections on pereonite 1 and paired anteriorly curved mid-dorsal projections on pereonite 2 (see Guerra-García and Takeuchi 2004, fig. 3B), while an immature female, 5.22 mm in body length, collected from King George Sound, Western Australia possessed paired anteriorly curved middorsal projections and anteriorly curved dorsodistal projection on pereonite 2, paired mid-dorsal projections and shallow dorsodistal projection on pereonite 3, a middorsal projection on pereonite 4 and a shallow mid-dorsal projection on pereonite 5 (see Guerra-García 2004a, fig. 7). These differences indicate that it is necessary to find fully adult males to clarify the species diagnosis of “ D. tasmaniensis ” collected from off Mountain Creek, Tasmania. : Published as part of Takeuchi, Ichiro & Lowry, James K., 2015, A taxonomic study on the Phtisicidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) of New South Wales, Australia, pp. 603-648 in Journal of Natural History 50 on pages 605-610, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2015.1079338, http://zenodo.org/record/3985737 : {"references": ["Stebbing TRR. 1910 b. Scientific results of the trawling expedition of H. M. C. S. \" Thetis \" off the coast of New South Wales, in February and March, 1898, Crustacea. Part V. Amphipoda. Aust Mus Mem. 4: 567 - 658.", "Guiler ER. 1952. A list of the Crustacea of Tasmania. Rec Queen Victoria Mus, Launceston. 3: 15 - 44.", "Guiler ER. 1954. Some collections of caprellids from Tasmania. Ann Mag Nat Hist Zool, Botany, and Geology. 7: 531 - 553. 12 th Series.", "Lowry JK, Stoddart HE. 2003. Crustacea: Malacostraca: Peracarida: Amphipoda, Cumacea, Mysidacea. In: Beesley PL, Houston WWK, editors. Zoological catalogue of Australia. Vol. 19.2 B. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 531 pp.", "Mayer P. 1903. Die Caprellidae der Siboga-Expedition. Siboga-Expeditie, Monographie. 34: 1 - 160 + pls 1 - 10.", "Guerra-Garcia JM, Takeuchi I. 2004. The Caprellidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from Tasmania, Australia. J Nat Hist. 38: 967 - 1044.", "Takeuchi I, Hirano R. 1991. Growth and reproduction of Caprella danilevskii (Crustacea: Amphipoda) reared in the laboratory. Mar Biol. 110: 391 - 397.", "Nakajima K, Takeuchi I. 2008. Rearing method for Caprella mutica (Malacostraca: Amphipoda) in an exhibition tank in the Port of Nagoya Public Aquarium, with notes on reproductive biology. J Crustacean Biol. 28: 171 - 174.", "Guerra-Garcia JM. 2004 a. The Caprellidea (Crustacea, Amphipoda) from Western Australia and Northern Territory, Australia. Hydrobiologia. 522: 1 - 74."]}
format Text
author Takeuchi, Ichiro
Lowry, James K.
author_facet Takeuchi, Ichiro
Lowry, James K.
author_sort Takeuchi, Ichiro
title Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing 1910
title_short Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing 1910
title_full Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing 1910
title_fullStr Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing 1910
title_full_unstemmed Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing 1910
title_sort dodecas decacentrum stebbing 1910
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2015
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4331256
https://zenodo.org/record/4331256
long_lat ENVELOPE(9.895,9.895,63.645,63.645)
ENVELOPE(-63.017,-63.017,-64.517,-64.517)
ENVELOPE(-64.150,-64.150,-84.550,-84.550)
ENVELOPE(-57.892,-57.892,-63.678,-63.678)
ENVELOPE(-72.399,-72.399,61.951,61.951)
geographic Antarctic
Seta
Briggs
Lowry
Botany Bay
King George Sound
geographic_facet Antarctic
Seta
Briggs
Lowry
Botany Bay
King George Sound
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation http://zenodo.org/record/3985737
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF83FFB4FFCD9C68EE147100FFA2B460
http://zoobank.org/975EE532-0FAD-4D4F-8E18-9DF3B790953F
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1079338
http://zenodo.org/record/3985737
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF83FFB4FFCD9C68EE147100FFA2B460
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985739
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985741
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985743
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985745
http://zoobank.org/975EE532-0FAD-4D4F-8E18-9DF3B790953F
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4331257
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
op_rights Open Access
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
cc0-1.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4331256
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1079338
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985739
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985741
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985743
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985745
ht
_version_ 1766264466914148352
spelling ftdatacite:10.5281/zenodo.4331256 2023-05-15T13:56:53+02:00 Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing 1910 Takeuchi, Ichiro Lowry, James K. 2015 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4331256 https://zenodo.org/record/4331256 unknown Zenodo http://zenodo.org/record/3985737 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF83FFB4FFCD9C68EE147100FFA2B460 http://zoobank.org/975EE532-0FAD-4D4F-8E18-9DF3B790953F https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1079338 http://zenodo.org/record/3985737 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF83FFB4FFCD9C68EE147100FFA2B460 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985739 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985741 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985743 https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985745 http://zoobank.org/975EE532-0FAD-4D4F-8E18-9DF3B790953F https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4331257 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit Open Access Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode cc0-1.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC0 Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Caprellidae Dodecas Dodecas decacentrum Text Taxonomic treatment article-journal ScholarlyArticle 2015 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4331256 https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1079338 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985739 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985741 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985743 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3985745 ht 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing, 1910b (Figures 1 – 3) Dodecas decacentrum Stebbing, 1910b: 629 – 631, 652, pl. 60. – Briggs, 1914: 77 – 78. – Guiler, 1952: 31. – Guiler, 1954: 541. – McCain and Steinberg: 1970: 49. – Lowry and Stoddart, 2003: 35. Type material Syntypes. 232 individuals, AM P2546, 34°03.5 ʹ S, 151°12.5 ʹ E, 2 – 3 km off Port Hacking, New South Wales, 69 m depth, sandy, 10 March 1898, Stn 35; 1 male, AM P2547, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales, 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37; 1 male, AM P3383, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales, 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37; 220 individuals, AM P46931, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37; 36 individuals (17 males, 18 mature females and 1 juvenile), AM P46917, 34°10 ʹ S, 151°11 ʹ E, 5.5 – 6.5 km off Wattamolla, New South Wales, 99 – 108 m depth, mud, 2 March 1898, Stn 57; 1 female, AM P46941, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales, 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37; 53 individuals (24 males, 25 mature and 4 immature females), AM P46942, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales, 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37; 1 male, AM P46943, 34°05 ʹ S, 151°15 ʹ E, 3 – 4 km off Botany Bay, New South Wales, 91 – 95 m depth, mud, 11 March 1898, Stn 37. Additional material examined AM P46929, 5 males, 43°15 ʹ S, 147°16 ʹ E, D ’ Entrecasteaux Channel, Tasmania, 3.5 – 20 m depth, on the hydrozoan Sertularia operculata . Type locality Botany Bay and off Wattamolla, New South Wales, Australia, 69 – 108 m depth. Description Based on syntype, male, body length 18.98 mm, AM P2547 and male, 13.35 mm, AM P3383, for pereopods 6 and 7. Head and pereonite 1 combined length 2.71 mm; pereonite 2 , 1.91 mm; pereonite 3 , 2.49 mm; pereonite 4 , 3.42 mm; pereonite 5 , 4.58 mm; pereonite 6 , 3.33 mm; pereonite 7 , 0.53 mm. Head and pereonites slender. Head smooth, rounded dorsally; eye large, distinctive; head/ pereonite 1 concave along dorsal margin; pereonite 1 with paired dorsodistal projections. Antenna 1 slender; 0.67 × body length; peduncle articles 2 and 3 subequal in length; peduncular article 3 straight; flagellum 0.17 × peduncular length, with more than five articles; proximal article result of fusion of 3 – 4 articles. Antenna 2 slender; 0.33 × antenna 1 length; peduncle with several feeble setae; flagellum 0.33 × peduncular length, with seven articles. Upper lip notched, forming rounded quadrilateral projections. Mandible right side incisor with six teeth; lacinia mobilis a reverse trapezoid plate followed by one smaller plate; accessory setal row with 10 setae; palp article 2 with one lateral seta; palp article 3 setal formula 1 – 16 – 1; left side incisor with five teeth; left side lacinia mobilis with five teeth, followed by one trapezoid plate; left side accessory setal row with one bundled seta and 10 setae; palp article 2 with five lateral setae; palp article 3 setal formula 1 – 17 – 1. Lower lip finely setose on inner and outer lobes. Maxilla 1 outer plate with six stout apical setal-teeth; palp distal margin with six triangular projections, each with one slender or robust seta, with a row of slender setae. Maxilla 2 inner plate triangular with nine apical robust setae; outer plate elongate with 12 apical setae. Maxilliped inner plate (basal endite) oval, with three stout serriform setae on expanded inner half of distal margin, with one or two setae on outer half; outer plate (ischial endite) oval, 0.5 × length of inner plate (basal endite), inner margin smooth, with four setae on inner margin; palp article 2 setose on inner margin; palp article 3 with moderately dense distal setae; palp article 4 weakly falcate. Pereon. Pereonite 2 with anterolateral triangular projection, with midlateral projection, with paired anteriorly curved mid-dorsal projections, with paired anteriorly curved dorsodistal projections. Pereonite 3 with paired mid-dorsal projections. Pereonite 4 with paired small mid-dorsal projections. Pereonite 5 longest. Gnathopod 1 propodus triangular, with four rows of submarginal setae near dorsal margin; palm begins about 1/4 along posterior margin, smooth, with two robust setae near corner of palm; dactylus curved. Gnathopod 2 situated near middle of pereonite 2; gill length about 4.5 × width, 1/2 × pereonite length; coxa vestigial; basis 2.2 × length of pereonite 2; carpus 0.55 × basis length; propodus elongate, subrectangular, large, length 2.6 × width, anterodistal margin straight; palm proximal projection with three robust (one large and two small) setae, palm margin straight, smooth, with narrow well-developed distal shelf with two small triangular projections distally. Pereopod 3 very slender; gill length about 1/2 × corresponding pereonite, curved anteriorly; basis to carpus straight and cylindrical; basis longer than other pereopod articles, 2/5 × the pereopod length; propodus without distal palm and robust setae; dactylus spatulate. Gill 4 length about 1/4 × corresponding pereonite. Pereopod 5 broad; articulation between articles 1 and 2 oblique; dactylus medium length, falcate. Pereopod 6 basis longer than propodus; carpus with four robust setae and one slender seta on anterior margin; propodus with two pairs of robust setae on proximal margin and one robust and one slender seta; dactylus curved, not setose. Pereopod 7 basis shorter than propodus; merus subequal in length to basis; carpus longer than basis with five robust setae; propodus and dactylus similar to those of pereopod 6. Pleon. Pleopod one pair, tiny. Uropod 1 peduncle elongate, about 6 – 8 × width; ramus 0.2 × peduncular length. Uropod 2 peduncle about 5 – 6 × width, shorter than uropod 1; ramus 0.5 × peduncular length. Female (sexually dimorphic characters). Based on female syntype, body length 16.67 mm, AM P 46941. Antenna 1 about 0.5 × body length; flagellum 0.25 × peduncular length. Length of head and pereonite 1 combined length 1.47 mm, and each length of pereonites 2–7 , 1.91 mm, 1.82 mm, 2.98 mm, 4.58 mm, 3.24 mm and 0.67 mm, respectively. Gnathopod 2 situated near anterior end of pereonite 2; palm margin of propodus convex, with one small triangular projection distally. Gill 3 length about as long as corresponding pereonite, distal part curved posteriorly. Gill 4 length about 1/3 × corresponding pereonite. Remarks Of the seven species of Dodecas , two species, D. decacentrum Stebbing, 1910b and D. hexacentrum Mayer, 1903, have been reported along the coasts of New South Wales and redescribed in the present study. Guiler (1954) synonymized D. decacentrum with D. hexacentrum based on the Tasmanian specimens. Dodecas decacentrum is, however, easily distinguished from D. hexacentrum , which coexists along the New South Wales coasts by the following diagnosis: (1) in D. decacentrum pereonite 2 possesses a pair of dorsodistal projections in addition to mid-dorsal projections on pereonite 2, while in D. hexacentrum the pereonite 2 lacks the dorsodistal ones; (2) in D. decacentrum pereonites 3 – 4 possess a pair of mid-dorsal projections, while in D. hexacentrum pereonites 3 – 4 lack these projections; (3) gills on pereonites 2 and 3 of male D. decacentrum are half the length of the corresponding pereonites, whereas those of male D. hexacentrum are longer than the corresponding pereonites; (4) in D. decacentrum the carpus of pereopods 6 and 7 are elongated with four or five spines along the anterior margin, while in D. hexacentrum the carpus of pereopods 6 and 7 lacks anterior spines. The other five species have been reported so far from Tasmania and sub-Antarctic and Antarctic regions. Especially, D. grandimanus Guiler, 1954 and D. tasmaniensis Guiler, 1954 were established based on specimens which were collected from off Mountain Creek, Tasmania by Guiler (1954). Guerra-García and Takeuchi (2004) showed the lateral view of a male and a mature female of D. tasmaniensis Guiler, 1954 from Tasmania. The male, 9.41 mm in body length, is a little smaller than a mature female, 9.47 mm in body length, in both Guerra-García and Takeuchi (2004). The figure of the male indicates the presence of paired posterodorsal projections on pereonite 1, midlateral projection, paired anteriorly curved mid-dorsal projections, and anteriorly curved dorsodistal projection on pereonite 2 and paired mid-dorsal projections on pereonite 3 (see Guerra-García and Takeuchi 2004, fig. 3A). These characteristics show the close relationship of D. tasmaniensis to D. decacentrum (Guerra-García and Takeuchi 2004). However, the male specimen of D. tasmaniensis might not be a fully grown male, which fits precisely the species diagnosis of the present study, since in D. decacentrum and D. hexacentrum males grow larger than females (see Figures 1 and 4) similar to Caprella (see Takeuchi and Hirano 1991; Nakajima and Takeuchi 2008). Moreover, the lateral figure of a mature female of D. tasmaniensis lacks the posterodorsal projections on pereonite 1 and paired anteriorly curved mid-dorsal projections on pereonite 2 (see Guerra-García and Takeuchi 2004, fig. 3B), while an immature female, 5.22 mm in body length, collected from King George Sound, Western Australia possessed paired anteriorly curved middorsal projections and anteriorly curved dorsodistal projection on pereonite 2, paired mid-dorsal projections and shallow dorsodistal projection on pereonite 3, a middorsal projection on pereonite 4 and a shallow mid-dorsal projection on pereonite 5 (see Guerra-García 2004a, fig. 7). These differences indicate that it is necessary to find fully adult males to clarify the species diagnosis of “ D. tasmaniensis ” collected from off Mountain Creek, Tasmania. : Published as part of Takeuchi, Ichiro & Lowry, James K., 2015, A taxonomic study on the Phtisicidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) of New South Wales, Australia, pp. 603-648 in Journal of Natural History 50 on pages 605-610, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2015.1079338, http://zenodo.org/record/3985737 : {"references": ["Stebbing TRR. 1910 b. Scientific results of the trawling expedition of H. M. C. S. \" Thetis \" off the coast of New South Wales, in February and March, 1898, Crustacea. Part V. Amphipoda. Aust Mus Mem. 4: 567 - 658.", "Guiler ER. 1952. A list of the Crustacea of Tasmania. Rec Queen Victoria Mus, Launceston. 3: 15 - 44.", "Guiler ER. 1954. Some collections of caprellids from Tasmania. Ann Mag Nat Hist Zool, Botany, and Geology. 7: 531 - 553. 12 th Series.", "Lowry JK, Stoddart HE. 2003. Crustacea: Malacostraca: Peracarida: Amphipoda, Cumacea, Mysidacea. In: Beesley PL, Houston WWK, editors. Zoological catalogue of Australia. Vol. 19.2 B. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 531 pp.", "Mayer P. 1903. Die Caprellidae der Siboga-Expedition. Siboga-Expeditie, Monographie. 34: 1 - 160 + pls 1 - 10.", "Guerra-Garcia JM, Takeuchi I. 2004. The Caprellidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from Tasmania, Australia. J Nat Hist. 38: 967 - 1044.", "Takeuchi I, Hirano R. 1991. Growth and reproduction of Caprella danilevskii (Crustacea: Amphipoda) reared in the laboratory. Mar Biol. 110: 391 - 397.", "Nakajima K, Takeuchi I. 2008. Rearing method for Caprella mutica (Malacostraca: Amphipoda) in an exhibition tank in the Port of Nagoya Public Aquarium, with notes on reproductive biology. J Crustacean Biol. 28: 171 - 174.", "Guerra-Garcia JM. 2004 a. The Caprellidea (Crustacea, Amphipoda) from Western Australia and Northern Territory, Australia. Hydrobiologia. 522: 1 - 74."]} Text Antarc* Antarctic DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Antarctic Seta ENVELOPE(9.895,9.895,63.645,63.645) Briggs ENVELOPE(-63.017,-63.017,-64.517,-64.517) Lowry ENVELOPE(-64.150,-64.150,-84.550,-84.550) Botany Bay ENVELOPE(-57.892,-57.892,-63.678,-63.678) King George Sound ENVELOPE(-72.399,-72.399,61.951,61.951)